Bevacizumab improves the overall and progression-free survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with 5-fluorouracil-based regimens irrespective of baseline risk.

BACKGROUND: Kohne et al. [Ann Oncol 2002;13:308-317] showed that four prognostic variables can be used to classify patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) into three risk groups with different overall survival (OS). This model was applied to data from phase II/III trials of first-line bevacizumab plus 5-FU/LV with/without irinotecan (IFL). METHODS: Data on tumor sites, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, alkaline phosphatase levels and white blood cell counts were used to classify patients into Kohne prognostic high-, intermediate- and low-risk groups. Median OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated for patients receiving 5-FU/LV plus bevacizumab or placebo (n = 489) and IFL plus bevacizumab or placebo (n = 812). RESULTS: Median OS was longer in 5-FU/LV/bevacizumab (11.2-22.6 months) than in the 5-FU/LV/placebo (5.7-17.5 months), and in the IFL/bevacizumab arm (14.3-22.5 months) than in the IFL/placebo arm (8.4-17.9 months) across the Kohne high-, intermediate- and low-risk groups. The addition of bevacizumab also extended median PFS across the Kohne risk groups compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab improves OS and PFS across the Kohne risk classification in patients with metastatic CRC. The Kohne model can be extended to patients treated with 5-FU/LV/bevacizumab, IFL and IFL/bevacizumab and to PFS data.

Phase I study of tomuzotuximab, a glycoengineered therapeutic antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor, in patients with advanced carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Changes in glycosylation of the constant domain (Fc) of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) enhance antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity independently of downstream effects following receptor blockade by the antibody, thus extending their indication. We investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and antitumour activity of tomuzotuximab, an IgG1 glycoengineered mAb against the epidermal growth factor receptor with enhanced tumour cytotoxicity in a phase I dose-escalation study (NTC01222637). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with advanced solid tumours refractory to standard therapies received tomuzotuximab weekly (12-1370 mg) or two-weekly (990 mg) on a three-plus-three dose escalation design. RESULTS: A maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were infusion-related reactions in 31 (76%) patients (grade 3, 12%), mainly confined to the first dose, and skin toxicities (grade 1 or 2) in 30 (73%) patients. Hypomagnesaemia was observed in 9 out of 23 evaluable patients (39%). Similar to cetuximab, tomuzotuximab concentrations increased proportionally to dose from doses≥480 mg with a median terminal half life (t½) of 82 hours, range 55-113 hours. Antitumour activity included one complete response ongoing since more than 4.5 years in a patient with non-small-cell lung cancer and one partial response lasting 353 days in a patient with colorectal cancer. Twelve patients achieved stable disease (median, 166 days, range, 71-414 days) and two patients had prolonged control (>1 year) of their non-measurable disease. CONCLUSION: Tomuzotuximab was safe and showed promising antitumour activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced metastatic disease. A phase IIb trial of chemotherapy and weekly tomuzotuximab or cetuximab followed with maintenance therapy with the corresponding mAb in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is ongoing.

Beyond the development of health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measures: a checklist for evaluating HRQOL outcomes in cancer clinical trials--does HRQOL evaluation in prostate cancer research inform clinical decision making?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the inclusion of health-related quality of life (HRQOL), as a part of the trial design in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) setting, has supported clinical decision making for the planning of future medical treatments in prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A minimum standard checklist for evaluating HRQOL outcomes in cancer clinical trials was devised to assess the quality of the HRQOL reporting and to classify the studies on the grounds of their robustness. It comprises 11 key HRQOL issues grouped into four broader sections: conceptual, measurement, methodology, and interpretation. Relevant studies were identified in a number of databases, including MEDLINE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Both their HRQOL and traditional clinical reported outcomes were systematically analyzed to evaluate their consistency and their relevance for supporting clinical decision making. RESULTS: Although 54% of the identified studies did not show any differences in traditional clinical end points between treatment arms and 17% showed a difference in overall survival, 74% of the studies showed some difference in terms of HRQOL outcomes. One third of the RCTs provided a comprehensive picture of the whole treatment including HRQOL outcomes to support their conclusions. CONCLUSION: A minimum set of criteria for assessing the reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials is necessary to make informed decisions in clinical practice. Using a checklist developed for this study, it was found that HRQOL is a valuable source of information in RCTs of treatment in metastatic prostate cancer.

Short course radiation therapy for elderly cancer patients. Evidences from the literature review.

