Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 279(9): 4229-4240, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35462578

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To this day, there is no cure for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP). Multiple surgical procedures are performed to achieve symptom relief and prevention of airway obstruction. A promising drug for RRP is the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) binding antibody bevacizumab. This chemotherapeutic agent has an angiogenesis-inhibiting effect which inhibits tumor growth. The objective of this review was to investigate the efficacy of bevacizumab as treatment option for RRP, and to explore the difference of its effects between intralesional and systemic treatment. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase. Articles were included if bevacizumab treatment was given intralesionally and/or systemically. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the CAse REport (CARE) guidelines. RESULTS: Of 585 unique articles screened by title and abstract, 15 studies were included, yielding a total of 64 patients. In 95% of the patients treated with systemic bevacizumab, the post-bevacizumab surgical interval was considerably prolonged. More than half of them did not need any surgical intervention during mean follow-up of 21.6 months. Treatment with intralesional bevacizumab showed a lower efficacy: in 62% of the patients, the post-bevacizumab surgical interval (mean, 1.8 months follow-up) was extended when compared to the interval before the treatment. CONCLUSION: Systemically and intralesionally administered bevacizumab are effective treatment options for severe RRP. A systemic administration might be the treatment of first choice. Further prospective research with long term follow-up is advocated to elucidate this important topic.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Infecções Respiratórias , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/cirurgia , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Respiratórias/cirurgia , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular
2.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 278(10): 3643-3651, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33523284

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Postoperative headache (POH) is a complication that occurs after surgical resection of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors. The two most common surgical approaches are the translabyrinthine (TL), and retrosigmoid (RS) approach. The objective of this systematic review was to investigate whether POH occurs more frequently after RS compared to TL approaches. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in Cochrane, Pubmed and Embase. Studies were included if POH after CPA tumor removal was reported and both surgical approaches were compared. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. RESULTS: In total, 3,942 unique articles were screened by title and abstract. After the initial screening process 63 articles were screened for relevance to the inquiry, of which seven studies were included. Three studies found no significant difference between both surgical approaches (p = 0.871, p = 0.120, p = 0.592). Three other studies found a lower rate of POH in the TL group compared to the RS group (p = 0.019, p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Another study showed a significantly lower POH rate in the TL group after one and six months (p = 0.006), but not after 1 year (p = 0.6). CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review show some evidence of a lower rate of POH in favor of the TL approach versus the RS approach for CPA tumor resection. Prospective research studies are needed to further investigate this finding.


Assuntos
Neuroma Acústico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Ângulo Cerebelopontino/cirurgia , Cefaleia , Humanos , Neuroma Acústico/cirurgia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia
3.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 275(12): 2893-2904, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30324404

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL). DATA SOURCES: An Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane search were utilised to identify various clinical trials on the treatment of ISSHL. Studies that were published between 2002 and 2018 and written in the English, Dutch or German language were included. Search terms included synonyms for idiopathic sudden hearing loss. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 16 articles were identified regarding hyperbaric oxygen therapy. All patients were evaluated with pure-tone audiometry. A major part of the cases presented with unilateral hearing loss(bilateral hearing loss less than 5%). In several studies, the average of the mean hearing gain at five contiguous frequencies was significantly higher in the hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy and systemic steroid (SS) group in patients with severe or profound hearing impairment. They recorded a significant treatment effect (p = 0.005) of HBO + SS therapy on patients with an initial hearing loss of ≥ 81 dB. CONCLUSIONS: On the whole group of ISSHL patients, no significant difference was demonstrated between the intervention and control group. However, in severe or profound hearing-impaired ISSHL patients, significant benefit was observed in the intervention group. These results likely indicate that adding HBO to steroid therapies might be of benefit in cases of severe and profound hearing impairment.


