Indirect markers of oocyte quality in patients with ovarian endometriosis undergoing IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of ovarian endometriomas (OMA) on indirect markers of oocyte quality in patients undergoing IVF, compared with women without anatomical or functional ovarian abnormalities. The search spanned original randomized controlled trials, case-control studies and cohort studies published in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the ClinicalTrials.gov database up to October 2023. Thirty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis, showing no significant differences in fertilization (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.94-1.30), blastulation (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64-1.14) and cancellation (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.78-1.44) rates. However, patients with OMA exhibited significantly lower numbers of total and mature (metaphase II) oocytes retrieved (mean difference -1.59, 95% CI -2.25 to -0.94; mean difference -1.86, 95% CI -2.46 to -1.26, respectively), and lower numbers of top-quality embryos (mean difference -0.49, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.06). The Ovarian Sensitivity Index was similar between the groups (mean difference -1.55, 95% CI -3.27 to 0.18). The lack of data published to date prevented meta-analysis on euploidy rate. In conclusion, although the presence of OMA could decrease the oocyte yield in patients undergoing IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, it does not appear to have an adverse impact on oocyte quality.

Comparison of aneuploidy for patients of different ages treated with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation or GnRH antagonist protocols.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does euploidy status differ among patients of different ages treated with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) or gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-a) protocols? DESIGN: Patients undergoing PGT-A (n = 418; 440 cycles) were enrolled and grouped according to female age (<35 years and ≥35 years). Protocols were as follows: PPOS: <35 years (n = 131; 137 cycles); ≥35 years (n = 72; 80 cycles); GnRH-a: <35 years (n = 149; 152 cycles); ≥35 years (n = 66; 71 cycles). RESULTS: For cycles treated with PPOS in the older group, rates of euploid blastocyst per metaphase Ⅱ oocyte (15.48% versus 10.47%) and per biopsied blastocyst (54.94% versus 40.88%) were significantly higher than those treated with GnRH-a (P < 0.05). The mosaic rate per biopsied blastocyst was significantly lower for cycles treated with PPOS than cycles treated with GnRH-a (8.64% versus 23.36%) (P < 0.001). In the younger group, no significant difference was found between treatments (P > 0.05). In older and younger groups, the drug to inhibit LH surge was cheaper for cycles treated with PPOS compared with GnRH-a (P < 0.001). Generalized estimation equations based on binomial distribution female age and euploidy rate was significantly negatively correlated for all participants (ß -0.109, 95% CI -0.183 to -0.035, P = 0.004), and between GnRH-a protocol (reference: PPOS) and the euploidy rate in the older group (ß -0.126, 95% CI -0.248 to -0.004, P = 0.042). Multiple logistic regression indicated that ovarian stimulation protocol was not associated with ongoing pregnancy rate (OR 0.652, 95% CI 0.358 to 1.177; P = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: PPOS is suitable for patients undergoing PGT-A, particularly older patients for the higher euploid blastocyst rate attained by PPOS protocol.

The comparision among euploidy of preimplantation blastocysts in different controlled ovary stimulation (COH) protocols.

PURPOSE: To compare differences in euploidy rates for blastocysts in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long and short protocols, GnRH-antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol, progestin-primed ovarian stimulation and mild stimulation protocols, and other ovary stimulation protocols. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study from the Assisted Reproductive Medicine Department of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. A total of 1657 PGT-A cycles with intracytoplasmic sperm injection after different controlled ovary hyperstimulation protocols were analyzed, and a total of 3154 embryos were biopsied. Differences in euploidy rate per embryo biopsied, embryo euploidy rate per oocyte retrieved and cycle cancellation rate were compared. RESULTS: For the PGT-A cycles, the euploidy rate per embryo biopsied was lower in the GnRH-ant protocol than in the GnRH-a long protocol (53.26 vs. 58.68%, respectively). Multiple linear regression showed that the GnRH-ant protocol was associated with a lower euploidy rate per embryo biopsied (ß = -0.079, p = 0.011). The euploidy rate per embryo biopsied was not affected by total gonadotropin dosage, duration of stimulation and number of oocytes retrieved. The embryo euploidy rate per oocyte retrieved was similar in all protocols and was negatively correlated with the total number of oocytes retrieved (ß = -0.003, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Compared with the GnRH-a long protocol, the GnRH-ant protocol was associated with a lower euploidy rate per embryo biopsied. The total gonadotropin dosage, duration of stimulation and number of oocytes retrieved did not appear to significantly influence euploidy rates.

Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) protocol yields lower euploidy rate in older patients undergoing IVF.

BACKGROUND: To explore if exogenous progestin required for progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol compromises the euploidy rate of patients who underwent preimplantation genetic testing cycles when compared to those who received the conventional gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 128 preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles performed from January 2018 to December 2021 in a single university hospital-affiliated fertility center. Infertile women aged 27 to 45 years old requiring PGT-A underwent either PPOS protocol or GnRH-antagonist protocol with in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for fertilization. Frozen embryo transfers were performed following each PGT-A cycle. Data regarding the two groups were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). RESULTS: Patients who underwent PPOS treatment had significantly reduced blastocyst formation rate and euploidy rate compared to those who received the GnRH antagonist protocol. Subgroup-analysis was performed by stratifying patients' age into elder and young subgroups (elder: ≥ 38-year-old, young: < 38-year-old). In the elder sub-population, the blastocyst formation rate of the PPOS group was significantly lower than that of the GnRH-antagonist group (45.8 ± 6.1% vs. 59.9 ± 3.8%, p = 0.036). Moreover, the euploidy rate of the PPOS group was only about 20% of that of  the GnRH-antagonist group (5.4% and 26.7%, p = 0.006). In contrast, no significant differences in blastocyst formation rate (63.5 ± 5.7% vs. 67.1 ± 3.2%, p = 0.45) or euploidy rate (30.1% vs. 38.5%, p = 0.221) were observed in the young sub-population. Secondary outcomes, which included implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, and miscarriage rate, were comparable between the two treatment groups, regardless of age. CONCLUSION: When compared to the conventional GnRH-antagonist approach, PPOS protocol could potentially reduce the euploidy rate in aging IVF patients. However, due to the retrospective nature of this study, the results are to be interpreted with caution. Before the PPOS protocol is widely implemented, further studies exploring its efficacy in larger populations are needed to define the optimal patient selection suitable for this method. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Human Investigation and Ethical Committee of Chang Gung Medical Foundation (202200194B0).

The association of obesity with euploidy rates in women undergoing in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of body mass index (BMI) on euploidy rates for in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) utilizing primarily next-generation sequencing (NGS). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included women aged ≤ 45 years who underwent IVF/PGT between September 2013 and September 2020 at a single university-affiliated fertility center. The primary outcome was euploidy rate. Secondary outcomes included peak serum estradiol (E2), number of oocytes retrieved, oocyte maturation rate, high-quality blastulation rate, clinical loss rate (CLR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate (OPR/LBR). RESULTS: The study included 1335 IVF cycles that were stratified according to BMI (normal, n = 648; overweight, n = 377; obese, n = 310). The obese group was significantly older with significantly lower baseline FSH, peak E2, high-quality blastulation rate, and number of embryos biopsied than the normal group. Overall euploidy rates were not significantly different between BMI groups (normal 36.4% ± 1.3; overweight 37.3% ± 1.8; obese 32.3% ± 1.8; p = 0.11), which persisted after controlling for covariates (p = 0.82) and after stratification of euploidy rate by age group and by number of oocytes retrieved per age group. There were no significant differences in CLR, CPR, and OPR/LBR across BMI groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a lower high quality blastulation rate with obesity, there is not a significant difference in euploidy rates across BMI groups in women undergoing IVF/PGT.

Comparison of euploidy rates of blastocysts in women treated with progestins or GnRH antagonist to prevent the luteinizing hormone surge during ovarian stimulation.

STUDY QUESTION: Does the prevalence of euploid blastocysts differ between patients treated with progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) and those treated with conventional ovarian stimulation? SUMMARY ANSWER: The numbers of blastocysts and euploid blastocysts per patient and the number of euploid embryos per injected oocyte are similar for patients undergoing progestin-primed ovarian stimulation and for those undergoing conventional ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonist. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: New approaches to ovarian stimulation have been developed based on the use of drugs administrable by mouth instead of via injections. Attention has been dedicated to progestins to block the LH surge. Previous data regarding the number of oocytes retrieved and the number of good-quality embryos generated in PPOS have demonstrated similar outcomes when compared to conventional ovarian stimulation, even if some concerns regarding the quality of embryos have been advanced. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a prospective non-inferiority age-matched case-control study. In a period of 6 months, a total of 785 blastocysts from 1867 injected oocytes obtained from 192 patients were available for analysis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Infertile women undergoing IVF and preimplanation genetic testing (PGT) cycles were included. Forty-eight patients were treated with PPOS, and for each of them three age-matched historical controls (n = 144) treated with a GnRH antagonist protocol were selected. PGT was performed according to next-generation sequencing technology. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Basal characteristics were similar in the two groups; a substantial similarity of the main outcome measures in the two treatment groups has also been found. The rate of formation of euploid blastocysts per oocyte was 21% in both the two treatment groups. The percentage of patients with euploid embryos and the total number of euploid blastocysts per patient (median and interquartile range, IQR) in the PPOS group were 38.7 (25.5-52.9) and 2 (1.3-3.1), respectively. These figures were not significantly different in women treated with the GnRH antagonist protocol i.e. 42 (28-53.8) and 2.1 (1.3-2.9), respectively. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This was a case-control study which may limit the reliability of the main findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our results encourage the use of PPOS, especially for oocyte donation, for fertility preservation and for patients in which total freezing of embryos is foreseen, for those expected to be high responders or candidates for preimplantation genetic testing. However, studies aiming to investigate the effect of PPOS on the live birth rate are warranted. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None.

No effect of ovarian stimulation and oocyte yield on euploidy and live birth rates: an analysis of 12 298 trophectoderm biopsies.

STUDY QUESTION: Does ovarian stimulation affect embryo euploidy rates or live birth rates (LBRs) after transfer of euploid embryos? SUMMARY ANSWER: Euploidy rates and LBRs after transfer of euploid embryos are not significantly influenced by gonadotropin dosage, duration of ovarian stimulation, estradiol level, follicle size at ovulation trigger or number of oocytes retrieved, regardless of a woman's age. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Aneuploidy rates increase steadily with age, reaching >80% in women >42 years old. The goal of ovarian stimulation is to overcome this high aneuploidy rate through the recruitment of several follicles, which increases the likelihood of obtaining a euploid embryo that results in a healthy conceptus. However, several studies have suggested that a high response to stimulation might be embryotoxic and/or increase aneuploidy rates by enhancing abnormal segregation of chromosomes during meiosis. Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated a remarkable difference in euploidy rates, ranging from 39.5 to 82.5%, among young oocyte donors in 42 fertility centres, potentially suggesting an iatrogenic etiology resulting from different stimulation methods. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a retrospective cohort study that included 2230 in vitro fertilisation (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles and 930 frozen-thawed single euploid embryo transfer (FET) cycles, performed in our centre between 2013 and 2017. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A total of 12 298 embryos were analysed for ploidy status. Women were divided into five age groups (<35, 35-37, 38-40, 41-42 and >42 years old). Outcomes were compared between different durations of stimulation (<10, 10-12 and ≥13 days), total gonadotropin dosages (<4000, 4000-6000 and >6000 IU), numbers of oocytes retrieved (<10, 10-19 and ≥20 oocytes), peak estradiol levels (<2000, 2000-3000 and >3000 pg/mL), and sizes of the largest follicle on the day of trigger (<20 and ≥20 mm). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Within the same age group, both euploidy rates and LBRs were comparable between cycles regardless of their differences in total gonadotropin dosage, duration of stimulation, number of oocytes harvested, size of the largest follicles or peak estradiol levels. In the youngest group, (<35 years, n = 3469 embryos), euploidy rates were comparable between cycles with various total gonadotropin dosages (55.6% for <4000 IU, 52.9% for 4000-6000 IU and 62.3% for >6000 IU; P = 0.3), durations of stimulation (54.4% for <10 days, 55.2% for 10-12 days and 60.9% for >12 days; P = 0.2), number of oocytes harvested (59.4% for <10 oocytes, 55.2% for 10-19 oocytes and 53.4% for ≥20 oocytes; P = 0.2), peak estradiol levels (55.7% for E2 < 2000 pg/mL, 55.4% for E2 2000-3000 pg/mL and 54.8% for E2 > 3000 pg/mL; P = 0.9) and sizes of the largest follicle (55.6% for follicles <20 mm and 55.1% for follicles ≥20 mm; P = 0.8). Similarly, in the oldest group (>42 years, n = 1157 embryos), euploidy rates ranged from 8.7% for gonadotropins <4000 IU to 5.1% for gonadotropins >6000 IU (P = 0.3), from 10.8% for <10 days of stimulation to 8.5% for >12 days of stimulation (P = 0.3), from 7.3% for <10 oocytes to 7.4% for ≥20 oocytes (P = 0.4), from 8.8% for E2 < 2000 pg/mL to 7.5% for E2 > 3000 pg/mL (P = 0.8) and from 8.2% for the largest follicle <20 mm to 8.9% for ≥20 mm (P = 0.7). LBRs after single FET were also comparable between these groups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although this large study (2230 IVF/PGT-A cycles, 12 298 embryos and 930 single FET cycles) demonstrates the safety of ovarian stimulation in terms of aneuploidy and implantation potential of euploid embryos, a multi-centre study may help to prove the generalisability of our single-centre data. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These findings reassure providers and patients that gonadotropin dosage, duration of ovarian stimulation, estradiol level, follicle size at ovulation trigger and number of oocytes retrieved, within certain ranges, do not appear to significantly influence euploidy rates or LBRs, regardless of the woman's age. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was received and there are no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Looking past the appearance: a comprehensive description of the clinical contribution of poor-quality blastocysts to increase live birth rates during cycles with aneuploidy testing.

