Disease-modifying treatments for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in the context of a new generation of biotherapies.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare but debilitating autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) for which several biotherapies have recently been approved on the market. Historically, NMOSD disease-modifying treatments relied on wide-spectrum off-label immunosuppressants, such as azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclophosphamide. Since 2015, evidence has accumulated to support off-label biotherapies (rituximab and tocilizumab) and to approve satralizumab, inebilizumab, eculizumab, and ravulizumab. This next generation of drugs provides several targeted disease-modifying treatment options for NMOSD. Here, we review this modern panel. We first review the mechanistic rationales associated with their specific targets. We then review the pivotal evidence supporting their use in practice and their respective regimens. Lastly, we discuss the positioning of each therapeutic class. The current therapeutic options in NMOSD comprise three targeted mechanisms at different stages of a unique tissue-injury cascade: B-cell depleting, anti-cytokine, and anti-complement therapies. One drug has been approved on the market in each class. The current consensus proposes positioning the approved drugs as first-line treatments for newly-diagnosed patients and as alternative therapies in case of failure of historical treatment. Yet, there has been limited acceptance in practice due to high drug prices.

Attack adjudication in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: Substantiation of criteria by magnetic resonance imaging and biomarkers in N-MOmentum.

BACKGROUND: The N-MOmentum trial investigated safety and efficacy of inebilizumab in participants with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the attack identification process and adjudication committee (AC) performance in N-MOmentum. METHODS: Adults (n = 230) with NMOSD and Expanded Disability Status Scale score ⩽8 were randomized (3:1) to inebilizumab 300 mg or placebo. The randomized controlled period was 28 weeks or until adjudicated attack. Attacks were adjudicated according to 18 predefined criteria. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biomarker (serum glial fibrillary acidic protein [sGFAP]) analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 64 participant-reported neurological events occurred; 51 (80%) were investigator-determined to be attacks. The AC confirmed 43 of the investigator-determined attacks (84%). There was high inter- and intra-AC-member agreement. In 25/64 events (39%) and 14/43 AC-adjudicated attacks (33%), MRI was reviewed during adjudication. Retrospective analysis revealed new domain-specific T1 and T2 MRI lesions in 90% of adjudicated attacks. Increased mean sGFAP concentrations (>2-fold change) from baseline were observed in 56% of adjudicated attacks versus 14% of investigator-determined attacks rejected by the AC and 31% of participant-reported events determined not to be attacks. CONCLUSION: AC adjudication of NMOSD attacks according to predefined criteria appears robust. MRI lesion correlates and sGFAP elevations were found in most adjudicated attacks.

Pharmacodynamic modelling and exposure-response assessment of inebilizumab in subjects with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders.

AIMS: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is an autoantibody-mediated, B cell-driven disease. Inebilizumab is a humanized, affinity-optimized, afucosylated IgG1 κ monoclonal antibody that binds to the B-cell specific surface antigen CD19, resulting in rapid, profound and sustained depletion of circulating peripheral B cells in NMOSD subjects (pivotal study). The objective of this study was to conduct population modelling of B-cell response following inebilizumab treatment in adult subjects with NMOSD, and to assess the impact of drug exposure to outcome. METHODS: A haematopoietic transit model was developed to describe the joint effects of reducing influx from pro-B cells and accelerating CD20+ B-cell depletion in the blood by inebilizumab. Furthermore, the relationships between inebilizumab pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure and the primary efficacy endpoint and key secondary efficacy endpoints were evaluated. RESULTS: At the 300-mg dose, there was no apparent relationship between efficacy (reduction in disease attack risk, risk of worsening from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale, cumulative total active MRI lesions, and the number of NMOSD-related in-patient hospitalizations) and PK exposure. Subjects with low, medium and high PK exposure had a similar hazard ratio of NMOSD attack vs. placebo group. CONCLUSION: The pharmacodynamic modelling confirmed effective depletion of B cells is achieved with a 300 mg intravenous dose of inebilizumab administered on Day 1 and Day 15 and every 6 months thereafter. The PK variability between patients had no apparent effect on clinical efficacy.

Adverse Events in NMOSD Therapy.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are rare neurologic autoimmune diseases that have a poor prognosis if left untreated. For many years, generic oral immunosuppressants and repurposed monoclonal antibodies that target the interleukin-6 pathway or B cells were the mainstays of drug treatment. Recently, these drug treatments have been complemented by new biologics developed and approved specifically for NMOSD. In principle, all of these drugs are effective, but treatment recommendations that take this into account are still pending. Instead, the choice of a drug may depend on other criteria such as drug safety or tolerability. In this review, we summarise current knowledge on the adverse effects of azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab, tocilizumab, eculizumab, satralizumab, and inebilizumab in NMOSD. Infections, cytopenias, and infusion-related reactions are most common, but the data are as heterogeneous as the manifestations are diverse. Nevertheless, knowledge of safety issues may facilitate treatment choices for individual patients.

Sensitivity analysis of the primary endpoint from the N-MOmentum study of inebilizumab in NMOSD.

BACKGROUND: In the N-MOmentum trial, the risk of an adjudicated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) attack was significantly reduced with inebilizumab compared with placebo. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the robustness of this finding, using pre-specified sensitivity and subgroup analyses. METHODS: N-MOmentum is a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked trial of inebilizumab, an anti-CD19 monoclonal B-cell-depleting antibody, in patients with NMOSD. Pre-planned and post hoc analyses were performed to evaluate the primary endpoint across a range of attack definitions and demographic groups, as well as key secondary endpoints. RESULTS: In the N-MOmentum trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02200770), 174 participants received inebilizumab and 56 received placebo. Attack risk for inebilizumab versus placebo was consistently and significantly reduced, regardless of attack definition, type of attack, baseline disability, ethnicity, treatment history, or disease course (all with hazard ratios < 0.4 favoring inebilizumab, p < 0.05). Analyses of secondary endpoints showed similar trends. CONCLUSION: N-MOmentum demonstrated that inebilizumab provides a robust reduction in the risk of NMOSD attacks regardless of attack evaluation method, attack type, patient demographics, or previous therapy.The N-MOmentum study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT2200770.

[Treatment and new evidences in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder]. / Terápiás megközelítés és új evidenciák a neuromyelitis optica spektrum kezelésében.

Treatment and new evidences in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder Illés Zs, MD, PhD Ideggyogy Sz 2021;74(9-10):309-321. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is associated with antibodies against AQP4 in about 80% of the cases. In about one-fourth of seronegative cases, antibodies against the MOG protein are present in the serum (MOG-antibody associated disease, MOGAD). This article discusses off-label azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of NMOSD and reviews the evidence-based clinical aspects of B/plasma cell depletion, antagonization of IL-6 signaling and blocking the complement pathway. The review also summarizes basic aspects of NMOSD pregnancy focusing on treatment, and the different therapeutic approach in MOGAD. In the recent two years, phase 3 clinical trials provided class I evidence for the efficacy and safety of rituximab (anti-CD20), inebilizumab (anti-CD19), tocilizumab (anti-IL6R), satralizumab (anti-IL6R), and eculizumab (anti-C5) in combination with other immunosuppressants or in monotherapy. The treatment approach in MOGAD is complicated by the monophasic course in about half of the cases and by the potential disappearance of MOG antibody. The necessity of maintenance treatment in MOGAD should be decided after tapered oral steroid. Immunosuppression is recommended in NMOSD during pregnancy and lactation, and this should be considered for optimal selection of treatment in fertile female patients. The new monoclonal antibodies broadened treatment options NMOSD, and the treatment strategy of MOGAD has become more straightforward.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence-based treatment options for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) patients are beginning to enter the market. Where previously, there was only the exclusive use of empiric and off-label immunosuppressants in this rare and devastating central nervous system autoimmune disease. AREAS COVERED: In accordance to expanding pathogenetic insights, drugs in phase II and III clinical trials are presented in the context of the current treatment situation for acute attacks and immunopreventative strategies in NMOSD. Some such drugs are the 2019-approved complement inhibitor eculizumab, other compounds in late development include its modified successor ravulizumab, IL-6 receptor antibody satralizumab, CD19 targeting antibody inebilizumab and the TACI-Fc fusion protein telitacicept. EXPERT OPINION: Moving from broad immunosuppression to tailored treatment strategies, the prospects for efficient NMOSD therapy are positive. For the first time in this disease, class I treatment evidence is available, but long-term data will be necessary to confirm the overall promising study results of the compounds close to approval. While drug development still centers around AQP4 antibody seropositive patients, current and future research requires consideration of possible diverging treatment demands for the smaller group of seronegative patients and patients with presence of MOG antibodies.

