Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 29(11): 6829-6842, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35849284

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is still debate regarding the principal role and ideal timing of perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) for patients with upfront resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study assesses long-term oncological outcomes in patients receiving neoadjuvant CTx only versus those receiving neoadjuvant combined with adjuvant therapy (perioperative CTx). METHODS: International multicentre retrospective analysis of patients with CRLM undergoing liver resection between 2010 and 2015. Characteristics and outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Primary endpoints were long-term oncological outcomes, such as recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, stratification by the tumour burden score (TBS) was applied. RESULTS: Of 967 patients undergoing hepatectomy, 252 were analysed, with a median follow-up of 45 months. The unmatched comparison revealed a bias towards patients with neoadjuvant CTx presenting with more high-risk patients (p = 0.045) and experiencing increased postoperative complications ≥Clavien-Dindo III (20.9% vs. 8%, p = 0.003). Multivariable analysis showed that perioperative CTx was associated with significantly improved RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.579, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.420-0.800, p = 0.001) and OS (HR 0.579, 95% CI 0.403-0.834, p = 0.003). After PSM (n = 180 patients), the two groups were comparable regarding baseline characteristics. The perioperative CTx group presented with a significantly prolonged RFS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.76, p = 0.007) and OS (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.87, p = 0.010) in both low and high TBS patients. CONCLUSIONS: When patients after resection of CRLM are able to tolerate additional postoperative CTx, a perioperative strategy demonstrates increased RFS and OS in comparison with neoadjuvant CTx only in both low and high-risk situations.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
HPB (Oxford) ; 23(12): 1873-1885, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34103246

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is still uncertainty regarding the role of perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), especially in those with a low-risk of recurrence. METHODS: Multicentre retrospective analysis of patients with CRLM undergoing liver resection between 2010-2015. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they received perioperative CTx or not and were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Then, they were stratified according to prognostic risk scores, including: Clinical Risk Score (CRS), Tumour Burden Score (TBS) and Genetic And Morphological Evaluation (GAME) score. RESULTS: The study included 967 patients with a median follow-up of 68 months. After PSM analysis, patients with perioperative CTx presented prolonged overall survival (OS) in comparison with the surgery alone group (82.8 vs 52.5 months, p = 0.017). On multivariable analysis perioperative CTx was an independent predictor of increased OS (HR 0.705, 95%CI 0.705-0.516, p = 0.029). The benefits of perioperative CTx on survival were confirmed in patients with CRS and TBS scores ≤2 (p = 0.022 and p = 0.020, respectively) and in patients with a GAME score ≤1 (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Perioperative CTx demonstrated an increase in OS in patients with CRLM. Patients with a low-risk of recurrence seem to benefit from systemic treatment.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Hepatectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
4.
World J Emerg Surg ; 18(1): 20, 2023 03 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36934276

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Less invasive alternatives than early cholecystectomy (EC) for acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) treatment have been spreading in recent years. We still lack a reliable tool to select high-risk patients who could benefit from these alternatives. Our study aimed to prospectively validate the Chole-risk score in predicting postoperative complications in patients undergoing EC for ACC compared with other preoperative risk prediction models. METHOD: The S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study is a World Society of Emergency Surgery prospective multicenter observational study. From 1st September 2021 to 1st September 2022, 1253 consecutive patients admitted in 79 centers were included. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of ACC and to be a candidate for EC. A Cochran-Armitage test of the trend was run to determine whether a linear correlation existed between the Chole-risk score and a complicated postoperative course. To assess the accuracy of the analyzed prediction models-POSSUM Physiological Score (PS), modified Frailty Index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologist score (ASA), APACHE II score, and ACC severity grade-receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to compare the diagnostic abilities. RESULTS: A 30-day major morbidity of 6.6% and 30-day mortality of 1.1% were found. Chole-risk was validated, but POSSUM PS was the best risk prediction model for a complicated course after EC for ACC (in-hospital mortality: AUC 0.94, p < 0.001; 30-day mortality: AUC 0.94, p < 0.001; in-hospital major morbidity: AUC 0.73, p < 0.001; 30-day major morbidity: AUC 0.70, p < 0.001). POSSUM PS with a cutoff of 25 (defined in our study as a 'Chole-POSSUM' score) was then validated in a separate cohort of patients. It showed a 100% sensitivity and a 100% negative predictive value for mortality and a 96-97% negative predictive value for major complications. CONCLUSIONS: The Chole-risk score was externally validated, but the CHOLE-POSSUM stands as a more accurate prediction model. CHOLE-POSSUM is a reliable tool to stratify patients with ACC into a low-risk group that may represent a safe EC candidate, and a high-risk group, where new minimally invasive endoscopic techniques may find the most useful field of action. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04995380.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia , Colecistite , Humanos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Morbidade
6.
Hormones (Athens) ; 20(4): 715-721, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34228313

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The role of oxyphil cells (OxC) in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) still remains controversial. Historically, they were believed to be involuted cells. However, they could play an important role in hormone secretion. The clinical behavior of OxC-rich adenomas and preoperative PHPT localization tests have been widely studied. The aim of this study is to analyze the implications of OxC in PHTP. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for PHPT was conducted. Additionally, we included normal glands removed in the context of PHPT or inadvertently during a thyroidectomy. All glands were reviewed independently by three researchers, performing a semi-quantitative analysis of the percentage of OxC. Groups with < 25% OxC and > 75% OxC were compared. RESULTS: In the period 2010-2017, 238 patients and 261 removed glands were included (8.8% OxCA > 75%). There were no differences in symptomatology and levels of preoperative calcium, parathormone, or 25-OH vitamin. Patients with OxCA > 75% had worse preoperative glomerular filtration rate (81.2 vs. 69.7 mL/min/1.73 m2; p = 0.043). They also had a trend towards larger size and weight (17 vs. 20 mm, p = 0.135 and 562 vs. 875 mg, p = 0.495), while ultrasound was found to have better accuracy (48.3% vs. 73.7%; p = 0.035). There were no normal glands with a content of OxC > 75%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that phosphocalcic metabolism is not influenced by the presence of a high content of OxC in the parathyroid glands. A high content of OxC seems to be exclusive to pathologic glands and could be related to the deterioration of renal function in patients with PHPT.


Assuntos
Hiperparatireoidismo Primário , Células Oxífilas , Glândulas Paratireoides/citologia , Humanos , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/cirurgia , Glândulas Paratireoides/patologia , Hormônio Paratireóideo , Paratireoidectomia , Estudos Retrospectivos
7.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 47(3): 683-692, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33742223

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To analyse acute cholecystitis (AC) management during the first pandemic outbreak after the recommendations given by the surgical societies estimating: morbidity, length of hospital stay, mortality and hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection rate. METHODS: Multicentre-combined (retrospective-prospective) cohort study with AC patients in the Community of Madrid between 1st March and 30th May 2020. 257 AC patients were involved in 16 public hospital. Multivariant binomial logistic regression (MBLR) was applied to mortality. RESULTS: Of COVID-19 patients, 30 were diagnosed at admission and 12 patients were diagnosed during de admission or 30 days after discharge. In non-COVID-19 patients, antibiotic therapy was received in 61.3% of grade I AC and 40.6% of grade II AC. 52.4% of grade III AC were treated with percutaneous drainage (PD). Median hospital stay was 5 [3-8] days, which was higher in the non-surgical treatment group with 7.51 days (p < 0.001) and a 3.25% of mortality rate (p < 0.21). 93.3% of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection at admission were treated with non-surgical treatment (p = 0.03), median hospital stay was 11.0 [7.5-27.5] days (p < 0.001) with a 7.5% of mortality rate (p > 0.05). In patients with hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection, 91.7% of grade I-II AC were treated with non-surgical treatment (p = 0.037), with a median hospital stay of 16 [4-21] days and a 18.2% mortality rate (p > 0.05). Hospital-acquired infection risk when hospital stay is > 7 days is OR 4.7, CI 95% (1.3-16.6), p = 0.009. COVID-19 mortality rate was 11.9%, AC severity adjusted OR 5.64 (CI 95% 1.417-22.64). In MBLR analysis, age (OR 1.15, CI 95% 1.02-1.31), SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 14.49, CI 95% 1.33-157.81), conservative treatment failure (OR 8.2, CI 95% 1.34-50.49) and AC severity were associated with an increased odd of mortality. CONCLUSION: In our population, during COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increase of non-surgical treatment which was accompanied by an increase of conservative treatment failure, morbidity and hospital stay length which may have led to an increased risk hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection. Age, SARS-CoV-2 infection, AC severity and conservative treatment failure were mortality risk factors.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , COVID-19 , Colecistectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Colecistite Aguda , Tratamento Conservador , Infecção Hospitalar , Controle de Infecções , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico , Colecistite Aguda/epidemiologia , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Tratamento Conservador/métodos , Tratamento Conservador/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/virologia , Drenagem/métodos , Drenagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Controle de Infecções/normas , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Medição de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Espanha/epidemiologia
8.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 30(5): 410-415, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32398449

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There are no strong recommendations regarding the management of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC). The aim of this study was to assess the safety of early PC removal in terms of complications and recurrent disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study of consecutive patients who underwent PC for acute cholecystitis from January 2012 to December 2017. We first evaluated PC-related complications and recurrent disease in patients whose drainage was removed as inpatients (IPR) or as outpatients (OPR). Patients were then divided into 2 groups according to the timing of PC removal: G1 with the PC removed within the first 7 days after its collocation and G2 with the PC removed after 7 days. RESULTS: We included 151 patients. Patients in the OPR group had their catheters removed after 52 days (26 to 67 d) while the IPR group after 8 days (6 to 11 d); P<0.001. No difference was seen regarding complications, recurrent disease rate, or readmissions.G1 was comprised of 56 patients (37.1%), whereas G2 had 95 (62.9%). When G1 was compared with G2, no differences were seen in terms of complications. However, G1 presented a shorter duration of antibiotic treatment with 11 days (8 to 14 d) versus 15 days (12 to 23 d) in G2; P<0.001, but had a higher rate of recurrent disease 32.1% versus 14.7% in G2; P=0.014 and a higher rate of readmission 30.3% versus 13.6% in G2; P=0.019. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of the PC during the index admission was not associated with a higher risk of complications. However, the PC removal before 7 days could be related to an increase in recurrent disease and readmissions.


Assuntos
Colecistite Aguda , Colecistostomia , Colecistite Aguda/cirurgia , Drenagem , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Cir Esp (Engl Ed) ; 98(9): 525-532, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32408995

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The spread of the SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) has required adaptation by hospitals affected by the pandemic, which has caused a reduction in elective surgical activity. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients operated on in the previous month and during the peak of the pandemic. We analysed the COVID-19 infection rate, the severity of respiratory infection according to the Brescia respiratory COVID-19 severity scale, the adopted therapeutic measures and the overall postoperative complications. RESULTS: From 17th February to 31st March 2020, there was a progressive decrease in surgical activity, with only 213 patients operated on. This comprised 59 (27.8%) elective operations for oncological diseases, 97 (45.5%) elective operations for benign diseases and 57 (26.7%) as urgent procedures.There was a progressive increase in the rate of infection by COVID-19, with a total of 15 cases (7%). This included 10 patients (16.9%) in the elective group for oncological disease, 1 (1%) in the elective surgery group for benign disease and 4 (7%) in the urgent surgery group (p < 0.001). Five patients presented with a severe respiratory infection, of which 4 were affected by oncological disease. There were 3 deaths (1.4%), which were all due to the worsening of a respiratory infection. CONCLUSIONS: The patients undergoing the surgical procedures showed high rates of COVID-19 infection and postoperative complications, especially the patients with oncological diseases. Local resumption of surgical activity must be based on the prioritisation of the cases to be operated on, respecting certain premises of security and optimisation of the available resources.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Seleção de Pacientes , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Humanos , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , SARS-CoV-2 , Análise de Sobrevida
10.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20172017 May 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28536111

RESUMO

Metastatic melanoma to adrenal gland are very infrequent, being generally associated with additional evidence of systemic disease and, consequently, with short-term survival. However, the prognosis and the therapeutic management vary depending on some important oncological features. Long-term survival rates have been described after complete resection of metastatic disease. Here, we report the case of a woman aged 41 years diagnosed with a cutaneous melanoma on the right side of her paravertebral region, level III of Clark, in 2002, who underwent surgical excision of the tumour with negative margins and a negative sentinel node. She posteriorly developed pulmonary metastasis in 2006 and 2009, both resected with curative intention and in 2013, she was diagnosed with an adrenal metastasis. Therefore, she was submitted to an uneventful right laparoscopic adrenalectomy. The pathology report described metastasis of a cutaneous melanoma, negative for BRAF mutation. The patient is actually disease-free after 30 months of follow-up.


Assuntos
Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/secundário , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/cirurgia , Melanoma/secundário , Melanoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/patologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Melanoma/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA