SER-109, an Oral Microbiome Therapy for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection.

BACKGROUND: Current therapies for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection do not address the disrupted microbiome, which supports C. difficile spore germination into toxin-producing bacteria. SER-109 is an investigational microbiome therapeutic composed of purified Firmicutes spores for the treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in which patients who had had three or more episodes of C. difficile infection (inclusive of the qualifying acute episode) received SER-109 or placebo (four capsules daily for 3 days) after standard-of-care antibiotic treatment. The primary efficacy objective was to show superiority of SER-109 as compared with placebo in reducing the risk of C. difficile infection recurrence up to 8 weeks after treatment. Diagnosis by toxin testing was performed at trial entry, and randomization was stratified according to age and antibiotic agent received. Analyses of safety, microbiome engraftment, and metabolites were also performed. RESULTS: Among the 281 patients screened, 182 were enrolled. The percentage of patients with recurrence of C. difficile infection was 12% in the SER-109 group and 40% in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.58; P<0.001 for a relative risk of <1.0; P<0.001 for a relative risk of <0.833). SER-109 led to less frequent recurrence than placebo in analyses stratified according to age stratum (relative risk, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.78] for patients <65 years of age and 0.36 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.72] for those ≥65 years) and antibiotic received (relative risk, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.79] with vancomycin and 0.09 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.63] with fidaxomicin). Most adverse events were mild to moderate and were gastrointestinal in nature, with similar numbers in the two groups. SER-109 dose species were detected as early as week 1 and were associated with bile-acid profiles that are known to inhibit C. difficile spore germination. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with symptom resolution of C. difficile infection after treatment with standard-of-care antibiotics, oral administration of SER-109 was superior to placebo in reducing the risk of recurrent infection. The observed safety profile of SER-109 was similar to that of placebo. (Funded by Seres Therapeutics; ECOSPOR III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03183128.).

Prevalence of Comorbid Factors in Patients With Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection in ECOSPOR III, a Randomized Trial of an Oral Microbiota-Based Therapeutic.

BACKGROUND: Although comorbidities are risk factors for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI), many clinical trials exclude patients with medical conditions such as malignancy or immunosuppression. In a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial (ECOSPOR III), fecal microbiota spores, live (VOWST, Seres Therapeutics; hereafter "VOS," formerly SER-109), an oral microbiota therapeutic, significantly reduced the risk of rCDI at week 8. We evaluated the efficacy of VOS compared with placebo in patients with comorbidities and other risk factors for rCDI. METHODS: Adults with rCDI were randomized to receive VOS or placebo (4 capsules daily for 3 days) following standard-of-care antibiotics. In this post hoc analysis, the rate of rCDI through week 8 was assessed in VOS-treated participants compared with placebo for subgroups including (i) Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score category (0, 1-2, 3-4, ≥5); (ii) baseline creatinine clearance (<30, 30-50, >50 to 80, or >80 mL/minute); (iii) number of CDI episodes, inclusive of the qualifying episode (3 and ≥4); (iv) exposure to non-CDI-targeted antibiotics after dosing; and (v) acid-suppressing medication use at baseline. RESULTS: Of 281 participants screened, 182 were randomized (59.9% female; mean age, 65.5 years). Comorbidities were common with a mean overall baseline age-adjusted CCI score of 4.1 (4.1 in the VOS arm and 4.2 in the placebo arm). Across all subgroups analyzed, VOS-treated participants had a lower relative risk of recurrence compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis, VOS reduced the risk of rCDI compared with placebo, regardless of baseline characteristics, concomitant medications, or comorbidities.

