Three and twelve-month analysis of the PROM-Q study: comparison of patient-reported outcome measures using the BREAST-Q questionnaire in pre- vs. sub-pectoral implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is being increasingly performed with implant placed above the pectoral muscle (pre-pectoral), instead of below the pectoral muscle (sub-pectoral). Currently, there is a lack of comparative data on clinical and patient-perceived outcomes between pre- vs. sub-pectoral IBR. We investigated whether this difference in surgical approach influenced clinical or patient-perceived outcomes. METHODS: This prospective non-randomised longitudinal cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04842240) recruited patients undergoing immediate IBR at the Leeds Breast Unit (Sep 2019-Sep 2021). Data collection included patient characteristics and post-operative complications. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures were collected using the BREAST-Q questionnaire at baseline, 2 weeks, 3- and 12-months post-surgery. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients underwent IBR (46 patients pre-pectoral; 59% vs. 32 patients sub-pectoral; 41%). Similar complication rates were observed (15.2% pre-pectoral vs. 9.4% sub-pectoral; p = 0.44). Overall implant loss rate was 3.8% (6.5% pre-pectoral vs. 0% sub-pectoral; p = 0.13). Respective median Breast-Q scores for pre- and sub-pectoral IBR at 3 months were: breast satisfaction (58 vs. 48; p = 0.01), psychosocial well-being (60 vs. 57; p = 0.9), physical well-being (68 vs. 76; p = 0.53), and Animation Q scores (73 vs. 76; p = 0.45). Respective Breast-Q scores at 12 months were: breast satisfaction (58 vs. 53; p = 0.3), psychosocial well-being (59 vs. 60; p = 0.9), physical well-being (68 vs. 78; p = 0.18), and Animation Q scores (69 vs. 73; p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates equivalent clinical and patient-perceived outcomes between pre- and sub-pectoral IBR. The study findings can be utilised to aid informed decision making regarding either surgical option.

Extracting big data from the internet to support the development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast implant illness: a proof of concept study.

PURPOSE: Individuals with health conditions often use online patient forums to share their experiences. These patient data are freely available and have rarely been used in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) research. Web scraping, the automated identification and coding of webpage data, can be employed to collect patient experiences for PRO research. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of using web scraping to support the development of a new PRO measure for breast implant illness (BII). METHODS: Nine publicly available BII-specific web forums were chosen post-consultation with two prominent BII advocacy leaders. The Python Selenium and Pandas packages were used to automate extraction of de-identified text from the individual posts/comments into a spreadsheet. Data were coded using a line-by-line approach and constant comparison was used to create top-level domains and sub-domains. RESULTS: 6362 unique codes were identified and organized into four top-level domains of information needs, symptom experiences, life impact of BII, and care experiences. Information needs of women included seeking/sharing information pre-breast implant surgery, post-breast implant surgery, while contemplating explant surgery, and post-explant surgery. Symptoms commonly described by women included fatigue, brain fog, and musculoskeletal symptoms. Many comments described BII's impact on daily activities and psychosocial wellbeing. Lastly, some comments described negative care experiences and experiences related to advocating for themselves to providers. CONCLUSION: This proof-of-concept study demonstrated the feasibility of employing web scraping as a cost-effective, efficient method to understand the experiences of women with BII. These data will be used to inform the development of a BII-specific PROM.

Breast Implant Illness Through a Psychiatric Lens.

Since their introduction in the 1960's, the safety of silicone breast implants has remained contentious due to concerns regarding carcinogenicity as well as a growing array of adverse psychiatric symptoms, which have now been termed 'Breast Implant Illness.' This article aims to explore the merits of a psychiatric approach to treating Breast Implant Illness by outlining how it is defined by psychiatric symptoms and categorized alongside other psychiatric illnesses. Furthermore, it is unclear whether the pathology of Breast Implant Illness is purely medical or psychiatric. However, the efficacy of the medical approach to treatment through a process called explantation, which involves removal of the implant and surrounding scar tissue, or capsule, is not strongly supported by existing data. A psychiatric approach to treatment, in conjunction with explanation, thus holds potential in remedying the novel and poorly understood Breast Implant Illness.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Contextualizing the Impact of Pop Culture on Breast Implant Illness and its Medical Relevance.