A lifetime aging study of human CD19 transgenic mice.

Mice transgenic for human CD19 have been an important animal model to help understand the role of this molecule in B lymphocyte function. Previously, no lifetime studies had been performed to understand the effects of this CD19 over expression on the survival or spontaneous pathology within the C57BL/6J background strain. We conducted a lifetime study with interim sacrifices to understand the transgenic effects on clinical signs, body weight, survival, and spontaneous pathology. Blood and urine samples were collected from select animals at various time points during the study for measurement of clinical pathology parameters and groups of animals were euthanized and examined at predetermined intervals. There was fair survival with some animals living to 108 weeks of age. Clinical pathology evaluations revealed a declining red cell mass with a regenerative anemia, increasing total white blood cell counts and decreasing glucose level. Total protein, albumin, and globulin levels increased to 52 weeks of age and then declined to or below baseline with advancing age. Increased urinary microalbumin levels correlated with the severity of a glomerulopathy at 76 and 84 weeks of age. Mean body weight increased through 70 weeks and then declined to weights similar to week 28 at 108 weeks. Macroscopic observations included pale kidneys, enlarged seminal vesicles, and enlarged spleens (at 108 weeks of age). The most common neoplasms in this study were bronchiolar alveolar adenomas in the lung, histiocytic sarcoma in several different tissues, and hepatocellular adenomas. The most common non-neoplastic lesions were renal glomerulopathy, and pulmonary lymphocytic infiltrates with increased numbers of alveolar macrophages.

Comparison of inebilizumab or rituximab in addition to glucocorticoid therapy for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders.

AIM: To investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of inebilizumab for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). METHODS: A total of 33 patients with NMOSD treated with inebilizumab (Group INB, n=15) or rituximab (Group RTX, n=18) in addition to high-dose glucocorticoids were included. Both groups underwent hormone shock therapy during the acute phase. Subsequently, Group INB received inebilizumab injections during the remission phase, while Group RTX received rituximab injections. A comparison of aquaporins 4 (AQP4) titer values, peripheral blood B lymphocyte counts, and visual function recovery was conducted before and 8wk after treatment. Additionally, adverse reactions and patient tolerability were analyzed after using inebilizumab treatment regimes. RESULTS: Following inebilizumab treatment, there was a significantly improvement in the visual acuity of NMOSD patients (P<0.05), accompanied by a notable decrease in AQP4 titer values and B lymphocyte ratio (P<0.05). Moreover, inebilizumab treatment showed a partial effect in preventing optic nerve atrophy (P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in other therapeutic effects compared to rituximab, which has previously demonstrated substantial therapeutic efficacy (P>0.05). Furthermore, inebilizumab exhibited higher safety levels than that of rituximab injections. CONCLUSION: The combination of inebilizumab and high-dose glucocorticoids proves to be effective. In comparison to rituximab injections, inebilizumab displays better tolerance and safety. Moreover, it demonstrates a partial effect in preventing optic nerve atrophy. Thus, it stands as an effective method to reduce the disability rates and improve the daily living ability of patients with NMOSD.

Monoclonal antibody therapies for aquaporin-4-immunoglobulin G-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease.

Monoclonal antibody therapies mark the new era of targeted treatment for relapse prevention in aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-immunoglobulin G (IgG)-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4-IgG+NMOSD). For over a decade, rituximab, an anti-CD20 B-cell-depleting agent, had been the most effectiveness treatment for AQP4-IgG+NMOSD. Tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin-6 receptor, was also observed to be effective. In 2019, several randomized, placebo-controlled trials were completed that demonstrated the remarkable efficacy of eculizumab (anti-C5 complement inhibitor), inebilizumab (anti-CD19 B-cell-depleting agent), and satralizumab (anti-interleukin-6 receptor), leading to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of specific treatments for AQP4-IgG+NMOSD for the first time. Most recently, ravulizumab (anti-C5 complement inhibitor) was also shown to be highly efficacious in an open-label, external-controlled trial. Although only some patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) warrant immunotherapy, there is currently no FDA-approved treatment for relapse prevention in MOGAD. Observational studies showed that tocilizumab was associated with a decrease in relapses, whereas rituximab seemed to have less robust effectiveness in MOGAD compared to AQP4-IgG+NMOSD. Herein, we review the evidence on the efficacy and safety of each monoclonal antibody therapy used in AQP4-IgG+NMOSD and MOGAD, including special considerations in children and women of childbearing potential.

A rare adverse effect in inebilizumab therapy for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a case report.

Inebilizumab is one of the monoclonal antibodies approved as maintenance therapy for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G-seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). It is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting cluster of differentiation 19 (CD19). Common adverse reactions include urinary tract infections, nasopharyngitis, arthralgia, infusion reactions, headaches and a decrease in immunoglobulin levels. Here, we present a case of an NMOSD patient who experienced transient hyperCKaemia after the use of inebilizumab. The adverse reactions of this very rare monoclonal antibody drug improved after discontinuation.

Network Meta-analysis of Ravulizumab and Alternative Interventions for the Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive (AQP4-Ab+) neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a complement-mediated autoimmune disease in which unpredictable and relapsing attacks on the central nervous system cause irreversible and accumulating damage. Comparative efficacy of new NMOSD therapies, such as ravulizumab, with established therapies is critical in making informed treatment decisions. METHODS: Efficacy of ravulizumab relative to established AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD treatments, such as eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab, was evaluated in a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Data were extracted from trials identified by a systematic literature review. The final evidence base consisted of 17 publications representing five unique and global studies (PREVENT, N-MOmentum, SAkuraSky, SAkuraStar, and CHAMPION-NMOSD). The primary endpoint was time-to-first relapse; other outcomes included annualized relapse rates (ARRs). RESULTS: For patients receiving monotherapy (monoclonal antibody only), ravulizumab was associated with a lower risk of relapse than inebilizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.09, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.02, 0.57) or satralizumab (HR 0.08, 95% CrI 0.01, 0.55) and was comparable to eculizumab (HR 0.86, 95% Crl 0.16, 4.52). Ravulizumab + immunosuppressive therapy (IST) was associated with a lower risk of relapse than satralizumab + IST (HR 0.15, 95% CrI 0.03, 0.78); the comparison with eculizumab + IST suggested no difference. No patients treated with inebilizumab received background IST and were thus excluded from analysis. The ARR with ravulizumab monotherapy was 98% lower compared with inebilizumab (rate ratio [RR] 0.02, 95% Crl 0.00, 0.38) and satralizumab (RR 0.02, 95% Crl 0.00, 0.42) monotherapies. The ARR with ravulizumab ± IST showed the strongest treatment-effect estimates compared with other interventions. CONCLUSION: In the absence of head-to-head randomized controlled trials, NMA results suggest ravulizumab, a C5 inhibitor, is likely to be more effective in preventing NMOSD relapse in patients with AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD when compared with other treatments having different methods of action.

Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, also called AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD, is a rare autoimmune disease that causes repeated episodes of symptoms such as blindness, arm/leg weakness, painful spasms, vomiting, and hiccups, among other symptoms. Each episode can cause nervous system damage to worsen, making it more difficult to recover back to regular abilities. Repeated episodes are likely to cause permanent damage, such as blindness and paralysis. Medical treatments that reduce episodes also reduce the damage and the chances symptoms will become permanent. One treatment, ravulizumab, is being studied to treat adults with AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD. This analysis looked at information from published clinical studies to compare ravulizumab with three other treatments (eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab) to determine how well each treatment reduced NMOSD episodes. There are no studies that have tested all four treatments in one study. Here, the treatments were compared by a method used to estimate the likelihood of a treatment being better than the others. While all four treatments successfully reduced episodes in their own studies, this analysis predicts that ravulizumab would likely be best in preventing episodes compared with inebilizumab or satralizumab when used alone or in combination with other immunosuppressive treatments. These findings, in consideration along with other relevant factors such as cost, safety, dosing delivery method, and frequency of treatment, may help doctors and patients decide what is the best treatment option for each individual patient to prevent attacks in adults with AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD.

A case report of AQP4-IgG-seropositive refractory neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder patient with Sjögren's syndrome and pancytopenia treated with inebilizumab.

Patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) coexisting with both Sjögren's syndrome (SS) and pancytopenia are exceptionally rare. There is no study on the treatment of such patients. We presented a case of AQP4-IgG seropositive refractory NMOSD patient combined with SS and pancytopenia with significant response to inebilizumab. In 2017 the 49-year-old female patient was diagnosed with SS and pancytopenia without any treatment. In August 2022, she had a sudden onset of lower limbs weakness, manifested as inability to walk, accompanied by urinary incontinence. After receiving methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide, she regained the ability to walk. In February 2023, she suffered from weakness of both lower limbs again and paralyzed in bed, accompanied by retention of urine and stool, and loss of vision in both eyes. After receiving methylprednisolone and three plasmapheresis, the condition did not further worsen, but there was no remission. In March 2023, the patient was admitted to our hospital and was formally diagnosed with AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD combined with SS and pancytopenia. After receiving two 300 mg injections of inebilizumab, not only the symptoms of NMOSD improved significantly, but also the symptoms of concurrent SS and pancytopenia. In the cases of AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD who have recurrent episodes and are comorbid with other autoimmune disorders, inebilizumab may be a good choice.

Case report: Identification of Hepatitis B Virus in the cerebrospinal fluid of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and successful treatment with ofatumumab and inebilizumab.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare demyelinating disease of the central nervous system primarily affecting the optic nerves, spinal cord, and brainstem. Viral infection may trigger NMOSD. Here, we report the case of a 34-year-old female presenting with a range of symptoms including nausea, vomiting, dysphagia, choking, and fatigue with unsteady gait, diplopia, hearing loss, left-sided facial paralysis, breathing difficulties, and hoarseness of voice. Her HBV DNA concentration, as determined by quantitative PCR analysis, exceeded 5×107 IU/ml in serum and 4.48×102 IU/ml in CSF. Next-generation sequencing of CSF revealed 1,528 HBV sequences in DNA analysis and 6 sequences in RNA analysis. Serum aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-Ab) titer was 1:10, and the CSF titer was 1:3.2. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed high signal intensities in the brain stem, medulla oblongata, and left middle cerebellar peduncle with mild restricted-diffusion. The patient received antiviral and hepatoprotective medications before the high-dose methylprednisolone pulse therapy. However, the patient did not respond well to the first-line treatment. Subsequently, the patient received ofatumumab and inebilizumab. Throughout the follow-up period, there was a gradual improvement in her neurological symptoms, with no reactivation of hepatitis B or deterioration of liver function observed. Thereby, to the best of our knowledge, we report the first case of successful treatment with ofatumumab and inebilizumab in a patient with NMOSD concurrent with HBV infection.

Case report: Transition from anti-CD20 therapy to inebilizumab for 14 cases of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system characterized by recurrent, disabling attacks that affect the optic nerve, spinal cord, and brain/brainstem. While rituximab, targeting CD20-positive B-cells, is used as an off-label therapy for NMOSD, some patients continue to exhibit breakthrough attacks and/or adverse reactions. Inebilizumab, a humanized and glycoengineered monoclonal antibody targeting CD19-positive B-cells, has been FDA approved for the treatment of NMOSD in adult patients who are anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody positive. Given the limited real-world data on the efficacy and safety of inebilizumab, especially in those transitioning from rituximab, a retrospective chart review was conducted on 14 NMOSD patients from seven centers. Of these, 71.4% (n = 10) experienced a combined 17 attacks during rituximab treatment, attributed to either breakthrough disease (n = 10) or treatment delay (n = 7). The mean duration of rituximab treatment was 38.4 months (3.2 years). Notably, no subsequent attacks were observed during inebilizumab treatment [mean duration of inebilizumab treatment was 19.3 months (1.6 years)], underscoring its potential as an effective treatment for NMOSD. Our data suggest that inebilizumab provides clinical benefit with effective disease control and a favorable safety profile for patients transitioning from rituximab.

Utilization of FDA approved treatments for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in clinical practice: A survey study of academic neuroimmunologists.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune condition for which three treatments have been approved since 2019: eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab. We conducted a survey of U.S. academic neuroimmunologists to assess adoption of these therapies and barriers to use. Thirty-three neuroimmunologists from 18 states completed the survey. Nearly all (88 %) reported using the novel NMOSD treatments (NNTs). They uncommonly switched clinically stable patients to NNTs (69 % switched none, 22 % switched 1-25 % of their patients). For newly diagnosed patients, NNT initiation rates varied. Following relapse, respondents were dichotomized, either switching 75-100 % of patients (60 %) or 0-25 % (40 %). Insurance and cost-related barriers were common.

New advancements in the management of Neuromyelitis Optica spectrum disease: literature review.

Neuromyelitis Optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a relapsing autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) where aquaporin-4 water channels are the antigenic target of the disease. The spectrum of the disease involves regions of the CNS where the water channel is widely expressed including the spinal cord, the optic nerve, dorsal medulla, brainstem, and thalamus/hypothalamus. Management of NMOSD includes acute as well as long term treatment. Acute symptoms are typically treated with intravenous corticosteroids and/or plasma exchange while long-term treatment involves the use of immunosuppression/immune modulation. The year 2019 is thought to be the "year of the NMOSD" as three new medications became available for this devastating disease. In this review, FDA approved NMOSD medications are discussed.

Inebilizumab for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders in Italy: a budget impact model.

BACKGROUND: The Italian National Health Service (INHS) has recently reimbursed the monoclonal antibody inebilizumab as a second line monotherapy after rituximab (RTX) use for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) patients ≥ 18 years anti-aquaporin 4 antibody-immunoglobulin G positive, who experienced a relapse in the last year or cannot receive RTX, if incident patients. Other INHS-reimbursed drugs for NMOSD treatment are satralizumab, eculizumab and, off-label, besides RTX, ocrelizumab, tocilizumab, and immunosuppressants. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 3-year (2023-2025) prevalence-based budget impact model following the INHS viewpoint compared the costs and the NMOSD attacks without (1st scenario) and with inebilizumab (2nd scenario). The epidemiology of NMOSD, and the INHS-funded healthcare resources (drugs and their administration; specialist visits; hospitalizations due to drug-related adverse events and NMOSD attacks) were obtained from the literature. One-way, threshold value and scenario sensitivity analyses investigated the robustness of the baseline findings. RESULTS: During 2023-2025 inebilizumab saves the INHS €8,373,125.13 (1st scenario: €176,770,028.63; 2nd scenario: €168,396,903.50) and 12.74 NMOSD attacks (1st scenario: 213.94; 2nd scenario: 201.19). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the baseline results. CONCLUSION: Inebilizumab reduces the INHS expenditure for NMOSD drugs. Future research should explore the cost-effectiveness of inebilizumab vs other NMOSD-targeting drugs in Italy.

An update on biologic treatments for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system mediated by antibodies targeting the aquaporin-4 (AQP4) water channel expressed on astrocytes. The binding of specific antibodies to AQP4 causes complement-dependent cytotoxicity, leading to inflammation and demyelination. Several recent phase 2 and 3 randomized placebo-controlled trials showed the efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibody therapies targeting B-cells, interleukin-6 receptor, and complement. AREAS COVERED: Current biologic treatments for NMOSD and developments therein, and unresolved issues in NMOSD treatment. EXPERT OPINION: New biologic treatments demonstrate high efficacy and good safety for patients with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD. The optimal therapeutics for seronegative NMOSD, pediatric patients, and female patients who are pregnant or wish to be are unclear, and further research is needed. Also, real-world studies of new biological agents and the data on the durability of their beneficial effects and their long-term safety are required. Effective rescue therapy for an acute attack is critical given permanent disability in NMOSD is attack-related, and biologic agents that treat acute attack are emerging. If such treatments are to become widely applied, studies on the most cost-effective treatment strategies are needed.

Efficacy and safety of inebilizumab in Asian participants with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: Subgroup analyses of the N-MOmentum study.

BACKGROUND: Inebilizumab, an anti-CD19 B cell-depleting antibody, reduced the risk of a neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) attack, disability worsening, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion activity, and disease-related hospitalizations in participants with NMOSD in the N-MOmentum study (NCT02200770). However, the efficacy and safety outcomes of inebilizumab specific to an Asian population were not fully reported. Therefore, subgroup analyses of the N-MOmentum study were conducted post hoc to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inebilizumab in Asian participants with NMOSD. METHODS: The N-MOmentum study was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2/3 trial with an open-label extension period (OLP). In the subgroup analyses, data from Asian participants from the N-MOmentum study were compared with those of non-Asian participants. Eligible participants were randomly allocated (3:1) to receive 300 mg intravenous (IV) inebilizumab or placebo on Days 1 and 15. Participants who had an NMOSD attack or completed the randomized controlled period (RCP) could enter the OLP, where they received inebilizumab for ≥2 years. All participants who entered the OLP received inebilizumab 300 mg IV every 6 months. RESULTS: Overall, 230 participants received treatment (174 received inebilizumab and 56 received placebo), of whom 47 were Asian (39 received inebilizumab and 8 received placebo). Baseline characteristics were similar between the Asian and non-Asian subgroups, except for disease duration, annualized relapse rate prior to randomization in this study, and previous maintenance therapy. In the Asian subgroup, the risk of NMOSD attacks was reduced with inebilizumab versus placebo (hazard ratio, 0.202) and the attack-free rate at 28 weeks was 82.1% with inebilizumab versus 37.5% with placebo, in the 6-month RCP. NMOSD attack rates were comparable between the Asian and non-Asian subgroups. In the Asian subgroup, the rates of Expanded Disability Status Scale worsening from baseline, active MRI lesions, and disease-related hospitalizations tended to be lower in the inebilizumab group than in the placebo group; similar results were shown in the non-Asian subgroup. For long-term efficacy and safety (RCP and OLP), the annualized adjudicated NMOSD attack rate in Asian participants treated with inebilizumab was reduced (0.096) compared with that at baseline (1.04), with a mean follow-up period of inebilizumab treatment of 3.38 years, which was consistent with the results in the non-Asian subgroup. The risk of NMOSD attack decreased with prolonged duration of treatment in both the inebilizumab/inebilizumab and placebo/inebilizumab groups in the Asian and non-Asian subgroups. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar between the Asian and non-Asian subgroups. In the Asian and non-Asian subgroups, 15.2% and 35.2% of participants, respectively, had at least one serious TEAE and/or Grade ≥3 TEAE during long-term therapy. No deaths occurred in the Asian subgroup whereas three deaths occurred in the non-Asian subgroup. CONCLUSION: Inebilizumab reduced the risk of an NMOSD attack, progression of disability, MRI lesion activity, and disease-related hospitalizations in Asian participants with NMOSD. The efficacy of inebilizumab in reducing NMOSD attacks continued without any unexpected safety signals or concerns during long-term use in Asian participants.