Documentation of the Patient Characteristics Morbid Obesity and Bariatric Surgery in the Hospital Information System and the Influence on the Number of Medication-Related Problems.

BACKGROUND: As a result of pharmacokinetic changes, individuals with morbid obesity and/or with bariatric surgery may require dose adjustments, additional monitoring or medication should be avoided. Clinical decision support (CDS) may provide automated alerts enabling correct prescribing but requires documentation of these patient characteristics in the Hospital Information System (HIS) to prevent medication-related problems (MRPs). OBJECTIVE: The primary objective is to determine the proportion of patients with documentation of the patient characteristics morbid obesity and bariatric surgery in the HIS. The secondary objective is to compare the proportion of patients with an MRP in the group with versus without documentation. Also, the type and severity of MRPs and the medication involved are determined. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed. Patients admitted to the hospital were identified as morbidly obese and/or with bariatric surgery. In the identified patients, the proportion of patients with documentation of the patient characteristics in the HIS was evaluated as primary outcome. Subsequently, patient records were reviewed for MRPs, which were categorized and associated medication was registered. For the primary objective, descriptive statistics was used. For the secondary outcome, the Fisher's exact test was used. RESULTS: In 43 (21.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.7%-27.1%) of 201 included patient (113 morbid obesity, 70 bariatric surgery and 18 both), the patient characteristics were documented. An MRP occurred in 2.3% versus 13.9% (P = 0.032) of patients with and without documentation, respectively. The most common MRP was underdosing in morbid obesity, while in patients with bariatric surgery it was prescription of contra-indicated medication. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The proportion of patients with documentation of the patient characteristics bariatric surgery and/or morbid obesity in the HIS is low, which appears to be associated with more MRPs. To improve medication safety, it is important to document these patient characteristics.

Clinical Guidance for Dosing and Monitoring Oral Antihormonal Drugs in Patients with Breast Cancer After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

ABSTRACT: Obesity is associated with an increased risk of cancers, such as breast cancer. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a common surgical intervention used to induce weight loss, reduce comorbidities, and improve overall survival. Due to alterations in the gastrointestinal tract, RYGB is associated with changes in oral drug disposition, which can affect treatment outcomes. Oral antihormonal agents were monitored in 9 patients who previously underwent RYGB. The results of therapeutic drug monitoring and estradiol concentrations were analyzed, and a review of the relevant literature was performed. As only 1 of the 6 patients prescribed tamoxifen achieved a therapeutic endoxifen concentration with the standard dose of 20 mg/d, a higher starting dose of 40 mg/d was recommended to increase the probability of attaining a therapeutic plasma concentration. All patients with decreased CYP2D6 metabolic activity could not achieve therapeutic plasma concentrations; therefore, CYP2D6 genotyping was recommended before the initiation of tamoxifen therapy to identify patients who should be switched to aromatase inhibitors. Anastrozole and letrozole exposure in patients who underwent RYGB patients appeared sufficient, with no dose adjustment required. However, until more data become available, monitoring aromatase inhibitor efficacy is recommended. Monitoring the drug concentrations is a viable option; however, only indicative data on therapeutic drug monitoring are available. Therefore, estradiol concentrations should be measured.

Increased frequency of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles in clopidogrel-treated patients with recurrent cerebral ischemia.

AIMS: Clopidogrel is used as secondary prevention after cerebral ischaemia. Previous, mainly Asian, studies have shown that genetic variations in CYP2C19 are associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke in clopidogrel-treated patients. Evidence on the impact of this drug-gene interaction in European neurology patients is currently limited. The aim of this study is to compare the prevalence of CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LoF) alleles in a population with recurrent cerebral ischaemia to two reference groups from the same region. METHODS: CYP2C19-genotyping (*2 and *3) was performed in clopidogrel-treated patients who presented with a recurrent ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Genotype distributions were compared with two reference groups; a cohort of consecutive patients who underwent elective coronary stent implantation and a cohort of healthy Dutch volunteers. RESULTS: In total, 188 cases with a recurrent ischaemic event were identified, of whom 38 (20.2%) experienced an early recurrent event (24 hours to 90 days after the previous event). Among the total case group, 43.6% of the patients carried at least one CYP2C19 LoF allele, compared with 27.6% and 24.7% in respectively the cardiology and the healthy volunteers reference groups (P < .001 for both comparisons). Among the cases with an early recurrent event, 55.3% of patients were carriers of at least one CYP2C19 LoF allele (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: In this clopidogrel-treated population with recurrent cerebral ischaemia, the frequency of CYP2C19 LoF alleles was significantly higher than in reference groups, especially in early recurrent events. This study adds to the growing body of evidence that genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy could improve patient outcomes.

