Despite Excellent Test Characteristics of the cobas 4800 CT/NG Assay, Detection of Oropharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Remains Challenging.

Oropharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections and, especially, Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infections are common, but few commercial nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) specify extragenital samples for intended use. The test characteristics of the cobas 4800 CT/NG assay were evaluated for oropharyngeal swabs. The technical validation included analysis of the specificity, sensitivity, dynamic range, linearity, efficiency, and precision. The probability of detection curve combined with historical data enabled the estimation of potentially missed diagnoses. A clinical evaluation was performed on a subset of 2,798 clinical samples available from routine diagnostics. Results of the cobas 4800 were compared with those from in-house C. trachomatis/N. gonorrhoeae PCR assays. Discrepant samples were tested with resolver assays, and these results were considered decisive. No cross-reactivity was seen in the analytical specificity analysis. High linearity (R2 ≥ 0.983), efficiency (89% to 99%), and precision (cycle threshold [CT ] value of 0.1 to 0.9) were seen for both C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae The limit of detection in oropharyngeal samples was 3.2 × 102 inclusion-forming units (IFU)/ml for C. trachomatis and 6.7 × 102 CFU/ml for N. gonorrhoeae Estimates on potentially missed diagnoses were up to 7.2% for C. trachomatis and up to 24.7% for N. gonorrhoeae Clinical sensitivity and specificity were evaluated with 25 C. trachomatis-positive, 86 N. gonorrhoeae-positive, and 264 negative samples, resulting in 100% and 99.6% for C. trachomatis and 100% and 96.7% for N. gonorrhoeae, respectively. The findings in this study demonstrate the utility of the cobas 4800 CT/NG assay for oropharyngeal samples. Despite its being a highly accurate test, the range of reported CT values, especially for N. gonorrhoeae, suggests relatively low oropharyngeal loads. Hence, consistent detection over the full range of oropharyngeal loads could be impaired.

Analysis of two sequential SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks on a haematology-oncology ward and the role of infection prevention.

Two SARS-CoV-2 nosocomial outbreaks occurred on the haematology ward of our hospital. Patients on the ward were at high risk for severe infection because of their immunocompromised status. Whole Genome Sequencing proved transmission of a particular SARS-CoV-2 variant in each outbreak. The first outbreak (20 patients/31 healthcare workers (HCW)) occurred in November 2020 and was caused by a variant belonging to lineage B.1.221. At that time, there were still uncertainties on mode of transmission of SARS-CoV-2, and vaccines nor therapy were available. Despite HCW wearing II-R masks in all patient contacts and FFP-2 masks during aerosol generating procedures (AGP), the outbreak continued. Therefore, extra measures were introduced. Firstly, regular PCR-screening of asymptomatic patients and HCW; positive patients were isolated and positive HCW were excluded from work as a rule and they were only allowed to resume their work if a follow-up PCR CT-value was ≥30 and were asymptomatic or having only mild symptoms. Secondly, the use of FFP-2 masks was expanded to some long-lasting, close-contact, non-AGPs. After implementing these measures, the incidence of new cases declined gradually. Thirty-seven percent of patients died due to COVID-19. The second outbreak (10 patients/2 HCW) was caused by the highly transmissible omicron BA.1 variant and occurred in February 2022, where transmission occurred on shared rooms despite the extra infection control measures. It was controlled much faster, and the clinical impact was low as the majority of patients was vaccinated; no patients died and symptoms were relatively mild in both patients and HCW.