Serum uric acid level negatively correlated with the prevalence of clopidogrel low response in patients undergoing antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It has been reported that elevated serum uric acid (SUA) is related to inflammation and potentially to platelet hyper-reactivity. However, the relationship between elevated SUA and residual platelet reactivity is uncertain in patients on dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cross-sectional cohort study was conducted on 2569 patients undergoing DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel. Patients' SUA levels, residual platelet aggregation, routine blood tests and clinical characteristics were recorded. The relationship between SUA level and residual platelet aggregation was assessed by correlation analysis, and the relationship between SUA level and the prevalence of clopidogrel low response (CLR) was assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP) induced platelet aggregation (PLADP) was higher in normal-SUA group than that in hyperuricemia group [30(21, 40) % vs. 27(19, 39) %, p = 0.032]. No significant difference was found for arachidonic acid (AA) induced platelet aggregation (PLAA) between the two groups [4(2, 5) % vs. 3(2, 5) %, p = 0.557]. The correlation between SUA and PLADP was statistically significant(r = -0.115, p < 0.001), while that between SUA and PLAA was non-significant (r = -0.012, p = 0.643). Using the multivariate logistic regression analysis, higher SUA concentration was associated with a decreased risk of clopidogrel low response (CLR) (OR [95%CI] = 0.997 [0.995-0.999], p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This is the largest study to date showing that in patients receiving DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel, SUA is independently and negatively associated with the prevalence of clopidogrel low response. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT01955200.

Comparison of VerifyNow P2Y12 and thrombelastography for assessing clopidogrel response in stroke patients in China.

Poor response to clopidogrel is often associated with recurrent ischemic events, and reliable platelet function tests are needed to identify clopidogrel low response (CLR). The aim of the study was to compare the consistency of VerifyNow P2Y12 and thrombelastography (TEG) in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with clopidogrel. Patients hospitalized in Changhai Hospital from August 2012 to September 2013 and assigned to treatment with a daily 75-mg dose of clopidogrel. The blood samples were taken on the 5-7th day to assess the capability of VerifyNow P2Y12 and TEG for evaluation of clopidogrel response, and all instrument parameters were used to perform correlation analysis. Patients with CLR were detected by using the methods and criteria published earlier (PRU ≥ 230 assayed by VerifyNow P2Y12 or TEG-Inhib% ≤30 % measured by TEG). Totally 58 patients were enrolled for the study and there were wide varieties in parameters of VerifyNow P2Y12 and TEG. Results showed a total of 17 and 9 patients, respectively, identified as CLR assessed by VerifyNow P2Y12 and TEG, but only three patients were detected to be clopidogrel low responders with both tests. The kappa consistency analysis showed poor consistency between VerifyNow P2Y12 and TEG results in terms of CLR (Kappa = -0.0349, p = 0.7730). Linear regression also demonstrated poor correlation between VerifyNow-PRU/VerifyNow-Inhib% and TEG-Inhib% (p = 0.07901 and p = 0.3788, respectively). Our study demonstrated that there was poor correlation between VerifyNow P2Y12 and TEG results, and VerifyNow P2Y12 showed a larger proportion of CLR than TEG.

Impact of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on platelet response to clopidogrel in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has been reported to down-regulate the expression of CYP2C19 gene, which may decrease the bioactivation of clopidogrel into active metabolites. We aimed to evaluate the impact of HBV infection on platelet response to clopidogrel in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation. METHODS: A total of 1805 patients who had received coronary stent implantation and taken aspirin 100 mg in combination with clopidogrel 75 mg daily ≥5 days were consecutively recruited. The serologic identifications for HBV, platelet aggregations in response to arachidonic acid (PLAA) and adenosine diphosphate (PLADP), as well as ABCB1, CYP2C19, CYP3A5, PON1 and P2RY12 genotypes were determined. Clopidogrel low response (CLR) was defined as PLADP > 40%. RESULTS: Among the recruited subjects, 102 patients showed hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive and 1703 patients negative. PLADP was significantly higher in HBsAg positive group than that in HBsAg negative group [38 (24-48) % vs. 29 (20-39) %, p < 0.001] while the difference of PLAA was not statistically significant (p = 0.329). The incidence of CLR was significantly higher in HBsAg positive group compared with that in HBsAg negative group (43.1% vs. 23.4%, p < 0.001). After adjusted for CYP2C19 genotype and known risk factors, HBsAg positive patients exhibited a significantly higher risk of CLR (adjusted odds ratio: 2.81, 95% confidence interval: 1.73 to 4.58, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HBV infection is an independent risk factor of CLR, in addition to CYP2C19 gene mutations. (Pharmacogenetic and Pharmacokinetic Study of Clopidogrel; NCT01968499).

Pantoprazole Does Not Reduce the Antiplatelet Effect of Clopidogrel: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Korea.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Concerns that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) diminish the efficacy of clopidogrel could hamper the appropriate prescription of PPIs. We evaluated the influence of pantoprazole on the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel compared with ranitidine, which is regarded as safe, after stratification of the population according to the presence of a cytochrome (CYP) 2C19 polymorphism in Korea. METHODS: Forty patients who underwent dual antiplatelet therapy were randomized to receive pantoprazole (n=20) or ranitidine (n=20). Platelet aggregation was evaluated by impedance aggregometry at baseline (D0) and 8 days after acid-lowering treatments (D9). CYP2C19 was genotyped by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. RESULTS: After co-treatment, the percentage of clopidogrel low-response was 11.1% (2/18) in the pantoprazole group and 10.5% (2/19) in the ranitidine group (p=0.954). The impedance values with adenosine diphosphate stimulus after acid-lowering treatments did not significantly differ between the two groups. In a multiple regression analysis, only ST-elevation myocardial infarction was marginally associated with a reduced antiplatelet effect (odds ratio, 12.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 173.78). However, pantoprazole use did not affect the antiplatelet effect after correction for the CYP2C19 polymorphism. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that pantoprazole does not increase platelet aggregation in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02733640).