How did the COVID-19 pandemic affect burn centres in German-speaking countries?

The exponential growth of COVID-19 cases in early 2020 presented a massive challenge for healthcare systems and called for the adaptation of emergency care routines and intensive care capacities. We, therefore, analyzed a possible impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the general structure and emergency preparedness of burn centers in German-speaking countries through a cross-sectional descriptive survey questionnaire. The survey was conducted for the first time in January 2019 by Al-Shamsi et al. before the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. It was performed for a second time in November 2020 during the second wave of COVID-19 infections in German-speaking countries. We noticed a pronounced increase in the preparation for a great number of patients in need of intensive care including the enlargement of overall capacity when necessary. We also showed a notable decrease in the specific preparation for burn disasters and also reduced communication with first responders and other burn centers. To what extent these alterations were caused by the impact the pandemic had on healthcare systems could not be determined in this study and should be the subject of future research.

Global Surgery: Burn Outreach by Shriners Children's Texas.

Global surgery describes a rapidly developing field that seeks to improve surgical treatment internationally, specifically in those specialized treatments that are not readily accessible, considered complex and expensive. Burns cause 300,000 deaths annually, 90% of which occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Burns are a public health problem since they can cause disability and death. Shriners Children's Texas is a unique model of global surgery for an important number of countries in Central and South Americas and Mexico, providing specialized acute burn care with low mortality for burned children. Survivors of severe burns may face devastating sequelae due to burn scar contractures and hypertrophic burn scars that may limit the social reintegration. Burn reconstruction is not easily accessible to patients in LMICs. After discharge from acute burn treatment at our hospital, patients may return every 6 months for in-person follow-up to assess any surgical, psychological, or rehabilitative needs. Telemedicine allows for monitoring of postoperative results and evaluation for new surgical procedures. Follow-up clinic visits called outreach clinics held in international hospitals or international Shriners Temples allow for evaluation of follow-up patients and new patients with reconstructive needs that may benefit from a treatment in Shriners Children's Texas in Galveston, Texas.

Preparing for a burn disaster in Brazil: Geospatial modelling to inform a coordinated response.

INTRODUCTION: To optimize the early care of burned patients, protocols were developed that guide pre-hospital care and the need to transfer to a specialized burn treatment unit. Burn disasters are an important public health concern in developed and developing nations. Among the early steps in disaster preparedness is the understanding of geographic locations and capacity of burn care facilities. We aimed to map and classify medical facilities that provide burn care in Brazil and to undertake a location-allocation analysis to identify which could be targeted to increase capacity. METHODS: A review of burn hospitalizations was conducted using Brazilian Ministry of Health data. Capacity was defined by number of burn patients admitted each year and bed type. Spatial population data per one-square kilometer were obtained from World Pop as a raster dataset. A road network dataset using Open Street Map data was created to conduct the drive time analysis. Location/allocation analysis was conducted to identify the proportion of Brazil's population living within 2- and 6-hours' drive time of a burn care capable hospital, stratified by the level of hospital capacity. Hospitals were ranked according to number of additional people served. RESULTS: We found 26.471 burn admissions. Of these, 3.508(13,2 %) were ICU admissions. A total of 735(2,7 %) hospital deaths occurred under the selected burn codes. In all, 1.273 facilities admitted burn patients, and 263(20,7 %) reported ICU admissions of burn patients. Seventeen hospitals were classified as maximum capacity facilities. Additional 23 hospitals were identified as potential targets for capacity building. Most maximum capacity hospitals are clustered in the Southeast of Brazil. Currently, 40.8 % of the Brazilian population live within 2 h of a maximum capacity facility. A large part of the population lives farther than 6 h away from a maximum capacity hospital. Most of the potential targets for capacity building are located near the coast of Brazil. DISCUSSION: We mapped and classified facilities that provide public burn care in Brazil. We identified public facilities that could be targeted to increase capacity to improve access for patients in the event of a burn disaster. Mapping, planning, and coordinating response is key for optimal outcomes in Mass Casualties Incidents. Cataloging and understanding local resources is a crucial first step in disaster management. Inequality in profiles can determine specific regional needs. Specialized burn centers are rare in regions other than the southeast. Health equity should be considered when planning disaster preparedness initiatives. Location-allocation modelling may assist in universal and equitable burn care service offerings. CONCLUSION: This study proposes an initial step in the classification and mapping of available burn treatment centers and population coverage in Brazil.

Factors Influencing the Prioritization of Injured Patients for Transfer to a Burn or Trauma Center Following a Mass Casualty Event.

OBJECTIVES: In New York City, a multi-disciplinary Mass Casualty Consultation team is proposed to support prioritization of patients for coordinated inter-facility transfer after a large-scale mass casualty event. This study examines factors that influence consultation team prioritization decisions. METHODS: As part of a multi-hospital functional exercise, 2 teams prioritized the same set of 69 patient profiles. Prioritization decisions were compared between teams. Agreement between teams was assessed based on patient profile demographics and injury severity. An investigator interviewed team leaders to determine reasons for discordant transfer decisions. RESULTS: The 2 teams differed significantly in the total number of transfers recommended (49 vs 36; P = 0.003). However, there was substantial agreement when recommending transfer to burn centers, with 85.5% agreement and inter-rater reliability of 0.67 (confidence interval: 0.49-0.85). There was better agreement for patients with a higher acuity of injuries. Based on interviews, the most common reason for discordance was insider knowledge of the local community hospital and its capabilities. CONCLUSIONS: A multi-disciplinary Mass Casualty Consultation team was able to rapidly prioritize patients for coordinated secondary transfer using limited clinical information. Training for consultation teams should emphasize guidelines for transfer based on existing services at sending and receiving hospitals, as knowledge of local community hospital capabilities influence physician decision-making.

Rethinking preparedness planning in disaster emergency care: lessons from a beyond-surge-capacity event.

BACKGROUND: Large-scale burn disasters can produce casualties that threaten medical care systems. This study proposes a new approach for developing hospital readiness and preparedness plan for these challenging beyond-surge-capacity events. METHODS: The Formosa Fun Coast Dust Explosion (FFCDE) was studied. Data collection consisted of in-depth interviews with clinicians from four initial receiving hospitals and their relevant hospital records. A detailed timeline of patient flow and emergency department (ED) workload changes of individual hospitals were examined to build the EDs' overload patterns. Data analysis of the multiple hospitals' responses involved chronological process-tracing analysis, synthesis, and comparison analysis in developing an integrated adaptations framework. RESULTS: A four-level ED overload pattern was constructed. It provided a synthesis of specifics on patient load changes and the process by which hospitals' surge capacity was overwhelmed over time. Correspondingly, an integrated 19 adaptations framework presenting holistic interrelations between adaptations was developed. Hospitals can utilize the overload patterns and overload metrics to design new scenarios with diverse demands for surge capacity. The framework can serve as an auxiliary tool for directive planning and cross-check to address the insufficiencies of preparedness plans. CONCLUSIONS: The study examined a wide-range spectrum of emergency care responses to the FFCDE. It indicated that solely depending on policies or guidelines for preparedness plans did not contribute real readiness to MCIs. Hospitals can use the study's findings and proposal to rethink preparedness planning for the future beyond surge capacity events.

Implication of Burn Disaster Planning and Management: Coverage and Accessibility of Burn Centers in Belgium.

INTRODUCTION: Burn disasters represent a real challenge to burn centers worldwide. Several burn disasters with a considerable number of casualties happened in Belgium in the past. The positioning of burn centers is a significant issue to account for in a burn disaster preparedness and response. The objectives of this study are to identify the geographic coverage and accessibility of the burn centers in Belgium in the realm of a burn disaster scenario. METHOD: Cross-sectional secondary analysis was performed using data from the Belgian Burn Association and Belgian Department of the Statistic. Data were analyzed using ArcGIS, a geographic information system tool to identify the coverage of burn centers within half an hour driving time, and access time of both populations in the districts and the disaster-prone areas to the individual burn centers. RESULTS: Around 7.3 million (65%) people are covered by a half an hour driving time window from the burn centers. However, the accessibility to the individual burn centers is varied across different regions and provinces. CONCLUSION: There is a slightly over-supply of burn centers in the mid part of the country, contrasted by an under-supply and poor accessibility for the population living near the borders, particularly in the south part of the country. This study would provide a benchmark for stakeholders in Belgium and other industrial countries to consider the coverage and accessibility of the burn centers as part of preparation and planning for burn disasters in the future.

Are burn centers in German-speaking countries prepared to respond to a burn disaster? Survey-based study.

Burn disasters present a challenge not only to burn centers but the entire healthcare system. Most burn centers worldwide are unprepared to deal with a burn disaster as it is an uncommon event. We investigated the status of burn center preparedness in German-speaking countries to respond to a burn disaster. Self-administered survey questionnaires were sent to the directors of burn centers; the questions of survey used before in a similar way in Belgium were translated into German language. Of the 46 questioned burn centers, 32 (78%) responded, including all of the German adult burn centers. A clear difference in the preparation status of the burn centers in the three countries was observed due to geopolitical factors such as decentralized healthcare systems. However, the healthcare system is generally well-prepared concerning command, transfer, and capacity to provide sustained supplies to handle a massive influx of patients. Nevertheless, there are some gaps in the areas of planning and preparation, funding for disaster activities, and regular training of staff for burn disasters. We call for a unified burn disaster plan and increased cooperation between burn centers and civil defense regarding communication and training. We strongly recommend the implementation of a special disaster fund and telemedicine in disaster management to circumvent shortages in burn staff.

Response and legislative changes after the Kiss nightclub tragedy in Santa Maria/RS/Brazil: Learning from a large-scale burn disaster.

PURPOSE: A major fire occurred on January 27, 2013, at 02:30 at Kiss nightclub in the city of Santa Maria, State of Rio Grande do Sul, in Southern Brazil. In this retrospective report, we aimed to describe the nightclub fire event, its immediate consequences, and evaluated its impact on legislation. Our objective was to disseminate the lessons we learned from this large-scale nightclub fire disaster. METHODS: We conducted a literature review in PubMed and Lilacs database from 2013 to 2015 related to the nightclub Kiss, Santa Maria, fire, burns, and similar events worldwide over the past 15 years. We searched in the general press and online media information sites, and seeking legislation about this topic at the federal level in Brazil. We reported on the legislation changes that resulted from this nightclub fire. RESULTS: Current federal legislation on fire prevention and the scope of public safety, including night clubs and discos, states is the duty of the state and everyone's responsibility, pursuant to Article 144 of the Federal Constitution of Brazil. Thus, the federal union, individual states and municipalities have the power to legislate on fire prevention, and especially to ensure the security of the population. A state law called "Law Kiss", was passed in 2014, establishing standards on safety, prevention and protection against fire in buildings and areas of fire risk in the state of Rio Grande do Sul. On a national level, a law of prevention and fire fighting in Brazil was also drafted after the Santa Maria disaster (Law project no. 4923, 2013). Currently, this bill is still awaiting sanction before it can take effect. CONCLUSION: As we push for enactment of the national law of prevention and fire fighting in Brazil, we will continue emphasizing fire prevention, fire protection, fire fighting, means of escape and proper management. All similar events in this and other countries remind us that similar tragedies may occur anywhere, and that the analysis of facts, previous mistakes, during and after the incident are crucial to our understanding, and will help us lessen the chance of future occurrences.

Disasters; the 2010 Haitian earthquake and the evacuation of burn victims to US burn centers.

