Capacity and capability of remote sensing to inform invasive plant species management in the Pacific Islands region.

The Pacific Islands region is home to several of the world's biodiversity hotspots, yet its unique flora and fauna are under threat because of biological invasions. These invasions are likely to proliferate as human activity increases and large-scale natural disturbances unfold, exacerbated by climate change. Remote sensing data and techniques provide a feasible method to map and monitor invasive plant species and inform invasive plant species management across the Pacific Islands region. We used case studies taken from literature retrieved from Google Scholar, 3 regional agencies' digital libraries, and 2 online catalogs on invasive plant species management to examine the uptake and challenges faced in the implementation of remote sensing technology in the Pacific region. We synthesized remote sensing techniques and outlined their potential to detect and map invasive plant species based on species phenology, structural characteristics, and image texture algorithms. The application of remote sensing methods to detect invasive plant species was heavily reliant on species ecology, extent of invasion, and available geospatial and remotely sensed image data. However, current mechanisms that support invasive plant species management, including policy frameworks and geospatial data infrastructure, operated in isolation, leading to duplication of efforts and creating unsustainable solutions for the region. For remote sensing to support invasive plant species management in the region, key stakeholders including conservation managers, researchers, and practitioners; funding agencies; and regional organizations must invest, where possible, in the broader geospatial and environmental sector, integrate, and streamline policies and improve capacity and technology access.

Capacidad y potencial de la telemetría para informar la gestión de especies de plantas invasoras en las islas del Pacífico Resumen Las islas del Pacífico albergan varios de los puntos calientes de biodiversidad del planeta; sin embargo, su flora y fauna únicas se encuentran amenazadas por las invasiones biológicas. Es probable que estas invasiones proliferen conforme incrementa la actividad humana y se desarrollan las perturbaciones naturales a gran escala, exacerbadas por el cambio climático. Los datos y las técnicas telemétricas proporcionan un método viable para mapear y monitorear las especies invasoras de plantas y orientar su manejo en la región de las islas del Pacífico. Usamos estudios de caso tomados de la bibliografía de Google Scholar, las bibliotecas digitales de tres agencias regionales y dos catálogos virtuales del manejo de especies invasoras de plantas para analizar la asimilación y retos que enfrenta la implementación de la telemetría en la región del Pacífico. Sintetizamos las técnicas telemétricas y describimos su potencial para detectar y mapear las especies de plantas invasoras con base en la fenología de las especies, características estructurales y algoritmos de textura de imagen. La aplicación de los métodos de telemetría para detectar las especies invasoras de plantas dependió en gran medida de la ecología de la especie, la extensión de la invasión y los datos disponibles de imágenes telemétricas y geoespaciales. Sin embargo, los mecanismos actuales de apoyo para el manejo de especies invasoras de plantas, incluyendo los marcos normativos y la infraestructura para datos geoespaciales, operan de manera aislada, lo que lleva a que se dupliquen los esfuerzos y se creen soluciones insostenibles para la región. Para que la telemetría apoye al manejo de especies invasoras de plantas en la región, los actores clave, incluidos los gestores, investigadores, practicantes, agencias financiadoras y organizaciones regionales, deben invertir, en lo posible, en un sector ambiental y geoespacial más amplio, integrar y simplificar las políticas y mejorar la capacidad y el acceso a la tecnología.

Using the IUCN Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa to inform decision-making.

The Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT) is an important tool for biological invasion policy and management and has been adopted as an International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) standard to measure the severity of environmental impacts caused by organisms living outside their native ranges. EICAT has already been incorporated into some national and local decision-making procedures, making it a particularly relevant resource for addressing the impact of non-native species. Recently, some of the underlying conceptual principles of EICAT, particularly those related to the use of the precautionary approach, have been challenged. Although still relatively new, guidelines for the application and interpretation of EICAT will be periodically revisited by the IUCN community, based on scientific evidence, to improve the process. Some of the criticisms recently raised are based on subjectively selected assumptions that cannot be generalized and may harm global efforts to manage biological invasions. EICAT adopts a precautionary principle by considering a species' impact history elsewhere because some taxa have traits that can make them inherently more harmful. Furthermore, non-native species are often important drivers of biodiversity loss even in the presence of other pressures. Ignoring the precautionary principle when tackling the impacts of non-native species has led to devastating consequences for human well-being, biodiversity, and ecosystems, as well as poor management outcomes, and thus to significant economic costs. EICAT is a relevant tool because it supports prioritization and management of non-native species and meeting and monitoring progress toward the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) Target 6.

