RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Visceral leishmaniasis is a disease caused by the protozoan Leishmania sp. and is transmitted by Lutzomyia longipalpis (sand fly). In renal transplant recipients, visceral leishmaniasis causes severe damage to the liver, spleen, and hematopoietic system, as well as poor outcomes for patients with transplanted kidneys. This study describes the largest series of cases of visceral leishmaniasis in renal transplant recipients, providing important information about the diagnostic routines and therapeutic strategies in this patient population. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study was performed to analyze the distribution and evaluate the extent of the epidemiologic, clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of 30 renal transplant recipients from endemic regions who presented with visceral leishmaniasis in the post-transplantation period. RESULTS: In this study, visceral leishmaniasis was more frequent in men (80%). The mean age of presentation was 40 ± 10.5 years. The majority of patients worked in urban areas (66.7%), cohabitated with domestic animals (90%), and were from low-income households. In 73.3% of cases, diagnosis was made by direct isolation of Leishmania forms. Patients were treated with liposomal amphotericin, resulting in a high degree of disease remission (80%). CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the largest series of visceral leishmaniasis in renal transplant recipients and expands clinical-epidemiological knowledge for transplantation teams to perform adequate disease management for this specific patient population.
Assuntos
Anfotericina B/uso terapêutico , Antiprotozoários/uso terapêutico , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim , Leishmaniose Visceral/epidemiologia , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Animais , Animais Domésticos , Feminino , Humanos , Nefropatias/induzido quimicamente , Nefropatias/diagnóstico , Nefropatias/tratamento farmacológico , Nefropatias/epidemiologia , Leishmania/isolamento & purificação , Leishmaniose Visceral/induzido quimicamente , Leishmaniose Visceral/diagnóstico , Leishmaniose Visceral/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatopatias/diagnóstico , Hepatopatias/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatopatias/epidemiologia , Hepatopatias/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Características de Residência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Distribuição por Sexo , Esplenopatias/induzido quimicamente , Esplenopatias/diagnóstico , Esplenopatias/tratamento farmacológico , Esplenopatias/epidemiologia , TransplantadosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is characterized by abnormalities in cerebral white matter and neurologic symptoms. It can be caused by immunosuppressive drugs or autoimmune diseases. We describe a case of PRES in a patient with collapsing focal glomeruloesclerosis (collapsing FGS) with complete recovery after withdrawal of cyclosporine (CSA). CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old male presented a corticosteroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome secondary to collapsing FGS corticosteroid. Treatment with CSA was started after a nonresponding course of prednisone. Three weeks later, he developed an abrupt elevation of blood pressure (210/120 mmHg), with headaches, mental confusion, and generalized seizures. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed lesions suggestive of PRES. CSA was withdrawn, and a new MRI was normal after 2 months. CONCLUSIONS: PRES is a rare syndrome that must be suspected in every patient presenting neurologic symptoms in the course of immunosuppression. It can be induced by CSA and is totally reversible when the drug is rapidly withdrawn.
Assuntos
Ciclosporina/efeitos adversos , Glomerulosclerose Segmentar e Focal/tratamento farmacológico , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Síndrome da Leucoencefalopatia Posterior/induzido quimicamente , Adulto , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Síndrome da Leucoencefalopatia Posterior/diagnósticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies reported a high prevalence of neuropathic pain in leprosy, being especially present in "pharmacologically cured" patients. The presence of neuropathic pain in leprosy poses a supplementary burden in patient's quality of life, daily activities, and mood. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether neuropathic pain in leprosy has similar symptom profile as neuropathic pain of other etiologies and to retrospectively assess the efficacy of neuropathic pain medications regularly prescribed to leprosy. METHODS: Leprosy and nonleprosy patients had their neuropathic pain characterized by the neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI, ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 being the maximal neuropathic pain intensity) in a first visit. In a second visit, leprosy patients who had significant pain and received pharmacological treatment in the first evaluation were reassessed (NPSI) and had their pain profile and treatment response further characterized, including information on drugs prescribed for neuropathic pain and their respective pain relief. RESULTS: The pain characteristics based on NPSI did not significantly differ between leprosy and nonleprosy neuropathic pain patients in visit 1 after correction for multiple analyses, and cluster analyses confirmed these findings (ie, no discrimination between leprosy and nonleprosy groups; Pearson χ2 = 0.072, P = 0.788). The assessment of pain relief response and the drugs taken by each patient, linear regression analysis showed that amitriptyline, when effective, had the highest percentage of analgesic relief. CONCLUSIONS: Neuropathic pain in leprosy is as heterogeneous as neuropathic pain of other etiologies, further supporting the concept that neuropathic pain is a transetiological entity. Neuropathic pain in leprosy may respond to drugs usually used to control pain of neuropathic profile in general, and amitriptiline may constitute a potential candidate drug for future formal clinical trials aimed at controlling neuropathic pain in leprosy.