Pharmacological profile of ALKS 7119, an investigational compound evaluated for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: ALKS 7119 is a novel compound with in vitro affinity highest for the SERT, and for µ receptor, α1A -adrenoceptor, α1B -adrenoceptor, NMDA receptor and sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1. This first-in-human study evaluated safety and PK/PD effects of single ascending doses (SAD) of ALKS 7119 in healthy males and compared effects with neurotransmitter modulators with partially overlapping targets. METHODS: In 10 cohorts (n = 10 subjects each), PK, safety and PD (NeuroCart tests, measuring neurophysiologic effects [pupillometry, pharmaco-EEG (pEEG)], visuomotor coordination, alertness, [sustained] attention [saccadic peak velocity, adaptive tracking], subjective drug effects [VAS Bowdle and VAS Bond and Lader] and postural stability [body sway]) were evaluated. Neuroendocrine effects (cortisol, prolactin, growth hormone) were measured. Data were analysed over the 12-hour post-dose period using mixed-effects model for repeated measure (MMRM) with baseline as covariate. RESULTS: ALKS 7119 demonstrated linear PK and was generally well tolerated. QTcF interval increases of 30-60 ms compared to baseline were observed with ALKS 7119 doses of ≥50 mg without related adverse events. Significant increases in left and right pupil/iris ratio were observed at dose levels ≥50 mg (estimate of difference [95% CI], P-value) (0.04 [0.01; 0.07], P < .01) and (0.06 [0.03; 0.09], P = .01), respectively. From dose levels ≥50 mg significant increases (% change) of serum cortisol (51.7 [8.4; 112.3], P = .02) and prolactin (77.9 [34.2; 135.8], P < .01) were observed. CONCLUSION: In line with ALKS 7119's in vitro pharmacological profile, the clinical profile observed in this study is most comparable to SERT inhibition.

Size matters: the importance of particle size in a newly developed injectable formulation for the treatment of schizophrenia.

One of the challenges with initiating long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic regimens is achieving relevant drug levels quickly. After first injection of the LAI antipsychotic aripiprazole lauroxil (AL), the lag to reaching relevant plasma aripiprazole levels was initially addressed using supplemental oral aripiprazole for 21 days. A 1-day AL initiation regimen using a NanoCrystal® Dispersion formulation of AL (ALNCD; Aristada Initio®) combined with a single 30 mg dose of oral aripiprazole has been developed as an alternative approach. We compared the 1-day AL initiation regimen (ALNCD + 30 mg oral aripiprazole for 1 day) with the 21-day AL initiation regimen (AL + 15 mg/day of oral aripiprazole for 21 days) using kinetic modeling. Observed and modeled data demonstrate that the 1-day AL initiation regimen provides continuous aripiprazole exposure comparable to the 21-day AL initiation regimen. Each component of the 1-day AL initiation regimen (30 mg oral aripiprazole, ALNCD, and AL) contributes to aripiprazole plasma levels at different times, with oral aripiprazole predominating in the first week, then ALNCD and AL over time. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 study in patients with schizophrenia, the 1-day initiation regimen resulted in rapid achievement of relevant plasma aripiprazole levels comparable to those from the 21-day initiation regimen. Safety and tolerability of the 1-day regimen were consistent with the known profile of aripiprazole. Each part of the 1-day initiation regimen, together with AL, is necessary for continuous aripiprazole exposure from treatment initiation until the next regularly scheduled AL injection is administered.

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of a 1-Day Treatment Initiation Option for Starting Long-Acting Aripiprazole Lauroxil for Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Aripiprazole lauroxil (AL), a long-acting injectable antipsychotic for the treatment of schizophrenia, requires 21 days of oral aripiprazole supplementation upon initiation. We report findings from a phase 1 study investigating a nanocrystalline milled dispersion of AL (ALNCD) as a potential 1-day initiation regimen. The 1-day initiation regimen is designed to enable rapid achievement of plasma aripiprazole concentrations that are comparable with the 21-day oral initiation regimen. Here, a 6-month pharmacokinetic study compared 2 different initiation regimens for starting AL. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive 1 of 4 treatments consisting of the 1-day (single ALNCD injection + one 30-mg dose of oral aripiprazole on day 1 only) or the 21-day (15-mg daily dose of oral aripiprazole for 21 days) initiation regimen, each combined with a starting AL dose of either 441 mg or 882 mg. RESULTS: In total, 133/161 patients completed the study. The pharmacokinetic profile of the 1-day initiation regimen was comparable to the 21-day initiation regimen; both achieved aripiprazole concentrations in the therapeutic range within 4 days and remained in a comparable concentration range during treatment initiation. Common adverse events (≥5.0%) were injection-site pain, headache, increased weight, insomnia, dyspepsia, and anxiety. Nine akathisia events occurred (4 events in 4 patients and 5 events in 2 patients in the 1-day and 21-day initiation regimen groups, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The 1-day initiation regimen resulted in plasma aripiprazole concentrations consistent with the 21-day initiation regimen. Therefore, a single dose of ALNCD with a single 30-mg oral dose of aripiprazole provides an alternative initiation regimen for starting AL.

