The impact of low and high dialysate calcium concentrations on cardiovascular disease and death in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal dialysate calcium (Ca) concentration for patients undergoing hemodialysis remains inconclusive, particularly concerning cardiovascular protection. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a meta-analysis of eight RCTs to determine the optimal dialysate Ca concentration for cardiovascular protection. We compared outcomes in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis treated with either a low-Ca dialysate (LCD) (1.125 or 1.25 mmol/L) or a high-Ca dialysate (HCD) (1.5 or 1.75 mmol/L). The outcomes were coronary artery calcification score (CACS), all-cause and cardiovascular death, cardiovascular function and structure, and serum biochemical parameters. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between LCD and HCD concerning CACS (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [-0.38, 0.07]), the risk of all-cause death, and cardiovascular death in patients treated with chronic maintenance hemodialysis. Conversely, LCD was associated with a significantly lower intima-media thickness (SMD = -0.49, 95% CI [-0.94, -0.05]) and pulse wave velocity than HCD (SMD = -0.86, 95% CI [-1.21, -0.51]). Furthermore, LCD significantly decreased serum Ca levels (mean difference [MD] = 0.52 mg/dL, 95% CI [0.19, 0.85]) and increased serum parathyroid hormone levels (MD = 44.8 pg/mL, 95% CI [16.2, 73.3]) compared with HCD. Notably, most RCTs examined in our analysis did not include patients receiving calcimimetics. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed no significant differences in cardiovascular calcification and death between LCD and HCD and revealed a paucity of RCTs on dialysate Ca concentrations, including those involving patients on calcimimetics, indicating the urgent need for further studies.

Calcium balance in hemodialysis: More uncertainty than certainty.

There is controversy about the choice of dialysate calcium concentration (DCa), with strong arguments both in favor of and against the use of a low or high DCa, as they can both be potentially harmful. Evidence suggests that calcium mass balance is positive with a DCa 3.5 mEq/L, negative or neutral with the use of DCa 2.5 mEq/L, whereas both positive and negative balances have been observed with the use of DCa 3.0 mEq/L. Overall, the use of DCa >2.5 mEq/L is usually associated with an increase in serum calcium level and a decrease in serum PTH level and use of lower vitamin D analogue dose, with the opposite effects usually observed with the use of lower DCa. Most of the available evidence is from small-sized and crossover studies; hence, evidence should be regarded with caution and applied in a patient-specific manner. As there are a lot of significant unanswered questions regarding calcium balance and the optimal DCa in hemodialysis patients, further high-quality research is needed to clarify many still unclear aspects of calcium homeostasis and balance in these patients. In conclusion, with the existing evidence the choice of DCa needs to be individualized and contextualized in the setting of each patient's calcium balance needs and homeostatic response, taking also into account oral calcium intake (dietary and medicinal), any other relevant therapy administered, such as vitamin D analogues, the type of renal mineral bone disorder, and associated cardiovascular comorbidity.

Long-term effects on PTH and mineral metabolism of 1.25 versus 1.75 mmol/L dialysate calcium in peritoneal dialysis patients: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare 1.25 and 1.75 mmol/L dialysate calcium for their effects on parathyroid hormone (PTH) and mineral metabolism in peritoneal dialysis (PD). METHODS: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EmBase databases were searched from inception to October 2016. Methodological quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the risk of bias tool of the Review Manager software. The meta-analysis was carried out with the Stata12.0 software. Subgroup analysis was performed by study design [randomized controlled trial (RCT) and non-RCT]. Odds ratios or standardized mean differences were used to assess the outcome measures, including intact parathyroid hormone (i-PTH) levels, serum total calcium amounts, ionized calcium levels, phosphate concentrations, and peritonitis episodes. RESULTS: Seven studies were enrolled in the synthesized analysis, including 4 RCTs and 3 non-RCTs. All studies compared 1.25 mmol/L and 1.75 mmol/L dialysate calcium for PD. Pooled analysis revealed that 1.75 mmol/L dialysate calcium significantly reduced i-PTH levels compared with the 1.25 mmol/L dose in PD patients. However, 1.25 mmol/L dialysate calcium was superior to the 1.75 mmol/L dose in decreasing the levels of serum total calcium and ionized calcium in PD patients. No significant differences in phosphate amounts and peritonitis episodes were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSION: These findings indicated that 1.75 mmol/L dialysate calcium is more appropriate for PD patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Meanwhile, 1.25 mmol/L dialysate calcium is more favorable to PD patients with secondary hypercalcemia. However, further well-designed and high-quality studies are required to validate these findings.

