Recompensation in Cirrhosis: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

The natural history of cirrhosis has usually been conceptualized in the context of progression from compensated cirrhosis to subsequent stages of decompensation. While this unidirectional concept is the most common pathophysiological trajectory, there has been an emerging understanding of a subgroup of patients which undergo recompensation. While literature mostly based on transplant waitlist registries have indicated towards such a population who experience disease regression, the overall literature about this entity remains inexplicit. An effort to generate consensus on defining recompensation has been attempted which comes with its own nuances and limitations. We summarize the available literature on this emerging yet controversial concept of recompensation in cirrhosis and delve into future implications and impact on real-life practice.

Impact of ammonia levels on outcome in clinically stable outpatients with advanced chronic liver disease.

Background & Aims: Ammonia levels predicted hospitalisation in a recent landmark study not accounting for portal hypertension and systemic inflammation severity. We investigated (i) the prognostic value of venous ammonia levels (outcome cohort) for liver-related outcomes while accounting for these factors and (ii) its correlation with key disease-driving mechanisms (biomarker cohort). Methods: (i) The outcome cohort included 549 clinically stable outpatients with evidence of advanced chronic liver disease. (ii) The partly overlapping biomarker cohort comprised 193 individuals, recruited from the prospective Vienna Cirrhosis Study (VICIS: NCT03267615). Results: (i) In the outcome cohort, ammonia increased across clinical stages as well as hepatic venous pressure gradient and United Network for Organ Sharing model for end-stage liver disease (2016) strata and were independently linked with diabetes. Ammonia was associated with liver-related death, even after multivariable adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.05 [95% CI: 1.00-1.10]; p = 0.044). The recently proposed cut-off (≥1.4 × upper limit of normal) was independently predictive of hepatic decompensation (aHR: 2.08 [95% CI: 1.35-3.22]; p <0.001), non-elective liver-related hospitalisation (aHR: 1.86 [95% CI: 1.17-2.95]; p = 0.008), and - in those with decompensated advanced chronic liver disease - acute-on-chronic liver failure (aHR: 1.71 [95% CI: 1.05-2.80]; p = 0.031). (ii) Besides hepatic venous pressure gradient, venous ammonia was correlated with markers of endothelial dysfunction and liver fibrogenesis/matrix remodelling in the biomarker cohort. Conclusions: Venous ammonia predicts hepatic decompensation, non-elective liver-related hospitalisation, acute-on-chronic liver failure, and liver-related death, independently of established prognostic indicators including C-reactive protein and hepatic venous pressure gradient. Although venous ammonia is linked with several key disease-driving mechanisms, its prognostic value is not explained by associated hepatic dysfunction, systemic inflammation, or portal hypertension severity, suggesting direct toxicity. Impact and implications: A recent landmark study linked ammonia levels (a simple blood test) with hospitalisation/death in individuals with clinically stable cirrhosis. Our study extends the prognostic value of venous ammonia to other important liver-related complications. Although venous ammonia is linked with several key disease-driving mechanisms, they do not fully explain its prognostic value. This supports the concept of direct ammonia toxicity and ammonia-lowering drugs as disease-modifying treatment.

Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) at Admission Predicts Mortality in Patients With Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis (SAH).

Background & aims: Severe alcoholic hepatitis (SAH) is a grave condition, and the presence of acute kidney injury (AKI) further jeopardizes patient survival. However, the impact of AKI on survival in SAH has not been assessed from this region of Asia. Materials and methods: This study was conducted on consecutive alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) patients hospitalized in Gastroenterology Department, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, India, between October 2016 and December 2018. On diagnosis of SAH (mDF score ≥32), demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters were recorded, and survival was compared between patients with and without AKI (AKIN criteria). In addition, survival was compared among SAH patients defined by other criteria and prognostic models in the presence and absence of AKI. Results: 309 (70.71%) of ALD patients had SAH, and 201 (65%) of them had AKI. SAH patients with AKI had higher total leucocyte count, total bilirubin, serum creatinine, serum urea, INR, MELD (UNOS), MELD (Na+), CTP score, mDF score, Glasgow score, ABIC score, and increased prevalence of acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) as per EASL-CLIF Consortium criteria (P < 0.001). Further, they had prolonged hospital stay, and increased death during hospitalization, at 28 days as well as 90 days (P < 0.001). Significant differences in survival were also seen in SAH (as per MELD, ABIC, and GAHS criteria) patients above the marked cut offs in respect to AKI. Conclusions: Over two-thirds of ALD patients had SAH, and about two-thirds had AKI. Patients with SAH and AKI had an increased prevalence of ACLF, longer hospital stay, and increased mortality during hospitalization at 28 days and 90 days. Lay summary: SAH is a critical condition, and the presence of AKI negatively affects their survival. Hence, early identification of SAH and AKI, as well as early initiation of treatment, is crucial for better survival. Our study from the coastal part of eastern India is the first to demonstrate the prevalence of SAH among patients with ALD along with the prevalence of AKI among SAH patients in this region. This knowledge will be helpful in managing these patients from this region of world.

Rifaximin Vs. Norfloxacin for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Prophylaxis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) heralds increased mortality in cirrhosis, mandating strategies for prophylaxis. Norfloxacin has been the recommended choice for SBP prevention. However, its use has raised concerns about antibiotic resistance. Rifaximin has been suggested as an alternative. We investigated the efficacy of rifaximin against norfloxacin in primary and secondary prophylaxis of SBP. Methods: In this open-labeled randomized trial, patients with either advanced cirrhosis having ascitic fluid protein levels (<1.5 g/l), Child-Pugh score ≥9 points, serum bilirubin ≥3 mg/dl or impaired renal function (primary prophylaxis group), or those with prior SBP (secondary prophylaxis group) received either norfloxacin (400 mg once daily) or rifaximin (550 mg twice daily). All patients were followed for six months, with the primary endpoint being the development of incident SBP. Results: 142 patients were assessed for eligibility, of which 132 met the enrolment criteria; 12 were lost to follow-up, while 4 discontinued treatment. In patients on primary prophylaxis, occurrence of SBP was similar (14.3% vs. 24.3%, P = 0.5), whereas in secondary prophylaxis SBP recurrence was lower with rifaximin (7% vs. 39% P = 0.004). Rifaximin significantly reduced the odds for SBP development in secondary prophylaxis [OR (95% CI0.14 (0.02-0.73; P = 0.02)]. Patients receiving rifaximin as secondary prophylaxis also had fewer episodes of hepatic encephalopathy (23.1% vs. 51.5%, P = 0.02). 180-day survival between the arms in either group was similar (P = 0.5, P = 0.2). Conclusion: In comparison to norfloxacin, rifaximin significantly reduces incident events of SBP, as well as HE when used as a secondary prophylaxis, whereas for primary prophylaxis both have similar effects (NCT03695705). Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03695705.

A Prospective Study of Prevalence and Predictors of Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy and Its Role in Development of Hepatorenal Syndrome.

Background and aims: Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) is a term used to collectively describe abnormal structural and functional changes in heart of patients with cirrhosis. The present study was undertaken to find the prevalence of CCM in patients with liver cirrhosis and its predictors. We also followed these patients to evaluate the role of CCM in the development of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). Materials & methods: This was a prospective study carried out in department of Gastroenterology, Sir Ganga Ram hospital, New Delhi. A total of 104 patients with liver cirrhosis were included. Liver cirrhosis was diagnosed on basis of clinical, biochemical, and imaging features. CCM was defined based on echocardiography. Dobutamine stress echocardiography and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) were performed in patients who gave consent. HRS was defined as per standard criteria. Patients with CCM were followed for development of HRS. Results: Fifty (48%) patients were diagnosed with CCM. All patients had diastolic dysfunction, and none had systolic dysfunction. Median age of patients with CCM was significantly higher (59 [31-78 y] vs. 52 [24-70 y], P < 0.05). Severity of liver disease (Child Turcotte Pugh score and model for end-stage liver disease score) and portal pressures (HVPG) did not differ in patients with or without CCM. Patients with CCM did not have increased incidence of HRS at the end of 6-month follow-up study. Conclusion: The presence of CCM was not related with the severity of liver dysfunction or portal pressures. Age was a significant determinant of CCM. Diastolic cardiac dysfunction does not influence the occurrence of HRS.

Surgical Risk Assessment in Patients with Chronic Liver Diseases.

Chronic liver diseases (CLD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. The overall life span of patients with CLD has increased and so is the number of surgical procedures these patients undergo. Pathophysiological and hemodynamic changes in cirrhosis make these patients more susceptible to hypotension and hypoxia during surgery. They also have a high risk of drug induced liver injury, renal dysfunction and post-operative liver decompensation. Patients with CLD planned for elective or semi-elective surgery should undergo detailed preoperative risk assessment. Patients should be evaluated for the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension and cirrhosis. In the absence of both cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension, patients with CLD can undergo surgery with minimal or low risk. Various risk assessment tools available for patients with advanced CLD are-CTP score, MELD Score, Mayo risk score, VOCAL-Penn score. A Child class C and/or Mayo risk score >15 in general is associated with high risk of post-operative mortality and elective surgery should be deferred in these patients. In patients with Child class, A and MELD 10-15 surgery is permissible with caution (except liver resection and cardiac surgery) while in Child A and MELD <10 surgery is well tolerated. VOCAL-Penn score is a new promising tool and can be the better alternative of CTP, MELD, and Mayo risk score models but more prospective studies with large patients' population are warranted. Certain surgeries like Hepatic resection, intraabdominal, and cardiothoracic have higher risk than abdominal wall hernia repair and orthopedic surgery. Laparoscopic approaches have better outcomes and less risk of liver failure than open surgery. Minimally invasive alternatives like colonic stent placement in case of obstruction can be considered in high-risk cases. Perioperative optimization and management of ascites, HE, bleeding, liver decompensation, and nutrition should be done with multidisciplinary approach. Patients with cirrhosis undergoing high risk elective surgery can develop liver failure in post-operative period and should be evaluated and counseled for liver transplantation if not contraindicated.

Erectile Dysfunction in Cirrhosis: Its Prevalence and Risk Factors.

Background: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is common in men with cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of ED and the factors associated with ED in men with cirrhosis. Methods: 400 men with cirrhosis [Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class A, 44.0%; CTP class B, 41.0%; and CTP class C, 15.0%] having high Karnofsky performance score, and living in a stable monogamous relationship with a female partner were included in the study. International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, and Short-Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) were used to assess erectile function and the health-related quality of life (HRQOL), respectively. Results: ED was found in 289 (72.3%) patients. Patients with ED reported significantly lower SF-36 scores across all the eight domains of SF-36 (i.e., physical functioning score, role physical score, bodily pain score, general health perception score, vitality score, social functioning score, role emotional score, and mental health score); physical component summary score, and mental physical component summary score, compared with those without ED. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with ED were older age, longer duration of cirrhosis, CTP-C (vs. CTP-A), higher hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), presence of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), presence of major depression, and lower appendicular skeletal muscle index measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA ASMI). Conclusion: ED is common in men with cirrhosis, and men with ED have poor HRQOL compared with those without ED. Older age, longer duration of cirrhosis, CTP-C (vs. CTP-A), higher HVPG, presence of GAD, presence of major depression, and lower DEXA ASMI are associated with ED.

Comparison of Anthropometry, Bioelectrical Impedance, and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Body Composition in Cirrhosis.

Background & aims: This study was planned to evaluate triceps skinfold thickness (TSFT), mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) for assessing body composition using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) (reference) and to predict fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) in patients with cirrhosis. Methods: FM and FFM were assessed by using DEXA and BIA. Skin-fold calliper was used for measuring TSFT, and MAMC was calculated. Bland-Altman plot was used to determine agreement and linear regression analysis for obtaining equations to predict FM and FFM. Results: Patients with cirrhosis (n = 302, 241 male, age 43.7 ± 12.0 years) were included. Bland-Altman plot showed very good agreement between BIA and DEXA for the estimation of FM and FFM. Majority of patients were within the limit of agreement: FM (98%) and FFM (96.4%). BIA shows a positive correlation with DEXA:FM (r = 0.73, P ≤ 0.001) and FFM (r = 0.86, P ≤ 0.001). DEXA (FM and FFM) shows a positive correlation with TSFT (r = 0.69, P ≤ 0.01) and MAMC (r = 0.61, P ≤ 0.01). The mean difference between the observed and predicted value of FM and FFM by BIA in the developmental set was 0.01 and 0.05, respectively; whereas in the validation set, it was -0.13 and 0.86, respectively. The mean difference between the observed and predicted value of TSFT and MAMC in the developmental set was 0.43 and 0.07; whereas, in the validation set, it was 0.16 and 0.48, respectively. Conclusion: Anthropometry (TSFT and MAMC) and BIA are simple and easy to use and can be a substitute of DEXA for FM and FFM assessment in routine clinical settings in patients with cirrhosis.

Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Combined With Sorafenib versus TACE in Patients With BCLC Stage C Hepatocellular Carcinoma - A Retrospective Study.

Objective: Advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma is a heterogeneous group with limited treatment options. TACE has been advocated recently by various study groups. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if TACE in combination with sorafenib, as well as TACE alone, was safe and efficacious in treating BCLC stage C HCC. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of the clinical data of 78 patients with BCLC stage C HCC who received either TACE-sorafenib (TS) combination therapy or TACE monotherapy as their first treatment was done. The two groups were compared in terms of radiological tumor response 1 month after the intervention. The two groups were also compared in terms of time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Results: The disease control rate (44.9% and 25.8%, respectively, P = 0.09) was higher in the TS combination group than in the TACE monotherapy group after 1 month of treatment. The TS combination group had significantly superior TTP and OS than the TACE group (TTP was 4.6 and 3.1 months, respectively, P = 0.001), and OS was 10.1 and 7.8 months, respectively, P < 0.001). The TACE-S group had a greater cumulative survival time at 6 months, 9 months, and 1 year than the TACE group (97.9%, 51.1%, 25.7% vs. 90.4%, 51.6%, and 0%, respectively). Conclusion: TS combination therapy in advanced-stage (BCLC-C) HCC significantly improved disease control rate, TTP, and OS compared with TACE alone, without any significant increase in adverse reactions.

Alpha-1 antitrypsin Pi∗Z allele is an independent risk factor for liver transplantation and death in patients with advanced chronic liver disease.

Background & Aims: Alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency causes/predisposes individuals to advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD). However, the role of the SERPINA1 Pi∗Z allele in patients who have already progressed to ACLD is unclear. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the impact of the Pi∗Z allele on the risk of liver transplantation/liver-related death in patients with ACLD, while adjusting for the severity of liver disease at inclusion. Methods: A total of 1,118 patients with ACLD who underwent hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement and genotyping for the Pi∗Z/Pi∗S allele at the Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab were included in this retrospective analysis. The outcome of interest was liver transplantation/liver-related death, while non-liver-related death and removal/suppression of the primary etiological factor were considered as competing risks. Results: Viral hepatitis was the most common etiology (44%), followed by alcohol-related (31%) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (11%). Forty-two (4%) and forty-six (4%) patients harboured the Pi∗Z and Pi∗S variants, respectively. Pi∗Z carriers had more severe portal hypertension (HVPG: 19±6 vs.15±7 mmHg; p <0.001) and hepatic dysfunction (Child-Turcotte-Pugh: 7.1±1.9 vs. 6.5±1.9 points; p = 0.050) at inclusion, compared to non-carriers. Contrarily, the Pi∗S allele was unrelated to liver disease severity. In competing risk regression analysis, harbouring the Pi∗Z allele was significantly associated with an increased probability of liver transplantation/liver-related death, even after adjusting for liver disease severity at inclusion. The detrimental impact of the common Pi∗MZ genotype (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio: ≈1.56 vs. Pi∗MM) was confirmed in a fully adjusted subgroup analysis. In contrast, Pi∗S carriers had no increased risk of events. Conclusion: Genotyping for the Pi∗Z allele identifies patients with ACLD at increased risk of adverse liver-related outcomes, thereby improving prognostication. Therapies targeting the accumulation of abnormal AAT should be evaluated as disease-modifying treatments in Pi∗Z allele carriers with ACLD. Lay summary: Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency is a genetic disease that affects the lung and the liver. Carrying two dysfunctional copies of the gene causes advanced liver disease. Harbouring one dysfunctional copy increases disease severity in patients with other liver illness. However, the significance of this genetic defect in patients who already suffer from advanced liver disease is unclear. Our study found that harbouring at least one dysfunctional copy of the alpha-1 antitrypsin gene increases the risk of requiring a liver transplantation or dying from a liver disease. This indicates the need for medical therapies aimed at treating the hepatic consequences of this genetic defect.

Predictors of in-hospital Outcomes in Patients With Cirrhosis and Coronavirus Disease-2019.

Background: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) cases continue to increase globally. Poor outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and cirrhosis have been reported; predictors of outcome are unclear. The existing data is from the early part of the pandemic when variants of concern (VOC) were not reported. Aims: We aimed to assess the outcomes and predictors in patients with cirrhosis and COVID-19. We also compared the differences in outcomes between the first wave of pandemic and the second wave. Methods: In this retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database, data on consecutive cirrhosis patients (n = 221) admitted to the COVID-19 care facility of a tertiary care center in India were evaluated for presentation, the severity of liver disease, the severity of COVID-19, and outcomes. Results: The clinical presentation included: 18 (8.1%) patients had compensated cirrhosis, 139 (62.9%) acute decompensation (AD), and 64 (29.0%) had an acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Patients with ACLF had more severe COVID-19 infection than those with compensated cirrhosis and AD (54.7% vs. 16.5% and 33.3%, P < 0.001). The overall mortality was 90 (40.7%), the highest among ACLF (72.0%). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of mortality were high leukocyte count, alkaline phosphatase, creatinine, child class, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and COVID-19 severity. The second wave had more cases of severe COVID-19 as compared to the first wave, with a similar MELD score and Child score. The overall mortality was similar between the two waves. Conclusion: Patients with COVID-19 and cirrhosis have high mortality (40%), particularly those with ACLF (72%). A higher leukocyte count, creatinine, alkaline phosphatase, Child class, and MELD score are predictors of mortality.