INTRODUCTION: Despite a lack of data demonstrating causation, there is growing concern over breast implants and systemic illness. This study examines the impact of rising public interest in breast implant illness (BII) and its implications on breast implant removals (BIR). METHODS: A Google Trends (GT) analysis of each year between 2010 and 2022 was performed globally, and then separately for the United States alone (US), using the search terms "capsular contracture," "breast implant illness," and "breast implant(s) removal". Linear regression was performed to determine significant correlations. Data on BII-related Facebook advocacy groups, relevant pop culture events, numbers of BIR surgeries, and number of BII-related publications were collected and analyzed alongside GT data to determine relevance. RESULTS: For global GT, there was a significant relationship between "breast implant illness" and "breast implant(s) removal" in 2016 (R2=0.62, ß =0.33, p<0.01), 2020 (R2=0.53, ß =0.23, p=0.01), and 2022 (R2=0.60, ß =0.44, p=0.01). In the US, 2016 (R2=0.53, ß =1.75, p=0.01) 2018 (R2=0.61, ß =1.93, p<0.01) and 2020 (R2=0.72, ß=0.91, p<0.01) were significant. In 2020, "capsular contracture" and "breast implant(s) removal" was significant in the US (R2=0.58, ß=0.4, p=0.01). In 2016, Facebook was the platform for the largest BII advocacy group and in 2020 YouTube was the platform for the first BII documentary and TEDx talk. From 2010 to 2020, PubMed publications containing "ASIA" and "BII" increased 24-fold and ASPS reports on BIR rose 70%. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that BII is a topic of global concern and has implications on both academic medicine and clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Comprehensive Systematic Review of Breast Implant Illness: Symptoms, Management, and Long-Term Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation using silicone implants is common, with over 300,000 annual US surgeries. It was initially approved in 1962, there were safety concerns with the use of silicone implants, leading to a 1992-2006 FDA moratorium. Recently, Breast Implant Illness (BII) was described as a cluster of symptoms associated with silicone implants, with a lack of diagnostic criteria, which increased the likelihood of implant removal and a variety of treatment options. This comprehensive review aims to shed light on the extent, symptoms, management, and outcomes of BII. METHODS: Multiple electronic databases were systematically searched in May 2023 for studies on Breast Implant Illness utilizing terms related to BII and its symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment. Out of 1204 studies, 20 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for the included cohort prospective and retrospective studies, and the tool for evaluating the methodological quality of case reports and case series were utilized during quality assessment. RESULTS: There were 20 papers on Breast Implant Illness published between 1995 and 2022, including a peak of papers published in 2020 and 2022. The majority of the studies came from the USA, with a variety of research methods, including case reports. Reports of arthralgia and fatigue were common findings. These symptoms were frequently alleviated by surgical procedures such as en bloc explantation and capsulectomy, highlighting the intricacy of the problem and the need for individualized treatment plans. CONCLUSION: The review underscores the critical need for further research into BII, advocating for a multidisciplinary strategy that prioritizes patient safety, informed decision-making, and comprehensive care. As the medical community progresses in understanding and managing BII, emphasizing evidence-based practices and patient-provider communication will be essential in addressing this complex condition effectively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Testing Mechanical Properties of Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants and Their Degradation.

Breast augmentation procedures using silicone implants have become increasingly popular over the past six decades. This article addresses the concerns of patients regarding implant strength by providing clinicians with valuable information in addition to video and pictorial evidence to share, fostering reassurance. The article focuses on the structural integrity and stability of breast implants, which play a critical role in their long-term performance and patient satisfaction. Specifically, it examines the industry standards outlined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), with a particular emphasis on ISO14607-2018, which encompasses a range of mechanical and physio-mechanical tests, including the assessment of silicone gel-fill firmness, evaluation of shell integrity, and examination of the impact of environmental conditions on implant performance. Breast implants are not static devices and are subject to aging and fatigue-based degradation. This emphasizes the need for ongoing monitoring and evaluation to ensure the long-term safety and satisfaction of patients. By providing a comprehensive examination of breast implant structure and industry standards, this article equips clinicians with the necessary knowledge to address patient concerns and foster confidence in the safety and longevity of breast augmentation procedures using silicone implants.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Total Capsulectomy Without Drains is a Safe Technique Facilitated by Pectoralis Major Muscle Repair.

