Quantification of Ankle Dorsiflexion in Ponseti-managed Unilateral Clubfoot Patients During Early Childhood.

BACKGROUND: Following the initial correction of a clubfoot using the Ponseti method, diminished passive ankle dorsiflexion may be observed over time, which could represent a possible relapsed deformity. Alternatively, the change may be attributable to patient age or other variables. Our purpose was to quantify passive ankle dorsiflexion in the involved and contralateral unaffected limbs of Ponseti-managed unilateral clubfoot patients, and to determine what patient-related variables influence this finding. METHODS: In total, 132 unilateral clubfoot patients were studied. Passive ankle dorsiflexion was measured in both limbs at each visit. Data were excluded from visits in which patients showed clear evidence of a relapse. Mean ankle dorsiflexion for clubfeet and contralateral unaffected limbs were reported for annual age intervals and compared using paired t tests. A general linear model was established to assess the effects of age, severity, sex, and side on ankle dorsiflexion. RESULTS: Mean ankle dorsiflexion for unaffected limbs declined with age, measuring 53±6 degrees between 0 and 1 year of age and decreasing to 39±7 degrees by 4 to 5 years of age. Similarly, mean ankle dorsiflexion in treated clubfeet declined with age, measuring 44±7 degrees between 0 and 1 year and 29±7 degrees between 4 and 5 years. Overall, the difference between limbs in these patients averaged ~10 degrees for every age interval through 9 years (P<0.001). Ankle dorsiflexion of clubfeet in 95% of patients aged 0 to 2 years was at least 20 degrees, and in 95% of patients aged 3 to 5 years this was at least 15 degrees. Patient age (P<0.001) and severity of deformity (P<0.001) were found to be the only significant factors affecting ankle dorsiflexion in the affected limbs. CONCLUSIONS: Ankle dorsiflexion in the Ponseti-treated clubfeet was influenced by age of the patient and the initial severity of the affected limb. Furthermore, our data suggest that, in patients who showed no relapse, a minimum of 20 degrees of ankle dorsiflexion in the corrected clubfoot is maintained through age 3 years and a minimum of 15 degrees is maintained through age 5 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-this is a retrospective case series.

Management of Clubfoot Relapses With the Ponseti Method: Results of a Survey of the POSNA Members.

BACKGROUND: Despite the high rate of initial success using the Ponseti method to manage idiopathic clubfoot deformity, relapse continues to be a problem. We surveyed the Pediatric Orthopedic Society of North America (POSNA) members about their experience with relapsed deformity following the initial correction of clubfeet. METHODS: We created a survey to focus on the management of clubfeet after initial correction of deformity. The survey included questions on postcorrective bracing, clinical findings used to identify relapse, the observed frequency of relapsed deformity, and how relapses are managed. The questionnaire was approved by the POSNA Evidence Based Committee and was sent electronically to all POSNA members. RESULTS: We received responses from 321 members (26%). Of those, 94% were fellowship trained in pediatric orthopaedics. The Ponseti method was used by 98% of respondents. The Mitchell-Ponseti orthosis was most commonly used (51%), followed by the Denis-Browne brace (25%). The duration of bracing used varied among members with 23% recommending only 2 years, 33% recommending 3 years, and 34% recommending 4 years. A tight heel cord was felt to be the first sign of relapse by 59% of respondents, and dynamic supination by 30%. The rate of relapse was observed to be <10% by 22% of the respondents, 10% to 20% by 52%, and 20% to 40% by 25%. Manipulation and cast treatment alone (55%) and cast treatment with tenotomy (23%) were reported as the 2 most common initial treatment approaches for a relapsed deformity. Cast treatment to correct relapsed deformity before tibialis anterior tendon transfer was reported by 62% of respondents. Heel cord tenotomy (75%) and posterior capsular release (43%) were the 2 most common procedures used in addition to tibialis anterior tendon transfer for the treatment of clubfoot relapse. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the wide variation with which clubfoot relapses are evaluated and treated among the POSNA membership with differences in the recommended duration of bracing, identification of relapses, and their management. These wide differences highlight the need for future research and educational programs to inform and standardize the management of clubfoot using the Ponseti Method. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable.