European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) Criteria With Population-Based Skeletal Muscle Index Best Predicts Mortality in Asians With Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Multiple definitions of sarcopenia exist and the acceptable criterion that best predicts outcome is lacking. We estimated the prevalence of sarcopenia based on four criteria and assessed their utility in predicting mortality in cirrhotics. METHODS: In a prospective observational study, consecutive Asian patients with cirrhosis underwent testing for handgrip strength (HGS) and estimation of skeletal muscle index (SMI) using computed tomography at the third lumbar vertebra. Sarcopenia was defined based on the Western cut-off (WC; SMI < 50 cm2/m2 for men and <39 cm2/m2 for women), Asian cut-off (AC; SMI < 36.5 cm2/m2 for men and 30.2 cm2/m2 for women), European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People-2nd meeting (EWGSOP2) definition incorporating low HGS (<27 kg for men and <16 kg for women) with low SMI (defined by the WC), and EWGSOP2 definition with low HGS and low SMI (defined by AC). Risk factors for mortality were assessed using multivariate Cox-proportional hazards. RESULTS: We included 219 patients with cirrhosis (168 men; mean age 42.6 years) with 50.2% patients having decompensation. Alcohol was the commonest aetiology (33.3%). The prevalence of sarcopenia was highest with the WC (men: 82.1%; women: 62.7%). There was a weak concordance among all criteria (Fleiss' kappa 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-0.37). Overall, 12-month survival was 86.1% (81.1-91.3%) over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 12 (6-15) months. Ascites (hazards ratio [HR] 6.27 [95% CI 1.6-24.1]; P < 0.007) and SMI (HR 0.92 [0.85-0.98]; P = 0.021) were independent predictors of mortality. The 12-month mortality rate was higher in patients with sarcopenia, irrespective of criteria (log rank P < 0.05). Low HGS and low SMI (defined by AC) was the best for predicting mortality (HR 3.04 [1.43-6.43]; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: A weak concordance exists amongst various diagnostic definitions of sarcopenia. Sarcopenia diagnosed by a combination of low HGS and population-specific SMI cut-off (AC) best predicts mortality.

The Outcome in Cirrhosis after Hospital Discharge is Not Worsened with COVID-19 Infection: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.

Background: Patients with cirrhosis and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) have high in-hospital mortality. The information on the outcome of cirrhosis patients in the posthospitalization period is limited. Aims: We aimed to study the outcome of cirrhosis patients with COVID-19 after hospital discharge. Methods: The records of the cirrhosis patients discharged after COVID-19 were reviewed. Their data were compared with a similar number of cirrhosis patients without COVID-19 after propensity score matching for age, sex, etiology of cirrhosis, and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. Results: Cirrhosis patients with (n = 92) or without (n = 92) COVID-19 were included in 1:1 ratio. The mortality among COVID-19 (22; 23.9%) and non-COVID-19 (19; 20.7%) were comparable (HR 1.224; 95% CI 0.663-2.263, P = 0.520), over a similar duration of follow-up [186 (86-271) vs. 183 (103-274)]. Among COVID-19 patients, 45; 48.9% developed a new acute decompensation-increased ascites (40; 43.5%), hepatic encephalopathy (20; 21.7%), or variceal bleeding (8; 8.7%) whereas 25 (27.2%) patients needed rehospitalization. A proportion of participants continued to have either fatigue/weakness (24/80; 30.0%), sleep disturbances (11/80; 13.7%), or joint pains (16/80; 20.0%). The most common causes of death in patients of both groups were end-stage liver disease: 16 (72.7%) vs. 9 (47.4%), followed by multiorgan dysfunction: 4 (18.2%) vs. 6 (31.6%), GI bleeding: 2 (9.1%) vs. 4 (21.0%), P = 0.484. A lower albumin level, higher international normalized ratio, bilirubin, Child-Turcotte-Pugh, and MELD scores at discharge predicted mortality in the COVID-19 group. Conclusion: Short-term outcomes of patients with cirrhosis who survive the initial insult of COVID-19 are not different from patients without COVID-19, and survival is determined by the severity of liver disease at discharge.