The choice of the appropriate treatment strategy for elderly cancer patients may be a difficult challenge. Radiation therapy is commonly offered to these patients, but treatment duration may represent a limiting factor, as many patients cannot tolerate a conventional course of radiotherapy (RT) due to age-related medical or logistic problems. Hypofractionated RT may represent a very convenient choice, but it entails an increased risk of late toxicity occurrence. We made a literature review to define the possible role of hypofractionated RT for elderly cancer patients. As expected, we found out that short irradiation schedules are more commonly employed for treatments with palliative aims but a more widespread use of these regimes is still controversial. The lack of prospective trials tailored for these patients makes even more difficult to tailor the choice of treatment on standardised treatment guidelines. Nevertheless our review highlights that for several tumour types RT can be scheduled conveniently and effectively in order to achieve local disease control and/or symptom relief with the least discomfort and treatment-related morbidity for elderly patients.

Late toxicity following conventional radiotherapy for prostate cancer: analysis of the EORTC trial 22863.

Late toxicity and other serious adverse events (SAE) were analysed in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 22863. The study evaluated the value of adjuvant endocrine treatment for locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy. From 1987 to 1995, 415 patients were randomised. There was long-term toxicity information for 377 patients (91%). Median age was 70 years (range 50-80 years). Median follow-up for late toxicity was 42 months (range 3-136 months). Toxicity was graded according to a modified Radiotherapy and Oncology Group (RTOG) scale. Other late SAE, that was not classified as severe treatment toxicity, but were still life-threatening, were also assessed. There were 72 patients with grade 2, 10 patients with grade 3 and 4 patients with grade 4 toxicity. There were 20 patients with other late SAE, who were grouped according to their relationship to treatment; likely related (n = 1), unrelated (n = 7) and not assessable (n = 12). Although four treatment-related deaths (1%) occurred, grade 3 or 4 late complications were less than 5%.

Quality assurance of the 22961 EORTC trial. A phase III study of the optimal combination of hormonal adjuvant treatment by LHRH analogue and radiation therapy for the management of locally advanced prostate cancer: the dummy run.

PURPOSE: The EORTC trial 22961, opened in 1997, was designed to investigate the optimal combination of hormonal adjuvant treatment by LHRH analogue and radiation therapy for the management of locally advanced prostate cancer. A dummy run was established to assess centre compliance to the radiotherapy protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical and anatomical data obtained from 37 CT slices (5mm thickness) of an eligible patient were sent to 19 participating centres, which were asked to complete a questionnaire according to their practice and plan a theoretical radiotherapy treatment. The Planning Target Volume 1 (PTV1) should include prostate, seminal vesicles, internal iliac lymph nodes and inferior part of common iliac lymph nodes (extended pelvic fields). Centres which usually irradiate with small pelvic fields (N0 patients), were allowed to include the prostate, seminal vesicles and internal iliac lymph nodes plus a safety margin of 2 cm. For the Planning Target Volume 2 (PTV2), a safety margin of 1.5 to 2 cm should be around the prostate and seminal vesicles. Checks included patient positioning, treatment simulation, target volume definition, treatment set-up and clinical controls during treatment. RESULTS: Eleven institutions with actual 81% of patients' accrual in the protocol have responded. All centres used a supine treatment position and positioning lasers for the set-up, while 73 and 45% of the centres performed cystograms and used rectal contrast, respectively. Among the participating centres, 45% and 55% used blocks and MLC, respectively, to treat patients. Extended pelvic fields in terms of PTV1 were used by 63% of the centres. The remaining centres treated a small PTV1 with a 10-20 mm margin around to CTV1. All centres defined PTV2 according to protocol guidelines. Doses to PTV1 and PTV2 were correctly prescribed. It was difficult to assess the treated volumes due to a lack of standardisation in DVH calculations. CONCLUSION: In general, centres participating in the dummy run adhered to the guidelines. The dummy run enhances the reliability of the conclusions of the trial.

Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: We did a randomised phase III trial comparing external irradiation alone and external irradiation combined with an analogue of luteinising-hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) to investigate the added value of long-term androgen suppression in locally advanced prostate cancer. METHODS: Between 1987 and 1995, 415 patients were randomly assigned radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy plus immediate androgen suppression. Eligible patients had T1-2 tumours of WHO grade 3 or T3-4 N0-1 M0 tumours; the median age of participants was 71 years (range 51-80). In both treatment groups, 50 Gy radiation was delivered to the pelvis over 5 weeks, and 20 Gy over 2 weeks as a prostatic boost. Goserelin (3.6 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks) was started on the first day of irradiation and continued for 3 years; cyproterone acetate (150 mg orally) was given for 1 month starting 1 week before the first goserelin injection. The primary endpoint was clinical disease-free survival. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: 412 patients had evaluable data, with median follow-up of 66 months (range 1-126). 5-year clinical disease-free survival was 40% (95% CI 32-48) in the radiotherapy-alone group and 74% (67-81) in the combined-treatment group (p=0.0001). 5-year overall survival was 62% (52-72) and 78% (72-84), respectively (p=0.0002) and 5-year specific survival 79% (72-86) and 94% (90-98). INTERPRETATION: Immediate androgen suppression with an LHRH analogue given during and for 3 years after external irradiation improves disease-free and overall survival of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.