How Many Patients Who Have a Clubfoot Treated Using the Ponseti Method are Likely to Undergo a Tendon Transfer?

BACKGROUND: The Ponseti method has become the standard of care for the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. A commonly reported problem encountered with this technique is a relapsed deformity that is sometimes treated in patients older than 2.5 years by an anterior tibial tendon transfer (ATTT) to the third cuneiform. Presently, there is insufficient information to properly counsel families whose infants are beginning Ponseti treatment on the probability of needing later tendon transfer surgery. METHODS: All idiopathic clubfoot patients seen at the authors' institution during the study period who met the inclusion criteria and who were followed for >2.5 years were included (N=137 patients). Kaplan-Meier Survival analysis was used to determine the probability of survival without the need for ATTT surgery. In addition, the influence of patient characteristics, socioeconomic variables, and treatment variables on need for surgery was calculated. RESULTS: On the basis of the survivorship analysis, the probability of undergoing an ATTT remained below 5% for all patients at 3 years of age, but exceeded 15% by 4 years of age, increasing steadily afterwards such that by 6 years of age, the probability of undergoing an ATTT reached 29% of all patients. Overall, controlling for all other variables in the analysis, parent-reported adherence with bracing reduced the odds of undergoing surgery by 6.88 times, compared with parent-reported nonadherence (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to report the probability of undergoing ATTT surgery as a function of age using survivorship analysis following Ponseti clubfoot treatment. Although the overall probability reached 29% at 6 years, this was significantly reduced by compliance with bracing. This information may be useful to the clinician when counseling families at the start of treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-theraputic.

The Influence of Sex and Laterality on Clubfoot Severity.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic clubfoot is bilateral in approximately 50% of cases and has been widely reported to affect males more frequently than females. Despite these observations, the correlation between sex and severity of the deformity has not been established. As well, the difference in severity between unilateral and bilateral clubfeet has not been extensively investigated. Therefore, the goals of the present study were to: (1) examine the relationship between sex and severity of deformity and (2) determine the relationship between laterality and severity of deformity. METHODS: The families of infants with idiopathic clubfoot deformity treated at our institution were prospectively invited to participate in this institutional review board-approved study. Severity of the deformity was assessed by a single surgeon for each patient using the Dimeglio criteria at the first clinic visit. After evaluating the distributions, the correlations were quantified by nonparametric analyses. RESULTS: Over 8 years, 240 infants met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in the severity of deformity due to sex (P=0.61): the median Dimeglio score for males was 13 (variance 4.8) and for females, the median was 13.0 (variance of 5.1). In contrast, severity was distributed differently among unilateral versus bilateral patients. Although both unilateral and bilateral patients had a median Dimeglio score of 13, the ratio of bilateral patients was higher among those with moderate or very severe deformities compared with those with severe deformities (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although idiopathic clubfoot is commonly considered to affect male patients disproportionately, this is the first study to document no difference in severity due to sex. Further, this study demonstrated that on average, bilateral patients did not have increased severity, but presented with a larger range of severity than those patients with unilateral deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-prognostic.

What's New in Pediatric Flatfoot?

BACKGROUND: Children with flatfeet are frequently referred to pediatric orthopaedic clinics. Most of these patients are asymptomatic and require no treatment. Care must be taken to differentiate patients with flexible flatfeet from those with rigid deformity that may have underlying pathology and have need of treatment. Rigid flatfeet in infants may be attributable to a congenital vertical talus (CVT); whereas those in older children and adolescents may be due to an underlying tarsal coalition. We performed a review of the recent literature regarding evaluation and management of pediatric flatfeet to discuss new findings and suggest areas where further research is needed. METHODS: We searched the PubMed database for all papers related to the treatment of pediatric flatfoot, tarsal coalition, and CVT published from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2014, yielding 85 English language papers. RESULTS: A total of 18 papers contributed new or interesting findings. CONCLUSIONS: The pediatric flexible flatfoot (FFF) remains poorly defined, making the understanding, study, and treatment of the condition extremely difficult.Pediatric FFF is often unnecessarily treated. There is very little evidence for the efficacy of nonsurgical intervention to affect the shape of the foot or to influence potential long-term disability for children with FFF. The treatment of tarsal coalition remains challenging, but short-term and intermediate-term outcome studies are satisfactory, whereas long-term outcome studies are lacking. Management of the associated flatfoot deformity may be as important as management of the coalition itself. The management of CVT is still evolving; however, early results of less invasive treatment methods seem promising. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4-literature review.

