Impact of the CYP2D6 genotype on post-operative intravenous oxycodone analgesia.

BACKGROUND: Oxycodone is a semi-synthetic opioid with a mu-receptor agonist-mediated effect in several pain conditions, including post-operative pain. Oxycodone is metabolized to its active metabolite oxymorphone by O-demethylation via the polymorphic CYP2D6. The aim of this study was to investigate whether CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PMs) yield the same analgesia post-operatively from intravenous oxycodone as extensive metabolizers (EMs). METHODS: Two hundred and seventy patients undergoing primarily thyroid surgery or hysterectomy were included and followed for 24 h post-operatively. The CYP2D6 genotype was blinded until study procedures had been completed for all patients. All patients received intravenous oxycodone as pain treatment for 24 h post-operatively and morphine 5 mg was used as escape medication. A responder was characterized as a patient without the need for escape medication and a positive evaluation in a questionnaire 24 h post-operatively. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were PM (8.9%) and 246 were EM (91.1%). One PM (4.17%, CI=0.1-21.1) was a non-responder and 42 EM (17.07%, CI=12.6-22.4) were non-responders. The non-responder rate did not differ between the two genotypes (P=0.14). There was no difference in the total consumption of oxycodone between the two genotypes (EM=14.7 mg, CI=13.0-16.4 and PM=13.0 mg, CI=8.9-17.0, P=0.42). The mean oxymorphone/oxycodone ratios were 0.0031 and 0.00081 in the EMs and PMs, respectively (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study showed for the first time in patients that the oxymorphone formation depends on CYP2D6, but we found no difference in the post-operative analgesic effect of intravenous oxycodone between the two CYP2D6 genotypes.

Impact of CYP2C19 phenotypes on escitalopram metabolism and an evaluation of pupillometry as a serotonergic biomarker.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) phenotypes on escitalopram metabolism and to evaluate pupillometry as a serotonergic biomarker. METHODS: This was a double-blind, crossover design study with single and multiple doses of 10 mg escitalopram and placebo in panels of CYP2C19 extensive (EM) and poor metabolisers (PM). Pupillometry was measured by a NeurOptics Pupillometer-PLR. RESULTS: Five PM and eight EM completed the study. The CYP2C19 phenotype significantly affected the metabolism of escitalopram. The area under the time-plasma concentration curve (AUC(0-24)) was 1.8-fold higher in PM than in EM after both single and multiple doses. Escitalopram treatment did not affect the maximum pupil size, but it did statistically significantly decrease the relative amplitude of the pupil light reflex compared to the placebo; this effect was equal in both phenotype groups. CONCLUSIONS: The CYP2C19 polymorphism affects escitalopram metabolism, but the difference does not justify dose adjustment. The puzzling results from pupillometry can be due to interplay between a central and a local serotonergic effect. Based on these results, pupillometry can not be recommended as a serotonergic biomarker.

Escitalopram is a weak inhibitor of the CYP2D6-catalyzed O-demethylation of (+)-tramadol but does not reduce the hypoalgesic effect in experimental pain.

Tramadol is O-demethylated to the active metabolite (+)-O-desmethyltramadol ((+)-M1) via CYP2D6, an enzyme that is weakly inhibited by escitalopram. We investigated the possibility of a pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effect of escitalopram on tramadol metabolism. Fifteen healthy subjects completed this randomized, double-blind, three-phase, crossover trial. Combinations of escitalopram 20 mg/day or placebo together with tramadol 150 mg or placebo were used. Blood samples for pharmacokinetics were drawn at 0-24 h after medication. The analgesic effect of (+)-M was assessed by the cold pressor test (CPT) (area under effect curve, 1-12 h after medication (AUEC(1-12))). The median area under plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) of (+)-M1 was 2.75 micromol/l.h after placebo pretreatment compared with 1.95 micromol/l.h after escitalopram (P = 0.0027). The mean AUEC(1-12) of CPT were 4,140 and 4,388 cm.s after placebo and escitalopram, respectively (P = 0.71). Although escitalopram is a weak inhibitor of CYP2D6, it does not impair the analgesic effect of tramadol.