Assuntos
Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/terapia , Perda Auditiva Súbita/terapia , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Audiometria de Tons Puros , Terapia Combinada , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos
4.
Audiol Neurootol ; 21(2): 113-26, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27074000

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to evaluate the additional benefit of pediatric cochlear implantation before 12 months of age considering improved speech and language development and auditory performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a search in PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases and included studies comparing groups with different ages at implantation and assessing speech perception and speech production, receptive language and/or auditory performance. We included studies with a high directness of evidence (DoE). RESULTS: We retrieved 3,360 articles. Ten studies with a high DoE were included. Four articles with medium DoE were discussed in addition. Six studies compared infants implanted before 12 months with children implanted between 12 and 24 months. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 9 years. Cochlear implantation before the age of 2 years is beneficial according to one speech perception score (phonetically balanced kindergarten combined with consonant-nucleus-consonant) but not on Glendonald auditory screening procedure scores. Implantation before 12 months resulted in better speech production (diagnostic evaluation of articulation and phonology and infant-toddler meaningful auditory integration scale), auditory performance (Categories of Auditory Performance-II score) and receptive language scores (2 out of 5; Preschool Language Scale combined with oral and written language skills and Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test). CONCLUSIONS: The current best evidence lacks level 1 evidence studies and consists mainly of cohort studies with a moderate to high risk of bias. Included studies showed consistent evidence that cochlear implantation should be performed early in life, but evidence is inconsistent on all speech and language outcome measures regarding the additional benefit of implantation before the age of 12 months. Long-term follow-up studies are necessary to provide insight on additional benefits of early pediatric cochlear implantation.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Surdez/cirurgia , Desenvolvimento da Linguagem , Idioma , Inteligibilidade da Fala/fisiologia , Surdez/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Lactente , Percepção da Fala , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Otol Neurotol ; 41(1): 1-10, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31789967

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the functional outcomes and complications of intratympanic gentamicin (ITG) versus intratympanic corticosteroids (ITC) in Menière's disease. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases on February 3, 2019. Articles written in English, Dutch, German, French, or Turkish language were included. STUDY SELECTION: Study inclusion criteria were: 1) patients diagnosed with definite Menière's disease according to the criteria of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2) treated with ITG or ITC in a comparison study, and 3) reported subjective and objective outcomes concerning Menière's disease. DATA EXTRACTION: The quality of eligible studies was assessed according to an adjusted version of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The extracted data were study characteristics (study design, publication year, and number of relevant patients), patient's characteristics (sex and age), disease characteristics (uni or bilateral and duration of Menière's disease), treatment protocol, and different therapeutic outcomes (vertigo, tinnitus, aural fullness, and hearing loss). DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of eight articles were included for data extraction and analysis. For subjective outcomes, ITG was slightly favored compared to intratympanic corticosteroids. This was significant only in three studies (p < 0.05). For objective outcomes and complications, no significant differences were seen. CONCLUSIONS: The result of this systematic review shows some benefit of ITG over ITC for subjective outcomes and no difference regarding objective outcomes or complication rate. However, this superiority of ITG is rather weak. Both interventions can be effectively and safely used in controlling Menière's disease in acute situations.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/administração & dosagem , Gentamicinas/administração & dosagem , Doença de Meniere/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Síntese de Proteínas/administração & dosagem , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Aminoglicosídeos/administração & dosagem , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Injeção Intratimpânica , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
6.
J Int Adv Otol ; 14(2): 227-232, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30100541

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this scoping review was to evaluate existing classifications of surgical procedures of the middle ear and mastoid and find a suitable classification that could serve as an international standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Scoping review with a systematic literature search using reference tracking and a syntax including all surgical procedures in mastoid and middle ear surgery and their synonyms. Studies were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Eleven reported classifications were included; six of which focused on middle ear surgery, two on mastoid surgery, and three on both. However, none of the classifications included all current surgical procedures of mastoid and middle ear surgery. CONCLUSION: Many classifications have been proposed for innumerable surgical techniques in middle ear and mastoid surgery. Some are outdated, some are incomplete, most are not widely accepted, and only few correspond with all current surgical techniques.