Low parathyroid hormone status induced by high dialysate calcium is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular death in hemodialysis patients.

Here we studied a possible association between low parathyroid hormone (PTH) status and mortality in incident patients undergoing hemodialysis . A total of 1983 patients were included at baseline and prospectively followed for 24 months. Patients were classified according to their Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes PTH status at baseline and at 12 months, and mortality evaluated at 12 to 24 months using adjusted Cox analysis. Factors potentially involved in PTH status variability between baseline and 12 months were analyzed. A decrease in serum PTH from normal or high to low values between baseline and 12 months was associated with significantly increased cardiovascular mortality at 12 to 24 months (hazard ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-3.36). For patients with high or normal baseline PTH levels, the main independent factor at 6 months for a decrease to low PTH levels at 12 months was high dialysate calcium (1.75 mmol/L), whereas prescription of non-calcium-based phosphate binders was associated with a lower risk of PTH decrease. In the high cardiovascular (CV) mortality risk subgroup of patients who acquired a low PTH status at 12 months, the main independent factor at 12 months associated with significant 12- to 24-month CV mortality was high dialysate calcium (odds ratio, 5.44; 95% CI, 2.52-11.75). Thus, patients with a serum PTH decrease to low values after 1 year of hemodialysis treatment are at high risk of short-term CV death. High dialysate calcium was an important contributor to PTH oversuppression, and continued use was associated with increased CV mortality.

Dialysate Calcium Concentration, Mineral Metabolism Disorders, and Cardiovascular Disease: Deciding the Hemodialysis Bath.

Patients with end-stage kidney disease treated with dialysis are at increased risk to experience fractures and cardiovascular events than similar-aged people from the general population. The enhanced risk for these outcomes in dialysis patients is not completely explained by traditional risk factors for osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. Mineral metabolism abnormalities are almost universal by the time patients require dialysis therapy, with most patients having some type of renal osteodystrophy and vascular calcification. These abnormalities have been linked to adverse skeletal and cardiovascular events. However, it has become clear that the treatment regimens used to modify the serum calcium, phosphate, and parathyroid hormone levels almost certainly contribute to the poor outcomes for dialysis patients. In this article, we focus on one aspect of mineral metabolism management; dialysate calcium concentration and the relationships among dialysate calcium concentrations, mineral and bone disorder, and cardiovascular disease in hemodialysis patients.

Facility Dialysate Calcium Practices and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Receiving Hemodialysis: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Some US dialysis facilities have reduced default dialysate calcium concentrations from 2.5 mEq/L to lower levels. There has been no rigorous systematic examination of the effects of such a reduction on clinical and biochemical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Medicare-eligible patients who received in-center hemodialysis at a large dialysis organization in January 2008 to December 2010. PREDICTOR: Facility conversion from predominant use (≥75% patients) of 2.50-mEq/L dialysate calcium to predominant use of lower dialysate calcium concentrations versus maintenance of predominant use of 2.50-mEq/L dialysate calcium. OUTCOMES: All-cause and cause-specific mortality and hospitalization, laboratory markers of metabolic bone disease, and drug utilization. MEASUREMENTS: Hierarchical mixed linear and Poisson models were fit to compare pre- to postconversion differences in outcomes between converter and matched control facilities. Results, expressed as relative rate ratios (RRRs) and delta-delta (change in mean values), were estimated for early (months 0-2) and late (months 3-12) postconversion to allow for possible latent effects. RESULTS: Facility conversion was associated with greater rates of hospitalization for heart failure exacerbation (late RRR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.06-1.51]), hypocalcemia (early RRR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.05-1.35]; late RRR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.20-1.60]), and intradialytic hypotension (early RRR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.02-1.11]; late RRR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01-1.10]), but no differences were observed for all-cause mortality or hospitalization rates. Facility conversion was also associated with comparative temporal decreases in serum calcium level, increases in serum phosphate and parathyroid hormone levels, and increases in use of phosphate binders, vitamin D, and calcimimetics. LIMITATIONS: Possible residual confounding, generalizability beyond Medicare patients uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: There are potential safety concerns associated with the default use of dialysate calcium concentrations < 2.50 mEq/L, as well as biochemical evidence of poorer disease control despite associated greater medication use. Individualization of dialysate calcium concentration rather than predominant use of dialysate calcium concentrations < 2.50 mEq/L should be considered.