STUDY QUESTION: Which are the clinical benefits and risks of including poor-quality blastocysts (PQBs) in the cohort of biopsied embryos during a cycle with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A)? SUMMARY ANSWER: PQBs show a worse prognosis with respect to sibling non-PQBs, but their clinical use allows an overall 2.6% increase in the number of live births (LBs) achievable after PGT-A. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: PQBs (

Correlation between Morphologic Grading and Euploidy Rates of Blastocysts, and Clinical Outcomes in In Vitro Fertilization Preimplantation Genetic Screening.

BACKGROUND: The standard morphological evaluation has been widely used for embryo selection, but it has limitations. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between morphologic grading and euploidy rate of in vitro fertilization (IVF) preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) and compare the pregnancy rates in young and old ages. METHODS: This is a retrospective study using the medical records of patients who underwent IVF procedures with PGS between January 2016 and February 2017 in a single center. The embryo grades were categorized into 4 groups: excellent, good, fair, and poor. Basic characteristics, euploidy rates, clinical pregnancy (CP) rates and ongoing pregnancy rates were analyzed. RESULTS: The excellent group had significantly higher rate of euploid embryos than fair group (47.82% vs. 29.33%; P = 0.023) and poor group (47.82% vs. 29.60%; P = 0.005). When the four groups were recategorized into two groups (excellent and good vs. fair and poor), they also showed significant difference in euploidy rates (44.52% vs. 29.53%; P = 0.002). When the patients were divided into two groups by age 35, the CP rates for those under and over 35 years old were 44.74% and 47.83%, respectively, which showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: The significant differences among the euploidy rates of different morphologic embryo grades demonstrated the positive correlations between the morphologic grading of the embryo and the euploidy rate of PGS. Additionally, there was no significant difference between the younger and older patients' CP rates. These findings emphasize the fact that old age patients might benefit from PGS whatever the indication of PGS is.

Deconstructing the myth of poor prognosis for fast-cleaving embryos on day 3. Is it time to change the consensus?

PURPOSE: To determine the developmental competence of fast-cleaving D3 embryos. METHODS: Retrospective study including 4028 embryos from 513 PGT-A cycles performed between July 2014 and June 2017. Embryos were cultured in time-lapse incubators and biopsied at blastocyst stage. Embryos were classified in groups according to the number of cells on D3 (from 2-cell to ≥13 -cell and compacted). A generalized linear mixed model adjusted for confounding factors was performed to assess the chance to give rise to an euploid blastocyst in each group compared with the chance of 8-cell embryos. Implantation and live birth rates were also analyzed. RESULTS: The statistical analysis showed that embryos with 9 to 11 cells had a slightly lower euploid blastocyst rate than 8-cell embryos (OR (95% CI) 0.77 (0.61-0.96)) while embryos with more than 11 cells were found to be just as likely to give rise to an euploid blastocyst as the 8-cell embryos (OR (95% CI) 1.20 (0.92-1.56)). Conversely, slow-cleaving embryos had a significantly lower euploid blastocyst rate than 8-cell embryos (OR (95% CI) 0.31 (0.24-0.39)). Moreover, euploid blastocysts derived from fast-cleaving embryos and from 8-cell embryos exhibit similar live birth rates. No significant differences were found in the chance to give rise a live birth between 8-cell and 9- to 11-cell embryos (OR (95% CI) 1.23 (0.70-2.15)) and > 11-cell embryos (OR (95% CI) 1.09 (0.57-2.09)). CONCLUSIONS: Embryos with more than 11 cells exhibit similar developmental competence to 8-cell embryos. Their poor prognosis should be reconsidered.

Sperm DNA fragmentation index does not correlate with blastocyst euploidy rate in egg donor cycles.

Sperm DNA fragmentation is a known etiology for male infertility. We evaluated the impact of sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) on blastocyst euploidy in IVF cycles with egg donors. This observational retrospective study, which was conducted in a university affiliated fertility clinic, included IVF-ICSI-pre-implantation Genetic Screening (PGS) egg donor cycles in which DFI was tested prior to IVF, between January 1st, 2014 and July 31st, 2016. Twenty-seven cycles with DFI > 15% were included in the study group and compared with 18 cycles of DFI < 15% within control group. Research group participants had significantly lower sperm count and motility (55.4*106/ml and 37.4%, respectively) compared with controls (92.5*106/ml and 55.7%, respectively, p < .05). The groups were similar in terms of donors' demography (age, BMI), ovarian reserve (AMH, AFC) and response to hormonal stimulation (E2 level on triggering day and number of retrieved eggs). Embryo development (from 2PN through day 3 embryos to blastocysts) was similar as well. The number of biopsied blastocysts from study and control groups was 171 and 87, respectively. PGS with array comprehensive genomic hybridization revealed comparable euploidy rates of 69.3% and 67.3%, respectively (p > .05). DFI did not have an impact on the blastocyst euploidy rate in IVF cycles with egg donors.

Comparison of differences in development potentials between frozen-thawed D5 and D6 blastocysts and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes.

PURPOSE: Whether there are differences in the pregnancy outcomes of blastocysts cryopreserved during different developmental stages remains under debate because the results among studies are inconsistent. We analyzed blastocyst quality and pregnancy outcomes by considering blastocyst euploidy and investigated the differences in the development potential between blastocysts of different developmental stages (frozen-thawed day 5 [D5] and day 6 [D6] cycles) and their relationship with clinical pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: In total, 1374 D5 and 255 D6 frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles were retrospectively analyzed. Additionally, the chromosome euploidy and clinical pregnancy rates of 237 blastocysts from 50 pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGS) cycles were statistically analyzed. The corresponding euploidy rate and pregnancy outcomes of the D5 and D6 blastocyst transfers were also compared. RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate (47.2 vs 40.0 %; P = 0.04) and implantation rate (34.2 vs 28.8 %; P = 0.03) of the D5 blastocysts were higher than were those of the D6 blastocysts. However, the clinical pregnancy rate (52.4 vs 52.6 %; P = 0.97) and implantation rate (38.9 vs 35.6 %; P = 0.39) of the high-quality D5 blastocysts did not significantly differ from those of the high-quality D6 blastocysts. Analysis of blastocyst euploidy in 237 blastocysts examined in 50 PGS cycles showed that the euploidy rates of the D5 and D6 blastocysts were both 48.1 % (P = 0.99). The clinical pregnancy rate of the D5 blastocysts (48.5 vs 17.6 %; P = 0.03) was higher than that of the D6 blastocysts. The euploidy rates (55.2 vs 55.3 %; P = 0.99) and clinical pregnancy rates (60.0 vs 42.9 %; P = 0.77) of the high-quality D5 and D6 blastocysts did not differ. The euploidy rate (55.3 vs 41.5 %, P = 0.03) and clinical pregnancy rate (54.5 vs 25.0 %, P = 0.03) of the high-quality blastocysts were higher than were those of the poor-quality blastocysts. CONCLUSIONS: The euploidy rates between the D5 and D6 blastocysts did not differ. High-quality D6 blastocysts in frozen-thawed cycles had similar developmental potential and pregnancy outcomes compared to those of high-quality D5 blastocysts. The quality of the blastocysts was an important factor that affected the pregnancy outcomes of the frozen-thawed cycles.

Blastocysts originated from oocytes with smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates have a reduced euploidy rate: a retrospective cohort study.

Research question: Does the presence of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates (SERa) in oocytes adversely impact the euploidy rate of subsequent blastocysts? Design: We performed a retrospective cohort study with 671 young patients (< 38 years) undergoing their first preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) between January 2019 and October 2022 at a reproductive medical center of university affiliated teaching hospitals in China. Cycles were categorized as either SERa(+) cycles (containing at least one SERa(+) oocyte) or SERa(-) cycles (all oocytes without SERa). In SERa(+) cycles, oocytes were further subdivided into the SERa(+) oocyte group and the sibling SERa(-) oocyte group, comprising oocytes with normal morphology. Results: No significant differences were observed in the normal fertilization rate (72.9% vs. 75.4% vs. 72.6%, P=0.343), and cleavage rate (96.8% vs. 97.1% vs. 96.4%, P=0.839) among the SERa(-) cycle group, the SERa(-) oocyte group, and the SERa(+) oocyte group. Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in the rates of good quality embryos (44.7% vs. 48.8% vs. 46.2%, P=0.177) or blastocyst formation (60.1% vs. 60.9% vs. 60.5%, P=0.893) among the groups. However, the euploidy rate of blastocysts derived from SERa(+) oocytes was significantly lower compared to those from SERa(-) oocytes in SERa(+) cycles and normal oocytes in SERa(-) cycles (39.3% vs. 51.2% vs. 54.5%, P=0.005). Despite this, there were no significant differences in pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after euploid embryo transfer among the three groups. Conclusions: Blastocysts derived from SERa(+) oocytes have a lower euploidy rate than those derived from SERa(-) oocytes. Nevertheless, comparable reproductive outcomes were achieved following euploid embryo transfer from both SERa(+) and SERa(-) oocytes.

The impact of low oocyte maturity ratio on blastocyst euploidy rate: a matched retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between a low oocyte maturity ratio from in vitro fertilization cycle and blastocyst euploidy. METHODS: A total of 563 preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles (PGT cycles with chromosomal structural rearrangements were excluded) were performed between January 2021 and November 2022 at our center (average oocyte maturity rate: 86.4% ± 14.6%). Among them, 93 PGT cycles were classified into the low oocyte maturity rate group (group A, < mean - 1 standard deviation [SD]), and 186 PGT cycles were grouped into the average oocyte maturity rate group (group B, mean ± 1 SD). Group B was 2:1 matched with group A. Embryological, blastocyst ploidy, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The oocyte maturity (metaphase II [MII oocytes]), MII oocyte rate, and two pronuclei (2PN) rates were significantly lower in group A than in group B (5.2 ± 3.0 vs. 8.9 ± 5.0, P = 0.000; 61.6% vs. 93.0%, P = 0.000; 78.7% vs. 84.8%, P = 0.002, respectively). In group A, 106 of 236 blastocysts (44.9%) that underwent PGT for aneuploidy were euploid, which was not significantly different from the rate in group B (336/729, 46.1%, P = 0.753). However, euploid blastocysts were obtained only in 55 cycles in group A (55/93, 59.1%), which was lower than the rate in group B (145/186, 78.0%, P = 0.001). The clinical pregnancy rate in group B (73.9%) was higher than that in group A (58.0%) (P = 0.040). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a low oocyte maturity ratio is not associated with blastocyst euploidy but is associated with fewer cycles with euploid blastocysts for transfer, lower 2PN rates, and lower clinical pregnancy rates.

The presence of vacuoles in blastocysts is negatively associated with euploidy and live birth rates.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the presence of vacuoles in biopsied blastocysts is associated with the likelihood of aneuploidy and clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: A single reproductive center. INTERVENTION(S): None. PATIENT(S): This study retrospectively analyzed data obtained through preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy performed on 3351 blastocysts from 826 patients at a single reproductive center between August 2018 and July 2020. Ultimately, 167 single euploid blastocyst transfers were performed in these patients. Vacuoles existing in the trophectoderm or inner cell mass were observed using blastocyst biopsy. After the biopsy, all blastocysts were vitrified, and embryo transfer was performed in a subsequent treatment cycle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The associations between vacuoles and euploidy or live birth rates were assessed using logistic regression models and estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULT(S): Of the 3351 blastocysts from 826 patients, 903 (26.9%) were discovered to have vacuoles. The vacuole-positive group had a significantly lower percentage of euploid blastocysts after TE biopsy than the vacuole-negative group (28.8% vs. 35.5%). Embryos with vacuoles were significantly more likely to be poor quality (30.6% vs. 18.2%). Logistic regression analyses revealed that euploid blastocysts were positively associated with the absence of vacuoles, maternal age, and good embryo quality (vacuole-negative group: adjusted OR 1.291; 95% CI: 1.089-1.530; age <38 years: adjusted OR 1.989; 95% CI: 1.692-2.337; good embryo quality: adjusted OR 1.703; 95% CI: 1.405-2.064). The implantation and live birth rates were significantly lower for the transferred single euploid blastocysts with vacuoles than those without (35.5% vs. 56.6%; 29.0% vs. 52.2%, respectively). The live birth rate was positively associated with the absence of vacuoles (adjusted OR 2.792; 95% CI: 1.180-6.608). CONCLUSION(S): The formation of vacuoles in blastocysts is associated with lower rates of euploidy and live birth. Blastocysts without vacuoles should thus be prioritized for embryo transfer in vitro fertilization cycles.

Compared with conventional insemination, intracytoplasmic sperm injection provides no benefit in cases of nonmale factor infertility as evidenced by comparable euploidy rate.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether differences in euploidy rates exist between intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and conventional insemination (CI) in nonmale factor infertility cases. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single, academically affiliated infertility center in the United States. PATIENTS: A total of 3554 patients who underwent in vitro fertilization cycles from January 2014 to December 2021. All cycles that had preimplantation testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) performed by trophectoderm biopsy and had a postpreparation sperm concentration >4 million total motile sperm per milliliter were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the embryo euploidy rate per embryo biopsied in the ICSI vs. CI group. Secondary outcomes included the fertilization rate and number of embryos biopsied. Generalized estimating equations with a Poisson distribution were used to estimate the euploid rate ratio (with total embryos biopsied as an offset), while accounting for multiple retrievals per patient. To adjust for confounding, a propensity score model was fit for ICSI using 14 baseline female and male characteristics. RESULTS: Oocytes retrieved and the number of embryos biopsied were similar in both groups, while the fertilization rate per oocyte retrieved was significantly lower with ICSI (0.64 vs. 0.66). The proportion of euploid embryos in the ICSI group was significantly lower when compared with CI (0.47 vs. 0.52), with a euploid rate ratio of 0.89. Interestingly, when accounting for the variation in PGT reference laboratories over the study time period, adjusting for the date of procedure did not change the relationship between ICSI and euploid rate (rate ratio = 0.89); however, after adjusting for the PGT reference laboratory, the relationship between ICSI and euploid rate was no longer significant (rate ratio = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of nonmale factor infertility, ICSI resulted in a lower fertilization rate and an 11% lower embryo euploid rate compared with CI. Although the data are not statistically significant when adjusted for the PGT reference laboratory, we still can conclude that ICSI does not provide any benefit. These data support the recommendation that CI should be the preferred methodology for fertilization in nonmale factor infertility cases.

Analysis of euploidy rates in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles with progestin-primed versus GnRH agonist/antagonist protocol.

BACKGROUND: Progestins can suppress endogenous luteinising hormone (LH) secretion from the pituitary gland and have shown similar efficacy in terms of collecting competent oocytes and embryos; however, some inconsistencies have been proposed regarding the quality of embryos collected with the use of progestins. This study aimed to evaluate euploidy rates and pregnancy outcomes in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles using the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol versus the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist/antagonist protocol. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 608 PGT-A cycles: 146 women in the PPOS group, 160 women in the GnRH agonist group, and 302 women in the GnRH antagonist group. This study was performed at the in vitro fertilisation (IVF) centre of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital between January 2019 and December 2021. Additionally, 267 corresponding first frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles were analysed to assess pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: The euploid blastocyst rate per injected metaphase II(MII) oocytes (14.60% vs. 14.09% vs. 13.94%) was comparable among the three groups (p > 0.05). No significant differences were observed among the three groups regarding pregnancy outcomes, including biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, implantation, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, and live birth rates per transfer in the first FET cycles (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The PPOS protocol had no negative effect on euploid blastocyst formation, and the pregnancy outcomes in FET cycles using the PPOS protocol were similar to those of the GnRH agonist and antagonist protocols. Trial registration This trial was retrospectively registered.

Oocytes With Smooth Endoplasmic Reticulum Aggregates May Not Impact Blastocyst Euploidy Rate.

Objective: To investigate whether the euploidy rate of blastocysts derived from smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates (SERa) positive cycles and oocytes are impacted. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: A total of 601 preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles with at least one oocyte retrieved in our center between April 2017 and May 2021 were initially included in the study. Women>35 years and PGT cycles with chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) were excluded. Embryological and blastocyst ploidy outcomes were compared among SERa+ oocyte, sibling SERa- oocytes and oocytes in SERa- cycles. Results: No significant difference was observed among the SERa+ oocyte group, sibling SERa- oocyte group, and SERa- cycle group in the normal fertilization rate (82.1% vs. 77.8% vs. 83.1%, respectively, P=0.061), blastocyst formation rate (71.0% vs. 72.5% vs. 68.4%, respectively, P=0.393), good quality blastocyst formation rate (46.4% vs. 48.3% vs. 42.6%, respectively, P=0.198). No significant difference was observed in the euploidy rate (50.0% vs. 62.5% vs. 63.3%, respectively, P=0.324), mosaic rate (12.5% vs. 9.7% vs. 13.4%, respectively, P=0.506), and aneuploidy rate (37.5% vs. 27.8% vs. 23.2%, respectively, P=0.137) among the three groups. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the euploidy rate of blastocysts derived from SERa+ cycles and oocytes may not be impacted.

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) parameters associated with euploidy rates in donor oocytes.

Although oocyte donors are young and are expected to provide a high rate of euploid oocytes, significant differences of euploidy rates for donor embryos exist between different IVF centers (1). Laboratory conditions can lead to differences of euploidy (2,3,4,5,6,7); but, the role of COH has not been investigated. In this study, we investigated whether euploidy rates in the embryos created from donor oocytes are influenced by controlled ovarian hyperstimulation parameters used during assisted reproduction. Euploidy rates in egg donor cycles undergoing PGT-A (N = 423) were examined retrospectively for associations with donor age, gonadotropin doses (dose per day), the fraction of gonadotropin provided by hMG (F(hMG)), days of stimulation, estradiol per mature oocyte on day of trigger, number of mature oocytes retrieved, number of embryos biopsied, incidence of euploidy and physician of record. Differences in euploidy rates between physicians were examined using analysis of variance. The proportion of euploid embryos per donor cycle was examined for associations with COH parameters using pairwise post-hoc comparisons, adjusting for multiple testing. The set of variables from this analysis was then submitted to a principal component analysis. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationships between stimulation parameters and the incidence of euploidy (the dependent variable). Euploidy rates and cycle parameters varied significantly among treating physicians. Euploidy rates (expressed as a fraction of biopsied embryos) were associated (p = 0.01) only with the F(hMG) but not with the number of MII retrieved or other variables. On the other hand, the number of euploid embryos (in contrast to the euploidy rate) was associated with the number of MII produced. Donor euploidy rates are significantly associated with the fraction of total gonadotropin comprising human menopausal gonadotropin (or F(hMG)) during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation but are not associated with other cycle parameters. The study provides the first suggestion that patient stimulation parameters can affect the incidence of euploidy in embryos generated through the use of standard assisted reproductive techniques. The study is limited by its retrospective approach and because the aCGH analysis used is less sensitive than more recent NGS technology. Further, it provides a suggestion that the use of hMG is beneficial for obtaining euploid embryos.