Low titer A plasma in three AB patients for therapeutic plasma exchange.

BACKGROUND: Currently, low titer A plasma is used on a routine basis in bleeding trauma patients of unknown AB type. Three AB non-bleeding apheresis patients are presented here who safely received a combination of AB and low titer A plasma during therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). One control AB patient received AB plasma only. METHODS: Data was obtained retrospectively on number of procedures, volume replaced, total plasma, and A plasma volumes including hemolysis laboratory data. Average A plasma volume and % of A plasma out of total plasma volume used were calculated. RESULTS: Two female AB patients were treated for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) with TPE and a third female AB patient was treated for microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. Patient 1 received a total of 12 procedures, 10/12 with AB+A plasma (average 916.3 ±84.6 mL). Patient 2 received a total of 12 procedures, 4/12 with AB+A plasma (average 1210.5 ±27.9 mL). Patient 3 received a total of six procedures, four out of six procedures with AB+A plasma (average 1009.8 ±80.3 mL). Patient 4, control, received AB plasma only. Percent of A plasma volume exchanged ranged between 23.8% and 47.8%. Haptoglobin, LDH, hemoglobin, and total bilirubin were monitored and trends were comparable with the control patient. The patients had a negative follow up direct antiglobulin test, adequate platelet recovery and a favorable clinical outcome with treatments. CONCLUSIONS: TPE was effectively performed without evidence of increased hemolysis using up to 47.8% of low titer A plasma. This approach can reduce strains on limited supplies of AB plasma whereas providing a vital treatment alternative for AB patients undergoing TPE with plasma replacement.

Perception of low-titer group A plasma and potential barriers to using this product: A blood center's experience serving community and academic hospitals.

BACKGROUND: To alleviate the shortage of AB plasma, an alternative plasma product, low-titer group A plasma (LTGAP), is now available. The product is indicated for emergency transfusions when the patient's blood group has not been identified. The product's defining anti-B titers vary across institutions, and at our blood center we define <1:100 as low-titer. METHODS: We created two surveys and emailed them to hospital blood bank managers, supervisors, and medical directors who currently use LTGAP and those that have not ordered it. We calculated the amount of LTGAP that met our <1:100 cutoff. We searched our inventory database to obtain sales of LTGAP, AB, and all other types of plasma in 2014. RESULTS: We learned from the surveys that the product is safe and being used as indicated for only life or limb-threatening emergencies until patient's blood group is known and specific products can be provided. Most common reasons for not using LTGAP were lack of need in non-trauma hospitals and limiting capabilities in blood bank software. Although sales of LTGAP increased by ~5% by end of the first year since introduction, sales of AB plasma remained relatively steady. CONCLUSION: LTGAP appears to be a safe alternative to group AB plasma for emergency indications. By reviewing our percentage of group A plasma units that meet our low-titer cutoff and the current interest for the product, we can reduce the amount of units we titer each day by ~30% and can readjust that amount if there is increased interest. Besides lack of familiarity and limitations in computer software to incorporate LTGAP, the steady demand for AB plasma can potentially be attributed to trauma centers ordering more AB plasma than needed and potentially wasting it in nonurgent cases to avoid outdating the product and lack of institutional guidelines on when to switch from AB to type-specific plasma resulting in excess AB plasma being transfused.