BACKGROUND: The number of breast implant removal and capsulectomy procedures continues to increase rapidly. The aim of explant surgery should be to optimise patient outcomes from both an aesthetic and functional perspective. OBJECTIVES: To confirm the safety of drainless total capsulectomy and to determine the role of muscle repair in explant outcomes following the removal of sub-pectoral or dual-plane cosmetic breast implants. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective evaluation of our technique between January 2021 and November 2023. We report a single surgeon series of 140 consecutive cases of cosmetic breast implant removal from dual-plane or sub-pectoral pockets, all performed with total capsulectomy. In each case, meticulous repair of the Pectoralis major muscle was performed following capsulectomy. Drains were not used in any case. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 3 months. Patient satisfaction was assessed a minimum of 6 months post-operatively. RESULTS: By performing the described drainless technique, there were no cases of seroma, haematoma, pneumothorax or cosmetic breast distortion in this series. 83% of patients were treated as day cases and patient satisfaction with outcomes was high. CONCLUSIONS: Total capsulectomy without the use of drains is a novel and safe approach, aided by careful repair of the Pectoralis major muscle. There is no increased risk of seroma. The muscle repair may help to prevent post-explant cosmetic deformity of the breast. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Breast Implant Rupture Surveillance Practices among Plastic Surgeons in Publicly Funded Healthcare Systems.

BACKGROUND: The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends silicone breast implant rupture surveillance using MRI or ultrasound beginning at 5-6 years post-insertion and every 2-3 years thereafter. No surveillance guidelines exist in Canada or the UK. This study aims to identify surveillance practices and perceived barriers to surveillance among plastic surgeons in Canada and the UK and compare surgeon practices between public and private sectors. METHODS: All active members of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons (CSPS) and British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS) with an interest in breast surgery were surveyed. Surgeon demographics, screening practices and perceived barriers to screening were analyzed. Fisher's exact test was used to detect significant associations. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 16%. Most surgeons (68%, n=58/85) were familiar with FDA guidelines; however, only 2.4% (n=2/85) followed them. Surgeons in private practice screened significantly more than surgeons in the public sector [45% (n=13/29) vs 13% (n=7/56), p<0.002]. Among surgeons, ultrasound and high-definition ultrasound were the most common screening modalities and a perceived lack of clinical necessity followed by a perceived lack of satisfactory evidence qualifying these guidelines was the most reported barrier to screening. CONCLUSION: Despite awareness of FDA guidelines, compliance among surgeons surveyed remains low, reportedly due to a perceived lack of necessity or evidence base. Most public sector surgeons opt not to screen and do not recommend surveillance, even without barriers. While governing bodies should consider current practices to shape guidelines, increasing surgeons' awareness on their evidentiary foundation and potential consequences of silent ruptures is imperative. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Outcomes of ADM-Assisted Implant-based Breast Reconstructions According to Division Types of the Pectoralis Major Muscle.

BACKGROUND: In implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR), several surgical techniques are based on the implant insertion planes. Ideal location for breast implants has become a popular topic in IBRs because each technique has advantages and disadvantages. Herein, we report the outcomes of three different division types of the pectoralis muscle and suggest an algorithm for selecting the division types. METHODS: Charts of patients who underwent IBRs between October 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were classified into three groups (prepectoral, high subpectoral, and subpectoral) according to the division types of the pectoralis muscle. Aesthetic outcomes were assessed in terms of animation deformity, rippling deformity, and visibility of the upper implant border. RESULTS: Total 104 cases were included. 25, 38, and 41 were in the prepectoral, high-subpectoral, subpectoral IBR groups, respectively. Animation deformities frequently appeared in the subpectoral group. Nipple displacement was most prominent in the subpectoral group. Skin rippling at rest was mostly detected in the prepectoral group, whereas ripping during contraction was commonly observed in the subpectoral group. Visibility of upper border was more prominent in the prepectoral group than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: We propose an algorithm for selecting the division types of the pectoralis muscle. If the pectoralis muscle is thick, prepectoral plane is most preferred to avoid the animation deformity. In cases with thin pectoralis muscle, thickness of the mastectomy flap is considered next. If it is thicker than 1cm, prepectoral plane is better than the subpectoral plane; otherwise, high-subpectoral plane is preferable for better aesthetic outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Breast Implant Removal-Only: The Role of Targeted Compression.

