Results of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with and without tibial tubercle osteotomy in patellar instability: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To confirm which method provides lower rate of recurrent instability and superior clinical outcomes. METHOD: We searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for the trials involving one intervention or both for patellar instability: medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) with and without tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO). The postoperative Kujala score, Lysholm score, Tegner scores and the rate of recurrent instability (dislocation or subluxation) were analyzed as the primary clinical outcome parameters in a random or fixed effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: In total, 43 articles met inclusion criteria after full-text review. A total of 2046 patients were analyzed. The overall mean age was 20.3 years (range, 9.5-60.0 years), with a mean follow-up time of 3.2 years (range, 1-8 years). The mean Kujala scores in MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO were 89.04 and 84.44, respectively. There was significant difference in Kujala scores between MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO (MD = 4.60, 95%CI: 1.07-8.13; P = 0.01). The mean Lysholm scores in MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO were 90.59 and 88.14, respectively. There was no significant difference in Lysholm scores between MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO (MD = 2.45, 95%CI: -3.20-8.10; P = 0.40). The mean Tegner scores in MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO were 5.30 and 4.88, respectively. There was no significant difference in Tegner scores between MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO (MD = 0.42, 95%CI: -0.39-1.23; P = 0.31). At final follow-up, the rates of recurrent instability in MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO were 3% and 4%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the rates between MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO (OR = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.96-1.02; P = 0.4848). CONCLUSION: MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO are effective and reliable treatments in the setting of patellofemoral instability. MPFLR seems to show a better performance in functional outcomes than MPFLR + TTO. Moreover, their rates of recurrent instability are very low, and no significant difference exists.

Long-term patient reported outcome measures and kneeling function in patients with tibial intramedullary nails.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior knee pain (AKP) is a common complaint following intramedullary nail (IMN) insertion for tibial shaft fractures. There is a lack of long-term patient reported outcome data following tibial IMN, with conflicting evidence of the role of nail protrusion on AKP. In this study, we assess the long-term patient reported outcome measures and kneeling function in patients with tibial IMNs and compare the results with IMN protrusion, measured radiologically. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 128 patients, from a single UK centre, were invited to participate in the study, to complete a Kujala score, KOOS, EQ-5D-5L and a four-posture kneeling assessment. We report the outcomes of 45 patients at an average follow-up of 6.9 years. RESULTS: The mean Kujala score was 80.7. The mean KOOS score was 83.2, 83.9, 85.8, 70.7 and 72.8 for symptoms, pain, daily living, sport and quality of life, respectively. We found 20.5% of patients experienced daily AKP. Pain and fear of pain were the most common limiting factors in the kneeling assessment. No significant correlation was found between the KOOS or Kujala score and nail-plateau distance, nail-anterior cortex distance, or the overall nail prominence. CONCLUSION: AKP affects a subset of patients more than five years post-tibial IMN, limiting their ability to kneel and other functions of daily living. Tibial IMN prominence does not seem to be associated with AKP.

Patients who undergo bilateral medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction return to sport at a similar rate as those that undergo unilateral reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Lateral patellar instability is a debilitating condition not only to athletes, but also to a wide range of highly active individuals. Many of these patients experience symptoms bilaterally, though it is unknown how these patients fair with return to sports following a second medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rate of return to sport following bilateral MPFLR compared to a unilateral comparison group. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary MPFLR with minimum 2-year follow-up were identified from 2014 to 2020 at an academic center. Those who underwent primary MPFLR of bilateral knees were identified. Pre-injury sport participation and Tegner score, Kujala score, Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain, satisfaction, and MPFL-Return to Sport after Injury (MPFL-RSI) scale were collected. Bilateral and unilateral MPFLRs were matched in a 1:2 ratio based on age, sex, body mass index, and concomitant tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO). A sub-analysis was performed regarding concomitant TTO. RESULTS: The final cohort consisted of 63 patients, including 21 patients who underwent bilateral MPFLR, matched to 42 unilateral patients at mean follow-up of 47 ± 27 months. Patients who underwent bilateral MPFLR returned to sport at a rate of 62% at a mean of 6.0 ± 2.3 months, compared to a unilateral rate of 72% at 8.1 ± 4.2 months (n.s.). The rate of return to pre-injury level was 43% among bilateral patients and 38% in the unilateral cohort. There were no significant differences in VAS pain, Kujala, current Tegner, satisfaction, and MPFL-RSI scores between cohorts. Approximately half of those (47%) who failed to return to sport cited psychological factors and had significantly lower MPFL-RSI scores (36.6 vs 74.2, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent bilateral MPFLR returned to sports at a similar rate and level compared to a unilateral comparison group. MPFL-RSI was found to be significantly associated with return to sport. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Double-bundle ACL reconstruction versus anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a comparative study of clinical outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies showed increasing evidences of anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction that proves to be more superior to the previous double-bundle (DB) ACLR technique especially in improving knee stability in biomechanic studies. However to date, there have been no studies evaluating the functional outcome of DB-ACLR vs single-bundle (SB) with ALL in ACLR. METHODS: A total of 138 patients with ACL deficient knee were enrolled to the study. Double-bundle ACL reconstruction (DB-ACLR) was performed in 75 patients and single-bundle ACL reconstruction with anterolateral ligament reconstruction (SB + ALL) ACLR was performed in 63 patients. Surgical outcomes were compared with The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) and the Kujala score at the 3rd, 6th and 9th month post-operative. RESULTS: The IKDC score in the 3rd and 6th month was superior in the SB + ALL group compared to the DB group. However, this difference was not statistically significant. In the meantime, there were no statistically significant difference between the Kujala Score at the 3rd, 6th, and 9th months consecutively. There were no statistically significant differences in the functional outcomes of DB-ACLR and SB + ALL groups at the 3rd, 6th, and 9th months post-operative period. CONCLUSION: The functional outcome comparison showed non-superiority of SB + ALL group compared to the DB-ACLR group. The patellar pain was less found in DB-ACLR group at 6- and 9-months post-operative period.

Arthroscopy-controlled medial reefing and lateral release for recurrent patellar dislocation: clinical, radiologic outcomes and complications.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have reported the clinical outcomes of the medial reefing procedure and lateral release with arthroscopic control of medial retinacular tension in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical, radiologic outcomes and complications of arthroscopy-controlled medial reefing and lateral release. METHODS: Patients who underwent arthroscopy-controlled medial reefing and lateral release for recurrent patellar dislocation between November 2007 and June 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. The clinical outcome (Kujala score), radiologic outcome (congruence and patellar tilt angles), and complications were evaluated at final follow-up. The results were also compared with literature-reported outcomes of other surgical procedures for patellar dislocation. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (mean age, 18.3 ± 4.8 years) were included in the study. The mean clinical follow-up period was 7.0 ± 2.5 (range, 3.8-12.2) years. The mean Kujala score was significantly improved from 54.7 ± 14.0 (range, 37-86) preoperatively to 91.0 ± 7.6 (range, 63-99) at a mean follow-up period of 7 years (P < 0.001). The radiologic results also significantly improved from 17.8° ± 5.9° to 6.8° ± 2.4° (P < 0.001) in the congruence angle and from 17.5° ± 8.2° to 5.6° ± 3.1° (P < 0.001) in the patella tilt angle at a mean follow-up period of 3.6 years. One patient developed a redislocation after a traumatic event, and two patients showed patellofemoral osteoarthritis progression. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopy-controlled medial reefing and lateral release significantly improved the clinical and radiologic outcomes of the patients with recurrent patellar dislocation at a mean follow-up period of 7 years. The results of this study are comparable with the literature-reported outcomes of other surgical procedures for patellar dislocation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.