Extended Follow-up of Microbiome Therapeutic SER-109 Through 24 Weeks for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection in a Randomized Clinical Trial.

This study examines adverse events and durability of response of SER-109, an investigational microbiome therapeutic comprised of purified Firmicutes spores, compared with placebo for Clostridioides difficile infection.

Lack of clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between warfarin and the antisense oligonucleotide mipomersen.

Mipomersen is a second-generation antisense oligonucleotide indicated as an adjunct therapy for homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH). Warfarin is commonly prescribed for a variety of cardiac disorders in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia population, and concurrent use of warfarin and mipomersen is likely. This open-label, single-sequence 2-period phase 1 study in healthy subjects evaluated the potential drug-drug interactions between mipomersen and warfarin. The subjects received a single oral 25 mg dose of warfarin alone on day 1, and after a 7-day washout period, received 200 mg mipomersen alone subcutaneously every other day on days 8-12, and received both concurrently on day 14. Coadministration of mipomersen did not change the pharmacodynamics (international normalized ratio, prothrombin time, and activated partial thromboplastin time) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of warfarin. There were no clinically significant changes in the PK of mipomersen with concurrent administration of warfarin. There were no events indicative of an increase in bleeding tendency when warfarin was coadministered with mipomersen, and the adverse event profile of mipomersen did not appear to be altered in combination with warfarin, as compared with that of the respective reference treatment. The combination of these 2 medications appeared to be safe and well tolerated. These results suggest that the dosage adjustment of warfarin or mipomersen is not expected to be necessary with coadministration.

Pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of mipomersen in healthy Japanese volunteers and comparison with Western subjects.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and dose proportionality of mipomersen after single subcutaneous (SC) administration to Japanese healthy subjects; and to compare the PK profiles of Japanese and Western subjects. METHODS: 20 healthy first-generation Japanese male subjects were enrolled into one of three treatment cohorts (50, 100 and 200 mg SC) in a dose-escalation design. Within each cohort, subjects were randomized in a 4 : 1 ratio to receive mipomersen or placebo. RESULTS: Mipomersen was absorbed rapidly after SC administration; median tmax varied between 2 and 3 hours. After reaching peak levels, plasma concentrations of mipomersen decayed multiphasically with an initial distribution t1/2 in several hours and a terminal t1/2 of 261 - 393 hours. Mean Cmax increased in a dose-linear manner while all mean AUC from time 0 to different cut points increased slightly more than dose proportionally. Although mean terminal t1/2 varied in the dose range tested, it did not show dose-dependence. The PK profiles of mipomersen in Japanese subjects are similar to those observed in Western subjects. A single SC dose of 50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg mipomersen was well tolerated by male Japanese subjects. CONCLUSION: Single SC doses of 50 - 200 mg were safe and well tolerated when administered to Japanese subjects. Comparison of PK between Japanese and Western subjects does not support any need for dose adjustment in Japanese population in future clinical development.

Integrated Safety and Efficacy Analyses of Phase 3 Trials of a Microbiome Therapeutic for Recurrent CDI.

INTRODUCTION: Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) often occurs after standard-of-care antibiotics. VOWST oral spores (VOS, previously SER-109), an FDA-approved orally administered microbiome therapeutic, is indicated to prevent rCDI following antibiotics for rCDI. OBJECTIVE, DESIGN, AND PATIENTS: To evaluate safety and efficacy of VOS from two phase 3 trials, (randomized, placebo-controlled [ECOSPOR III: NCT03183128] and open-label, single arm [ECOSPOR IV: NCT03183141]) of 349 adults with rCDI and prevalent comorbidities. METHODS: VOS or placebo [ECOSPOR III only] (4 capsules once daily for 3 days). Integrated analysis of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) collected through week 8; serious TEAEs and TEAEs of special interest collected through week 24; and rates of rCDI (toxin-positive diarrhea requiring treatment) evaluated through weeks 8 and 24. RESULTS: TEAEs were mostly mild or moderate and gastrointestinal. Most common treatment-related TEAEs were flatulence, abdominal pain and distension, fatigue, and diarrhea. There were 11 deaths (3.2%) and 48 patients (13.8%) with serious TEAEs, none treatment-related. The rCDI rate through week 8 was 9.5% (95% CI 6.6-13.0) and remained low through 24 weeks (15.2%; 95% CI 11.6-19.4). Safety and rCDI rates were consistent across subgroups including age, renal impairment/failure, diabetes, and immunocompromise/immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: VOS was well tolerated and rates of rCDI remained low through week 24 including in those with comorbidities. These data support the potential benefit of VOS following antibiotics to prevent recurrence in high-risk patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03183128 and NCT03183141.

Safety and Tolerability of SER-109 as an Investigational Microbiome Therapeutic in Adults With Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Phase 3, Open-Label, Single-Arm Trial.

Importance: A safe and effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is urgently needed. Antibiotics kill toxin-producing bacteria but do not repair the disrupted microbiome, which promotes spore germination and infection recurrence. Objectives: To evaluate the safety and rate of CDI recurrence after administration of investigational microbiome therapeutic SER-109 through 24 weeks. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 3, single-arm, open-label trial (ECOSPOR IV) was conducted at 72 US and Canadian outpatient sites from October 2017 to April 2022. Adults aged 18 years or older with recurrent CDI were enrolled in 2 cohorts: (1) rollover patients from the ECOSPOR III trial who had CDI recurrence diagnosed by toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and (2) patients with at least 1 CDI recurrence (diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction [PCR] or toxin EIA), inclusive of their acute infection at study entry. Interventions: SER-109 given orally as 4 capsules daily for 3 days following symptom resolution after antibiotic treatment for CDI. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were safety, measured as the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in all patients receiving any amount of SER-109, and cumulative rates of recurrent CDI (toxin-positive diarrhea requiring treatment) through week 24 in the intent-to-treat population. Results: Of 351 patients screened, 263 were enrolled (180 [68.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 64.0 [15.7] years); 29 were in cohort 1 and 234 in cohort 2. Seventy-seven patients (29.3%) were enrolled with their first CDI recurrence. Overall, 141 patients (53.6%) had TEAEs, which were mostly mild to moderate and gastrointestinal. There were 8 deaths (3.0%) and 33 patients (12.5%) with serious TEAEs; none were considered treatment related by the investigators. Overall, 23 patients (8.7%; 95% CI, 5.6%-12.8%) had recurrent CDI at week 8 (4 of 29 [13.8%; 95% CI, 3.9%-31.7%] in cohort 1 and 19 of 234 [8.1%; 95% CI, 5.0%-12.4%] in cohort 2), and recurrent CDI rates remained low through 24 weeks (36 patients [13.7%; 95% CI, 9.8%-18.4%]). At week 8, recurrent CDI rates in patients with a first recurrence were similarly low (5 of 77 [6.5%; 95% CI, 2.1%-14.5%]) as in patients with 2 or more recurrences (18 of 186 [9.7%; 95% CI, 5.8%-14.9%]). Analyses by select baseline characteristics showed consistently low recurrent CDI rates in patients younger than 65 years vs 65 years or older (5 of 126 [4.0%; 95% CI, 1.3%-9.0%] vs 18 of 137 [13.1%; 95% CI, 8.0%-20.0%]) and patients enrolled based on positive PCR results (3 of 69 [4.3%; 95% CI, 0.9%-12.2%]) vs those with positive toxin EIA results (20 of 192 [10.4%; 95% CI, 6.5%-15.6%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this trial, oral SER-109 was well tolerated in a patient population with recurrent CDI and prevalent comorbidities. The rate of recurrent CDI was low regardless of the number of prior recurrences, demographics, or diagnostic approach, supporting the beneficial impact of SER-109 for patients with CDI. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03183141.

SER-109: An Oral Investigational Microbiome Therapeutic for Patients with Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection (rCDI).

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is classified as an urgent health threat by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and affects nearly 500,000 Americans annually. Approximately 20−25% of patients with a primary infection experience a recurrence, and the risk of recurrence increases with subsequent episodes to greater than 40%. The leading risk factor for CDI is broad-spectrum antibiotics, which leads to a loss of microbial diversity and impaired colonization resistance. Current FDA-approved CDI treatment strategies target toxin or toxin-producing bacteria, but do not address microbiome disruption, which is key to the pathogenesis of recurrent CDI. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) reduces the risk of recurrent CDI through the restoration of microbial diversity. However, FDA safety alerts describing hospitalizations and deaths related to pathogen transmission have raised safety concerns with the use of unregulated and unstandardized donor-derived products. SER-109 is an investigational oral microbiome therapeutic composed of purified spore-forming Firmicutes. SER-109 was superior to a placebo in reducing CDI recurrence at Week 8 (12% vs. 40%, respectively; p < 0.001) in adults with a history of recurrent CDI with a favorable observed safety profile. Here, we discuss the role of the microbiome in CDI pathogenesis and the clinical development of SER-109, including its rigorous manufacturing process, which mitigates the risk of pathogen transmission. Additionally, we discuss compositional and functional changes in the gastrointestinal microbiome in patients with recurrent CDI following treatment with SER-109 that are critical to a sustained clinical response.

Application of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Predict the Effect of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Olanzapine and Samidorphan Given in Combination.

BACKGROUND: A combination of the antipsychotic olanzapine and opioid receptor antagonist samidorphan (OLZ/SAM) is in development for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder. The effect of severe renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of olanzapine and samidorphan after a single oral dose of OLZ/SAM was evaluated in a clinical study. Complementary to the clinical findings, physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling was used to assess the effects of varying degrees of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of olanzapine and samidorphan. METHODS: A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for OLZ/SAM was developed and validated by comparing model-simulated data with observed clinical data. The model was applied to predict changes in olanzapine and samidorphan pharmacokinetics after administration of OLZ/SAM in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment relative to age-matched controls with normal renal function. RESULTS: The model predicted 1.5- and 2.2-fold increases in olanzapine and samidorphan area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), respectively, after a single dose of OLZ/SAM in subjects with severe renal impairment vs controls, which was consistent with results from the clinical study. Application of the model prediction indicated increases in steady-state olanzapine AUC of 1.2-, 1.5-, and 1.6-fold, and samidorphan AUC of 1.4-, 1.8-, and 2.2-fold, in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively, relative to healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling extended the findings from a clinical study in severe renal impairment to other untested clinical scenarios; these data could be of interest to clinicians treating patients with renal impairment.

Using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling for predicting the effects of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of olanzapine and samidorphan given as a combination tablet.

A combination of olanzapine and samidorphan (OLZ/SAM) was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of patients with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder. The effects of moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of olanzapine and samidorphan after a single dose of OLZ/SAM were characterized in a clinical study. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling was used to extend the clinical findings to predict the effects of varying degrees of hepatic impairment on the PKs of olanzapine and samidorphan. A previously developed PBPK model for OLZ/SAM was refined to recover the observed pharmacokinetic differences between individuals with moderate hepatic impairment and healthy controls. The optimized model was applied to predict changes in olanzapine and samidorphan PKs after multiple once-daily doses of OLZ/SAM in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment relative to healthy controls. Modifications to model parameters, including absorption rate constant and fraction unbound to plasma protein, were made to recover the observed change in the PKs of olanzapine and samidorphan in individuals with moderate hepatic impairment. In applying the optimized model, mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment were predicted to increase steady-state total systemic exposures by 1.1-, 1.5-, and 1.6-fold, respectively, for olanzapine, and by 1.2-, 1.9-, and 2.3-fold, respectively, for samidorphan. PBPK modeling allowed for prediction of untested clinical scenarios of varying degrees of hepatic impairment in lieu of additional clinical studies.

Quantitative prediction and clinical observation of a CYP3A inhibitor-based drug-drug interactions with MLN3897, a potent C-C chemokine receptor-1 antagonist.

A novel in vitro model was recently developed in our laboratories for the prediction of magnitude of clinical pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs), based on reversible hepatic cytochrome P450 (P450) inhibition. This approach, using inhibition data from human hepatocytes incubated in human plasma, and quantitative P450 phenotyping data from hepatic microsomal incubations, successfully predicted DDIs for 15 marketed drugs with ketoconazole, a strong competitive inhibitor of CYP3A4/5, generally used to demonstrate a "worst-case scenario" for CYP3A inhibition. In addition, this approach was successfully extended to DDI predictions with the moderate competitive CYP3A inhibitor fluconazole for nine marketed drugs. In the current report, the general applicability of the model has been demonstrated by prospectively predicting the degree of inhibition and then conducting DDI studies in the clinic for an investigational CCR1 antagonist MLN3897, which is cleared predominantly by CYP3A. The clinical studies involved treatment of healthy volunteers (n = 17-20), in a crossover design, with ketoconazole (200 mg b.i.d.) or fluconazole (400 mg once a day), while receiving MLN3897. Administration of MLN3897 and ketoconazole led to an average 8.28-fold increase in area under the curve of plasma concentration-time plot (AUC) of MLN3897 at steady state, compared with the 8.33-fold increase predicted from the in vitro data. Similarly for fluconazole, an average increase of 3.93-fold in AUC was observed for MLN3897 in comparison with a predicted value of 3.26-fold. Thus, our model reliably predicted the exposure changes for MLN3897 in interaction studies with competitive CYP3A inhibitors in humans, further strengthening the utility of our in vitro model.

Sources of variability in ketoconazole inhibition of human cytochrome P450 3A in vitro.

Despite the extensive use of ketoconazole as an index inhibitor of human cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) isoforms in vitro, literature reports of the quantitative inhibitory potency of ketoconazole are highly variable. In 51 published studies reporting 76 values of ketoconazole inhibition constants (K(i)) versus in vitro clearance of 31 different CYP3A substrates, the K(i) values ranged from 0.001 µM to 25 µM. The geometric mean was 0.1 µM (90% confidence interval: 0.07 to 0.15 µM), and the median was 0.08 µM. Even for one specific substrate metabolized to one specific metabolite (midazolam α-hydroxylation), variability was still extensive (K(i) range: 0.004-0.18 µM). Only about 20% of overall variability in K(i) was explained by a combination of incubation, duration, and microsomal protein concentration. The remaining variation is unexplained, but could be attributable to factors such as: in vitro clearance by non-CYP3A pathways; incorrect assignment of inhibition mechanism; and variable relative content of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in different microsomal preparations. However, the role of these factors still is not established. Until sources of variation are more clearly defined, variability can be minimized by use of low microsomal protein concentrations, short incubation periods, and data analysis procedures that use untransformed reaction velocities and inhibition models that allow for mixed competitive-noncompetitive mechanisms.

Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Predicting Drug Interactions of a Combination of Olanzapine and Samidorphan.

A combination of the antipsychotic olanzapine and the opioid receptor antagonist samidorphan (OLZ/SAM) is intended to provide the antipsychotic efficacy of olanzapine while mitigating olanzapine-associated weight gain. As cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 and CYP3A4 are the major enzymes involved in metabolism of olanzapine and samidorphan, respectively, physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling was applied to predict any drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential between olanzapine and samidorphan or between OLZ/SAM and CYP3A4/CYP1A2 inhibitors/inducers. A PBPK model for OLZ/SAM was developed and validated by comparing model-simulated data with observed clinical study data. Based on model-based simulations, no DDI between olanzapine and samidorphan is expected when administered as OLZ/SAM. CYP3A4 inhibition is predicted to have a weak effect on samidorphan exposure and negligible effect on olanzapine exposure. CYP3A4 induction is predicted to reduce both samidorphan and olanzapine exposure. CYP1A2 inhibition or induction is predicted to increase or decrease, respectively, olanzapine exposure only.

Combination of Olanzapine and Samidorphan Has No Clinically Significant Effect on the Pharmacokinetics of Lithium or Valproate.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia and, either as monotherapy or as an adjunct to lithium or valproate, for bipolar I disorder. Multiple daily doses of olanzapine do not affect the pharmacokinetics of lithium or valproate; therefore, concomitant olanzapine administration does not require dosage adjustment of lithium or valproate. ALKS 3831, a combination of olanzapine and the opioid receptor antagonist samidorphan (OLZ/SAM), is currently under development to provide the established antipsychotic efficacy of olanzapine while mitigating olanzapine-induced weight gain. Olanzapine is recognized as one of the most efficacious antipsychotics; however, the benefits of olanzapine are offset by its propensity to cause significant weight gain, which may lead to long-term metabolic sequelae. This study evaluated the effects of multiple daily doses of OLZ/SAM on the pharmacokinetics of lithium or valproate in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was an open-label, single-sequence, two-cohort study (ALKS3831-B101) conducted at a single center in the USA. Thirty-four healthy adult subjects were assigned (1:1) to receive lithium carbonate 300-mg tablets (cohort 1) or divalproex sodium 500-mg tablets (cohort 2), once every 12 h on days 1-7. Once-daily oral doses of OLZ/SAM (olanzapine 10 mg/samidorphan 10 mg) bilayer tablets were administered on days 8-18. Subjects resumed every 12-h doses of lithium or valproate concomitantly with the once-daily oral doses of OLZ/SAM on days 12-18. Plasma concentrations of lithium and valproic acid (valproate) were quantified in blood samples collected prior to and up to 12 h after lithium or valproate dose administration on days 7 and 18. Pharmacokinetic parameters of lithium and valproate, including maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over a 12-h dosing interval, were calculated. The ratio of geometric means of maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over a 12-h dosing interval in the presence and absence of OLZ/SAM, and its two-sided 90% confidence intervals, were derived from a mixed-effects model. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: The 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of geometric means, in the presence vs. absence of OLZ/SAM, were within the equivalence interval of 80-125% for both maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over a 12-h dosing interval of lithium and of valproate. The safety profiles of lithium or valproate co-administered with OLZ/SAM were consistent with what has been previously reported for lithium or valproate. The safety profile of OLZ/SAM was consistent with that observed in previous clinical studies with OLZ/SAM. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with previously reported findings on olanzapine, administration of multiple doses of OLZ/SAM did not have a clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of lithium or valproate. Co-administration of OLZ/SAM and lithium or valproate was generally well tolerated; the safety profile of OLZ/SAM was consistent with that observed in previous clinical studies.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of a 2-Month Dose Interval Regimen of the Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Aripiprazole Lauroxil: Results From a 44-Week Phase I Study.

BACKGROUND: Aripiprazole lauroxil (AL) is a long-acting injectable antipsychotic approved for treatment of schizophrenia in adults. Approved AL doses and dosing regimens include 441 mg monthly, 662 mg monthly, and 882 mg monthly or every 6 weeks (q6wk), as well as the most recently approved dose, 1064 mg, administered every 2 months. OBJECTIVE: Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of an AL regimen with a dose interval of every 2 months (1064 mg) were compared with two other regimens available as monthly and q6wk options. METHODS: This study evaluated pharmacokinetics of AL given at a higher dosage strength (1064 mg) and at a longer dose interval (every 8 weeks [q8wk]) than previously studied. Patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder entering this 44-week, phase I, open-label, multicenter study had no recent exposure to aripiprazole and were maintained on other oral antipsychotics throughout the study. Patients were randomized to one of three AL dose regimens for 24 weeks (four 1064-mg injections [q8wk], five 882-mg injections [q6wk], or seven 441-mg injections [q4wk], with the last AL exposure at week 24). Oral aripiprazole was prohibited. Patients were followed for an additional 20 weeks to assess terminal aripiprazole plasma concentrations and ongoing safety. Plasma concentration samples were obtained at regular intervals to provide pharmacokinetic data for the duration of AL exposure and to measure persistence of plasma aripiprazole concentrations after AL discontinuation. RESULTS: Eligible patients received AL 1064 mg q8wk (n = 35), 882 mg q6wk (n = 34), or 441 mg q4wk (n = 35). Overall, 103/104 (99.0%) patients were taking concomitant non-aripiprazole oral antipsychotic medications during the study. All three AL dose regimens provided continuous exposure to aripiprazole. Mean aripiprazole concentrations from the 1064-mg q8wk regimen were comparable to the 882-mg q6wk regimen and higher than the 441-mg q4wk regimen. Overall incidence by group of any adverse events (AEs) throughout the study was 68.6% (1064 mg q8wk), 50.0% (882 mg q6wk), and 65.7% (441 mg q4wk). The most common AE across regimens was injection-site pain (range 8.6%-11.4%). Serious AEs were reported by eight patients (all but one [increased psychosis in one patient, 441-mg q4wk group] considered unrelated to study drug). Discontinuations due to AEs were reported for 2.9%, 11.8%, and 5.7% of patients receiving the 8-, 6-, and 4-week regimens, respectively. AEs of akathisia, dyskinesia, and dystonia occurred in 2.9%, 8.6%, and 5.7% of patients in the 1064-mg q8wk group, 8.8%, 0%, and 2.9% in the 882-mg q6wk group, and 8.6%, 0%, and 0% in the 441-mg q4wk group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AL 1064 mg q8wk provided continuous exposure to aripiprazole throughout the 8-week dosing interval and had a safety profile consistent with the 4- and 6-week regimens. These findings were used to support FDA approval of the 1064-mg dose administered every 2 months. REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02320032.

