Does a face-bow lead to better occlusion in complete dentures? A randomized controlled trial: part I.

OBJECTIVES: In a double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial, the impact of face-bow registration for remounting complete dentures (CDs) on the occlusal parameters (part I) was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: New CDs of 32 patients were duplicated and mounted after intraoral pin registration according to mean settings (group 1) and (group 2) using a face-bow (arbitrary hinge axis). The vertical dimension was reduced to the first occlusal contact point, and a bite record was fabricated in the articulator. The number of contacts and the number of teeth in contact were evaluated by a computer program (laboratory result). After randomization, half of the CDs were adjusted according to protocol of group 1 and group 2 and delivered to the patients. After 3 days (T1) and 84 days (T2), clinical static contact points and teeth in contact were counted. Contact points and teeth in contact of both groups (laboratory results) and at different moments (clinical results) were analyzed statistically with the F test and bootstrapping. RESULTS: Laboratory: No. 2 (face-bow) showed more occlusal contact points than no. 1 (mean setting), p > 0.05. The number of teeth with at least one occlusal contact was significantly higher in no. 2 (p = 0.027). Clinic: The mean number of teeth with at least one clinical contact point was significantly higher in no. 1 (no. 1 = 7.13, no. 2 = 5.31; p = 0.042). Extent of the vertical shift poorly correlated with number of laboratory occlusal contact points (R 2 = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the complex multistep study design, a limited number of participants, and referring to one specific arbitrary face-bow, the following conclusion could be drawn: no substantial difference by the use of the arbitrary face-bow compared to a mean setting could be determined, when changing the vertical dimension in the articulator within a remounting procedure of complete dentures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Further research is necessary to determine the effects of different arbitrary face-bows on the fabrication and adaptation of removable dentures.

Electronic central bearing point as registration method in individuals with and without temporomandibular disorders.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine different central bearing point methods in patients with and without temporomandibular disorders (TMD) by an experienced and unexperienced examiner. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The 20 fully dentulous subjects were screened for TMD based on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD and distinguished into functional impaired and functional healthy groups. The mandibular relationship was recorded by an electronic central bearing tracing device (IPR-System, IPR GmbH, Oldenburg, Germany) with an integrated pressure sensor. Three bite registration methods were performed using this device: initial neuromuscular position, final neuromuscular position after dynamic sequences with the intraoral pin (=neuromuscular deprogramming), and centric relation guided manually by an experienced and an unexperienced examiner. RESULTS: The neuromuscular positions before and after neuromuscular deprogramming were not significantly different (paired t test as a group comparison test: transverse: p = 0.369; sagittal: p = 0.486). Both positions were significantly anterior in comparison to the manually guided centric relation (paired t test as a group comparison test: p < 0.0001). The neuromuscular positions before and after deprogramming tend to have high scattering values. CONCLUSION: By means of the central bearing point method, the manually guided centric relation is the one which is sufficiently reproducible. It seems doubtful to take the significant anterior neuromuscular position for a definite reconstruction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Using the central bearing point method, the manually guided centric relation should be preferred, whereas the neuromuscular position should not be used for definite reconstructions.