Prophylactic Perioperative Terlipressin Therapy for Preventing Acute Kidney Injury in Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in the perioperative transplant period and is associated with poor outcomes. Few studies reported a reduction in AKI incidence with terlipressin therapy by counteracting the hemodynamic alterations occurring during liver transplantation. However, the effect of terlipressin on posttransplant outcomes has not been systematically reviewed. Methods: A comprehensive search of electronic databases was performed. Studies reporting the use of terlipressin in the perioperative period of living donor liver transplantation were included. We expressed the dichotomous outcomes as risk ratio (RR, 95% confidence interval [CI]) using the random effects model. The primary aim was to assess the posttransplant risk of AKI. The secondary aims were to assess the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), vasopressors, effect on hemodynamics, blood loss during surgery, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and in-hospital mortality. Results: A total of nine studies reporting 711 patients (309 patients in the terlipressin group and 402 in the control group) were included for analysis. Terlipressin was administered for a mean duration of 53.44 ± 28.61 h postsurgery. The risk of AKI was lower with terlipressin (0.6 [95% CI, 0.44-0.8]; P = 0.001). However, on sensitivity analysis including only four randomized controlled trials (I2 = 0; P = 0.54), the risk of AKI was similar in both the groups (0.7 [0.43-1.09]; P = 0.11). The need for RRT was similar in both the groups (0.75 [0.35-1.56]; P = 0.44). Terlipressin therapy reduced the need for another vasopressor (0.34 [0.25-0.47]; P < 0.001) with a concomitant rise in mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance by 3.2 mm Hg (1.64-4.7; P < 0.001) and 77.64 dyne cm-1.sec-5 (21.27-134; P = 0.007), respectively. Blood loss, duration of hospital/ICU stay, and mortality were similar in both groups. Conclusions: Perioperative terlipressin therapy has no clinically relevant benefit.

Tuberculosis in Cirrhosis - A Diagnostic and Management Conundrum.

Background: Diagnosis and management of tuberculosis (TB) in patients with cirrhosis remains challenging. We studied the clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and management of TB along with the assessment of the diagnostic utility of various laboratory investigations in this cohort. Methods: A retrospective review of records of patients with cirrhosis (July 2017 and December 2019) was done. Out of 30 patients with cirrhosis and TB, 20 patients with pleural/peritoneal TB (cases) were compared with 20 consecutively selected spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) controls. Composite of clinical, laboratory, radiologic features and response to antituberculosis therapy (ATT) was taken as the gold standard to diagnose TB. Results: Extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) (n = 23, 76.7%) was more common. Overall, 9 (30%) patients presented with ATT-induced hepatitis. Patients with pleural/peritoneal TB had less severe hepatic dysfunction as compared to SBP group with significantly lower CTP [8 ± 1.5 vs. 9 ± 1.7 (P = 0.01)], MELD [16.3 ± 5.8 vs. 20.2 ± 6.6 (P = 0.02)] and MELD-Na [18.8 ± 5.9 vs. 22.5 ± 7.1 (P = 0.03)] scores. Median ascitic/pleural fluid total protein [2.7 (2.4-3.1) vs. 1.1 (0.9-1.2); P < 0.0001] and adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels [34.5 (30.3-42.7) vs. 15 (13-16); P < 0.0001] were significantly higher in the TB group. Total protein levels had a sensitivity and specificity 81% and 93.3%, respectively, at cut off value of >2 g/dl with an AUROC of 0.89 [(0.79-0.96); P < 0.001] whereas ADA levels at cutoff >26 IU/L showed 80% sensitivity and 90% specificity to diagnose pleural/peritoneal TB with an AUROC of 0.93 [(0.82-0.97); P < 0.001]. Only 11 (36.7%), and 8 (26.6%) patients showed positivity on GeneXpert and mTB-PCR, respectively. Patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores of ≤7 and 8-10 tolerated well two and one hepatotoxic drugs, respectively. Conclusions: EPTB is more frequent in patients with cirrhosis. Relatively lower cutoffs of ascitic/pleural fluid total protein and ADA may be useful to diagnose EPTB in patients with high pretest probability. Individualized ATT with close monitoring and dynamic modifications is effective and well-tolerated.

A Comparison of Different Frailty Scores and Impact of Frailty on Outcome in Patients With Cirrhosis.