Use of hyaluronic acid injection after arthroscopic release in lateral patellar compression syndrome with degenerative cartilage changes: randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: Degenerative cartilage changes can be seen, in cases of lateral patellar compression syndrome, involving the patellofemoral joint. Hyaluronic acid is a natural component of the synovial fluid and responsible for its elastic features and function of articular surfaces. The aim of this study is to show the effect of intra-articular injection of Hyaluronic acid, after arthroscopic lateral release in lateral patellar compression syndrome, on the functional outcome and knee pain in those patients with degenerative cartilage changes. METHOD: Ninety patients age (30-50) years with lateral patellar compression syndrome and degenerative cartilage changes were divided randomly into 2 groups. Group A was treated by arthroscopic lateral release and received intraarticular injection of Hyaluronic acid 2 weeks after surgery. Group B was treated by arthroscopic lateral release only. Both groups were assessed by Kujala score and visual analogue scale for knee pain preoperatively and re-assessed postoperatively at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in Kujala score and Visual analogue scale post-operatively in both groups (P-value< 0.001) with better improvement in Kujala score in group A after intra-articular injection of Hyaluronic acid up to 2 year of follow up (P-value = 0.006) as well as better improvement in visual analogue score at 6 months post-operatively (P-value = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Intra-articular injection of Hyaluronic acid after arthroscopic release, in patients with lateral patellar compression syndrome and degenerative cartilage changes, can result in better improvement of knee pain and functional outcome up to 2 years of follow up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT, NCT04134611 . Registered 18 October 2019 -Retrospectively registered.

Effects of tibiofemoral mobilization in patients of Patellofemoral pain syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of tibiofemoral joint mobilisation on pain and range of motion in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. METHODS: The randomised control trial was conducted at the Lady Reading Hospital and Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan, from July to December 2019, and comprised patellofemoral pain syndrome patients of either gender aged 25-35 years with anterior knee pain for at least one month. The subjects were randomly allocated control group A and experimental group B. Group A received 6 stretching and strengthening exercises of hip and knee muscles with hot pack, while group B additionally received tibiofemoral joint mobilisation. There were 3 sessions per week over 4 weeks for both the groups. Numeric pain rating scale, Kujala scale, algometer and goniometer were used to assess pain and range of motion at baseline and at the end of the last session. Data was analysed using SPSS 20. RESULTS: Of the 60 individuals initially assessed, 52(86.6%) were enrolled; 26(50%) in each of the two groups. The overall mean age of the sample was 29.63±3.25 years. The experimental group B showed significant improvement in pain, range of motion and pressure pain threshold (p<0.05) compared to the control group A. Group B also showed significant improvement in terms of functional activities (p<0.05). Except patellar instability and weight-bearing activities, the groups showed no significant difference (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tibiofemoral joint mobilisations with hip and knee stretching and strengthening exercises were found to be more effective in reducing pain, and increasing range of motion as well as pressure pain threshold. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Identifier: NCT04225000:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04225000.

A comparison of anterior knee pain, kneeling pain and functional outcomes in suprapatellar versus infrapatellar tibial nailing.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior knee pain and kneeling pain are some of the most common complications following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. With the increased uptake of suprapatellar nailing at our institution, we undertook a service evaluation to assess anterior knee pain and kneeling pain in patients who underwent the suprapatellar tibial nailing technique compared with the infrapatellar approach. METHODOLOGY: Data from all consecutive intramedullary tibial nailing operations between January 2014 and July 2017 were analysed from a prospectively collected database. All acute diaphyseal fracture nailing procedures were included. All patients were reviewed between six-month and four-year post-operation. Each patient was asked to complete a standardised questionnaire with three main outcome measures: pain on kneeling, presence of anterior knee pain and the severity of pain. RESULTS: After exclusions, a total of 148 patients were identified. A total of 102 responses were received, 41 in the infrapatellar group (73.2%) and 61 in the suprapatellar group (66.3%). A longer time from surgery to telephone follow-up response was noted in the infrapatellar group: 32.4 months (interquartile range, 16.1) vs. 19.3 months (interquartile range, 17.4), p < 0.001. A trend towards lower reported anterior knee pain was noted in the suprapatellar group (67.9% VS 53.7%). Most patients reported mild or no pain on kneeling, with no significant difference between the two groups. There was also no significant difference in severity of knee pain between the two groups and no significant effect on the Kujala score. CONCLUSION: With the comparable pain outcomes between the two groups, our analysis supports the continued use of the suprapatellar tibial nailing technique for tibial shaft fractures at our institution.