Response to the 2010 Haitian earthquake included an array of diverse yet critical actions. This paper will briefly review the evacuation of a small group of patients with burns to burn centers in the southeastern United States (US). This particular evacuation brought together for the first time plans, groups, and organizations that had previously only exercised this process. The response to the Haitian earthquake was a glimpse at what the international community working together can do to help others, and relieve suffering following a catastrophic disaster. The international response was substantial. This paper will trace one evacuation, one day for one unique group of patients with burns to burn centers in the US and review the lessons learned from this process. The patient population with burns being evacuated from Haiti was very small compared to the overall operation. Nevertheless, the outcomes included a better understanding of how a larger event could challenge the limited resources for all involved. This paper includes aspects of the patient movement, the logistics needed, and briefly discusses reimbursement for the care provided.

Primary triage of mass burn casualties with associated severe traumatic injuries.

A key aim in any mass disaster event is to avoid diverting resources by overwhelming specialized tertiary centers with minor casualties. The most crucial aspect of an effective disaster response is pre-hospital triage at the scene. Unfortunately, many triage systems have serious shortcomings in their methodologies and no existing triage system has enough scientific evidence to justify its universal adoption. Moreover, it is observed that the optimal approach to planning is by no means clear-cut and that each new incident involving burns appears to produce its own unique problems not all of which were predictable. In most major burns disasters, victims mostly have combined trauma burn injuries and form a heterogeneous group with a broad range of devastating injuries. Are these victims primarily burn patients or trauma patients? Should they be taken care of in a burn center or in a trauma center or only in a combined burns-trauma center? Who makes the decision? The present review is aimed at answering some of these questions.

Un objectif clé après les désastres de masse de tous les types est d'éviter le détournement des ressources submergeant les centres tertiaires spécialisés de patients atteints de lésions mineures. L'aspect le plus crucial d'une réponse efficace aux catastrophes est le triage préhospitalier à la scène de l'accident. Malheureusement, de nombreux systèmes de triage présentent de sérieuses lacunes dans leurs méthodologies et aucun système de triage actuellement utilisé ne démontre de posséder les qualités scientifiques suffisantes pour justifier son adoption universelle. Par ailleurs, on observe que l'approche optimale pour la planification n'est pas nullement claire et que tous les cas de désastre par feu présentent des aspects particuliers non tous prévisibles. Dans la plupart des grands désastres par feu, la majorité des victimes présentent une association de brûlures et d'autres traumatismes et constituent un groupe hétérogène atteint d'une large gamme de lésions dévastatrices. Ces victimes sont-elles principalement des patients brûlés ou des patients traumatisés? Faut-il les prendre en charge dans un centre des brûlés ou un centre des traumatisés ou seulement dans un centre dédié aux soins des deux catégories de patients? Qui prend la décision? Les Auteurs de cette étude mirent à répondre à certaines de ces questions.

Examining disaster planning models for large scale burn incidents--a theoretical plane crash into a high rise building.

BACKGROUND: The escalation of global terrorist attacks has resulted in a rise of traumatic injuries. Planning for mass casualty incidents (MCIs) is critical to decrease the morbidity and mortality that ensues after large-scale terrorist attacks. This study provides criteria for the management of burn victims following large-scale disasters. METHODS: Mass casualty outcomes from three disasters involving commercial aircraft crashes were analyzed. The three events included the El-Al cargo Aircraft crash near the Amsterdam Schiphol Airport in 1992, the World Trade Center attacks in New York and the attack against the Pentagon in Washington, DC on 9/11/01. RESULTS: Using the data obtained from these events, the severity of injuries in patients were determined. The result is a general template that may be customized with locally or regionally specific data, in order to evaluate the preparedness of a specific burn alignment for such a scenario. CONCLUSION: Recommendations based on the analysis of previous MCI's were put forth. Based on the needs recognized during these past events, suggestions were made to enhance the preparedness of burn units, hospitals and national agencies as well as municipal authorities.