Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 51(6): 1076-80, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22302059

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The provisional ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) definition of remission in RA requires a score of ≤1 on the patient global assessment (PGA, 0-10 scale). We explored the relation between the PGA criterion and the patient's clinical disease state in an observational dataset. METHODS: Data of 512 newly diagnosed RA patients of the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring (DREAM) remission induction cohort were analysed. Both 28-joint counts and more comprehensive joint counts (tender joint count-53, swollen joint count-44) were used. RESULTS: ACR/EULAR remission was present in 20.1% of the patients when using 28-joint counts and in 17.4% of the patients when applying more comprehensive joint counts. In 108 patients, the PGA score was >1 despite fulfilment of the remaining criteria (TJC28, SJC28 and CRP in mg/dl ≤1). Residual disease activity was observed in 31.5% (34/108) and median (interquartile range) scores on PGA, pain and fatigue were 2.4 (1.8-4.0), 2.0 (1.1-3.0) and 2.7 (1.3-5.0), respectively. Applying more comprehensive joint counts showed comparable results. In 19.5% (100/512) of patients, disease activity was absent (TJC53 = 0, SJC44 = 0, and CRP ≤1). In 41% (n = 41) of these patients, the PGA score was >1. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed moderate accuracy of the PGA to discriminate between fulfilment and no fulfilment of all remaining criteria. CONCLUSION: Frequently, patients did not meet the PGA criterion despite a good clinical disease state. Apparently the PGA is not solely influenced by RA disease activity. In patients with marked divergence between the PGA and objective clinical measurements, caution should be taken when applying the provisional ACR/EULAR definition of remission.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/patologia , Articulações/patologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto , Idoso , Artralgia/epidemiologia , Artralgia/patologia , Artrite Reumatoide/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Fadiga/epidemiologia , Fadiga/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Indução de Remissão , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Clin Rheumatol ; 27(8): 1021-8, 2008 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18350329

RESUMO

This prospective open-label pilot study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab and the relationship to antibodies against infliximab (IFX) in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had been treated previously with IFX and experienced treatment failure owing to lack or loss of response or intolerance. Patients self-administered adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week for 16 weeks, followed by maintenance therapy for up to Week 56. Measures of effectiveness included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, 28-joint Disease Activity Score, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index. Serum IFX concentrations, human antichimeric antibody against IFX (HACA), adalimumab serum concentrations, antiadalimumab antibody, and safety also were assessed. Of the 41 enrolled patients, 37 completed 16 weeks and 30 completed 56 weeks of treatment. Patients experienced clinically meaningful improvements in all measures of RA activity, with greater response rates observed for patients who had experienced loss of initial response to or intolerance of IFX. At Week 16, 46% of patients achieved an ACR20 and 28% achieved an ACR50; 61% achieved an at least moderate and 17% achieved a good EULAR response. Clinical benefit was maintained through Week 56 in all effectiveness parameters. Baseline HACA status did not significantly impact effectiveness. No new safety signals were observed; neither former IFX intolerance status nor baseline HACA status had a clinically relevant impact on adverse event frequency or severity. Adalimumab was effective and well-tolerated in patients with RA who previously failed IFX therapy, irrespective of reason for discontinuation and of HACA status.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/imunologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos/sangue , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Adalimumab , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/farmacocinética , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Feminino , Humanos , Infliximab , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Falha de Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA