Neurological outcome following delayed traction and fixation in severe tetraparesis consecutive to posterior decompression for Chiari malformation: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) is a congenital hindbrain malformation characterized by herniation of the cerebellar tonsils below the foramen magnum. The term Chiari type 1.5 is used when herniation of the brainstem under the McRae line and anomalies of the craniovertebral junction are also present. These conditions are associated with several symptoms and signs, including headache, neck pain, and spinal cord syndrome. For symptomatic patients, surgical decompression is recommended. When radiographic indicators of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) instability or symptoms related to ventral brainstem compression are present, CVJ fixation should also be considered. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report the case of a 13-year-old girl who presented with severe tetraparesis after posterior decompression for Chiari malformation type 1.5, followed 5 days later by partial C2 laminectomy. Several months after the initial surgery, she underwent two fixations, first without and then with intraoperative cervical traction, leading to significant neurological improvement. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This case report underscores the importance of meticulous radiological analysis before CM surgery. For CM 1.5 patients with basilar invagination, CVJ fixation is recommended, and C2 laminectomy should be avoided. In the event of significant clinical deterioration due to nonadherence to these guidelines, our findings highlight the importance of traction with increased extension before fixation, even years after initial destabilizing surgery.

Tubular Microdiscectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Valuable Alternative to Endoscopic Techniques.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of tubular microdiscectomy (TMD) in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) is still unclear, especially compared with the endoscopic technique. We performed a retrospective study to analyze this question. METHODS: We retrospectively included all patients with an rLDH confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging who underwent TMD between January 2012 and February 2019. The general data included sex, age, body mass index, level of rLDH, first surgical approach, reoperation interval, occurrence of dural leak, re-recurrence, and re-reoperation. The clinical outcome was evaluated using a visual analog scale for leg pain, and the modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The visual analog scale score for leg pain was statistically significantly reduced from 7.46 preoperatively to 0.80 postoperatively (P < 0.00001), and the patient satisfaction was good or excellent in 85.7% of cases, according to the modified MacNab criteria. Complications occurred in 3 of the 15 included patients: 2 dural tears (13.3%) and 2 re-recurrence (13.3%), but none of the patients underwent a third surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: TMD seems to be an efficient technique for the surgical treatment of leg pain caused by rLDH. In the literature, this technique seems to be at least as good as the endoscopic technique and is easier to master.