Validation of the German version of the Kujala score in patients with patellofemoral instability: a prospective multi-centre study.

INTRODUCTION: The Kujala score is the most frequently used questionnaire for patellofemoral disorders like pain, instability or osteoarthritis. Unfortunately, we are not aware of a validated German version of the Kujala score. The aim of our study was the translation and linguistic validation of the Kujala score in German-speaking patients with patella instability and the assessment of its measurement characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The German Kujala score was developed in several steps of translation. In addition to healthy controls, the Kujala German was assessed in consecutive patients undergoing reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament for recurrent patellar dislocations. Pre-op, 6 and 12 months postop the patients completed the Kujala German score, the KOOS, the Lysholm score, a VAS Pain, and the SF-12v2 scores. In addition, there was a Kujala German Score retest preop after a 1-week interval. RESULTS: We found high reliability in terms of internal consistency for the Kujala score (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87). Convergent validity with the KOOS (symptom r = 0.65, pain r = 0.78, ADL r = 0.74, sports/recreation r = 0.84, quality of life r = 0.70), the Lysholm score (r = 0.88) and the SF-12 physical component summary score (r = 0.79) and VAS pain (r = - 0.71) was also very high. Discriminant validity in terms of correlation with the SF-12 mental component summary Score was satisfactory (r = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the German version of the Kujala score proved to be a reliable and valid instrument in the setting of a typical patellofemoral disease treated with a standard patellofemoral procedure.

An evaluation of the effectiveness of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using an anatomical tunnel site.

PURPOSE: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability has gained popularity, and anatomical and biomechanical studies have recently altered our operative techniques. The aim of this study was to report the clinical outcome of this new anatomical MPFL reconstructive technique and investigate whether correlating factors could be identified. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2012, a total of 31 consecutive patients underwent MPFL reconstruction using an autologous gracilis graft and anatomical tunnel placement. Pre- and post-operative data were collected as a part of routine clinical practice. The preoperative assessment included a rotational profile CT scan of the lower extremity according to the Lyon protocol with TT-TG distance measurement. Outcomes were evaluated with the Kujala and Norwich patella instability (NPI) scores preoperatively and at follow-up (1.5-5.1 years). RESULTS: A significant improvement in both the Kujala (p < 0.001) and NPI (p = 0.012) scores was recorded. A medium and large negative correlations were found between TT-TG distance and Kujala score improvement (ρ = -0.48, p = 0.020) and NPI score improvement (ρ = -0.83, p = 0.042), respectively. Multiple regression analysis identified TT-TG distance, Beighton score and BMI as factors explaining the variance of Kujala score improvement. CONCLUSION: Anatomical MPFL reconstruction with the gracilis autograft for patellar instability resulted in good outcome. This underlines the importance of anatomical tunnel placement in MPFL reconstruction. With a precise preoperative work-up, factors can be identified that may guide selecting the optimal operative strategy and improve counselling of the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, Level IV.

Patient-based outcomes after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate subjective outcomes after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstructions. METHODS: Fifty-four knees of 46 patients who received MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocations were examined with a minimum follow-up of two years. To assess patient-based outcomes, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Kujala score were assessed. RESULTS: The mean Kujala score was significantly improved from 64.6 ± 22.1 pre-operatively to 84.7 ± 11.8 post-operatively (P < 0.001). The mean KOOS was also significantly improved post-operatively in all five subscales. Further, the mean scores of 41 out of the 42 questions for the KOOS were significantly improved after surgery, except those of the question about "grinding and clicking". When the KOOS was assessed individually, the scores on one or more subscales out of the five were worsened post-operatively in eight patients, and seven of the eight patients had decreased post-operative pain subscale scores. Furthermore, those eight patients (worse group) were compared with patients without any worsened scores on any of the subscales (better group). The mean pre-operative pain and sports/recreation function subscale scores were significantly higher in the worse group whereas the mean post-operative pain and symptoms subscale scores were significantly lower in the worse group than in the better group. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, satisfactory patient-based outcomes were obtained after MPFL reconstruction in most of the patients. However, patients who only have mild pain pre-operatively tend to have worse subjective outcomes, and a caution may be needed when performing MPFL reconstruction on these patients.

Validation and cultural adaptation of "Kujala Score" in Spanish.

PURPOSE: To translate the patellofemoral disorder questionnaire "Kujala Score" into Spanish and to adapt it for Spanish culture . METHODS: International recommendations were followed to translate the "Kujala Score" into Spanish together with a cultural adaptation and validation. We analysed the following parameters: internal consistency, agreement construct validity, test-retest reliability, ceiling and floor effects, and responsiveness. The reproducibility and responsiveness were tested in 72 patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome in a test-retest design with follow-up testing at 7 days. The "Kujala Score" and the VISA-P were administered to 98 patients and 30 patients, respectively, who completed the "Kujala Score" and VISA-P after physiotherapy treatment, which consisted of rest, ice, proprioceptive exercise and manual therapy. RESULTS: The Spanish "Kujala Score" had high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.8; if an item was deleted, Cronbach α = 0.77-0.80), excellent reliability and agreement (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.99), and good construct validity that was significantly correlated with the outcome of the Spanish VISA-P (Spearman rho = 0.7; P < 0.001). No ceiling or floor effects was detected for the Spanish "Kujala Score" or the responsiveness of the participants based on 40 patients receiving physical therapy, rest, ice and proprioceptive exercises for 1 month, demonstrating that it is a good determinant of changes in the symptomatology of patients with knee pain. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish adaptation of the patellofemoral disorder questionnaire "Kujala Score" proved to be valid and sensitive to clinical changes and to be a reliable instrument to assess the severity of pain and disability in patients with patellofemoral disorders. This questionnaire will be useful in clinical practice and research as an appropriate tool to evaluate and record the symptomatology of patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome among Spanish population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level I.

A Comparison of the Outcomes Between Suprapatellar and Infrapatellar Approaches of Intramedullary Interlock Nailing in Patients With Extra-Articular Tibial Fractures.

Background and objective Intramedullary nailing can be considered the current gold standard for the treatment of diaphyseal tibial fractures. Nailing ensures good fracture stability, protection against malalignment, and quick mobilization. The suprapatellar (SP) approach of tibial nailing in the semi-extended position has recently been recommended as a safe and effective surgical technique; it has been gaining significant attention in the orthopedic literature, with fewer complications and reoperations. The approach has been shown to facilitate a reduction in fractures around the knee joint in the semi-extended position, and the extended position of the lower leg allows for easier fluoroscopic imaging. In this study, we aimed to compare the outcomes between SP and infrapatellar (IP) approaches of intramedullary nailing in patients with extra-articular tibial fractures. Method A randomized control trial was conducted over a period of 1.5 years at our tertiary care hospital after obtaining approval from its institutional ethics committee. A total of 60 patients with extra-articular tibial fractures were included in the study, with 30 patients each in the SP nailing group and the IP nailing group, based on randomized sampling and with the help of radiological exposure in SP and IP nailing as per a previous study. The groups were then compared in terms of KUJALA patellofemoral knee score, operative time, radiation exposure, and time of union. Results When comparing both groups, those treated with the SP approach had better outcomes, including reduced radiation exposure, less pain, decreased operative time, better KUJALA patellofemoral knee score, and faster union.  Conclusion Based on our findings of the comparison between SP and IP nailing approaches of extra-articular tibial fractures, the former leads to better and safer outcomes than the latter.

Results of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction with and without Tibial Tubercle Transfer in Patellar Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The optimal surgical intervention for lateral patellar instability remains a topic of controversy despite satisfactory clinical outcomes and low re-dislocation rates reported in numerous studies following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) with and without tibial tubercle transfer (TTT). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the hypothesis that combining MPFLR with TTT provides reduced complication rates and improved clinical outcomes to isolated MPFLR in patients with lateral patellar instability. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative trials involving MPFLR with and without TTT, sourcing data from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science. The primary clinical outcomes analyzed included the Kujala score, the Lysholm score, complication rates, and the Caton-Deschamps index (CDI). Random or fixed effects were used for the meta-analysis. Postoperatively, there were no significant differences observed in the Kujala and Lysholm scores between MPFLR and MPFLR + TTT (p = 0.053). At the final follow-up, the CDI had decreased 0.015 (95% CI -0.044, 0.013; p = 0.289) points in the MPFLR group, with no statistical significance. In contrast, the MPFLR + TTT group demonstrated a significant decrease of 0.207 (95% CI -0.240, -0.174; p = 0.000) points in CDI. Notably, the complication rate was higher in the MPFLR + TTT group compared to the MPFLR-only group (RR = 2.472; 95% CI 1.638, 3.731; p = 0.000). Both MPFLR and MPFLR + TTT procedures yield significant improvements in the Kujala and Lysholm scores. However, the MPFLR + TTT approach results in an apparent improvement in CDI and corrects patellar maltracking, particularly in cases involving high tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) (>20 mm) or patella alta (CDI > 1.2), while MPFLR alone cannot. It is essential to consider the higher complication rate of MPFLR + TTT, which suggests that MPFLR alone may be sufficient for patients without high TT-TG or patella alta.

Semi-extended extra-synovial (SEES) tibial intramedullary nailing technique: Up to 10 year retrospective analysis of outcomes and anterior knee pain rates.

Background: Tibial intramedullary nailing is a common method of fixation for fractures of the tibia, with several approaches described. Anterior knee pain is a common complication following nailing, but the reported incidence of knee pain varies in the literature between 10 % and 86 %. There is considerable variation in incidence between nailing techniques, with an exact aetiology still unknown. We investigated the reported incidence of anterior knee pain in patients undergoing tibial nailing using the semi-extended extra synovial (SEES) technique at a Major Trauma Centre (MTC) in the UK. Methods: A retrospective review of tibial fractures treated with the SEES technique between December 2012 to February 2021. Data collected included patient demographics, mechanism of injury, fracture characteristics, length of stay, union rates and re-operation rates. Primary outcomes were anterior knee pain rates and patient reported outcome measures (PROM), the Kujala Score. Secondary outcomes were rates of union and complications. Results: 55 fractures were identified in 53 patients. Male: Female ratio was 32:21. The average age was 45.5 years. 96 % were unilateral fractures; with 53 % being right-sided. 21(38 %) fractures were open. Prior to definitive nailing 21 fractures had temporary stabilisation with an external fixator (Ex-Fix) ± wound debridement whilst the rest received plaster backslab immobilisation. 13 of the open fractures required soft tissue cover. 75 % of patients had initial surgery (SEES Nailing/Ex-Fix) within 4 days. There was a 91 % union rate with a median time to full radiographic union of 14 months. One post-operative complication of wound dehiscence was recorded. The mean follow-up time was 13.6 months. 15 % of patients reported anterior knee pain in the postoperative follow-up period. The average Kujala PROM score was 85 (Range: 52-100). Conclusion/findings: The SEES technique had favourable PROM scores and displayed a lower incidence of anterior knee pain than the traditional infrapatellar approach. Knee pain rates were comparable to suprapatellar approaches without violating the knee joint. Disclosures: None.

Medial Knee Joint Space in Relation to Joint Function and Early Knee Pain in 20-45-Year Adults: A Cross Sectional Study.