Uso de la Clasificación de Impacto Ambiental de los Taxones Exóticos de la UICN para la toma de decisiones Resumen La Clasificación de Impacto Ambiental de los Taxones Exóticos (EICAT, en inglés) es una herramienta importante para las políticas y manejo de las invasiones biológicas y ha sido adoptada como un estándar de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza (UICN) para medir la seriedad del impacto ambiental causado por los organismos que viven fuera de su extensión nativa. La EICAT ya ha sido incorporada a algunos procedimientos locales y nacionales de toma de decisiones, lo que la vuelve un recurso particularmente relevante para abordar el impacto de las especies no nativas. Algunos principios conceptuales subyacentes de la EICAT han sido cuestionados recientemente, en particular aquellos relacionados con el uso del principio de precaución. Aunque todavía son relativamente nuevas, las directrices para la aplicación e interpretación de la EICAT tendrán una revisión periódica, basada en evidencia científica, por parte de la comunidad de la UICN para mejorar el proceso. Algunas de las críticas recientes están basadas en suposiciones seleccionadas subjetivamente que no pueden generalizarse y podrían perjudicar los esfuerzos globales para manejar las invasiones biológicas. La EICAT adopta un principio de precaución cuando considera el historial de impacto de una especie en cualquier otro lugar ya que algunos taxones tienen características que podrían volverlos más dañinos. Además, las especies no nativas suelen ser factores de pérdida de bidiversidad, incluso bajo otras presiones. Cuando ignoramos el principio de precaución al abordar el impacto de las especies no nativas, hay consecuencias devastadoras para el bienestar humano, la biodiversidad y los ecosistemas, así como resultados pobres de conservación, y por lo tanto con costos económicos importantes. La EICAT es una herramienta relevante porque respalda la priorización y el manejo de las especies no nativas y ayuda con el cumplimiento y monitoreo del progreso para llegar al objetivo 6 del Marco Mundial de Biodiversidad Kunming­Montreal.

A classification framework for interspecific trade-offs in aquatic ecology.

In some cases, wildlife management objectives directed at multiple species can conflict with one another, creating species trade-offs. For managers to effectively identify trade-offs and avoid their undesirable outcomes, they must understand the agents involved and their corresponding interactions. A literature review of interspecific trade-offs within freshwater and marine ecosystems was conducted to illustrate the scope of potential interspecific trade-offs that may occur. We identified common pitfalls that lead to failed recognition of interspecific trade-offs, including, single-species management and limited consideration of the spatial and temporal scale of ecosystems and their management regimes. We devised a classification framework of common interspecific trade-offs within aquatic systems. The classification can help managers determine whether the conflict is species based through direct relationships (i.e., predator-prey, competition, other antagonistic relationships) or indirect relationships involving intermediate species (i.e., conflict-generating species) or whether the conflict is driven by opposing management objectives for species that would otherwise not interact (i.e., nontarget management effects). Once the nature and scope of trade-offs are understood, existing decision-making tools, such as structured decision-making and real-options analysis, can be incorporated to improve the management of aquatic ecosystems. Article Impact Statement: A synthesis of interspecific trade-offs in aquatic ecosystems supports their identification and resolution.

Un Marco de Clasificación para Compensaciones Interespecíficas en Ecología Acuática Resumen En algunos casos, los objetivos del manejo de fauna dirigidos a muchas especies pueden entrar en conflicto entre sí creando compensaciones entre las especies. Para que los manejadores identifiquen efectivamente estas compensaciones y eviten sus resultados no deseados, deben entender a los agentes involucrados y sus interacciones correspondientes. Se realizó una revisión literaria de las compensaciones interespecíficas dentro de los ecosistemas marinos y de agua dulce para ilustrar el alcance de las compensaciones interespecíficas que pueden ocurrir. Identificamos dificultades comunes que llevan al reconocimiento fallido de las compensaciones interespecíficas, incluyendo el manejo de una sola especie y sus regímenes de manejo. Diseñamos un marco de clasificación de compensaciones interespecíficas comunes dentro de los ecosistemas acuáticos. La clasificación puede ayudar a los manejadores a determinar si el conflicto está basado en las especies por sus relaciones directas (es decir, depredador-presa, competencia, otras relaciones antagonistas) o por relaciones indirectas que involucran a otras especies (es decir, efectos del manejo de especies que no son el objetivo). Una vez que se entiende la naturaleza y el alcance de las compensaciones, las herramientas de toma de decisión existentes, como la toma estructurada de decisiones y el análisis de opciones reales, pueden incorporarse para mejorar el manejo de los ecosistemas acuáticos.

Evaluating unintended consequences of intentional species introductions and eradications for improved conservation management.

Increasingly intensive strategies to maintain biodiversity and ecosystem function are being deployed in response to global anthropogenic threats, including intentionally introducing and eradicating species via assisted migration, rewilding, biological control, invasive species eradications, and gene drives. These actions are highly contentious because of their potential for unintended consequences. We conducted a global literature review of these conservation actions to quantify how often unintended outcomes occur and to elucidate their underlying causes. To evaluate conservation outcomes, we developed a community assessment framework for systematically mapping the range of possible interaction types for 111 case studies. Applying this tool, we quantified the number of interaction types considered in each study and documented the nature and strength of intended and unintended outcomes. Intended outcomes were reported in 51% of cases, a combination of intended outcomes and unintended outcomes in 26%, and strictly unintended outcomes in 10%. Hence, unintended outcomes were reported in 36% of all cases evaluated. In evaluating overall conservations outcomes (weighing intended vs. unintended effects), some unintended effects were fairly innocuous relative to the conservation objective, whereas others resulted in serious unintended consequences in recipient communities. Studies that assessed a greater number of community interactions with the target species reported unintended outcomes more often, suggesting that unintended consequences may be underreported due to insufficient vetting. Most reported unintended outcomes arose from direct effects (68%) or simple density-mediated or indirect effects (25%) linked to the target species. Only a few documented cases arose from more complex interaction pathways (7%). Therefore, most unintended outcomes involved simple interactions that could be predicted and mitigated through more formal vetting. Our community assessment framework provides a tool for screening future conservation actions by mapping the recipient community interaction web to identify and mitigate unintended outcomes from intentional species introductions and eradications for conservation.

Evaluación de las Consecuencias Involuntarias de las Introducciones y Erradicaciones Intencionales de Especies para el Manejo Mejorado de la Conservación Resumen Actualmente se despliegan estrategias cada vez más intensas para mantener la biodiversidad y la función del ecosistema como respuesta a las amenazas antropogénicas mundiales, incluyendo la introducción y erradicación intencionales de especies por medio de la migración asistida, el retorno a la vida silvestre, el control biológico, la erradicación de especies invasoras y la genética dirigida. Estas acciones son muy polémicas por el potencial que tienen para generar consecuencias involuntarias. Realizamos una revisión de la literatura mundial sobre estas acciones de conservación para cuantificar cuán seguido ocurren las consecuencias involuntarias y cuáles son sus causas subyacentes. Para evaluar los resultados de conservación, desarrollamos un marco de trabajo de evaluación comunitaria para mapear sistemáticamente el rango de posibles interacciones para 111 estudios de caso. Con la aplicación de esta herramienta cuantificamos el número de tipos de interacción consideradas en cada estudio y documentamos la naturaleza y la fuerza de los resultados involuntarios. Se reportaron los resultados voluntarios en 51% de los casos, una combinación de resultados voluntarios e involuntarios en 26% de los casos y estrictamente los resultados involuntarios en el 10% de los casos. Por lo tanto, los resultados involuntarios fueron reportados en el 36% de todos los casos evaluados. En la evaluación general de los resultados de conservación (sopesando los efectos voluntarios y. los involuntarios), algunos efectos involuntarios fueron bastante inocuos en relación con el objetivo de conservación, mientras que otros resultaron en consecuencias involuntarias severas para las comunidades receptoras. Los estudios que evaluaron un mayor número de interacciones comunitarias con la especie objetivo reportaron resultados involuntarios con mayor frecuencia, lo que sugiere que las consecuencias involuntarias pueden estar subvaloradas debido al escrutinio insuficiente. La mayoría de los resultados involuntarios reportados surgieron de los efectos directos (68%) o de los efectos indirectos o mediados por la densidad (25%) vinculados con la especie diana. Solamente unos cuantos casos documentados surgieron de interacciones más complejas (7%). Por lo tanto, la mayoría de los resultados involuntarios involucran interacciones simples que podrían ser pronosticadas y mitigadas por medio de un escrutinio más formal. Nuestro marco de trabajo de evaluación comunitaria proporciona una herramienta para la revisión de las acciones de conservación en el futuro mediante el mapeo de la red de interacciones entre comunidades receptoras y para la mitigación de los resultados involuntarios surgidos de las introducciones y erradicaciones intencionales de especies a favor de la conservación.

Reallocating budgets among ongoing and emerging conservation projects.

Conserving biodiversity and combating ecological hazards require cost-effective allocation of limited resources among potential management projects. Project priorities, however, can change over time as underlying social-ecological systems progress, novel priorities emerge, and management capabilities evolve. Thus, reallocation of ongoing investments in response to shifting priorities could improve management outcomes and address urgent demands, especially when additional funding is not available immediately. Resource reallocation, however, could incur transaction costs, require additional monitoring and reassessment, and be constrained by ongoing project commitments. Such complexities may prevent managers from considering potentially beneficial reallocation strategies, reducing long-term effectiveness. We propose an iterative project prioritization approach, based on marginal return-on-investment estimation and portfolio optimization, that guides resource reallocation among ongoing and new projects. Using simulation experiments in 2 case studies, we explored how this approach can improve efficacy under varying reallocation constraints, frequencies, costs, and rates of project portfolio change. Periodic budget reallocation could enhance the management of stochastically emerging invasive weeds in Australia and thus reduce the overall risk by up to 50% compared with a static budget. Reallocation frequency and the rate of new weed incursion synergistically increased the conservation gains achieved by allowing unconstrained reallocation. Conversely, budget reallocation would not improve the International Union for Conservation of Nature conservation status of threatened Australian birds due to slow rates of transition among conservation states; extinction risk could increase if portfolio reassessment is costly. Although other project prioritization studies may recommend periodic reassessment and reallocation, our findings revealed conditions when reallocation is valuable and demonstrated a structured approach that can help conservation agencies schedule and implement iterative budget-allocation decisions cost-effectively.

Reasignación de Presupuestos entre los Proyectos de Conservación Emergentes y En Curso Resumen La conservación de la biodiversidad y el combate a los riesgos ecológicos requieren de una asignación rentable de los recursos limitados entre los proyectos potenciales de manejo. Sin embargo, las prioridades de los proyectos pueden cambiar con el tiempo conforme avanzan los sistemas socio-ecológicos subyacentes, emergen prioridades nuevas y evolucionan las capacidades de manejo. Por lo tanto, la reasignación de las inversiones en curso como respuesta a las prioridades cambiantes podría mejorar los resultados de manejo y resolver demandas urgentes, especialmente cuando el financiamiento adicional no está disponible de manera inmediata. Sin embargo, la reasignación de recursos podría incurrir en costos de transacción, requerir de monitoreo y reevaluación adicionales y estar restringida por los compromisos hechos por los proyectos en curso. Dichas complejidades pueden evitar que los administradores consideren estrategias de reasignación potencialmente benéficas, reduciendo así la efectividad a largo plazo. Proponemos un enfoque iterativo de priorización de proyectos basado en una estimación marginal de rentabilidad y en la optimización del portafolio, el cual guíe la reasignación de recursos entre los proyectos nuevos y en curso. Mediante experimentos de simulación en dos estudios de caso, exploramos cómo este enfoque puede mejorar la eficacia bajo cambiantes restricciones de reasignación, frecuencias, costos y tasas de cambio en el portafolio del proyecto. La reasignación periódica de presupuestos podría mejorar el manejo de las hierbas invasoras con surgimiento estocástico en Australia y así reducir el riesgo general hasta en un 50% en comparación con un presupuesto estático. La frecuencia de reasignación y la tasa de incursión de hierbas nuevas incrementaron de manera sinérgica las ganancias de conservación obtenidas al permitir una reasignación sin restricciones. En cambio, la reasignación de presupuestos no mejoraría el estado de conservación según la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza de las aves australianas amenazadas debido a las tasas lentas de transición entre los estados de conservación; el riesgo de extinción podría incrementar si la reevaluación del portafolio es costosa. Aunque otros estudios de priorización de proyectos pueden recomendar una reevaluación y una reasignación periódicas, nuestros resultados revelaron condiciones cuando la reasignación es valiosa y demostraron una estrategia estructurada que puede ayudar a las agencias de conservación a programar e implementar decisiones iterativas de asignación de presupuestos de manera rentable.

Effects of the Argentine ant venom on terrestrial amphibians.

Invasive species have major impacts on biodiversity and are one of the primary causes of amphibian decline and extinction. Unlike other top ant invaders that negatively affect larger fauna via chemical defensive compounds, the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) does not have a functional sting. Nonetheless, it deploys defensive compounds against competitors and adversaries. We estimated levels of ant aggression toward 3 native terrestrial amphibians by challenging juveniles in field ant trails and in lab ant foraging arenas. We measured the composition and quantities of toxin in L. humile by analyzing pygidial glands and whole-body contents. We examined the mechanisms of toxicity in juvenile amphibians by quantifying the toxin in amphibian tissues, searching for histological damages, and calculating toxic doses for each amphibian species. To determine the potential scope of the threat to amphibians, we used global databases to estimate the number, ranges, and conservation status of terrestrial amphibian species with ranges that overlap those of L. humile. Juvenile amphibians co-occurring spatially and temporally with L. humile die when they encounter L. humile on an ant trail. In the lab, when a juvenile amphibian came in contact with L. humile the ants reacted quickly to spray pygidial-gland venom onto the juveniles. Iridomyrmecin was the toxic compound in the spray. Following absorption, it accumulated in brain, kidney, and liver tissue. Toxic dose for amphibian was species dependent. Worldwide, an estimated 817 terrestrial amphibian species overlap in range with L. humile, and 6.2% of them are classified as threatened. Our findings highlight the high potential of L. humile venom to negatively affect amphibian juveniles and provide a basis for exploring the largely overlooked impacts this ant has in its wide invasive range.

Efectos del Veneno de la Hormiga Argentina sobre los Anfibios Terrestres Resumen Las especies invasoras tienen un impacto importante sobre la biodiversidad y son una de las causas principales del declive y extinción de los anfibios. A diferencia de otras hormigas super-invasoras que afectan negativamente a animales más grandes por medio de compuestos químicos de defensa, la hormiga argentina (Linepithema humile) no tiene unaguijón funcional. Sin embargo, esta hormiga despliega compuestos defensivos contra sus competidores y adversarios. Estimamos los niveles de agresión de las hormigas hacia tres anfibios terrestres nativos exponiendo a los anfibios juveniles en pistas de hormigas en el campo y en las arenas de forrajeo de las hormigas en el laboratorio. Medimos la composición y las cantidades de toxina que presenta L. humile por medio del análisis de las glándulas pigidiales y el contenido en el cuerpo completo. Examinamos los mecanismos de la toxicidad en los anfibios juveniles cuantificando la toxina en el tejido del anfibio, buscando daños histológicos y calculando las dosis tóxicas para cada especie de anfibio. Para determinar el alcance potencial de la amenaza para los anfibios usamos bases de datos mundiales para estimar el número, distribución y estado de conservación de las especies terrestres de anfibios con distribuciones que se solapan con la de L. humile. Los anfibios juveniles que co-ocurren temporal y espacialmente con L. humile mueren al encontrarse con esta especie de hormiga en sus pistas. En el laboratorio, cuando un anfibio juvenil entró en contacto con L. humile, las hormigas reaccionaron rápidamente rociando a estos juveniles con veneno proveniente de las glándulas pigidiales. La iridomyrmecina fue el compuesto tóxico que encontramos en las glándulas pigidiales. Después de ser absorbida por la piel del anfibio, se acumuló en el cerebro, los riñones y el hígado. La dosis tóxica para los anfibios depende de la especie. A nivel mundial, se estima que 817 especies de anfibios terrestres tienen una distribución que se solapa con la de L. humile, y el 6.2% de estas especies se encuentran clasificadas como amenazadas. Nuestros hallazgos resaltan el potencial alto del veneno de L. humile para tener efectos negativos sobre los anfibios juveniles y también proporcionan una base para la exploración de los impactos de esta hormiga en su amplio rango invasivo, los cuales generalmente son ignorados.

Fact and value in invasion biology.

Some invasion biologists contend their science has reached a consensus on 4 facts: cost estimates of the effects of nonindigenous species provided in papers by Pimentel et al. are credible; invasive species generally, not just predators, pose significant extinction threats; characteristic biological differences distinguish novel from native species, ecosystems, communities, and processes; and ontological dualism, which distinguishes between natural and anthropogenic processes and influences, plays a useful role in biological inquiry. I contend there is no convincing empirical evidence for any of these propositions. Leading invasion biologists cite their agreement about these propositions as evidence for them and impugn the motives of critics who believe consensus should be based on evidence not the other way around.

Hecho y Valor en la Biología de la Invasión Resumen Algunos biólogos de la invasión sostienen que su ciencia ha alcanzado un consenso en 4 hechos: las estimaciones de los costos de los efectos de las especies no nativas proporcionadas en artículos por Pimentel et al. son creíbles; las especies invasoras en general, no solo las depredadoras, representan amenazas de extinción significativas; las diferencias en las características biológicas distinguen a las especies, ecosistemas, comunidades y procesos nuevos de los nativos; y la dualidad ontológica, que distingue entre procesos e influencias naturales y antropogénicas, juega un papel útil en la investigación biológica. Sostengo que no hay evidencias empíricas convincentes para cualquiera de esas propuestas. Los principales biólogos de la invasión están de acuerdo acerca de estas propuestas como evidencia para ellos e impugnan los motivos de los críticos que consideran que el consenso debe basarse en evidencias, no al revés.

Deconstructing compassionate conservation.

Compassionate conservation focuses on 4 tenets: first, do no harm; individuals matter; inclusivity of individual animals; and peaceful coexistence between humans and animals. Recently, compassionate conservation has been promoted as an alternative to conventional conservation philosophy. We believe examples presented by compassionate conservationists are deliberately or arbitrarily chosen to focus on mammals; inherently not compassionate; and offer ineffective conservation solutions. Compassionate conservation arbitrarily focuses on charismatic species, notably large predators and megaherbivores. The philosophy is not compassionate when it leaves invasive predators in the environment to cause harm to vastly more individuals of native species or uses the fear of harm by apex predators to terrorize mesopredators. Hindering the control of exotic species (megafauna, predators) in situ will not improve the conservation condition of the majority of biodiversity. The positions taken by so-called compassionate conservationists on particular species and on conservation actions could be extended to hinder other forms of conservation, including translocations, conservation fencing, and fertility control. Animal welfare is incredibly important to conservation, but ironically compassionate conservation does not offer the best welfare outcomes to animals and is often ineffective in achieving conservation goals. Consequently, compassionate conservation may threaten public and governmental support for conservation because of the limited understanding of conservation problems by the general public.

Deconstrucción de la Conservación Compasiva Resumen La conservación compasiva se enfoca en cuatro principios: no causar daño; los individuos importan; la integración de los animales individualmente; y la coexistencia pacífica entre los humanos u los animales. Recientemente, la conservación compasiva ha sido promovida como una alternativa a la filosofía convencional de la conservación. Creemos que los ejemplos presentados por los conservacionistas compasivos han sido elegidos arbitraria o deliberadamente por estar enfocados en los mamíferos; por ser inherentes y no compasivos; y por ofrecer soluciones de conservación poco efectivas. La conservación compasiva se enfoca arbitrariamente en las especies carismáticas, principalmente los grandes depredadores y los megaherbívoros. La filosofía no es compasiva cuando deja que los depredadores invasores dentro del ambiente causen daño a un vasto número de individuos nativos o usa el miedo al daño por superdepredadores para aterrorizar a los mesodepredadores. El entorpecimiento del control de especies exóticas (megafauna, depredadores) in situ no mejorará las condiciones de conservación de la mayoría de la biodiversidad, incluso si los conservacionistas compasivos no dañan a los individuos exóticos. Las posiciones que toman los llamados conservacionistas compasivos sobre especies particulares y sobre las acciones de conservación podrían extenderse para entorpecer otros tipos de conservación, incluyendo las reubicaciones, el encercado para la conservación y el control de la fertilidad. El bienestar animal es increíblemente importante para la conservación e irónicamente, la conservación compasiva no ofrece los mejores resultados de bienestar para los animales y comúnmente es poco efectiva en el logro de los objetivos de conservación. Como consecuencia, la conservación compasiva puede poner en peligro el apoyo público y del gobierno que tiene la conservación debido al entendimiento poco limitado que tiene el público general sobre los problemas de conservación.

Minimizing opportunity costs to aquatic connectivity restoration while controlling an invasive species.

Controlling invasive species is critical for conservation but can have unintended consequences for native species and divert resources away from other efforts. This dilemma occurs on a grand scale in the North American Great Lakes, where dams and culverts block tributary access to habitat of desirable fish species and are a lynchpin of long-standing efforts to limit ecological damage inflicted by the invasive, parasitic sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). Habitat restoration and sea-lamprey control create conflicting goals for managing aging infrastructure. We used optimization to minimize opportunity costs of habitat gains for 37 desirable migratory fishes that arose from restricting sea lamprey access (0-25% increase) when selecting barriers for removal under a limited budget (US$1-105 million). Imposing limits on sea lamprey habitat reduced gains in tributary access for desirable species by 15-50% relative to an unconstrained scenario. Additional investment to offset the effect of limiting sea-lamprey access resulted in high opportunity costs for 30 of 37 species (e.g., an additional US$20-80 million for lake sturgeon [Acipenser fulvescens]) and often required ≥5% increase in sea-lamprey access to identify barrier-removal solutions adhering to the budget and limiting access. Narrowly distributed species exhibited the highest opportunity costs but benefited more at less cost when small increases in sea-lamprey access were allowed. Our results illustrate the value of optimization in limiting opportunity costs when balancing invasion control against restoration benefits for diverse desirable species. Such trade-off analyses are essential to the restoration of connectivity within fragmented rivers without unleashing invaders.

