Pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in chronic heart failure: effects across clinically relevant subgroups in the MONITOR-HF trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In patients with chronic heart failure (HF), the MONITOR-HF trial demonstrated the efficacy of pulmonary artery (PA)-guided HF therapy over standard of care in improving quality of life and reducing HF hospitalizations and mean PA pressure. This study aimed to evaluate the consistency of these benefits in relation to clinically relevant subgroups. METHODS: The effect of PA-guided HF therapy was evaluated in the MONITOR-HF trial among predefined subgroups based on age, sex, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, left ventricular ejection fraction, HF aetiology, cardiac resynchronization therapy, and implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Outcome measures were based upon significance in the main trial and included quality of life-, clinical-, and PA pressure endpoints, and were assessed for each subgroup. Differential effects in relation to the subgroups were assessed with interaction terms. Both unadjusted and multiple testing adjusted interaction terms were presented. RESULTS: The effects of PA monitoring on quality of life, clinical events, and PA pressure were consistent in the predefined subgroups, without any clinically relevant heterogeneity within or across all endpoint categories (all adjusted interaction P-values were non-significant). In the unadjusted analysis of the primary endpoint quality-of-life change, weak trends towards a less pronounced effect in older patients (Pinteraction = .03; adjusted Pinteraction = .33) and diabetics (Pinteraction = .01; adjusted Pinteraction = .06) were observed. However, these interaction effects did not persist after adjusting for multiple testing. CONCLUSIONS: This subgroup analysis confirmed the consistent benefits of PA-guided HF therapy observed in the MONITOR-HF trial across clinically relevant subgroups, highlighting its efficacy in improving quality of life, clinical, and PA pressure endpoints in chronic HF patients.

Rapidly rule out acute myocardial infarction by combining copeptin and heart-type fatty acid-binding protein with cardiac troponin.

BACKGROUND: The rapid exclusion of acute myocardial infarction in patients with chest pain can reduce the length of hospital admission, prevent unnecessary diagnostic work-up and reduce the burden on our health-care systems. The combined use of biomarkers that are associated with different pathophysiological aspects of acute myocardial infarction could improve the early diagnostic assessment of patients presenting with chest pain. METHODS: We measured cardiac troponin I, copeptin and heart-type fatty acid-binding protein concentrations in 584 patients who presented to the emergency department with acute chest pain. The diagnostic performances for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and NSTEMI were calculated for the individual markers and their combinations. Separate calculations were made for patients presenting to the emergency department <3 h, 3-6 h and 6-12 h after chest pain onset. RESULTS: For ruling out acute myocardial infarction, the net predictive values (95% CI) of cardiac troponin I, copeptin and heart-type fatty acid-binding protein were 90.4% (87.3-92.9), 84% (79.8-87.6) and 87% (83.5-90), respectively. Combining the three biomarkers resulted in a net predictive value of 95.8% (92.8-97.8). The improvement was most pronounced in the early presenters (<3 h) where the combined net predictive value was 92.9% (87.3-96.5) compared to 84.6% (79.4-88.9) for cardiac troponin I alone. The area under the receiver operating characteristic for the triple biomarker combination increased significantly (P < 0.05) compared to that of cardiac troponin I alone (0.880 [0.833-0.928] vs. 0.840 [0.781-0.898], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Combining copeptin, heart-type fatty acid-binding protein and cardiac troponin I measurements improves the diagnostic performance in patients presenting with chest pain. Importantly, in patients who present early (<3 h) after chest pain onset, the combination improves the diagnostic performance compared to the standard cardiac troponin I measurement alone.

Deliverability of the Resolute Integrity stent and a post hoc comparison of radial and femoral access: the DELIVER study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: DELIVER (DELiverability of the Resolute Integrity Stent in All-Comer Vessels and Cross-OvER stenting) was a prospective, multicenter, all-comers registry to assess the deliverability of the Resolute Integrity™ zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES). METHODS/MATERIALS: Patients (n=7740 patients, 10449 lesions) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and deemed suitable for R-ZES implantation were enrolled and treated according to standard practice of the participating centers in 30 countries. Outcomes included delivery success and in-hospital target lesion failure (TLF), major adverse cardiac event (MACE), and Academic Research Consortium definite/probable stent thrombosis. We performed a post hoc analysis comparing deliverability, in-hospital clinical outcomes and resource utilization with radial vs. femoral access. RESULTS: A high proportion of the population had complex disease (71%): mean lesion length was 26.7±17.5 mm, 35% of lesions were moderately/severely calcified and 17% were bifurcated. Femoral and radial accesses were used in 53% and 46% of patients, respectively. Patients treated using femoral access had more complex coronary artery disease. Primary delivery success was 98.9% and did not differ by approach. Radial access was associated with lower stent and balloon utilization, but higher guide catheter utilization, lower procedure duration, and contrast administered compared with femoral access. In-hospital TLF and MACE occurred in 1.6% of patients; definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 0.2%. Clinical outcomes did not differ by vascular access. CONCLUSIONS: R-ZES was found to be highly deliverable in a complex, all-comers, international population, regardless of whether radial or femoral access was used. In-hospital outcomes were excellent with very low risk of complications.