The thoracolumbar interfascial block with local anesthesia in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures treated with percutaneous kyphoplasty provides better analgesia compared with local anesthesia alone: A randomized controlled study.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the thoracolumbar interfascial block (TLIPB) in percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP), and to confirm that the TLIPB further minimizes perioperative pain and residual back pain on the basis of local anesthesia. Method: From April 2021 to May 2022, 60 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures were included in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to a local anesthesia group (A group) or a TLIPB on the basis of local anesthesia group (A + TLIPB group) before PKP. Pain level (visual analog scale, VAS), amount of analgesic rescue drugs (parecoxib), operative time, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and complications were assessed and compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with the A group, VAS scores were lower in the A + TLIPB group, respectively, when the trocar punctured the vertebral body (7.4 ± 0.7 vs. 4.5 ± 0.9; P < 0.01), during balloon dilatation (6.6 ± 0.9 vs. 4.6 ± 0.9; P < 0.01), during bone cement injection (6.3 ± 0.6 vs. 4.3 ± 0.8; P < 0.01), 1 h after surgery (3.5 ± 0.7 vs. 2.9 ± 0.7; P < 0.01), and 24 h after surgery (2.5 ± 0.8 vs. 1.9 ± 0.4; P < 0.01). Residual back pain (VAS: 1.9 ± 0.9 vs. 0.9 ± 0.8; P < 0.01) and the incidence of rescue analgesic use (P = 0.02) in the A + TLIPB group were lower compared with the A group. Compared with the A group, mean arterial pressure and heart rate were lower in the A + TLIPB group when the trocar punctured the vertebral body, and with balloon dilatation and bone cement injection; however, there were no statistical differences between the groups 1 and 24 h after surgery. The incidences of bone cement leakage, constipation, and nausea were similar between the two groups. No patient developed infection, neurological injuries, constipation in either group. Conclusion: The addition of the TLIPB to local anesthesia can further minimize perioperative pain and residual back pain, and reduce perioperative rescue analgesic use. When added to local anesthesia, the TLIPB is an effective and safe anesthetic method for PKP. Clinical trial registration: This study has been registered in the Clinical Trial registration: ChiCTR-2100044236.

[Effect of electroacupuncture at Baihui (GV 20) and Sishencong (EX-HN 1) on presurgical anxiety in patients with gynecological laparoscopic surgery].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the anti-anxiety effect of electroacupuncture at Baihui (GV 20) and Sishencong (EX-HN 1) in patients with gynecological laparoscopic surgery, and to explore its effect on the anesthetic dosage during anesthesia induction. METHODS: A total of 270 patients with gynecological laparoscopic surgery were randomized into an electroacupuncture group, a medication group and a control group, 90 cases in each group. At 24 h and 2 h before anesthesia induction, electroacupuncture was applied at Baihui (GV 20) and Sishencong (EX-HN 1) in the electroacupuncture group, with continuous wave, 100 Hz in frequency. At 30 min before anesthesia induction, midazolam of 0.02 mg/kg was given by intravenous drip in the medication group, while 0.9% sodium chloride solution was given by intravenous drip in the control group. At 10 min before anesthesia induction and 6 h after surgery, the scores of 6 item short form of state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI-S6) and visual analogue scale-anxiety (VAS-A) were observed; at 10 min before anesthesia induction (T1) and observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale (OAA/S) grade 4 (T2), mean artery pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and value of bispectral index (BIS) were recorded; the dosage of propofol at T2 was recorded and the surgery related adverse reactions were compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS: At 10 min before anesthesia induction and 6 h after surgery, the STAI-S6 and VAS-A scores in the electroacupuncture group and the medication group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Values of BIS at T1 and dosage of propofol at T2 in the electroacupuncture group and the medication group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). There were no statistical differences in MAP, HR and surgery related adverse reactions among the 3 groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Electroacupuncture at Baihui (GV 20) and Sishencong (EX-HN 1) can effectively relieve the presurgical anxiety in patients with gynecological laparoscopic surgery, and reduce the dosage of propofol, its effect is similar to traditional anti-anxiety drug.