Prospects for stakeholder coordination by protected-area managers in Europe.

Growing resource demands by humans, invasive species, natural hazards, and a changing climate have created broad-scale impacts and the need for broader-extent conservation activities that span ownerships and even political borders. Implementing regional-scale conservation brings great challenges, and learning how to overcome these challenges is essential for maintaining biodiversity (i.e., richness and evenness of biological communities) and ecosystem functions and services across scales and borders in the face of system change. We administered an online survey to examine factors potentially driving perspectives of protected-area (PA) managers regarding coordination with neighboring PAs and other stakeholders (i.e., stakeholder coordination) for conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services during the next decade within diverse regions across Europe. Although >70% (n = 58) of responding PA managers indicated that climate change and invasive species are relevant for their PAs, they gave <50% probability that these threats could be mitigated through stakeholder coordination. They thought there was a >60% probability (n = 85) that stakeholder coordination would take place with the aim to improve conservation outcomes. Consistent with the foundation on which many European PAs were established, managers viewed maintaining or enhancing biodiversity as the most important (>70%; n = 61) expected benefit. Other benefits included maintaining or enhancing human resources and environmental education (range of Bayesian credibility intervals [CIs] 57-93%). They thought the main barriers to stakeholder coordination were the lack of human and economic resources (CI 59-67% chance of hindering; n = 64) followed by communication and interstakeholder differences in political structures and laws (CI 51-64% probability of hindering). European policies and strategies that address these hindering factors could be particularly effective means of enabling implementation of green infrastructure networks in which PAs are the nodes.

Integrating archaeology and ancient DNA analysis to address invasive species colonization in the Gulf of Alaska.

The intentional and unintentional movement of plants and animals by humans has transformed ecosystems and landscapes globally. Assessing when and how a species was introduced are central to managing these transformed landscapes, particularly in island environments. In the Gulf of Alaska, there is considerable interest in the history of mammal introductions and rehabilitating Gulf of Alaska island environments by eradicating mammals classified as invasive species. The Arctic ground squirrel (Urocitellus parryii) is of concern because it affects vegetation and seabirds on Gulf of Alaska islands. This animal is assumed to have been introduced by historic settlers; however, ground squirrel remains in the prehistoric archaeological record of Chirikof Island, Alaska, challenge this timeline and suggest they colonized the islands long ago. We used 3 lines of evidence to address this problem: direct radiocarbon dating of archaeological squirrel remains; evidence of prehistoric human use of squirrels; and ancient DNA analysis of dated squirrel remains. Chirikof squirrels dated to at least 2000 years ago, and cut marks on squirrel bones suggested prehistoric use by people. Ancient squirrels also shared a mitochondrial haplotype with modern Chirikof squirrels. These results suggest that squirrels have been on Chirikof longer than previously assumed and that the current population of squirrels is closely related to the ancient population. Thus, it appears ground squirrels are not a recent, human-mediated introduction and may have colonized the island via a natural dispersal event or an ancient human translocation.

Relation between extinction and assisted colonization of plants in the arctic-alpine and boreal regions.

Assisted colonization of vascular plants is considered by many ecologists an important tool to preserve biodiversity threatened by climate change. I argue that assisted colonization may have negative consequences in arctic-alpine and boreal regions. The observed slow movement of plants toward the north has been an argument for assisted colonization. However, these range shifts may be slow because for many plants microclimatic warming (ignored by advocates of assisted colonization) has been smaller than macroclimatic warming. Arctic-alpine and boreal plants may have limited possibilities to disperse farther north or to higher elevations. I suggest that arctic-alpine species are more likely to be driven to extinction because of competitive exclusion by southern species than by increasing temperatures. If so, the future existence of arctic-alpine and boreal flora may depend on delaying or preventing the migration of plants toward the north to allow northern species to evolve to survive in a warmer climate. In the arctic-alpine region, preventing the dispersal of trees and shrubs may be the most important method to mitigate the negative effects of climate change. The purported conservation benefits of assisted colonization should not be used to promote the migration of invasive species by forestry.

Improving credibility and transparency of conservation impact evaluations through the partial identification approach.

The fundamental challenge of evaluating the impact of conservation interventions is that researchers must estimate the difference between the outcome after an intervention occurred and what the outcome would have been without it (counterfactual). Because the counterfactual is unobservable, researchers must make an untestable assumption that some units (e.g., organisms or sites) that were not exposed to the intervention can be used as a surrogate for the counterfactual (control). The conventional approach is to make a point estimate (i.e., single number along with a confidence interval) of impact, using, for example, regression. Point estimates provide powerful conclusions, but in nonexperimental contexts they depend on strong assumptions about the counterfactual that often lack transparency and credibility. An alternative approach, called partial identification (PI), is to first estimate what the counterfactual bounds would be if the weakest possible assumptions were made. Then, one narrows the bounds by using stronger but credible assumptions based on an understanding of why units were selected for the intervention and how they might respond to it. We applied this approach and compared it with conventional approaches by estimating the impact of a conservation program that removed invasive trees in part of the Cape Floristic Region. Even when we used our largest PI impact estimate, the program's control costs were 1.4 times higher than previously estimated. PI holds promise for applications in conservation science because it encourages researchers to better understand and account for treatment selection biases; can offer insights into the plausibility of conventional point-estimate approaches; could reduce the problem of advocacy in science; might be easier for stakeholders to agree on a bounded estimate than a point estimate where impacts are contentious; and requires only basic arithmetic skills.

A systematic survey of the integration of animal behavior into conservation.

The role of behavioral ecology in improving wildlife conservation and management has been the subject of much recent debate. We sought to answer 2 foundational questions about the current use of behavioral knowledge in conservation: To what extent is behavioral knowledge used in wildlife conservation and management, and how does the use of animal behavior differ among conservation fields in both frequency and types of use? We searched the literature for intersections between key fields of animal behavior and conservation and created a systematic heat map (i.e., graphical representation of data where values are represented as colors) to visualize relative efforts. Some behaviors, such as dispersal and foraging, were commonly considered (mean [SE] of 1147.38 [353.11] and 439.44 [108.85] papers per cell, respectively). In contrast, other behaviors, such as learning, social, and antipredatory behaviors were rarely considered (mean [SE] of 33.88 [7.62], 44.81 [10.65], and 22.69 [6.37] papers per cell, respectively). In many cases, awareness of the importance of behavior did not translate into applicable management tools. Our results challenge previous suggestions that there is little association between the fields of behavioral ecology and conservation and reveals tremendous variation in the use of different behaviors in conservation. We recommend that researchers focus on examining underutilized intersections of behavior and conservation themes for which preliminary work shows a potential for improving conservation and management, translating behavioral theory into applicable and testable predictions, and creating systematic reviews to summarize the behavioral evidence within the behavior-conservation intersections for which many studies exist.

Plague bacterium as a transformer species in prairie dogs and the grasslands of western North America.

Invasive transformer species change the character, condition, form, or nature of ecosystems and deserve considerable attention from conservation scientists. We applied the transformer species concept to the plague bacterium Yersinia pestis in western North America, where the pathogen was introduced around 1900. Y. pestis transforms grassland ecosystems by severely depleting the abundance of prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.) and thereby causing declines in native species abundance and diversity, including threatened and endangered species; altering food web connections; altering the import and export of nutrients; causing a loss of ecosystem resilience to encroaching invasive plants; and modifying prairie dog burrows. Y. pestis poses an important challenge to conservation biologists because it causes trophic-level perturbations that affect the stability of ecosystems. Unfortunately, understanding of the effects of Y. pestis on ecosystems is rudimentary, highlighting an acute need for continued research.

La Bacteria de la Peste como una Especie Transformadora en los Perritos de las Praderas y los Pastizales del Oeste de Norteamérica Resumen Las especies invasoras transformadoras cambian el carácter, la condición, la forma o la naturaleza de los ecosistemas y merecen atención considerable por parte de los científicos de la conservación. Aplicamos el concepto de especie transformadora a la bacteria de la peste Yersinia pestis en el oeste de Norteamérica, en donde el patógeno fue introducido alrededor de 1900. Y. pestis transforma los ecosistemas de pastizal al disminuir severamente la abundancia de los perritos de las praderas (Cynomys spp.) y por lo tanto causa declinaciones en la abundancia y diversidad de las especies nativas, incluidas las especies amenazadas y en peligro; altera las conexiones de las redes alimenticias; altera la importación y exportación de nutrientes; causa la pérdida de resiliencia del ecosistema ante las plantas invasoras; y modifica las madrigueras de los perritos. Y. pestis es un reto importante para los biólogos de la conservación ya que causa perturbaciones de nivel trófico que afectan la estabilidad de los ecosistemas. Desafortunadamente, el entendimiento de los efectos de Y. pestis sobre los ecosistemas es rudimentario, lo que resalta una necesidad aguda de investigación continua.

Use of structured expert judgment to forecast invasions by bighead and silver carp in Lake Erie.

Identifying which nonindigenous species will become invasive and forecasting the damage they will cause is difficult and presents a significant problem for natural resource management. Often, the data or resources necessary for ecological risk assessment are incomplete or absent, leaving environmental decision makers ill equipped to effectively manage valuable natural resources. Structured expert judgment (SEJ) is a mathematical and performance-based method of eliciting, weighting, and aggregating expert judgments. In contrast to other methods of eliciting and aggregating expert judgments (where, for example, equal weights may be assigned to experts), SEJ weights each expert on the basis of his or her statistical accuracy and informativeness through performance measurement on a set of calibration variables. We used SEJ to forecast impacts of nonindigenous Asian carp (Hypophthalmichthys spp.) in Lake Erie, where it is believed not to be established. Experts quantified Asian carp biomass, production, and consumption and their impact on 4 fish species if Asian carp were to become established. According to experts, in Lake Erie Asian carp have the potential to achieve biomass levels that are similar to the sum of biomasses for several fishes that are harvested commercially or recreationally. However, the impact of Asian carp on the biomass of these fishes was estimated by experts to be small, relative to long term average biomasses, with little uncertainty. Impacts of Asian carp in tributaries and on recreational activities, water quality, or other species were not addressed. SEJ can be used to quantify key uncertainties of invasion biology and also provide a decision-support tool when the necessary information for natural resource management and policy is not available.

The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control.