Assuntos
Orelha Média/cirurgia , Processo Mastoide/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otológicos/classificação , Humanos , Mastoidectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otológicos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otológicos/normas , Sistema de Registros , Timpanoplastia/métodos
7.
Laryngoscope ; 128(8): 1904-1913, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29086423

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our systematic review is to investigate the postoperative gustatory function of the chorda tympani nerve following noninflammatory ear surgery for which the chorda tympani is at risk for iatrogenic injury (stretching, handling, or sacrificing). DATA SOURCES: PubMed and EMBASE. REVIEW METHODS: A PubMed and EMBASE databases search was conducted on November 15, 2016. Study inclusion criteria included: 1) ear surgery performed for noninflammatory ear diseases, and 2) gustatory function of the chorda tympani reported as an outcome. The quality of eligible studies was assessed using the risk of bias assessment tool for nonrandomized studies. Study characteristics and outcome data of the included studies were extracted. RESULTS: In total 1,094 articles were retrieved. Fourteen studies encompassing 1,062 operated ears were included after quality assessment. Stapedectomy was the most frequent surgical procedure performed in 398 ears. The follow-up time varied between 6 weeks and 99 months. Patients with a preserved chorda tympani were less symptomatic (24% was symptomatic) compared to patients with a stretched (53% was symptomatic) or sacrificed chorda tympani (47% was symptomatic). The recovery rate varied from 61% to 79%. The results of the electrogustometry and strip test showed a discrepancy with the subjective complaints of the patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with a stretched chorda tympani were slightly more symptomatic compared to patients with a sacrificed chorda tympani. Therefore, in cases for which the chorda tympani greatly hinders a proper view of the surgical field, sacrificing the nerve could be considered to maximize surgical performance and have a satisfactory postoperative result. Laryngoscope, 1904-1913, 2018.


Assuntos
Nervo da Corda do Tímpano/lesões , Disgeusia/etiologia , Otopatias/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otológicos/efeitos adversos , Disgeusia/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica/prevenção & controle , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica
8.
Otol Neurotol ; 38(1): 1-10, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27861193

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We investigate the postoperative subjective and objective outcomes of different surgical treatments for superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD): vestibular signs, auditory signs, vestibular evoked myogenic potential test, pure tone audiogram, speech audiogram, or video-nystagmography. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases on 15th of September 2015. A systematic search was conducted. Articles were included if written in English, Dutch, German, or French language. STUDY SELECTION: Original studies reporting on the pre and postoperative subjective and/or objective outcomes of surgical treatments for superior semicircular canal dehiscence were included. DATA EXTRACTION: The methodological quality of the studies was independently assessed by two reviewers using a constructed critical appraisal, to assess the directness of evidence and the risk of bias. The results of the pre and postoperative subjective and/or objective outcomes were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Comparative study was conducted. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment for SSCD is particularly effective for vestibular symptoms and there is no evidence for improvement of hearing loss after surgical treatment. Since plugging using transmastoid approach had a lower complication rate, lower revision rate, and a shorter hospital stay, this treatment is recommended in high disabled SSCD patients.


Assuntos
Doenças do Labirinto/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otológicos/métodos , Canais Semicirculares/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
9.
Otol Neurotol ; 37(5): 421-7, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27050652

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of electrocochleography compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with intratympanic gadolinium administration to diagnose endolymphatic hydrops in patients with Ménière's disease. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases on September 15, 2015. A systematic search was conducted. Articles were included if written in English, Dutch, German, or French language. STUDY SELECTION: Original studies reporting on the diagnostic value of electrocochleography compared with MRI with intratympanic gadolinium administration, were included. DATA EXTRACTION: The methodological quality of the studies was independently assessed by two reviewers using an adjusted version of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool. The results of the diagnostic values of both tests were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: We performed analyses for the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of compared electrocochleography with MRI with intratympanic gadolinium administration in patients with definite Ménière's disease. CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review, based on a very low number of patients, show there is a relative low sensitivity and negative predictive value for click stimulus electrocochleography compared with MRI with intratympanic gadolinium administration for detecting endolymphatic hydrops in patients with definite Ménière's disease.


Assuntos
Audiometria de Resposta Evocada/métodos , Hidropisia Endolinfática/diagnóstico , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Doença de Meniere/complicações , Hidropisia Endolinfática/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA