RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: We assessed whether co-morbid small vessel disease (SVD) has clinical predictive value in preclinical or prodromal Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: In 1090 non-demented participants (65.4 ± 10.7 years) SVD was assessed with magnetic resonance imaging and amyloid beta (Aß) with lumbar puncture and/or positron emission tomography scan (mean follow-up for cognitive function 3.1 ± 2.4 years). RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent had neither Aß nor SVD (A-V-), 21% had SVD only (A-V+), 23% Aß only (A+V-), and 17% had both (A+V+). Pooled cohort linear mixed model analyses demonstrated that compared to A-V- (reference), A+V- had a faster rate of cognitive decline. Co-morbid SVD (A+V+) did not further increase rate of decline. Cox regression showed that dementia risk was modestly increased in A-V+ (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval: 1.8 [1.0-3.2]) and most strongly in A+ groups. Also, mortality risk was increased in A+ groups. DISCUSSION: In non-demented persons Aß was predictive of cognitive decline, dementia, and mortality. SVD modestly predicts dementia in A-, but did not increase deleterious effects in A+. HIGHLIGHTS: Amyloid beta (Aß; A) was predictive for cognitive decline, dementia, and mortality. Small vessel disease (SVD) had no additional deleterious effects in A+. SVD modestly predicted dementia in A-. Aß should be assessed even when magnetic resonance imaging indicates vascular cognitive impairment.
Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Doenças de Pequenos Vasos Cerebrais , Transtornos Cognitivos , Disfunção Cognitiva , Demência Vascular , Humanos , Peptídeos beta-Amiloides , Doença de Alzheimer/patologia , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças de Pequenos Vasos Cerebrais/complicações , Doenças de Pequenos Vasos Cerebrais/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância MagnéticaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: We developed a multimarker blood test result interpretation tool for the clinical dementia practice, including phosphorylated (P-)tau181, amyloid-beta (Abeta)42/40, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light (NfL). METHODS: We measured the plasma biomarkers with Simoa (n = 1199), applied LASSO regression for biomarker selection and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses to determine diagnostic accuracy. We validated our findings in two independent cohorts and constructed a visualization approach. RESULTS: P-tau181, GFAP, and NfL were selected. This combination had area under the curve (AUC) = 83% to identify amyloid positivity in pre-dementia stages, AUC = 87%-89% to differentiate Alzheimer's or controls from frontotemporal dementia, AUC = 74%-76% to differentiate Alzheimer's or controls from dementia with Lewy bodies. Highly reproducible AUCs were obtained in independent cohorts. The resulting visualization tool includes UpSet plots to visualize the stand-alone biomarker results and density plots to visualize the biomarker results combined. DISCUSSION: Our multimarker blood test interpretation tool is ready for testing in real-world clinical dementia settings. HIGHLIGHTS: We developed a multimarker blood test interpretation tool for clinical dementia practice. Our interpretation tool includes plasma biomarkers P-tau, GFAP, and NfL. Our tool is particularly useful for Alzheimer's and frontotemporal dementia diagnosis.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Visual interpretation of brain amyloid-ß (Aß) PET can be difficult in individuals with borderline Aß burden. Coregistration with individual MRI is recommended in these cases, which, however, is not always available. This study evaluated coregistration with the early perfusion frames acquired immediately after tracer injection to support the visual interpretation of the late Aß-frames in PET with 18F-flutemetamol (FMM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty dual-time-window FMM-PET scans of cognitively normal subjects with 0 to 60 Centiloids were included retrospectively (70.1 ± 6.9 years, 56% female, MMSE score 28.9 ± 1.3, 42% APOE É4 carrier). Regional Aß load was scored with respect to a 6-point Likert scale by 3 independent raters in the 10 regions of interest recommended for FMM reading using 3 different settings: Aß image only, Aß image coregistered with MRI, and Aß image coregistered with the perfusion image. The impact of setting, within- and between-readers variability, region of interest, and Aß-status was tested by repeated-measure analysis of variance of the Likert score. RESULTS: The Centiloid scale ranged between 2 and 52 (interquartile range, 7-19). Support of visual scoring by the perfusion image resulted in the best discrimination between Aß-positive and Aß-negative cases, mainly by improved certainty of excluding Aß plaques in Aß-negative cases (P = 0.030). It also resulted in significantly higher between-rater agreement. The setting effect was most pronounced in the frontal lobe and in the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus area (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The early perfusion image is a suitable alternative to T1-weighted MRI to support the visual interpretation of the late Aß image in FMM-PET.
Assuntos
Compostos de Anilina , Benzotiazóis , Encéfalo , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Benzotiazóis/farmacocinética , Imagem de Perfusão , Peptídeos beta-Amiloides/metabolismo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por ComputadorRESUMO
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is heterogenous at the molecular level. Understanding this heterogeneity is critical for AD drug development. Here we define AD molecular subtypes using mass spectrometry proteomics in cerebrospinal fluid, based on 1,058 proteins, with different levels in individuals with AD (n = 419) compared to controls (n = 187). These AD subtypes had alterations in protein levels that were associated with distinct molecular processes: subtype 1 was characterized by proteins related to neuronal hyperplasticity; subtype 2 by innate immune activation; subtype 3 by RNA dysregulation; subtype 4 by choroid plexus dysfunction; and subtype 5 by blood-brain barrier impairment. Each subtype was related to specific AD genetic risk variants, for example, subtype 1 was enriched with TREM2 R47H. Subtypes also differed in clinical outcomes, survival times and anatomical patterns of brain atrophy. These results indicate molecular heterogeneity in AD and highlight the need for personalized medicine.
Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Humanos , Doença de Alzheimer/genética , ProteômicaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is good evidence that elevated amyloid-ß (Aß) positron emission tomography (PET) signal is associated with cognitive decline in clinically normal (CN) individuals. However, it is less well established whether there is an association between the Aß burden and decline in daily living activities in this population. Moreover, Aß-PET Centiloids (CL) thresholds that can optimally predict functional decline have not yet been established. METHODS: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses over a mean three-year timeframe were performed on the European amyloid-PET imaging AMYPAD-PNHS dataset that phenotypes 1260 individuals, including 1032 CN individuals and 228 participants with questionable functional impairment. Amyloid-PET was assessed continuously on the Centiloid (CL) scale and using Aß groups (CL < 12 = Aß-, 12 ≤ CL ≤ 50 = Aß-intermediate/Aß± , CL > 50 = Aß+). Functional abilities were longitudinally assessed using the Clinical Dementia Rating (Global-CDR, CDR-SOB) and the Amsterdam Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire (A-IADL-Q). The Global-CDR was available for the 1260 participants at baseline, while baseline CDR-SOB and A-IADL-Q scores and longitudinal functional data were available for different subsamples that had similar characteristics to those of the entire sample. RESULTS: Participants included 765 Aß- (61%, Mdnage = 66.0, IQRage = 61.0-71.0; 59% women), 301 Aß± (24%; Mdnage = 69.0, IQRage = 64.0-75.0; 53% women) and 194 Aß+ individuals (15%, Mdnage = 73.0, IQRage = 68.0-78.0; 53% women). Cross-sectionally, CL values were associated with CDR outcomes. Longitudinally, baseline CL values predicted prospective changes in the CDR-SOB (bCL*Time = 0.001/CL/year, 95% CI [0.0005,0.0024], p = .003) and A-IADL-Q (bCL*Time = -0.010/CL/year, 95% CI [-0.016,-0.004], p = .002) scores in initially CN participants. Increased clinical progression (Global-CDR > 0) was mainly observed in Aß+ CN individuals (HRAß+ vs Aß- = 2.55, 95% CI [1.16,5.60], p = .020). Optimal thresholds for predicting decline were found at 41 CL using the CDR-SOB (bAß+ vs Aß- = 0.137/year, 95% CI [0.069,0.206], p < .001) and 28 CL using the A-IADL-Q (bAß+ vs Aß- = -0.693/year, 95% CI [-1.179,-0.208], p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Amyloid-PET quantification supports the identification of CN individuals at risk of functional decline. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The AMYPAD PNHS is registered at www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu with the EudraCT Number: 2018-002277-22.