BACKGROUND: The number of women seeking explantation of their breast implants has increased in recent years. Anxiety due to potential health problems has been one of the major catalysts. Mastopexy with or without autoaugmentation and fat grafting are the main techniques used in breast implant removal surgery. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the aesthetic and satisfactory outcomes after simple breast implant removal assisted by targeted compression. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were included in the series. Targeted compression of the breast after implant removal was performed during the 1st month. A satisfaction survey using a Likert scale was used before and after the final visit. The patients were followed up for 1 year. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 41 years old, and the mean time between implantation and removal was 10 years. Subjective reasons for removal (46.4% of the patients) were more frequent in women with less time since implantation (5 years) versus 15 years for implant-related problems. A total of 57.14% of the women were satisfied with the aesthetic result, and 42.86% were very satisfied. Only 17.8% of the total would consider an aesthetic refinement. CONCLUSIONS: Simple breast implant removal yields good aesthetic outcomes, and patients are satisfied with the results. Good management of compression of the breast and close follow-up to treat any collection in the pocket provides good adhesion and allows for effective management of the process of deflation and setting of the breast mound. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

The Problem of Diagnostic Criteria of Breast Implant Illness in Women After Breast Reconstruction: Review and Discussion of a Case.

INTRODUCTION: There has been a rising trend in the use of silicone breast implants for breast reconstructions after breast cancer treatment, as well as in the aesthetic breast procedures. A cluster of non-specific symptoms related to the presence of silicone implant has been called breast implant illness (BII). However, there are no strict criteria of BII which would specifically define this term. The increasing interest in BII among patients and physicians urges verifying own cases of "on-demand" explantations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this paper, we discussed a case of a patient with initial BII diagnosis, after breast reconstruction, and reviewed the literature on the BII symptoms and aetiology. A decision for aesthetic revision, not explantation, was made as the diagnosis of BII was questioned, and somatisation due to dissatisfaction with the aesthetic result of breast reconstruction was diagnosed. RESULTS: Improving aesthetics by implant exchange and contralateral mastopexy caused a full recovery from patient's symptoms. CONCLUSION: Based on our case, we point on the fact that BII diagnosis in patients after breast reconstruction is challenging. We suggest that while considering such a diagnosis and further proceedings, e.g. explantation, especially in patients after breast reconstruction, some exclusion criteria should be considered. Dissatisfaction with the result of the surgery can also lead to somatisation and the presence of real clinical symptoms, which should not be confused with the possible autoimmune reaction to silicone particles. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Complications After Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction in Patients Receiving Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of immediate breast reconstructions can be influenced by postoperative radiotherapy. However, there is no clarity on the use of prepectoral or subpectoral breast reconstruction in the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). We reviewed evidence on the complication rates of prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction in women undergoing PMRT. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were scanned for studies comparing complication rates of prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction with PMRT. All complications were pooled in a random-effect meta-analysis to obtain odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: Eight observational studies were included. Meta-analysis showed no difference in the risk of infections (OR: 1.22 95% CI 0.79, 1.88 I2=0%), implant loss (OR: 0.86 95% CI 0.50, 1.50 I2=14%), seroma (OR: 1.01 95% CI 0.43, 2.34 I2=50%), hematoma (OR: 0.44 95% CI 0.12, 1.71 I2=0%), wound dehiscence (OR: 0.95 95% CI 0.42, 2.17 I2=0%), and skin necrosis (OR: 0.61 95% CI 0.21, 1.75 I2=36%), contracture (OR: 0.46 95% CI 0.15, 1.48 I2=54%) and the need for revision surgeries (OR: 0.85 95% CI 0.45, 1.60 I2=15%) between the prepectoral and subpectoral groups. CONCLUSIONS: Data from observational studies indicates that in appropriately selected patients there may not be any difference in the risk of early complications with prepectoral or subpectoral breast reconstruction with PMRT. Current evidence is limited by the small number of studies, short follow-up and selection bias. There is a need for randomized controlled trials comparing the two approaches to obtain robust evidence on long-term outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Safe Reduction of Intermammary Distance in Implant Breast Augmentation Without Fat Grafting.

