RESUMO
Complex coacervate core micelles (C3Ms) are colloidal structures useful for encapsulation of biomacromolecules. We previously demonstrated that enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) can be encapsulated into C3Ms using the diblock copolymer poly(2-methyl-vinyl-pyridinium)41-b-poly(ethylene-oxide)205. This packaging resulted in deviating spectroscopic features of the encapsulated EGFP molecules. Here we show that for monomeric EGFP variant (mEGFP) micellar encapsulation affects the absorption and fluorescence properties to a much lesser extent, and that changes in circular dichroism characteristics are specific for encapsulated EGFP. Time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy of encapsulated (m)EGFP established the occurrence of homo-FRET (Förster resonance energy transfer) with larger transfer correlation times in the case of EGFP. Together, these findings support that EGFP dimerizes whereas the mEGFP mainly remains as a monomer in the densely packed C3Ms. We propose that dimerization of encapsulated EGFP causes a reorientation of Glu222, resulting in a pKa shift of the chromophore, which is fully reversible after release of EGFP from the C3Ms at a high ionic strength.
Assuntos
Proteínas de Fluorescência Verde/química , Micelas , Polietilenoglicóis/química , Polivinil/química , Dicroísmo Circular , Fluorescência , Polarização de Fluorescência , Conformação Proteica , Multimerização Proteica , Espectrometria de FluorescênciaRESUMO
Theoretical arguments and empirical investigations indicate that a high proportion of published findings do not replicate and are likely false. The current position paper provides a broad perspective on scientific error, which may lead to replication failures. This broad perspective focuses on reform history and on opportunities for future reform. We organize our perspective along four main themes: institutional reform, methodological reform, statistical reform and publishing reform. For each theme, we illustrate potential errors by narrating the story of a fictional researcher during the research cycle. We discuss future opportunities for reform. The resulting agenda provides a resource to usher in an era that is marked by a research culture that is less error-prone and a scientific publication landscape with fewer spurious findings.