Background & aims: There is no "gold standard" tool for the assessment of frailty in cirrhosis. This study compares Liver Frailty Index (LFI), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Fried Frailty Criteria (FFC), and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) for frailty assessment and ascertains its impact on predicting mortality and hospitalizations in a cohort of outpatients with cirrhosis. Methods: 116 patients were enrolled in this prospective observational cohort study. Frailty assessment was done using LFI, SPPB, FFC, and CFS. All patients were followed up for 6 months. The primary outcome was the first of either all-cause unplanned hospitalization or all-cause mortality occurring within 6 months of the study period. Results: 100 (86.2%) males and 16 (13.8%) females with a mean age of 50.2 (48.4-51.9, 95% CI) years were included. The most common cause of cirrhosis was alcoholic liver disease (47.4%) followed by hepatitis C (12.9%) and Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (10.3%). There was no significant difference in prevalence of frailty based on LFI (43.1%), FFC (36.2%), CFS (44%), and SPPB (47.4%) (P > 0.05). Frail patients had worse outcomes compared to the Not frail group. At 6 months, the mortality rate in Frail patients was 42% versus 1.5% for the Not frail; hospitalization in Frail patients occurred in 92% versus 6% in the Not frail. On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of mortality were Frailty [OR 14 (1.4-54.2)], alcohol-related cirrhosis [OR 4.2 (1.1-16.3)], Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) [OR 2.1 (1.4-2.9)] and Chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ) [OR 0.1 (0.1-0.4)] scores. Conclusions: LFI, SPPB, FFC, and CFS are comparable in frailty assessment in patients with cirrhosis. Importantly, comparability of the commonly used scores for frailty assessment and prediction of hospitalization and mortality allows flexibility for clinical application.

High Prevalence of Hormonal Changes and Hepatic Osteodystrophy in Frail Patients with Cirrhosis-An Observational Study.

Background/Aim: Hormonal changes and hepatic osteodystrophy are less often studied complications of cirrhosis. This study describes the variance in hormones and osteodystrophy between Frail and Not frail patients with cirrhosis. Methods: 116 outpatients with cirrhosis were prospectively enrolled in this study. Frailty assessment was done using Liver Frailty Index (LFI). Sociodemographic assessment, anthropometry, nutritional assessment, hormone profile, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan were done in all patients. Results: 116 patients, predominantly males (100 (86.2%) with mean age of 50.16 years (95% CI, 48.43-51.89) were included. Malnutrition was more common in Frail group as compared to Not frail group. Subjective global assessment (SGA) class-B patients were significantly more in Frail group (37 (74%) vs 3 (4.5%), P = 0.001). The prevalence of lower parathyroid hormone (PTH) (14 (28%) vs 2 (3%)), testosterone (33 (66%) vs 15 (22.7%)), vitamin D3 (44 (88%) vs 39 (59.1%)), and cortisol (37 (74%) vs 37 (56.1) levels was higher in Frail group (P < 0.05). The number of patients diagnosed with osteodystrophy (34 (68%) vs 21 (31.8%), P = 0.001) was significantly higher in Frail group. The marker of osteoclastic activity, ß-cross laps, was significantly elevated in the Frail group both in males (736 (655-818) vs 380 (329-432), P = 0.001) and (females 619 (479-758) vs 313 (83-543), P = 0.02). Bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine (LS) and neck of femur (NF) had significant correlation with LFI (ρ = 0.60, P = 0.001 for LS and ρ = 0.59, P = 0.001 for NF), serum testosterone (ρ = 0.58, P = 0.001 for LS and ρ = 0.53, P = 0.001 for NF), ß-cross laps (ρ = 0.38, P = 0.001for LS and ρ = 0.35, P = 0.000 for NF), vitamin D3 (ρ = 0.23, P = 0.04 for LS and ρ = 0.25, P = 0.01 for NF), PTH (ρ = 0.52, P = 0.001 for LS and ρ = 0.48. P = 0.001 for NF), and cortisol (ρ = 0.50, P = 0.001 for LS and ρ = 0.45, P = 0.001 for NF) levels. Conclusion: This is the first study that highlights the high prevalence of hormonal changes and hepatic osteodystrophy in frail patients with cirrhosis and opens a new dimension for research and target of therapy in this field.

SQSTM1 Expression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Relation to Tumor Recurrence After Radiofrequency Ablation.