Short- and Long-term Effects of Dialysate Calcium Concentrations on Mineral and Bone Metabolism in Hemodialysis Patients: The K4 Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: The short- and long-term impact of conversion of dialysate calcium concentration from either 2.5 or 3.0 mEq/L to 2.75 mEq/L on mineral and bone metabolism remains unknown in hemodialysis patients. STUDY DESIGN: Nonrandomized intervention study. SETTING & POPULATION: 12 hemodialysis patients treated at baseline with a 2.5-mEq/L dialysate calcium concentration and another 12 hemodialysis patients treated with a 3.0-mEq/L dialysate calcium concentration. INTERVENTION: Use of 2.75-mEq/L dialysate calcium concentration. OUTCOMES: Changes in intradialytic calcium and phosphate clearance and changes in predialysis and intradialytic serum and ionized mineral and biochemical parameters over the 24 weeks following dialysate calcium conversion. RESULTS: Conversion of dialysate calcium concentration from 2.5 to 2.75 mEq/L increased intradialytic calcium loading and serum total and ionized calcium levels, whereas conversion of dialysate calcium from 3.0 to 2.75 mEq/L decreased intradialytic calcium loading and serum total and ionized calcium levels. Dialysate calcium concentration conversion did not affect intradialytic serum parathyroid hormone level, intradialytic phosphate elimination, or predialysis serum calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone, and fibroblast growth factor 23 levels. Intradialytic calcium influx was determined by dialysate calcium concentration and predialysis serum calcium levels, whereas intradialytic phosphate elimination was determined by predialysis serum phosphate levels. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and no control groups treated with 2.5- and 3.0-mEq/L dialysate calcium concentrations during the 24 weeks of the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion of dialysate calcium concentration from either 3.0 or 2.5 to 2.75 mEq/L results in expected changes in calcium loading based on predialysis calcium concentration. The dialysate calcium concentration should be personalized based on clinical factors. FUNDING: None. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network, www.umin.ac.jp/english/, R000040105, UMIN000035184.

Dialysate Calcium Concentration below 3.0 mEq/L Is Not Associated with Improved Outcomes in the Japanese Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) markers have been associated with adverse outcomes in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Dialysate calcium concentration (D-Ca) likely influences serum calcium and phosphorus levels. Optimal D-Ca level remains unclear. We hypothesized that higher D-Ca is associated with cardiovascular events and mortality among Japanese HD patients. METHODS: Enrollment data of chronic HD patients in the prospective observational study JDOPPS, phases 1-5 (1999-2015), provided exposures and covariates. All-cause mortality, non-arrhythmic cardiovascular events (NonAR-CVE), or their composites were analyzed by D-Ca, and divided into 2.5, 2.75, and 3.0 mEq/L. To minimize confounding by indication, analyses were restricted to facilities in which at least 90% of patients received the same D-Ca prescription. Association of D-Ca level with outcomes was evaluated in Cox models stratified by phase and accounting for facility clustering. Covariates describing patient demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, CKD-MBD therapy, and facility attributes provided adjustment. RESULTS: Of 9,201 patients included, 25.0% had D-Ca of 2.5 mEq/L; 6.8% D-Ca 2.75; and 68.2% D-Ca 3.0. Median follow-up time was 2.03 years. D-Ca was not associated with all-cause mortality, with hazards ratios for 2.5 vs. 3.0 mEq/L of 0.90 and 95% CI (0.73-1.11), nor with other outcomes. One effect modification occurred, protective for lower D-Ca on NonAR-CVE in the absence of cardiovascular comorbidities (p = 0.032), although corresponding D-Ca effects were not significant after multiple comparisons adjustment (p = 0.261 [D-Ca 2.5] and 0.125 [D-Ca 2.75]). CONCLUSION: Lowering D-Ca level below 3.0 mEq/L seems not to have a meaningful effect on patient outcomes.