Does Clubfoot Treatment Need to Begin As Soon As Possible?

INTRODUCTION: Parents of an infant with an idiopathic clubfoot deformity are often urged by their primary care physician to seek treatment as soon as possible. This advice frequently appears in many general pediatric and pediatric orthopaedic textbooks and monographs on the subject. This recommendation has not changed since the wide acceptance of the minimally invasive Ponseti method to treat clubfoot. We determined the correlations among patient-related variables, early treatment variables, and the age at which the patient was first seen to begin treatment. METHODS: Infants with moderate to very severe idiopathic clubfoot deformity were invited to participate. Age at which the patient presented to begin treatment was correlated against early treatment-related variables, including number of casts required, cast slippage, cast-related skin problems, brace-related skin problems, early noncompliance with brace wearing, and relapse before 1 year. Patient-related variables were also correlated against age at first visit. RESULTS: Over 7 years, 176 infants met the inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences in the aspects of the early management as a function of age at first visit, with the exception of cast slippage (P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The age at first visit influenced the incidence of cast slippage, but otherwise did not affect the early treatment of clubfoot. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The treatment of idiopathic clubfoot deformity should not be considered an orthopaedic emergency, and parents whose infants are born with this deformity should be counseled accordingly.

What's New in Idiopathic Clubfoot?

This update summarizes selected research highlights pertaining to idiopathic clubfoot deformity that were published in peer-reviewed journals between January 2010 and December 2013.

The use of the Ponseti method to treat clubfeet associated with congenital annular band syndrome.

BACKGROUND: A clubfoot deformity may be associated with congenital annular band syndrome (CABS), and has, until recently, been thought to be resistant to nonoperative management. The purpose of this report was to describe the use of the Ponseti method in the treatment of 5 patients whose clubfeet were associated with this syndrome. METHODS: All patients with a diagnosis of clubfoot, who were treated at the Orthopaedic Hospital Clubfoot Clinic, over a period of 4 years, were reviewed. During that period, a total of 131 infants with 194 clubfeet were treated. We identified 5 infants (3.8%) with 6 clubfeet associated with CABS. The patients were managed using the Ponseti method. One of the patients, with a contralateral amputation of the limb opposite to the side with a clubfoot, required the use of a unilateral foot abduction orthosis rather than a conventional foot abduction orthosis. The outcomes evaluated included: the number of casts needed to obtain correction, the percentage of patients requiring a tendo-Achilles tenotomy, the number of relapses, and the need for additional secondary procedures. RESULTS: The mean age at presentation for the 5 patients was 6.2 weeks. Four of the clubfeet had an ipsilateral band and 2 did not. None of the patients had a neurological deficit distal to a band. The mean number of casts used to correct the deformity was 6, and a percutaneous tendo-Achilles tenotomy was done in all cases. All of the feet achieved initial correction. Four patients (5 feet) experienced a relapse attributed to failure to use the postcorrective brace as prescribed. Correction of the foot in 3 of these patients was regained and maintained by another series of manipulation and cast application followed by resumption of bracing. One patient underwent an anterior tibial tendon transfer. The patients were followed for an average of 32.6 months (21 to 49 mo). All feet were supple and plantigrade at latest follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The Ponseti method may be successfully applied to clubfeet associated with CABS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Propofol sedation for infants with idiopathic clubfoot undergoing percutaneous tendoachilles tenotomy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether percutaneous tenotomy of the Achilles tendon in infants with idiopathic clubfeet can be safely performed under propofol sedation. BACKGROUND: Many orthopaedic surgeons prefer to do a tenotomy under general anesthesia. At our institution, we have been using 2 different methods of induction and maintenance of anesthesia: one method using combined propofol and sevoflurane and various types of airway management, and the other using only propofol with facemask. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all patients less than 1 year of age with idiopathic clubfoot who underwent a percutaneous tendoachilles tenotomy under anesthesia. Collected data included: chronological age, earlier apneic events, medical risk factors, time from operating room entry to surgery, and surgical-related and anesthesia-related complications. RESULTS: The study group comprised 114 patients who underwent 162 tenotomies. Sixty-five patients were in group 1 (sevoflurane/propofol) and 49 patients were in group 2 (propofol). The 2 groups did not differ with respect to sex, bilaterality, chronological age, number of preterm infants, ASA class, or associated risk factors. The average time from operating room entry to surgery was approximately 5 minutes longer with group 1, which included 14 cases taking longer than 20 minutes. However, there were no differences between the 2 groups with respect to postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous tendoachilles tenotomy in infants with idiopathic clubfeet may be safely performed under anesthesia. Propofol sedation was safe and effective without the need for airway instrumentation for this short procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV (retrospective).

The current management of idiopathic clubfoot revisited: results of a survey of the POSNA membership.

BACKGROUND: In 2001, the members of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) were surveyed regarding their approach to treating idiopathic clubfoot deformity. Since that time, several studies have advocated a change in the approach to treating this deformity, moving away from surgical release and toward less invasive methods. The purpose of this study was to assess the recent approach to treating clubfoot among the POSNA membership. METHODS: A survey was emailed to all POSNA members to define their current treatment of idiopathic clubfoot deformity. RESULTS: We received 323 responses. Ninety-three percent of participants were fellowship trained and were in practice for an average of 17.2 years. On an average, physicians reported each treating 23.5 new clubfoot patients during the year of survey. Nearly all (96.7%) of those surveyed stated that they use the Ponseti treatment method. The average time to initial correction was estimated at 7.1 weeks. Eighty-one percent of patients were estimated to require a tenotomy; 52.7% were performed under general anesthesia or conscious sedation, whereas 39.4% were done under local. Those surveyed estimated that 22% of clubfeet relapsed and 7% required a comprehensive release. Seventy-five percent of the respondents stated that their current treatment approach differed from how they were trained, and 82.7% were trained in the Ponseti method in the last few years. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides convincing evidence that a large majority of pediatric orthopaedic surgeons now prefer the Ponseti method to treat idiopathic clubfoot and indicates that the move away from extensive release surgery occurred during the past decade. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable.

Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot: experience with the Mitchell-Ponseti brace.

OBJECTIVE: The Mitchell-Ponseti (MP) foot abduction orthosis was introduced to provide a more user-friendly alternative to the traditional Denis-Browne (DB) brace in the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. We describe our experience with the effectiveness of the MP brace to maintain correction of clubfeet corrected using the Ponseti method. METHODS: We evaluated 57 consecutive infants with 84 idiopathic clubfeet who were treated using the Ponseti method. After initial correction of the deformity was obtained, all infants were placed in the MP brace. RESULTS: The patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years (mean, 37.9 mo; range, 24 to 56 mo). Seventy-nine feet (94%) had heel-cord tenotomy or lengthening. The families of 34 (60%) patients were adherent with the postcorrective brace protocol. Skin problems were observed in 8 patients (14%), 6 of which were superficial dorsal skin abrasion, and none of the sandals required customization by an orthotist. A recurrence occurred in 40 feet (48%). Correction was regained with manipulation and cast application in all cases. Nineteen feet (23%) in 14 patients have had, or are scheduled for, an anterior tibial tendon transfer. At latest follow-up, all feet were plantigrade and had at least 10 degrees of dorsiflexion. None of the patients required surgical releases. Of 31 patients followed for at least 3 years, 26 (84%) used the brace for a minimum of 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Using the MP foot abduction orthosis, we were able to achieve compliance rates that were at least comparable with those of earlier reports using the DB brace. Families found the brace easy to use. The MP brace may be considered a useful alternative to the DB brace. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II--prospective.

Preventable childhood injuries.

BACKGROUND: This is a literature review generated from The Committee on Trauma and Prevention of Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America to bring to the forefront 4 main areas of preventable injuries in children. METHODS: Literature review of pertinent published studies or available information of 4 areas of childhood injury: trampoline and moonbouncers, skateboards, all-terrain vehicles, and lawn mowers. RESULTS: Much literature exists on these injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Preventable injuries occur at alarming rates in children. By arming the orthopaedist with a concise account of these injuries, patient education and child safety may be promoted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Type II supracondylar humerus fractures: can some be treated nonoperatively?

BACKGROUND: The range of injury severity that can be seen within the category of type II supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHFs) raises the question whether some could be treated nonoperatively. However, the clinical difficulty in using this approach lies in determining which type II SCHFs can be managed successfully without a surgical intervention. METHODS: We reviewed clinical and radiographic information on 259 pediatric type II SCHFs that were enrolled in a prospective registry of elbow fractures. The characteristics of the patients who were treated without surgery were compared with those of patients who were treated surgically. Treatment outcomes, as assessed by the final clinical and radiographic alignment, range of motion of the elbow, and complications, were compared between the groups to define clinical and radiographic features that related to success or failure of nonoperative management. RESULTS: During the course of treatment, 39 fractures were found to have unsatisfactory alignment with nonoperative management and were taken for surgery. Ultimately, 150 fractures (57.9%) were treated nonoperatively, and 109 fractures (42.1%) were treated surgically. At final follow-up, outcome measures of change in carrying angle, range of motion, and complications did not show clinically significant differences between treatment groups. Fractures without rotational deformity or coronal angulation and with a shaft-condylar angle of >15 degrees were more likely to be associated with successful nonsurgical treatment. A scoring system was developed using these features to stratify the severity of the injury. Patients with isolated extension deformity, but none of the other features, were more likely to complete successful nonoperative management. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that some of the less severe pediatric type II SCHFs can be successfully treated without surgery if close follow-up is achieved. Fractures with initial rotational deformity, coronal malalignment, and significant extension of the distal fragment are likely to fail a nonoperative approach. An algorithm using the initial radiographic characteristics can aid in distinguishing groups.

Objective analysis of intermediate-term outcome of the Ponseti technique: a review of the experience from Los Angeles.

The Ponseti method of manipulative treatment for clubfoot deformity became widely adopted by pediatric orthopaedic surgeons beginning in the mid-1990s. The technique allows correction of most idiopathic clubfeet using gentle manipulation and cast application. The treatment represents a marked advance over past efforts to gain correction of the foot through extensive release surgery. In 2006, we began a Clubfoot Clinic at the Orthopaedic Institute for Children in Los Angeles, California dedicated to managing clubfoot patients using Ponseti's method. An IRB-approved database of patient-related, treatment related, and demographic variables was assembled and used to ascertain the outcome of treatment as well as to address parental questions regarding certain aspects of treatment. Here, we present a review of our body of work, which has improved clinical decision making as well as our ability to better inform our patients' parents regarding the treatment and prognosis of the Ponseti method. Studies from our institution showed that while relapses and the need for extra-articular tibialis anterior tendon transfer (TATT) surgery remain common to the Ponseti method, these events do not adversely affect overall patient function or satisfaction. These findings were not unlike those of classic studies reported from Ponseti's institution. We conclude that the Ponseti method is not only a technique to achieve initial correction of an idiopathic clubfoot, but also how to manage relapses that will inevitably occur in many patients. While relapses and tendon transfer surgery are likely to remain common with this treatment method, these events do not adversely affect overall patient function or satisfaction. The parents of infants whose clubfeet are managed using the Ponseti method should be counselled accordingly.

Does generalized joint hypermobility influence the Ponseti treatment of clubfoot patients?

Previous investigators have suggested a role for generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) in the etiology of clubfoot deformity, while others have suggested its presence may influence treatment outcomes. We sought to determine if GJH was associated with the demographics, treatment, or propensity to relapse of patients whose clubfeet were managed using the Ponseti method. Fifty-seven patients with Ponseti-treated clubfeet comprised the cohort; median age 61 months (range, 38-111 months). A physical therapist evaluated each patient using the nine-point Beighton scale to quantify hypermobility. The scores were then correlated with patient sex, laterality, Dimeglio severity score, treatment, relapse, and surgery. The median Beighton score was 5; 49 of 57 patients (86%) had Beighton scores ≥4. All feet were plantigrade without symptomatic overcorrection at the time of evaluation. Although there was a slightly lower probability of relapse in patients with higher Beighton scores, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.10). Accordingly, the sex, laterality, initial severity, number of pretenotomy casts, need for tenotomy, relapse, and need for tendon transfer surgery were not significantly influenced by the Beighton score. The outcome of Ponseti clubfoot treatment is not altered by the presence of GJH in young children. Joint hypermobility does not appear to influence the likelihood of relapse or surgery. Unlike clubfeet reportedly treated with release surgery, Ponseti-treated clubfeet were not prone to excessive overcorrection regardless of joint laxity. Last, the distribution of Beighton scores in the study's cohort supports an association between GJH and clubfoot deformity.

Bracing following correction of idiopathic clubfoot using the Ponseti method.

The Ponseti method for the management of idiopathic clubfoot has recently experienced a rise in popularity, with several centers reporting excellent outcomes. The challenge in achieving a successful outcome with this method lies not in correcting deformity but in preventing relapse. The most common cause of relapse is failure to adhere to the prescribed postcorrective bracing regimen. Socioeconomic status, cultural factors, and physician-parent communication may influence parental compliance with bracing. New, more user-friendly braces have been introduced in the hope of improving the rate of compliance. Strategies that may be helpful in promoting adherence include educating the family at the outset about the importance of bracing, encouraging calls and visits to discuss problems, providing clear written instructions, avoiding or promptly addressing skin problems, and refraining from criticism of the family when noncompliance is evident. A strong physician-family partnership and consideration of underlying cognitive, socioeconomic, and cultural issues may lead to improved adherence to postcorrective bracing protocols and better patient outcomes.

The effects of surgical delay on the outcome of pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures.

BACKGROUND: Occasionally, the treatment of a pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture is delayed owing to lack of an available treating physician, necessitating transfer of the child, or delay in availability of an operating room. The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate whether delayed pinning of these fractures affects the outcome or number of complications. METHODS: We reviewed information that was prospectively collected on 145 pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures that were treated by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, with a minimum follow-up of 8 weeks. To determine the effect of delayed treatment, we compared a group of fractures that was treated within the first 21 hours after their presentation to our urgent care center (Group A) with a group that was treated after more than 21 hours (Group B). We compared the following variables: need for open reduction, length of surgery, length of hospitalization, the presence of neurologic complications, vascular complications including compartment syndrome, pin tract infection, loss of fixation, final carrying angle, range of motion, and outcome. RESULTS: Overall, the mean time from presentation to surgery for both groups was 52 hours. This interval was greater for Gartland type II fractures (65 h) than for Gartland type III fractures (19 h) (P=0.00001). There was no need for an open reduction in either group. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding iatrogenic nerve injuries, vascular complications, compartment syndromes, surgical time, final carrying angle, range of motion, and outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this prospective study found that a delay in pinning closed supracondylar humeral fractures in children did not lead to a higher incidence of open reduction or a greater number of complications. Although the urgency of treating any child with a supracondylar fracture should be individualized, our study suggests that most of these injuries can be managed safely in a delayed fashion without compromising the clinical outcome. We recommend careful monitoring of any patient with type 3 injury whose treatment is delayed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Time of return of elbow motion after percutaneous pinning of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.

UNLABELLED: The most common treatment for displaced pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures is closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. However, the time for return of elbow motion after treatment of these injuries is not well documented. To describe the return of elbow motion after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of these fractures we retrospectively reviewed 63 patients (age range, 1.6-13.8 years) with displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus stabilized with either two or three lateral entry pins. Pins were removed by 3 to 4 weeks. No patient participated in formal physical therapy. At each followup, elbow range of motion (ROM) was recorded for the injured and uninjured extremities. Elbow ROM returned to 72% of contralateral elbow motion by 6 weeks after pinning and progressively increased to 86% by 12 weeks, 94% by 26 weeks, and 98% by 52 weeks. After closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of a displaced, uncomplicated, supracondylar humerus fracture, 94% of the child's normal elbow ROM should be expected by 6 months after pinning. Further improvement may occur up to 1 year postoperatively. This information may be helpful in advising parents what to expect after their child's injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.