Effect of subdoses of sugarcane ripeners on lettuce physiology in a drift scenario.

In order to understand the physiological effects of ripeners in sensitive crops, the objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of subdoses of the ripeners glyphosate, trinexapac-ethyl and sulfometuron methyl commonly used in sugarcane, in the growth of lettuce cultivar 'Lucy Brown' and 'Vanda'. To address the effects of the products in the lettuce physiology, analyses of fresh weight, dry weight, number of leaves, chlorophyll content, quantum efficiency of photosystem II, lipid peroxidation (MDA), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), glutathione reductase (GR), guaiacol peroxidase (GPOX) were performed. We observed that among the products tested, glyphosate had minor impact on plant growth, compared to trinexapac-ethyl and sulfometuron methyl. All products induced a decrease in chlorophyll content for both cultivars. Chlorophyll A fluorescence suffered a major reduction with trinexapac-ethyl and sulfometuron methyl in 'Vanda' and no differences were observed for 'Lucy Brown'. MDA content and enzyme quantification varied by cultivar and the sugarcane ripener tested. By disturbing chlorophyll content and quantum efficiency of photosystem II, through these sugarcane ripeners did not have direct mode of action affecting photosystem II, they can cause some level of damage and activate different mechanisms and at different times, in response to stress. In this sense, it is possible to observe that reduced doses of glyphosate, trinexapac ethyl, and sulfometuron methyl affect the development of lettuce at different levels and trigger an oxidative response that was cultivar dependent.

Challenging glyphosate resistance EPSPS P106S and TIPS mutations with soybean competition and glyphosate: implications for management.

BACKGROUND: Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. (goosegrass) is a major weed in global cropping systems. It has evolved resistance to glyphosate due to single Pro-106-Ser (P106S) or double Thr-102-Ile + Pro-106-Ser (TIPS) EPSPS target site mutations. Here, experiments were conducted to evaluate the single effect of soybean competition and its combined effect with a glyphosate field dose (1080 g ae ha-1 ) on the growth and fitness of plants carrying these glyphosate resistance endowing target site mutations. RESULTS: TIPS E. indica plants are highly glyphosate-resistant but the double mutation endows a substantial fitness cost. The TIPS fitness penalty increased under the effect of soybean competition resulting in a cost of 95%, 95% and 96% in terms of, respectively, vegetative growth, seed mass and seed number investment. Glyphosate treatment of these glyphosate-resistant TIPS plants showed an increase in growth relative to those without glyphosate. Conversely, for the P106S moderate glyphosate resistance mutation, glyphosate treatment alone reduced survival rate, vegetative growth, aboveground biomass (34%), seed mass (48%) and number (52%) of P106S plants relative to the glyphosate nontreated plants. However, under the combined effects of both soybean competition and the field-recommended glyphosate dose, vegetative growth, aboveground biomass, seed mass and number of P106S and TIPS plants were substantially limited (by ≤99%). CONCLUSION: The ecological environment imposed by intense competition from a soybean crop sets a significant constraint for the landscape-level increase of both the E. indica single and double glyphosate resistance mutations in the agroecosystem and highlights the key role of crop competition in limiting the population growth of weeds, whether they are herbicide-resistant or susceptible. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry.

Weed interference on maize (Zea mays) under no tillage system.

A field trial was carried out in Brazil in March 2002 with the aim to evaluate the effects of different timing and extension of weedy period on maize productivity. The hybrid Pioneer 30K75 was sowed under 7 t ha(-1) mulching promoted by glyphosate spraying. The treatments were divided in two groups: In the first group, weeds were maintained since the maize sowing until different periods in the crop cycle: 0, 14, 28, 42, 56, 70, and 150 days (harvesting time). In the second group, the maize crop was kept weed free for the same periods of the first group. Weed control was done through hand hoeing. A complete randomized blocks experimental design with five replications was used for plots distribution in the field. Nonlinear regression model was used to study the effects of weedy or weedfree periods on maize productivity. Weed community included 13 families and 31 species. Asteraceae, Poaceae, and Euphorbiaceae were the most abundant families. Results showed that under no tillage condition with 7 t ha(-1) mulching at sowing time, the maize crop could cohabit with weed community for 54 days without any yield lost. On the other hand, if the crop was kept weed free for 27 days, the weed interference was not enable to reduce maize production. According to these results one weed control measure between 27 and 54 days after crop emergence could be enough to avoid any reduction in maize productivity.