Low versus high dialysate calcium concentration in alternate night nocturnal hemodialysis: A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Higher calcium dialysate is recommended for quotidian nocturnal hemodialysis (NHD) (≥6 nights/week) to maintain bone health. It is unclear what the optimal calcium dialysate concentration should be for alternate night NHD. We aimed to determine the effect of low calcium (LC) versus high calcium (HC) dialysate on cardiovascular and bone parameters in this population. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial where participants were randomized to LC (1.3 mmol/L, n = 24) or HC dialysate (1.6 or 1.75 mmol/L, n = 26). Primary outcome was change in mineral metabolism markers. Secondary outcomes included change in vascular calcification (VC) scores [CT abdominal aorta (AA) and superficial femoral arteries (SFA)), pulse wave velocity (PWV), bone mineral density (BMD) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) over 12 months. FINDINGS: In the LC group, pre-dialysis ionised calcium decreased -0.12 mmol/L (-0.18-0.06, P = 0.0001) and PTH increased 16 pmol/L (3.5-28.5, p = 0.01) from baseline to 12 months with no significant change in the HC group. In both groups, there was no progression of VC in AA or SFA and no change in PWV, LVMI or BMD. At 12 months, calcimimetics were prescribed in a higher percentage in the LC vs. HC groups (45.5% vs. 10.5%) with a lower proportion of the HC group being prescribed calcitriol (31.5% vs. 72%). DISCUSSION: Although dialysate calcium prescription influenced biochemical parameters it was not associated with difference in progression of VC between HC and LC groups. An important finding was the potential impact of alternate night NHD in attenuating progression of VC and inducing stabilisation of LVMI and PWV.

Effects of Lowering Dialysate Calcium Concentration on Mineral and Bone Disorders in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients: Conversion from 3.0 mEq/L to 2.75 mEq/L.

Selection of a lower dialysate calcium concentration (DCa) can reduce calcium burden and prevent vascular calcification in hemodialysis patients. However, decreased DCa can worsen mineral and bone disorders. This 1-year retrospective observational study evaluated 121 hemodialysis patients at Fukuoka Renal Clinic who underwent conversion of DCa from 3.0 mEq/L to 2.75 mEq/L. The primary outcomes were changes in serum levels of calcium, phosphate, and parathyroid hormone (PTH). The effects of baseline serum calcium and PTH levels on changes in biochemical parameters were also determined. One year after DCa conversion, mean serum calcium level decreased, while serum phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, and PTH concentrations increased. The rate of achievement of target PTH was higher in patients with lower serum PTH level at baseline, while patients with higher baseline serum PTH level tended to exceed the upper limit of the PTH target range. Patients with higher baseline serum calcium concentration showed a greater decrease in serum calcium level and a greater increase in serum PTH level at 1 year. Patients with a lower baseline serum PTH level can benefit from optimal PTH control following conversion of DCa from 3.0 mEq/L to 2.75 mEq/L. However, secondary hyperparathyroidism may be exacerbated in some patients with higher baseline serum calcium (Ca) and PTH levels. These results indicate that an individualized approach can maximize the benefits of Ca unloading after conversion to lower DCa.

ISPD Cardiovascular and Metabolic Guidelines in Adult Peritoneal Dialysis Patients Part I - Assessment and Management of Various Cardiovascular Risk Factors.

Cardiovascular disease contributes significantly to the adverse clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Numerous cardiovascular risk factors play important roles in the development of various cardiovascular complications. Of these, loss of residual renal function is regarded as one of the key cardiovascular risk factors and is associated with an increased mortality and cardiovascular death. It is also recognized that PD solutions may incur significant adverse metabolic effects in PD patients. The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) commissioned a global workgroup in 2012 to formulate a series of recommendations regarding lifestyle modification, assessment and management of various cardiovascular risk factors, as well as management of the various cardiovascular complications including coronary artery disease, heart failure, arrhythmia (specifically atrial fibrillation), cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease and sudden cardiac death, to be published in 2 guideline documents. This publication forms the first part of the guideline documents and includes recommendations on assessment and management of various cardiovascular risk factors. The documents are intended to serve as a global clinical practice guideline for clinicians who look after PD patients. The ISPD workgroup also identifies areas where evidence is lacking and further research is needed.