RESUMO
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threating entity with three main complications: heart failure (HF), uncontrolled infection (UI) and embolic events (EEs). HF and UI are the main indications of cardiac surgery and have been studied thoroughly. On the other hand, much more uncertainty surrounds EEs, which have an abrupt and somewhat unpredictable behaviour. EEs in the setting of IE have unique characteristics that must be explored, such as the potential of hemorrhagic transformation of stroke. Accurately predicting which patients will suffer EEs seems to be pivotal to achieve an optimal management of the disease, but this complex process is still not completely understood. The indication of cardiac surgery in order to prevent EEs in the absence of HF or UI is in question as scientific evidence is controversial and mainly of a retrospective nature. This revision addresses these topics and try to summarize the evidence and recommendations about them.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prognostic value of transit time (TT) assessment in the systemic circulation and organ perfusion in patients with ventricular dysfunction (VD). The primary endpoint was defined as death, heart failure admission, or ventricular arrhythmias, and the secondary endpoint was worsening renal function. METHODS: A retrospective study on 139 patients who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance for VD evaluation and 50 controls. TT was measured as peak-to-peak time in signal intensity over time curves obtained at different stages of circulation (right cavities, left cavities, aorta, and peripheral organs) from first-pass perfusion images. Outcomes were monitored over a median follow-up of 15 months. RESULTS: A total of 139 patients were included (84% male, age 63 [57-70] years). Patients exhibited significantly prolonged TT compared to controls, with in-patients showing longer times than outpatients. Among the 29 patients reaching the primary endpoint, both PTT and STT were significantly prolonged (PTT: 9.75 s vs 13.4 s, p < 0.01; STT: 4.77 s vs 7.00 s, p < 0.01). Concurrent prolongation of PTT (> 10 s) and STT (> 5 s) was associated with a higher event probability (42.3%), compared to isolated abnormalities (6.3% for PTT, 6.7% for STT). Multivariate analysis revealed that combined PTT and STT alteration independently predicted the combined endpoint (HR IC 95%: 8.685 (2.415-31.236), p = 0.001). Prolonged RPT was independently associated with renal function deterioration (OR IC 95%: 1.129 (1.015-1.256), p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of TT beyond pulmonary circulation provides prognostic insights into VD. Simultaneous assessment of PTT and STT enhances specificity compared to isolated PTT evaluation, predicting combined adverse events. RPT is independently associated with renal impairment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: For the first time, it is described that transit time can be evaluated in systemic circulation and in peripheral organs and that this assessment can be easily made from conventional CMR perfusion images and holds significant prognostic value. KEY POINTS: Pulmonary transit time is a valuable hemodynamic parameter; systemic transit time may also be valuable. Transit time can be measured in the systemic circulation, and is longer in patients with ventricular dysfunction. Systemic transit time assessed by magnetic resonance imaging identifies patients with ventricular dysfunction who will experience events during follow-up.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Most data regarding infective endocarditis (IE) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) comes from TAVI registries, rather than IE dedicated cohorts. The objective of our study was to compare the clinical and microbiological profile, imaging features and outcomes of patients with IE after SAVR with a biological prosthetic valve (IE-SAVR) and IE after TAVI (IE-TAVI) from 6 centres with an Endocarditis Team (ET) and broad experience in IE. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. From the time of first TAVI implantation in each centre to March 2021, all consecutive patients admitted for IE-SAVR or IE-TAVI were prospectively enrolled. Follow-up was monitored during admission and at 12 months after discharge. RESULTS: 169 patients with IE-SAVR and 41 with IE-TAVI were analysed. Early episodes were more frequent among IE-TAVI. Clinical course during hospitalization was similar in both groups, except for a higher incidence of atrioventricular block in IE-SAVR. The most frequently causative microorganisms were S. epidermidis, Enterococcus spp. and S. aureus in both groups. Periannular complications were more frequent in IE-SAVR. Cardiac surgery was performed in 53.6% of IE-SAVR and 7.3% of IE-TAVI (p=0.001), despite up to 54.8% of IE-TAVI patients had an indication. No differences were observed about death during hospitalization (32.7% vs 35.0%), and at 1-year follow-up (41.8% vs 37.5%), regardless of whether the patient underwent surgery or not. CONCLUSION: Patients with IE-TAVI had a higher incidence of early prosthetic valve IE. Compared to IE-SAVR, IE-TAVI patients underwent cardiac surgery much less frequently, despite having surgical indications. However, in-hospital and 1-year mortality rate was similar between both groups.