Background/Aims: Autophagy is a process that allows the degradation of detrimental components through the lysosome to maintain cellular homeostasis under variable stimuli. SQSTM1 is a key molecule involved in functional autophagy and is linked to different signaling pathways, oxidative responses, and inflammation. Dysregulation of autophagy is reported in a broad spectrum of diseases. Accumulation of SQSTM1 reflects impaired autophagy, which is related to carcinogenesis and progression of various tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study investigated SQSTM1 protein expression in HCC and its relation to the clinicopathological features and the likelihood of tumor recurrence after radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Methods: This study included 50 patients with cirrhotic HCC of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages 0/A-B eligible for RFA. Tumor and peritumor biopsies were obtained just prior to local ablation and assessed for tumor pathological grade and SQSTM1 expression by immunohistochemistry. Patients were followed for one year after achieving complete ablation to detect any tumor recurrence. Results: Serum alpha-fetoprotein level (U = 149.50, P = 0.027∗) and pathological grade of the tumor (χ2 = 12.702, P = 0.002∗) associated significantly with the tumor response to RFA. SQSTM1 expression level was significantly increased in HCC compared to the adjacent peritumor cirrhotic liver tissues (Z = 5.927, P < 0.001∗). Significant direct relation was found between SQSTM1 expression level in HCC and the pathological grade of the tumor (H = 33.789, P < 0.001∗). On follow-up, tumor and peritumor SQSTM1 expression levels performed significantly as a potential predictor of the overall survival, but not the disease recurrence. Conclusions: SQSTM1 expression could determine aggressive HCC, even with reasonable tumor size and number, and identify the subset of HCC patients with short overall survival and unfavorable prognosis. SQSTM1 expression could not predict post-RFA intrahepatic HCC recurrence. SQSTM1 may be a potential biomarker and target for the selection of HCC patients for future therapies.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation in a Cohort of Recipients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction.

Background: Data on feasibility, management, and outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) in patients with pre-existing left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), severe coronary artery disease (CAD) or cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) is scarce. Methods: We reviewed outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in recipients with LVSD (ejection fraction [EF] < 50%) from our series of 1946 LDLT's performed between July 2010 and July 2018. Results: LVSD was detected in 12 male patients with a mean age, BMI and MELD of 52 ± 9 years, 25 ± 5 kg/m2, and 19 ± 4 respectively. Out of these, 6 patients had CAD (2 with previous coronary artery bypass graft, 1 following recent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, 2 post myocardial infarction, 1 noncritical CAD), and 6 had CCM. The EF ranged from 25% to 45%. Ethanol was the predominant underlying etiology for cirrhosis (50%). During LDLT, 2 patients developed ventricular ectopic rhythm and were managed successfully with intravenous lidocaine. Stress cardiomyopathy manifested in 3 patients post operatively with decreased EF, of which 2 improved, while 1 needed IABP support and succumbed to multiorgan failure on 8th postoperative day (POD). Another patient died on POD30 due to septic shock. Both these patients had higher MELD scores (actual MELD), extremes of BMI (17.3and 35.8 kg/m2) and were diabetic. There were no long-term cardiac deaths. The 1-year, and 5-year survival were 75%, and 66%, respectively. Conclusion: Among potential LT recipients with LVSD, those with stable CAD and good performance status, and well optimized CCM patients may be considered for LDLT after careful risk stratification in experienced centers.

Overview of Complications in Cirrhosis.

Background: Cirrhosis is the outcome of chronic liver disease of any etiology due to progressive liver injury and fibrosis. Consequently, cirrhosis leads to portal hypertension and liver dysfunction, progressing to complications like ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome, cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, sarcopenia, hepatocellular carcinoma, and coagulation disorders. End-stage liver disease leads to an impaired quality of life, loss of social and economic productivity, and reduced survival. Methods: This narrative review explains the pathophysiology of complications of cirrhosis, the diagnostic approach and innovative management, with focus on data from India. A comprehensive literature search of the published data was performed in regard with the spectrum, diagnosis, and management of cirrhosis and its complications. Results: There is a change in the epidemiology of metabolic syndrome, lifestyle diseases, alcohol consumption and the spectrum of etiological diagnosis in patients with cirrhosis. With the advent of universal vaccination and efficacious long-term viral suppression agents for chronic hepatitis B, availability of direct-acting antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis C, and a booming liver transplantation programme across the country, the management of complications is essential. There are several updates in the standard of care in the management of complications of cirrhosis, such as hepatorenal syndrome, hepatocellular carcinoma, and hepatic encephalopathy, and new therapies that address supportive and palliative care in advanced cirrhosis. Conclusion: Prevention, early diagnosis, appropriate management of complications, timely transplantation are cornerstones in the management protocol of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. India needs improved access to care, outreach of public health programmes for viral hepatitis care, health infrastructure, and disease registries for improved healthcare outcomes. Low-cost initiatives like immunization, alcohol cessation, awareness about liver diseases, viral hepatitis elimination, and patient focused decision-making algorithms are essential to manage liver disease in India.