Esophageal temperature management during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal thermal injury (ETI) is a well-recognized complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Previous studies have demonstrated that direct esophageal cooling reduces ETI during radiofrequency AF ablation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of an esophageal warming device to prevent ETI during cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for AF. METHODS: This prospective, double-blinded study enrolled 42 patients with symptomatic AF undergoing CBA. Patients were randomized to the treatment group with esophageal warming (42°C) using recirculated water through a multilumen, silicone tube inserted into the esophagus (EnsoETM®; Attune Medical) (WRM) or the control group with a luminal single-electrode esophageal temperature monitoring probe (LET). Patients underwent upper endoscopy esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) the following day. ETI was classified into four grades. RESULTS: Baseline patient characteristics were similar between groups. Procedural characteristics including number of freezes, total freeze time, early freeze terminations, coldest balloon temperature, procedure duration, posterior wall ablation, and proton pump inhibitor and transesophageal echocardiogram use before procedure were not different between groups. The EGD was completed in 40/42 patients. There was significantly more ETI in the WRM group compared to the LET group (n = 8 [38%] vs. n = 1 [5%], p = 0.02). All ETI lesions were grade 1 (erythema) or 2 (superficial ulceration). Total freeze time in the left inferior pulmonary vein was predictive of ETI (360 vs. 300 s, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Use of a luminal heat exchange tube for esophageal warming during CBA for AF was paradoxically associated with a higher risk of ETI.

Late results of chord transfer and other techniques for anterior leaflet repair without neochords.

OBJECTIVE: Anterior and bileaflet degenerative mitral regurgitation repairs are challenging. We examined our early and late outcomes for repair using 4 techniques, without neochord repair. METHODS: Between February 1, 2006, and June 30, 2021, a total of 2368 patients received mitral valve ± other surgery by 1 surgeon, including 1160 with degenerative mitral regurgitation. Clinical follow-up was conducted annually (mean 6.8 ± 4.4 years). RESULTS: Repair was performed in 1137 patients (98%) (mean age, 60.5 ± 11.9 years). Repair rate varied between groups: 99% for isolated posterior leaflet (794/799), 91% for isolated anterior leaflet (83/91), and 96% for bileaflet prolapse (260/270; P < .001). Thirty-day mortality was 0.2%. On a scale of 0 to 4+ mitral regurgitation, mean mitral regurgitation grade decreased from 3.8 ± 0.6 preoperatively to 0.07 ± 0.3 at discharge, including moderate (2+) in 0.6% (7/1137) overall and 0.9% (3/343) with anterior prolapse. None were more than 2+ at discharge. Among the 3 groups of leaflet prolapse, there was no significant difference in long-term survival (P = .26), freedom from mitral valve reintervention (P = .12; 99.4% overall), and freedom from more than moderate (2+) mitral regurgitation (P = .16; 98.3% overall). The 4 most common anterior leaflet repair techniques (chord transfer 17%; commissuroplasty 10%; Alfieri [edge-to-edge] 6%); ring with posterior resection (4.3%) had similar freedom from 10-year reintervention (99.4%, 94%, 100%, and 100%, respectively; P = .29). CONCLUSIONS: Complex anterior leaflet prolapse repairs are successful using a variety of techniques without neochord implantation. Although neochords are popular, there are other ways to repair complex valves that do not require as much judgment and experience.