Sensitivity of the antiphasic digits-in-noise test to simulated unilateral and bilateral conductive hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is (1) to assess whether the presentation level of the antiphasic digits-in-noise (DIN) test affects the speech recognition threshold (SRT), (2) to evaluate how accurately simulated unilateral and bilateral conductive hearing loss is detected (CHL) and (3) to determine whether increasing the presentation level normalises the antiphasic DIN SRT. DESIGN: Participants performed antiphasic and diotic DINs at different presentation levels with unilateral, bilateral or no earplugs. STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty-four and twelve normal hearing adults. RESULTS: Without earplugs, antiphasic DIN SRTs did not differ between 60 and 80 dB SPL. At 60 dB SPL, the antiphasic DIN correctly classified 92% of the unilateral earplug cases; the diotic DIN 25%. The binaural intelligibility level difference did not differ between the no-earplug condition and the condition with bilateral earplugs when the presentation was increased with the attenuation level. CONCLUSIONS: In normal hearing participants, diotic and antiphasic DIN SRTs are independent of presentation level above a minimum level of 60 dB SPL. The antiphasic DIN is more sensitive than the diotic DIN for detecting unilateral CHL; not for bilateral CHL. The effect of CHL on DIN SRTs can be largely compensated by increasing the presentation level. Audibility plays an important role in the antiphasic and diotic DIN.

Attentional modulation of the auditory steady-state response across the cortex.

Selective auditory attention allows us to focus on relevant sounds within noisy or complex auditory environments, and is essential for the processing of speech and music. The auditory steady-state response (ASSR) has been proposed as a neural measure for tracking selective auditory attention, even within continuous and complex soundscapes. However, the current literature is inconsistent on how the ASSR is influenced by selective attention, with findings based primarily on attention being directed to either ear rather than to sound content. In this experiment, a mixture of melody streams was presented to both ears identically (diotically) as we examined if selective auditory attention to sound content influences the ASSR. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we assessed the stream-specific ASSRs from three frequency-tagged melody streams when attention was directed between each melody stream, based on their respective pitch and timing. Our main results showed that selective attention enhances the ASSR power of an attended melody stream by 14% at a general sensor level. This ability to readily capture attentional changes in a stimuli-precise manner makes the ASSR a useful tool for studying selective auditory attention, especially in complex auditory environments. As a secondary aim, we explored the distribution of cortical ASSR sources and their respective attentional modulation using a distributed source model of the ASSR activity. Notably, we uncovered the existence of ASSR attentional modulation outside the temporal cortices. Across-subject averages of the attentional enhancement over the cortical surface suggest that frontal regions show up to ~80% enhancement, while temporal and parietal cortices were enhanced by 20-25%. Importantly, this work advocates a novel 'beyond the temporal cortex' perspective on ASSR modulation and also serves as a template for future studies to precisely pin-point which cortical sites are more susceptible to ASSR attentional modulation.

A comparison between the Dutch and American-English digits-in-noise (DIN) tests in normal-hearing listeners.

OBJECTIVE: The Dutch digits-in-noise test (NL DIN) and the American-English version (US DIN) are speech-in-noise tests for diagnostic and clinical usage. The present study investigated differences between NL DIN and US DIN speech reception thresholds (SRTs) for a group of native Dutch-speaking listeners. DESIGN: In experiment 1, a repeated-measures design was used to compare SRTs for the NL DIN and US DIN in steady-state noise and interrupted noise for monaural, diotic, and dichotic listening conditions. In experiment 2, a subset of these conditions with additional speech material (i.e. US DIN triplets without inter-digit coarticulation/prosody) was used. STUDY SAMPLE: Experiment 1 was conducted with 16 normal-hearing Dutch students. Experiment 2 was conducted with nine different students. RESULTS: No significant differences between SRTs measured with the NL DIN and US DIN were found in steady-state noise. In interrupted noise the US DIN SRTs were significantly better in monaural and diotic listening conditions. Experiment 2 demonstrated that these better SRTs cannot be explained by the combined effect of inter-digit coarticulation and prosody in the American-English triplets. CONCLUSIONS: The NL DIN and US DIN are highly comparable and valuable tests for measuring auditory speech recognition abilities. These tests promote across-language comparisons of results.

