RESUMO
Some studies showed that a single session of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has the potential of modulating motor performance in healthy and athletes. To our knowledge, previously published systematic reviews have neither comprehensively investigated the effects of tDCS on athletic performance in both physical and psychological parameters nor investigated the effects of tDCS on high-level athletes. We examined all available research testing a single session of tDCS on strength, endurance, sport-specific performance, emotional states and cognitive performance for better application in competition and pre-competition trainings of national- or international-level athletes. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Embase, and Scopus up until to June 2023. Studies were eligible when participants had sports experience at a minimum of state and national level competitions, underwent a single session of tDCS without additional interventions, and received either sham tDCS or no interventions in the control groups. A total of 20 experimental studies (224 participants) were included from 18 articles. The results showed that a single tDCS session improved both physical and psychological parameters in 12 out of the 18 studies. Of these, six refer to the application of tDCS on the motor system (motor cortex, premotor cortex, cerebellum), five on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and two on temporal cortex. The most sensitive to tDCS are strength, endurance, and emotional states, improved in 67%, 75%, and 75% of studies, respectively. Less than half of the studies showed improvement in sport-specific tasks (40%) and cognitive performance (33%). We suggest that tDCS is an effective tool that can be applied to competition and pre-competition training to improve athletic performance in national- or international-level athletes. Further research would explore various parameters (type of sports, brain regions, stimulation protocol, athlete level, and test tasks) and neural mechanistic studies in improving efficacy of tDCS interventions. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022326989, identifier CRD42022326989.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Biosafety research requires a wide range of microorganisms and thorough disinfection to prevent laboratory infection is often required. Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) exposure reduces bacterial and viral concentrations. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a mobile UV-C device as a non-contact disinfection strategy. METHODOLOGY: The bactericidal efficacy of the UV-C device was determined based on log10 decreases in the relative abundances of bacterial indicators, including Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus albus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 0.5 and 1.0 m after irradiation for 30, 60, and 90 min. Next, the reduction of natural bacteria in air and on surface as a result of the UV-C device exposure in the laboratory were determined. RESULTS: Exposure to the UV-C disinfection device resulted in mean log10 decreases in microbial contamination of 3.55 and 5.85 following irradiation for 30 and 90 min, respectively, at a distance of 0.5 m. Further, P. aeruginosa and E. coli were the most and least sensitive to UV-C exposure, respectively. The bacterial load in air decreased by 65.53% after 60 min of irradiation, while those on surfaces decreased by 44.19% and 78.23% after 30 and 60 min of irradiation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The UV-C device effectively reduced bacterial load after irradiation for over 60 min. Further studies are encouraged to determine the effectiveness of the UV-C disinfection device in frequently occupied institutions, such as primary medical, health, and nursery, and its efficiency in infection control.