BACKGROUND: Over the latest 15 years, breast augmentation with implant has been progressively refined technically and artistically. However, little attention is usually given to the intermammary space. The aim of this article is to report author's experience and technique in the safe reduction of the intermammary space in breast augmentation with implants without fat grafting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 2019 to July 2021, 62 consecutive patients undergoing cosmetic breast enhancement with implant and requesting a reduction of the intermammary space were retrospectively evaluated. Preoperatively, breast features were registered for all patients. Preoperative intermammary distance ranged from 2.3 to 7 cm (5.4 ± 0.74). RESULTS: The average follow-up time was 20 months (range 12 to 36 months). All implants were anatomical silicon-gel filled implants with micropolyurethane foam shell. No major early and late complications were experienced. The outcomes were graded as excellent in 45 breasts (72.6 %), very good in 15 (24.2%), good in the two cases (3.2%) with minor delayed wound healing (less than 1 cm) which solved conservatively within 1 month. Patients' satisfaction was high to very high. Postoperative intermammary distance was reduced in all cases and ranged from 1 to 4.5 (mean 2.6 ± 0.52 cm) CONCLUSION: The intermammary distance can be safely reduced with implant only in all cases who seek it, both via submuscular and via subfascial approach by a precise medial pocket dissection and implantation of micropolyurethane foam-coated implant, which guarantee device's stability during the healing process avoiding malposition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Surgical Management of Breast Capsular Contracture-A Multi-institutional Data Analysis of Risk Factors for Early Complications.

BACKGROUND: Capsular contracture (CC) is a common complication following implant-based breast surgery, often requiring surgical intervention. Yet, little is known about risk factors and outcomes following CC surgery. METHODS: We reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2008-2021) to identify female patients diagnosed with CC and treated surgically. Outcomes of interest included the incidence of surgical and medical complications at 30-days, reoperations, and readmissions. Confounder-adjusted multivariable analyses were performed to establish risk factors. RESULTS: 5,057 patients with CC were identified (mean age: 55 ± 12 years and mean body mass index [BMI]: 26 ± 6 kg/m2). While 2,841 (65%) women underwent capsulectomy, capsulotomy was performed in 742 patients (15%). Implant removal and replacement were recorded in 1,160 (23%) and 315 (6.2%) cases, respectively. 319 (6.3%) patients experienced postoperative complications, with 155 (3.1%) reoperations and 99 (2.0%) readmissions. While surgical adverse events were recorded in 139 (2.7%) cases, 86 (1.7%) medical complications occurred during the 30 day follow-up. In multivariate analyses, increased BMI (OR: 1.04; p = 0.009), preoperative diagnosis of hypertension (OR: 1.48; p = 0.004), and inpatient setting (OR: 4.15; p < 0.001) were identified as risk factors of complication occurrence. CONCLUSION: Based on 14 years of multi-institutional data, we calculated a net 30 day complication rate of 6.3% after the surgical treatment of CC. We identified higher BMI, hypertension, and inpatient setting as independent risk factors of postoperative complications. Plastic surgeons may wish to integrate these findings into their perioperative workflows, thus optimizing patient counseling and determining candidates' eligibility for CC surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Technical Refinements for Reducing Reoperations in Single-Stage Augmentation Mastopexy: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The goals of mastopexy differ significantly from those of augmentation mammoplasty. Mastopexy is designed to lift and reshape the breasts, while augmentation mammoplasty is designed to increase the volume of the breasts. This conflict causes that one-stage augmentation mastopexies showed a revision rate from 8.7 to 23.2%. The aim of our study is to present some technical refinements for reducing the risk of implant exposure and reoperation. METHODS: We designed a retrospective matched cohort study, including 216 consecutive patients, undergone augmentation mastopexy between January 2013 and December 2022. We divided them in two groups: Group A undergone an inverted-T superomedial pedicled augmentation mastopexy and Group B undergone our inverted-T modified augmentation mastopexy. The groups were matched for clinical and surgical variables, with the surgical technique the only difference between the two. RESULTS: Complications were registered in ten patients (9.3%) in Group A (two wound breakdowns at T with implant exposure and eight wound dehiscences), six of which required surgical revision. In contrast, only three patients (2.8%) in Group B reported a complication, which was wound dehiscence without implant exposure in all cases. None of the dehiscence required surgical revision. The difference between complication and revision rates was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Separating the implant and the mastopexy dissection planes reduces the implant exposure and the reoperation rate in one-stage augmentation mastopexy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://link.springer.com/journal/00266 .