Combination of olanzapine and samidorphan has no clinically relevant effects on ECG parameters, including the QTc interval: Results from a phase 1 QT/QTc study.

BACKGROUND: OLZ/SAM is a combination of olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic, and samidorphan, an opioid antagonist, and is in development for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder. OLZ/SAM is under development with the intent to provide the established antipsychotic efficacy of olanzapine while mitigating olanzapine-associated weight gain. This thorough QT study assessed the effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of OLZ/SAM on cardiac repolarization in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo- and positive (moxifloxacin)-controlled, parallel-group study, 100 patients aged 18 to 60 years with stable schizophrenia were randomized 3:2 to the active arm and control arm. Subjects in the active arm received a therapeutic dose of 10/10 mg (10 mg olanzapine/10 mg samidorphan) on days 2-4, 20/20 mg on days 5-8, and a supratherapeutic dose of 30/30 mg (1.5 times and 3 times the maximum recommended daily dose of olanzapine and samidorphan, respectively) on days 9-13, and moxifloxacin-matched placebo on days 1 and 14. Subjects in the control arm received a single oral dose of moxifloxacin 400 mg and moxifloxacin-matched placebo on days 1 and 14 in a nested crossover fashion, along with OLZ/SAM-matched placebo on days 2-13. Serial electrocardiograms (ECGs) and simultaneous plasma drug concentrations were determined pre- and post-dose. The effects of OLZ/SAM on heart rate and ECG parameters (QT interval with Fridericia's correction [QTcF], PR and QRS interval, and T-wave morphology) were evaluated, and the primary endpoint was change from baseline in QTcF (ΔQTcF). The relationship between drug concentration and ΔQTcF (C-QTc) was evaluated using a linear mixed-effects model. Safety monitoring included adverse events reporting and clinical laboratory assessments. RESULTS: Based on primary analysis using C-QTc modeling, no clinically concerning QTc effect (ie, placebo-corrected ΔQTcF [ΔΔQTcF] ≥10 msec) was observed across the OLZ/SAM dose range tested (10/10 to 30/30 mg), up to olanzapine and samidorphan concentrations of approximately 110 and 160 ng/mL, respectively. The slope (90% confidence interval [CI]) of the C-QTc relationship was shallow and not significant for either olanzapine or samidorphan (0.03 [-0.01, 0.08] and 0.01 [-0.01, 0.04] msec per ng/mL, respectively). The predicted ΔΔQTcF (90% CI) was 2.33 (-2.72, 7.38) and 1.38 (-3.37, 6.12) msec at the observed geometric mean maximal concentration (Cmax) of olanzapine (62.6 ng/mL) and samidorphan (75.1 ng/mL) on day 13, respectively. The study's assay sensitivity was confirmed by the C-QTc relationship of moxifloxacin. OLZ/SAM was well tolerated at all doses; adverse events occurring in >5% of subjects treated with OLZ/SAM were somnolence, weight increased, nausea, and dizziness. CONCLUSIONS: This thorough QT study in patients with stable schizophrenia demonstrated that OLZ/SAM, in doses and plasma concentrations up to supratherapeutic levels, does not have a clinically relevant effect on ECG parameters, including QT/QTc prolongation.

Role of NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase and cytochrome-b5/NADH-b5 reductase in variability of CYP3A activity in human liver microsomes.

NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase (CPR) and cytochrome-b(5) (b(5)) together with NADH-b(5) reductase (b(5)R) play important roles in cytochrome P450 3A-mediated drug metabolism via electron transfer. However, it is not clear whether variability in expression of these accessory proteins contributes to the known interindividual variability in CYP3A activity. CPR and b(5) were measured in human liver microsomes (HLMs) by spectrophotometry and immunoblotting. HLMs from elderly (>or=46 years) male donors (n=11) averaged 27% (P=0.034) and 41% (P=0.011) lower CPR levels than young (