Benefits of Cartilage Conduction Hearing Aids for Speech Perception in Unilateral Aural Atresia.

Severe conductive hearing loss due to unilateral aural atresia leads to auditory and developmental disorders, such as difficulty in hearing in challenging situations. Bone conduction devices compensate for the disability but unfortunately have several disadvantages. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits of cartilage conduction (CC) hearing aids for speech perception in unilateral aural atresia. Eleven patients with unilateral aural atresia were included. Each participant used a CC hearing aid in the atretic ear. Speech recognition scores in the binaural hearing condition were obtained at low speech levels to evaluate the contribution of aided atretic ears to speech perception. Speech recognition scores were also obtained with and without presentation of noise. These assessments were compared between the unaided and aided atretic ear conditions. Speech recognition scores at low speech levels were significantly improved under the aided atretic ear condition (p < 0.05). A CC hearing aid in the unilateral atretic ear did not significantly improve the speech recognition score in a symmetrical noise presentation condition. The binaural hearing benefits of CC hearing aids in unilateral aural atresia were predominantly considered a diotic summation. Other benefits of binaural hearing remain to be investigated.

Neurophysiological Evaluation of Right-Ear Advantage During Dichotic Listening.

Right-ear advantage refers to the observation that when two different speech stimuli are simultaneously presented to both ears, listeners report stimuli more correctly from the right ear than the left. It is assumed to result from prominent projection along the auditory pathways to the contralateral hemisphere and the dominance of the left auditory cortex for the perception of speech elements. Our study aimed to investigate the role of attention in the right-ear advantage. We recorded magnetoencephalography data while participants listened to pairs of Japanese two-syllable words (namely, "/ta/ /ko/" or "/i/ /ka/"). The amplitudes of the stimuli were modulated at 35 Hz in one ear and 45 Hz in the other. Such frequency-tagging allowed the selective quantification of left and right auditory cortex responses to left and right ear stimuli. Behavioral tests confirmed the right-ear advantage, with higher accuracy for stimuli presented to the right ear than to the left. The amplitude of the auditory steady-state response was larger when attending to the stimuli compared to passive listening. We detected a correlation between the attention-related increase in the amplitude of the auditory steady-state response and the laterality index of behavioral accuracy. The right-ear advantage in the free-response dichotic listening was also found in neural activities in the left auditory cortex, suggesting that it was related to the allocation of attention to both ears.

The difference in poststimulus suppression between residual inhibition and forward masking.

The phenomenon of tinnitus masking (TM) and residual inhibition (RI) of tinnitus are two ways to investigate how external sounds interact with tinnitus: TM provides insight on the fusion between external sound activity and tinnitus related activity while RI provides insight on how the external sound might suppress the tinnitus related activity for a period of time. Differences in masking level between the tinnitus and an external tone with tinnitus characteristics (frequency, loudness) have previously shown a high level of heterogeneity. The difference in poststimulus suppression between the two, that is, residual inhibition for the former, and forward masking for the latter, has never been explored. This study aims to investigate minimum masking levels (MMLs) and minimum residual inhibition levels (MRILs) of tinnitus and of an external tone mimicking tinnitus while using diotic and dichotic noises. Pulsed narrowband noises (1 octave width and centered at 1kHz, frequency of the hearing loss slope, tinnitus frequency) and white noise were randomly presented to 20 tinnitus participants and 20 controls with an external tone mimicking tinnitus (4kHz, intensity level corresponding to tinnitus loudness). The MML values obtained for the masking of tinnitus and for the mimicking external sounds were very similar. On the other hand, the MRILs were significantly different between the tinnitus and the mimicking external sounds within tinnitus participants. They were also different between the tinnitus participants and the controls. Overall, for both within and between comparisons, the MRIL values were much higher to produce a poststimulus suppression for the mimicking sound than for the tinnitus. The results showed no significant differences between the diotic and dichotic conditions. These results corroborate other findings suggesting that the tinnitus-related neural activity is very different from the stimulus-related neural activity. The consequences of this last finding are discussed.