Reasons for Silicone Breast Implant Removal After Long-Term Implantation in Chinese Patients Without Complications: A Questionnaire-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: There are few studies of Chinese patients who request silicone breast implant removal after at least 10 years of implantation without any complications. This study aimed to study the characteristics of these patients, explore their reasons for breast implant removal and associate factors that affect their choice, so as to provide valuable information on clinical decision making. METHODS: A total of 55 eligible female patients (110 breasts) were enrolled from 2016 to 2022. A preoperative questionnaire survey before removal surgery and a telephone follow-up 1 year after removal surgery were conducted to collect data. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 40.6±8.8 years with the average time from breast augmentation to implant removal or replacement ranged from 10 to 15 years. Concerns about the aging of silicone gel-filled breast implant and the adverse effects of its long-term placement on body health were the top two reasons for breast implant removal. 63% of patients refused implant replacement, who were nearly 10 years older than those accepted implant replacement (p<0.05). Older age at implant removal (OR=0.67; 95%CI: 0.44-0.89) and a history of basic diseases (OR=0.02; 95%CI: 0.00-0.39) were statistically associated with lower rate of implant replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Concerns about the aging of silicone gel-filled breast implant were the main reason for uncomplicated patients to remove their breast implants. A comprehensive analysis based on patient's subjective choice and physical condition was suggested when an uncomplicated patient asks for implant removal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Outcomes of Implant Exchange and Latissimus Dorsi Flap Replacement After Breast Implant Complications.

BACKGROUND: Immediate action is required to address some complications of implant-based reconstruction after mastectomy to prevent reconstruction failure. Implant exchange may be simple but poses the risk of further complications while autologous flap reconstruction seems more complex but may pose less subsequent risk. Which of these is preferable remains unclear. METHODS: We reviewed thirty-two female breast cancer patients who had serious complications with their breast implants after post-mastectomy reconstruction. Latissimus dorsi flap (LDF) patients underwent explantation and immediate reconstruction with an LDF, while implant exchange (IE) patients underwent immediate implant removal and exchange with an expander followed by delayed reconstruction with silicon or immediately with a smaller size silicone implant. RESULTS: LDF patients underwent a single operation with an average duration of care of 31 days compared to an average 1.8 procedures (p= 0.005) with an average duration of care of 129.9 days (p < 0.001) among IE patients. Seven IE (50%) had serious complications that required subsequent revision while no LDF patients required additional procedures. Patient overall satisfaction and esthetics results were also superior in the LDF group at six months. CONCLUSION: In patients who want to reconstructively rescue and salvage their severely infected or exposed breast implant, the LDF offers an entirely autologous solution. LDF reconstruction in this setting allows patients to avoid an extended duration of care, reduces their risk of complications, and preserves the reconstructive process. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: The journal asks authors to assign a level of evidence to each article. For a complete description of Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, see the Table of Contents or the online Instructions for Authors at www.springer.com/00266 .

Consulting the Digital Doctor: Google Versus ChatGPT as Sources of Information on Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma and Breast Implant Illness.

BACKGROUND: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare complication associated with the use of breast implants. Breast implant illness (BII) is another potentially concerning issue related to breast implants. This study aims to assess the quality of ChatGPT as a potential source of patient education by comparing the answers to frequently asked questions on BIA-ALCL and BII provided by ChatGPT and Google. METHODS: The Google and ChatGPT answers to the 10 most frequently asked questions on the search terms "breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma" and "breast implant illness" were recorded. Five blinded breast plastic surgeons were then asked to grade the quality of the answers according to the Global Quality Score (GQS). A Wilcoxon paired t-test was performed to evaluate the difference in GQS ratings for Google and ChatGPT answers. The sources provided by Google and ChatGPT were also categorized and assessed. RESULTS: In a comparison of answers provided by Google and ChatGPT on BIA-ALCL and BII, ChatGPT significantly outperformed Google. For BIA-ALCL, Google's average score was 2.72 ± 1.44, whereas ChatGPT scored an average of 4.18 ± 1.04 (p < 0.01). For BII, Google's average score was 2.66 ± 1.24, while ChatGPT scored an average of 4.28 ± 0.97 (p < 0.01). The superiority of ChatGPT's responses was attributed to their comprehensive nature and recognition of existing knowledge gaps. However, some of ChatGPT's answers had inaccessible sources. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT outperforms Google in providing high-quality answers to commonly asked questions on BIA-ALCL and BII, highlighting the potential of AI technologies in patient education. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Fibrin associated large B-cell lymphoma accidentally identified in a breast implant capsule: a molecular report of a rare entity.

Breast implant-associated (BIA) lymphoma is a rare malignancy, typically originating from T-cells; however, few cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) have been recently described. These cases share major features: Epstein-Barr virus positivity and a favorable prognosis with surgical intervention alone, hinting at a potential link to fibrin-associated LBCL (FA-LBCL). This study presents the first case of BIA-FA-LBCL in Italy and one of the few assessed from a molecular standpoint so far. We identified two pathogenic mutations in DNMT3A and a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in JAK2. These findings suggest that dysfunctional epigenetic mechanisms and constitutive activation of the JAK-STAT pathway may underpin BIA-FA-LBCL lymphomagenesis. Finally, we summarized all the previously reported cases in alignment with the updated WHO-HAEM5 classification, shedding further light on the nature of this new entity. This report highlights the rarity of BIA-FA-LBCL and underscores the importance of comprehensive capsule sampling and reporting to national databases for accurate characterization and management of these lymphomas. The study supports the classification of BIA-FA-LBCL within the spectrum of FA-LBCL, emphasizing the need for further research to elucidate its molecular underpinnings and improve clinical outcomes.

Oncological Outcomes After Multidisciplinary Management of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL).

INTRODUCTION: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is an uncommon type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, associated with breast implant capsules. Despite improvements in our understanding of BIA-ALCL, communicating the prognosis to patients remains challenging due to limited long-term follow-up data. This has important implications for decision-making, including recommendations for subsequent reconstructive procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the longer-term oncological outcomes of patients receiving multidisciplinary treatment for BIA-ALCL. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of BIA-ALCL patients treated at a tertiary referral unit. The data are presented using simple descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2022, 18 BIA-ALCL patients were treated at our institution. The median age at diagnosis was 48.5 (IQR 41-55) years. Ten patients developed BIA-ALCL after cosmetic breast augmentation, and 8 after breast reconstruction following mastectomy for cancer. All patients had a history of textured implant insertion. The median time from first implant surgery to diagnosis was 8.5 (IQR 7-12) years. All patients underwent en-bloc total capsulectomy with implant removal, and 2 received systemic therapy. Fifteen patients had Stage I (IA-IC) disease, 2 had Stage IIA and 1 Stage III BIA-ALCL, based on the TNM classification system. At a median follow-up of 45 (IQR 15-71) months, there were no episodes of local or systemic relapse or death. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management for BIA-ALCL is sufficient in early-stage disease, and associated with excellent oncological outcomes. This information is reassuring for patients when discussing recurrence risk.