Compensating for biodiversity losses in 1 location by conserving or restoring biodiversity elsewhere (i.e., biodiversity offsetting) is being used increasingly to compensate for biodiversity losses resulting from development. We considered whether a form of biodiversity offsetting, enhancement offsetting (i.e., enhancing the quality of degraded natural habitats through intensive ecological management), can realistically secure additional funding to control biological invaders at a scale and duration that results in enhanced biodiversity outcomes. We suggest that biodiversity offsetting has the potential to enhance biodiversity values through funding of invasive species control, but it needs to meet 7 key conditions: be technically possible to reduce invasive species to levels that enhance native biodiversity; be affordable; be sufficiently large to compensate for the impact; be adaptable to accommodate new strategic and tactical developments while not compromising biodiversity outcomes; acknowledge uncertainties associated with managing pests; be based on an explicit risk assessment that identifies the cost of not achieving target outcomes; and include financial mechanisms to provide for in-perpetuity funding. The challenge then for conservation practitioners, advocates, and policy makers is to develop frameworks that allow for durable and effective partnerships with developers to realize the full potential of enhancement offsets, which will require a shift away from traditional preservation-focused approaches to biodiversity management.

Trait differences between naturalized and invasive plant species independent of residence time and phylogeny.

The ability to predict which alien plants will transition from naturalized to invasive prior to their introduction to novel regions is a key goal for conservation and has the potential to increase the efficacy of weed risk assessment (WRA). However, multiple factors contribute to plant invasion success (e.g., functional traits, range characteristics, residence time, phylogeny), and they all must be taken into account simultaneously in order to identify meaningful correlates of invasion success. We compiled 146 pairs of phylogenetically paired (congeneric) naturalized and invasive plant species in Australia with similar minimum residence times (i.e., time since introduction in years). These pairs were used to test for differences in 5 functional traits (flowering duration, leaf size, maximum height, specific leaf area [SLA], seed mass) and 3 characteristics of species' native ranges (biome occupancy, mean annual temperature, and rainfall breadth) between naturalized and invasive species. Invasive species, on average, had larger SLA, longer flowering periods, and were taller than their congeneric naturalized relatives. Invaders also exhibited greater tolerance for different environmental conditions in the native range, where they occupied more biomes and a wider breadth of rainfall and temperature conditions than naturalized congeners. However, neither seed mass nor leaf size differed between pairs of naturalized and invasive species. A key finding was the role of SLA in distinguishing between naturalized and invasive pairs. Species with high SLA values were typically associated with faster growth rates, more rapid turnover of leaf material, and shorter lifespans than those species with low SLA. This suite of characteristics may contribute to the ability of a species to transition from naturalized to invasive across a wide range of environmental contexts and disturbance regimes. Our findings will help in the refinement of WRA protocols, and we advocate the inclusion of quantitative traits, in particular SLA, into the WRA schemes.

The effect of scientific evidence on conservation practitioners' management decisions.

A major justification of environmental management research is that it helps practitioners, yet previous studies show it is rarely used to inform their decisions. We tested whether conservation practitioners focusing on bird management were willing to use a synopsis of relevant scientific literature to inform their management decisions. This allowed us to examine whether the limited use of scientific information in management is due to a lack of access to the scientific literature or whether it is because practitioners are either not interested or unable to incorporate the research into their decisions. In on-line surveys, we asked 92 conservation managers, predominantly from Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom, to provide opinions on 28 management techniques that could be applied to reduce predation on birds. We asked their opinions before and after giving them a summary of the literature about the interventions' effectiveness. We scored the overall effectiveness and certainty of evidence for each intervention through an expert elicitation process-the Delphi method. We used the effectiveness scores to assess the practitioners' level of understanding and awareness of the literature. On average, each survey participant changed their likelihood of using 45.7% of the interventions after reading the synopsis of the evidence. They were more likely to implement effective interventions and avoid ineffective actions, suggesting that their intended future management strategies may be more successful than current practice. More experienced practitioners were less likely to change their management practices than those with less experience, even though they were not more aware of the existing scientific information than less experienced practitioners. The practitioners' willingness to change their management choices when provided with summarized scientific evidence suggests that improved accessibility to scientific information would benefit conservation management outcomes.

Prioritizing islands for the eradication of invasive vertebrates in the United Kingdom overseas territories.

Invasive alien species are one of the primary threats to native biodiversity on islands worldwide. Consequently, eradicating invasive species from islands has become a mainstream conservation practice. Deciding which islands have the highest priority for eradication is of strategic importance to allocate limited resources to achieve maximum conservation benefit. Previous island prioritizations focused either on a narrow set of native species or on a small geographic area. We devised a prioritization approach that incorporates all threatened native terrestrial vertebrates and all invasive terrestrial vertebrates occurring on 11 U.K. overseas territories, which comprise over 2000 islands ranging from the sub-Antarctic to the tropics. Our approach includes eradication feasibility and distinguishes between the potential and realistic conservation value of an eradication, which reflects the benefit that would accrue following eradication of either all invasive species or only those species for which eradication techniques currently exist. We identified the top 25 priority islands for invasive species eradication that together would benefit extant populations of 155 native species including 45 globally threatened species. The 5 most valuable islands included the 2 World Heritage islands Gough (South Atlantic) and Henderson (South Pacific) that feature unique seabird colonies, and Anegada, Little Cayman, and Guana Island in the Caribbean that feature a unique reptile fauna. This prioritization can be rapidly repeated if new information or techniques become available, and the approach could be replicated elsewhere in the world.