Unintentional guideline deviations in hospitalized patients with two or more antithrombotic agents: an intervention study.

PURPOSE: Treatment schedules for antithrombotic therapy are complex, and there is a risk of inappropriate prescribing or continuation of antithrombotic therapy beyond the intended period of time. The primary aim of this study was to determine the frequency of unintentional guideline deviations in hospitalized patients. Secondary aims were to determine whether the frequency of unintentional guideline deviations decreased after intervention by a pharmacist, to determine the acceptance rate of the interventions and to determine the type of interventions. METHODS: We performed a non-controlled prospective intervention study in three teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. We examined whether hospitalized patients who used the combination of an anticoagulant plus at least one other antithrombotic agent had an unintentional guideline deviation. In these cases, the hospital pharmacist contacted the physician to assess whether this deviation was intentional. If the deviation was unintentional, a recommendation was provided how to adjust the antithrombotic regimen according to guideline recommendations. RESULTS: Of the 988 included patients, 407 patients had an unintentional guideline deviation (41.2%). After intervention, this was reduced to 22 patients (2.2%) (p < 0.001). The acceptance rate of the interventions was 96.6%. The most frequently performed interventions were discontinuation of an low molecular weight heparin in combination with a direct oral anticoagulant and discontinuation of an antiplatelet agent when there was no indication for the combination of an antiplatelet agent and an anticoagulant. CONCLUSION: A significant number of hospitalized patients who used an anticoagulant plus one other antithrombotic agent had an unintentional guideline deviation. Intervention by a pharmacist decreased unintentional guideline deviations.

Quality of clinical direct oral anticoagulant prescribing and identification of risk factors for inappropriate prescriptions.

AIMS: Even though the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is safe based on clinical outcomes, drug safety also depends on appropriateness of drug prescription, which is challenging for DOACs since many patient factors need to be considered. The aim of this study was to assess the appropriateness of DOAC prescriptions and to identify risk factors of determinants for inappropriate DOAC prescriptions. METHODS: A retrospective study in a nonuniversity teaching hospital was performed of hospitalized patients (≥18 years) who received an initial DOAC prescription between February and August 2018. Appropriateness of prescribing was evaluated on 8 criteria by using a modified version of the medication appropriateness index. RESULTS: A total of 770 initial DOAC prescriptions of inpatients were evaluated: 267 patients (34.6%) had at least met 1 inappropriate criterion for a DOAC prescription. The most frequent inappropriate criterion was dosage (17.4%). Of the 4 DOACs, dabigatran (21.6%) and apixaban (21.2%) were mostly inappropriate dosed. In a multivariable analysis, reduced renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate <50 mL/min; odds ratio [OR] = 2.35; P < .001), a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (OR = 1.87; P = .004), and 'prescribed by surgeons' (OR = 1.9; P = .013) were independently associated with inappropriateness of prescribing. CONCLUSION: This study has highlighted a high degree of inappropriate prescribing of DOACs. These results underline the need for targeted interventions to improve DOAC prescribing.

Lidocaine as treatment for neonatal seizures: Evaluation of previously developed population pharmacokinetic models and dosing regimen.

AIMS: Lidocaine is used to treat neonatal seizures refractory to other anticonvulsants. It is effective, but also associated with cardiac toxicity. Previous studies have reported on the pharmacokinetics of lidocaine in preterm and term neonates and proposed a dosing regimen for effective and safe lidocaine use. The objective of this study was to evaluate the previously developed pharmacokinetic models and dosing regimen. As a secondary objective, lidocaine effectiveness and safety were assessed. METHODS: Data from preterm neonates and (near-)term neonates with and without therapeutic hypothermia receiving lidocaine were included. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed using non-linear mixed effects modelling. Simulations were performed to evaluate the proposed dosing regimen. Lidocaine was considered effective if no additional anticonvulsant was required and safe if no cardiac adverse events occurred. RESULTS: Data were available for 159 neonates; 50 (31.4%) preterm and 109 term neonates, of whom 49 (30.8%) were treated with therapeutic hypothermia. Lidocaine clearance increased with postmenstrual age by 0.69%/day (95% confidence interval 0.54-0.84%). During therapeutic hypothermia (33.5°C), lidocaine clearance was reduced by 21.8% (7.26%/°C, 95% confidence interval 1.63-11.2%) compared to normothermia (36.5°C). Simulations demonstrated that the proposed dosing regimen leads to adequate average lidocaine plasma concentrations. Effectiveness and safety were assessed in 92 neonates. Overall effectiveness was 53.3% (49/92) and 56.5% (13/23) for neonates receiving the proposed dosing regimen. No cardiac toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: Lidocaine pharmacokinetics was adequately described across the entire neonatal age range. With the proposed dosing regimen, lidocaine can provide effective and safe treatment for neonatal seizures.

Extravasation of an antibody-drug conjugate: A case report of epidermal necrosis after trastuzumab-emtansine extravasation.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Trastuzumab-emtansine is an antibody-drug conjugate developed to decrease off-target toxicity. According to the product label, reactions secondary to extravasation are mild or moderate. CASE SUMMARY: We report on a 51-year-old woman who developed epidermal necrosis after extravasation of trastuzumab-emtansine, which required surgical intervention. Six weeks later, the lesions were healed with residual hyperpigmentation. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: We describe the course of a case of severe toxicity following trastuzumab-emtansine extravasation. We provide treatment recommendations and recommend amending the information on the product label on extravasation.

Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells Stimulate Cartilage Regeneration and Are Safe for Single-Stage Cartilage Repair in Humans upon Mixture with Recycled Autologous Chondrons.

Traditionally, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) isolated from adult bone marrow were described as being capable of differentiating to various lineages including cartilage. Despite increasing interest in these MSCs, concerns regarding their safety, in vivo behavior and clinical effectiveness have restrained their clinical application. We hypothesized that MSCs have trophic effects that stimulate recycled chondrons (chondrocytes with their native pericellular matrix) to regenerate cartilage. Searching for a proof of principle, this phase I (first-in-man) clinical trial applied allogeneic MSCs mixed with either 10% or 20% recycled autologous cartilage-derived cells (chondrons) for treatment of cartilage defects in the knee in symptomatic cartilage defect patients. This unique first in man series demonstrated no treatment-related adverse events up to one year postoperatively. At 12 months, all patients showed statistically significant improvement in clinical outcome compared to baseline. Magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopies showed completely filled defects with regenerative cartilage tissue. Histological analysis on biopsies of the grafts indicated hyaline-like regeneration with a high concentration of proteoglycans and type II collagen. Short tandem repeat analysis showed the regenerative tissue only contained patient-own DNA. These findings support the novel insight that the use of allogeneic MSCs is safe and opens opportunities for other applications. Stem cell-induced paracrine mechanisms may play an important role in the chondrogenesis and successful tissue regeneration found. Stem Cells 2017;35:256-264.

Lidocaine response rate in aEEG-confirmed neonatal seizures: Retrospective study of 413 full-term and preterm infants.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the seizure response rate to lidocaine in a large cohort of infants who received lidocaine as second- or third-line antiepileptic drug (AED) for neonatal seizures. METHODS: Full-term (n = 319) and preterm (n = 94) infants, who received lidocaine for neonatal seizures confirmed on amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG), were studied retrospectively (January 1992-December 2012). Based on aEEG findings, the response was defined as good (>4 h no seizures, no need for rescue medication); intermediate (0-2 h no seizures, but rescue medication needed after 2-4 h); or no clear response (rescue medication needed <2 h). RESULTS: Lidocaine had a good or intermediate effect in 71.4%. The response rate was significantly lower in preterm (55.3%) than in full-term infants (76.1%, p < 0.001). In full-term infants the response to lidocaine was significantly better than midazolam as second-line AED (21.4% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.049), and there was a trend for a higher response rate as third-line AED (67.6% vs. 57%, p = 0.086). Both lidocaine and midazolam had a higher response rate as third-line AED than as second-line AED (p < 0.001). Factors associated with a good response to lidocaine were the following: higher gestational age, longer time between start of first seizure and administration of lidocaine, lidocaine as third-line AED, use of new lidocaine regimens, diagnosis of stroke, use of digital aEEG, and hypothermia. Multivariable analysis of seizure response to lidocaine included lidocaine as second- or third-line AED and seizure etiology. SIGNIFICANCE: Seizure response to lidocaine was seen in ~70%. The response rate was influenced by gestational age, underlying etiology, and timing of administration. Lidocaine had a significantly higher response rate than midazolam as second-line AED, and there was a trend for a higher response rate as third-line AED. Both lidocaine and midazolam had a higher response rate as third-line compared to second-line AED, which could be due to a pharmacologic synergistic mechanism between the two drugs.