Advanced glycation end products, measured in skin, vs. HbA1c in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are considered major contributors to microvascular and macrovascular complications in adult patients with diabetes mellitus. AGEs can be measured non-invasively with skin autofluorescence (sAF). The primary aim was to determine sAF values in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus and to study correlations between sAF values and HbA1c and mean HbA1c over the year prior to measurement RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In children with type 1 diabetes mellitus, sAF values were measured using the AGE Reader®. Laboratory and anthropometric values were extracted from medical charts. Correlations were studied using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of multiple study parameters on sAF values. RESULTS: The mean sAF value was 1.33 ± 0.36 arbitrary units (AU) in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (n = 144). sAF values correlated positively with HbA1c measured at the same time (r = 0.485; p < 0.001), mean HbA1c over the year prior to measurement (r = 0.578; p < 0.001), age (r = 0.337; p < 0.001), duration of type 1 diabetes mellitus (r = 0.277; p = 0.001), serum triglycerides (r = 0.399; p < 0.001), and total cholesterol (r = 0.352; p = 0.001). sAF values were significantly higher in patients with non-white skin (1.56 vs. 1.27 AU, respectively, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In children with type 1 diabetes, sAF values correlate strongly with single HbA1c and mean HbA1c, making the non-invasive sAF measurement an interesting alternative to provide information about cumulative hyperglycemic states. To determine the value of sAF measurement in predicting long-term microvascular and macrovascular complications, further prospective follow-up studies are needed.

Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Per PD-L1 Stratum In Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Effectiveness Versus Trial Efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trial efficacy and real-world effectiveness of oncological treatments can differ. This study assessed the real-world survival outcomes of first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy per PD-L1 stratum in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) and compared them to clinical trial results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with nonsquamous and squamous mNSCLC who received first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in 7 Dutch teaching hospitals between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2021 were included. Hazard ratios (HR) with confidence intervals (95% CI) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated to determine the efficacy-effectiveness gap (EE gap) between real-world and clinical trial, stratified by PD-L1 stratum. RESULTS: The nonsquamous cohort (n = 486) consisted of 269 patients with PD-L1 < 1%, 158 with PD-L1 1% to 49%, and 59 with PD-L1 ≥ 50%. The squamous cohort (n = 117) consisted of 70 patients with PD-L1 < 1% and 47 with PD-L1 ≥ 1%. For OS, an EE gap was observed in nonsquamous patients with PD-L1 < 1% (HR 1.38 (95% CI 1.06-1.78; median OS 10 vs. 17.2 months) and HRs consistently >1 in all other nonsquamous and squamous PD-L1 strata, although not statistically significant. No EE-gap for PFS was observed in any stratum. CONCLUSION: No significant EE gap was found for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, except in the stratum nonsquamous mNSCLC with <1% PD-L1 tumor expression. In these patients, the survival in real-world was considerably shorter compared to the clinical trial results. Further studies are needed to determine which patient, treatment and or context factors contribute to this disparity.

Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: real-world outcomes versus clinical trial results.

Aim: We investigated the effectiveness of durvalumab post-concurrent CRT (cCRT) and post-sequential CRT (sCRT) versus cCRT and sCRT alone and compared these outcomes with the PACIFIC trial. Methods: Four cohorts of stage III NSCLC patients who received CRT were included: cCRT with and without durvalumab, sCRT with and without durvalumab. PFS and OS were analyzed using Cox regression. Results: Durvalumab improved PFS (cCRT: aHR = 0.69, sCRT: aHR = 0.71) and OS (cCRT: aHR = 0.71, sCRT: aHR = 0.32), although not all results were significant. PFS was longer in the real-world than in the trial, while OS did not differ. Conclusion: Durvalumab after CRT improved the survival outcomes. The difference between PFS in our study and the trial may be due to differences in follow-up methods.

We assessed a medicine called durvalumab on patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received chemoradiotherapy in a real-world setting. We compared their outcomes with those from a clinical trial. Patients who received two types of chemoradiotherapy with or without durvalumab were included, and their progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were analyzed. We found that patients treated with durvalumab had better PFS and OS than those treated without durvalumab. PFS was longer in the real-world than in the clinical trial, but OS was similar. The difference in PFS may be due to differences in measuring PFS.

Neutrophil count, lymphocyte count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in relation to response to adjunctive dexamethasone treatment in community-acquired pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: It is hypothesised that community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients with more severe disease or inflammation might benefit more from adjunctive corticosteroid treatment. Neutrophil count, lymphocyte count and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have been associated with inflammation and disease severity in CAP. We investigated the interaction between these parameters and adjunctive dexamethasone effects on clinical outcomes in CAP. METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the randomised placebo-controlled Santeon-CAP trial (n = 401), which showed a positive effect of adjunctive oral dexamethasone on length of stay (LOS) in CAP patients. White blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil count, NLR (highest tertile vs. lowest two tertiles) and lymphocyte count (lowest tertile vs. highest two tertiles) were examined as potential effect modifiers of treatment with dexamethasone on LOS (primary outcome) and ICU-admission, 30-day mortality and hospital readmission. RESULTS: WBC differential counts were available for 354 patients. The effect of dexamethasone on LOS was more pronounced in high WBC count, high neutrophil count or high NLR subgroups (difference in median LOS of 2 days versus zero days in the reference subgroups, p for interaction < 0.05). There was no effect modification for the other outcomes. Patients with low WBC and low neutrophil counts did not benefit from dexamethasone, while hospital readmission rate was higher in those treated with dexamethasone (6% vs. 11%). CONCLUSIONS: WBC count and/or neutrophil might be easily available biomarkers to guide selection of CAP patients who are more likely to benefit from adjunctive dexamethasone treatment. Future prospective trials are needed to confirm this predictive potential.

Altered splenic [89Zr]Zr-rituximab uptake in patients with interstitial lung disease not responding to rituximab: could this indicate a splenic immune-mediated mechanism?

Rituximab (RTX) for immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID) with interstitial pneumonitis (IP) results in non-response in about a third of patients for reasons not well understood. Complete peripheral B-cell depletion in IMID-IP does not seem to correlate with successful treatment outcome. A hypothesis is that splenic B cells might play a role in B-cell recovery and attraction of naïve B cells in non-responsive patients. The aim of this post hoc analysis of clinical trial data is to search for indicators in [89Zr]Zr-rituximab PET/CT data from the spleen that might explain non-responsiveness. PET/CT data of 20 patients with IMID-IP, who were enrolled in a phase II trial and treated with RTX were analyzed. Clinical outcome was categorized into responders (RSP) and non-responders (NR) after 6 months of initial RTX by two independent pulmonologists. Patients were examined separately to search for associations between clinical outcome, splenic activity on PET/CT, lymphocyte counts and other biomarkers. Treatment failure was found in 6/20 patients (30%) while all patients exhibited B-cell depletion from the circulation. NR patients demonstrated significantly higher splenic activity than RSP patients (non-preload protocol: SUV 4.9±1.96 and SUV 2.3±1.08 respectively, P=0.025). No correlations between treatment outcome and serum lymphocyte subsets were found. Our findings suggest a potential splenic mechanism in IMID-IP patients non-responding to RTX and warrant further consideration and investigation.

Real-World Effectiveness of Palbociclib Versus Clinical Trial Results in Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer That Progressed on Previous Endocrine Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy for the treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR-positive), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-negative), advanced/metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy, and to compare these results with the outcomes of the PALOMA-3 clinical trial. METHODS: This study was a retrospective observational cohort study including all patients who started with palbociclib in the St. Antonius Hospital between September 1, 2016 and April 1, 2018 for the treatment of HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy. Individual patient data were collected from electronic medical records. Primary study outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and the number of permanent treatment discontinuations before disease progression due to adverse events (AEs). Secondary outcomes were the frequency of all (serious) AEs and the frequency of and reasons for dose reductions, -interruptions and cycle delays. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were studied with a median follow-up of 13.0 months. Overall, the median PFS in real-world clinical practice was 10.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9-15.1), compared with 9.5 months in PALOMA-3 (95% CI 9.2-11.0). Two patients discontinued treatment because of AEs. Neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3-4 AE, but with no febrile neutropenia events. Most AEs were managed with palbociclib dose modifications. Regarding these modifications, more cycle delays, less dose reductions, and less dose interruptions occurred in clinical practice compared with PALOMA-3 (59 vs 36%, 22 vs 34%, and 9 vs 54%, respectively). Patients who did not meet the PALOMA-3 study eligibility criteria (n = 16) showed a lower median PFS of 5.5 months (95% CI 4.7-6.4). CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness and tolerability of palbociclib in real-world clinical practice corresponded well with the results obtained in the PALOMA-3 clinical trial. Despite the differences in dose modifications, this study suggests that there is no efficacy-effectiveness gap in this patient population.

[89Zr]Zr-rituximab PET/CT activity in patients with therapy refractory interstitial pneumonitis: a feasibility study.

Recent studies on immune-mediated inflammatory lung diseases show encouraging treatment results with rituximab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against CD20-expressing B lymphocytes. The present pilot study aimed to explore the possibility to image CD20-expression in the lungs as future early predictor of treatment response. We describe a series of 10 patients with therapy refractory interstitial pneumonitis who were treated with rituximab (1000 mg at day 0 and day 14) and underwent PET/CT after the administration of [89Zr]Zr-N-suc-DFO-rituximab abbreviated as [89Zr]Zr-rituximab. [89Zr]-rituximab PET/CT of the chest was performed on day 3 and 6. [89Zr]Zr-rituximab PET/CT showed visual and quantifiable increased pulmonary activity in four patients. Other patients demonstrated no increased activity in the lungs. One patient developed a severe allergic reaction during infusion of the first 10% unlabeled rituximab after which rituximab infusion was ceased. Subsequent administration of [89Zr]Zr-rituximab, however, did not result in any adverse reaction. This patient demonstrated the highest uptake of [89Zr]Zr-rituximab in mediastinal lymph nodes and lung parenchyma compared to the other 9 patients who did receive the full dose rituximab before [89Zr]Zr-rituximab. This pilot study demonstrates that [89Zr]Zr-rituximab PET/CT imaging in patients with therapy refractory interstitial pneumonitis is feasible and shows lung-specific uptake in some patients. Further research with larger sample size should establish if the [89Zr]Zr-rituximab uptake correlates with treatment response to rituximab. The higher uptake in the absence of a full 1000 mg rituximab preload may suggest that future studies should consider [89Zr]Zr-rituximab imaging at low mAb dose before treatment with rituximab.

Intravitreal aflibercept versus intravitreal ranibizumab in patients with age-related macular degeneration: a comparative effectiveness study.

AIM: A hospital-wide, unselected switch of ranibizumab to aflibercept in treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) allowed us to compare the clinical effectiveness of these agents. METHOD: In a single-center before-after, observational study design new AMD-patients started with aflibercept treatment in 2013-2014 were compared with a control group of AMD-patients on ranibizumab before the switch. RESULTS: The mean difference in visual acuity (in logMAR units) after 1 year was comparable (+0.012 [aflibercept, n = 37] vs +0.17 [ranibizumab, n = 30], p = 0.154). However, the aflibercept-group did receive more intravitreal injections (5.8 vs 4.7 injections, p = 0.004) and were treated longer (265.7 vs 197.7 days; p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: With no difference in clinical effectiveness, longer treatment intervals for aflibercept should be investigated.

GMP-compliant (68)Ga radiolabelling in a conventional small-scale radiopharmacy: a feasible approach for routine clinical use.

BACKGROUND: The number of routine care patient examinations with (68)Ga radiopharmaceuticals is still relatively limited, probably caused by the presumed need for large investments in hot cells, automated synthesis modules, laboratory equipment and validation efforts. Our aim was to set up the preparation of (68)Ga-DOTA-NOC in compliance with all current European Union-Good Manufacturing Practices (EU-GMP), current Good Radiopharmacy Practice (cGRPP) and European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) guidance but without the availability of a hot cell and gas chromatography (GC), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) equipment. METHODS: A risk-based approach was applied to align preparation conditions with applicable regulations, together with a validation of a thin-layer chromatography (ITLC) method to replace HPLC as modality for examining radiochemical purity. RESULTS: Using an internally shielded labelling module for manual operation, a (68)Ga-DOTA-NOC labelling procedure was set up that meets all applicable Ph. Eur. specifications. The applied ITLC method showed very good correlation with HPLC results (r = 0.961) and was able to detect relevant deviations in radiolabelling procedures. All identified quality assurance aspects were made compliant with EU-GMP and cGRPP guidance. CONCLUSIONS: We consider the described configuration and validation approach feasible for many conventional small-scale radiopharmacies, something that could help to increase the availability of (68)Ga radiopharmaceuticals to a large number of patients.