Background: Anterior knee pain is very common in the young and active age groups but there are no significant studies on the normal population. Therefore, the objective of the study was to understand the relation between medial knee joint space to the development of knee pain and functional disability with special reference to the 20-45-year age group. Materials and methods: 250 cases with mean age of 36.36 years presenting with knee pain for at least 1 month were included in this prospective study (July 2021 and June 2022) and were asked to self-complete questionnaires on knee pain which included KNEST, AKPQ, VAS and IPAQ. Patients underwent X-rays of bilateral knees in AP view with weight bearing and then medial and lateral knee joint spaces were calculated. Results: There was a higher incidence of knee pain in women compared to men. The average medial and lateral joint space widths (MJSW and LJSW) of the right knee were 4.22 mm and 4.57 mm, respectively. For the left knee it was 4.19 mm and 4.42 mm, respectively. There is a decrease in MJSW with increasing age, level of pain and BMI. Also, with an increase in physical activity, there was a higher incidence of knee pain. Conclusion: Overuse injuries are the main cause of knee pain in this age group. There is a significant association between medial joint space width and age, gender, level of pain, and BMI. Rising BMI patterns at a young age, leads to an increase in physical activity, which in turn leads to early knee pain and also predisposes to osteoarthritis.

Short-term improvement of patellofemoral pain in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with patellar denervation: a prospective comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: Medial osteoarthritis (OA) knees with symptomatic patellofemoral (PF) arthritis were not recommended for UKA in the past. However, UKA has shown good clinical results in patients with medial OA knee with symptomatic PF arthritis. On the contrary, this procedure is not recommended for patients with severe PF OA. Patella denervation (PD) by circumferential electrocautery can reduce the severity and incidence of anterior knee pain in TKA. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no studies reporting anterior knee pain and complications of medial UKA with PD in severe PF OA. OBJECTIVE: We have conducted a prospective comparative study to assess the short-term results of anterior knee pain and complications after medial UKA with PD or without PD in medial compartment arthritis and severe PF arthritis patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective comparative study was conducted from January 2018-September 2019 at Pranungkaew Hospital, Nonthaburi, Thailand. A total of 66 patients with medial compartment and severe patellofemoral arthritis were allocated to UKA with or without patella denervation. The primary outcomes were Kujala anterior knee pain scale and complications measured at 6 months after the surgery. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (37 patients undergoing UKA with PD and 27 patients undergoing UKA without PD) of medial compartment and severe lateral facet patellofemoral arthritis (62 female, 4 male; mean age 60.16 (5.03) years; 17 PF grade III, 49 PF grade IV) were included in this study. The mean preoperative Kujala scores were 54.96 (range 30-80) (SD 2.59) in the no-PD group (group I) and 47.77 (range 27-75) (1.62) in the PD group (group II), respectively (p value = 0.009). All baseline characteristics were also comparable between treatment groups except the preoperative Kujala score. The mean final value of Kujala score was 70.22 (range 50-96) (2.40) in the no-PD group (group I) and 80.10 (range 60-95) (SD 1.50) in the PD group (group II), respectively (p value < 0.001). The mean difference of Kujala score was statistically significantly higher by 9.88 (4.48, 15.28) points in the PD group when compared to the no-PD group. There were no complications in both groups after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patellar denervation seems to provide short-term benefits improving the Kujala score in patients with PF OA undergoing UKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03676179.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Measurement Properties of the Indonesian Kujala Score for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Patients.

Introduction: There is an overwhelming need for worldwide applicable subjective grading systems for patients' anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. The scoring system should be validated for their use in advance related measurements. For the Indonesian language speaking population, only the Kujala Patellofemoral Score (KPS) questionnaire has been translated and validated into the Indonesian language for diseases related to knee pain, but none for ACL tears. The present study aims at cross-cultural adaption to measure the validity and reliability of the Kujala patellofemoral score Indonesian version (KPS-I) specifically for ACL tear patients. Material and methods: The responses of 106 ACL tear patients on two questionnaires comprising the KPS-I and Short Form (SF)-36 were examined by determining the validity and reliability. We conducted the validity construct and content, so the reliability was evaluated by test-retest reliability, internal consistency and measurement error. In addition, the research utilised the Bland and Altman method to explore absolute agreement. Results: The construct and content validity were good, where all hypotheses were confirmed, and the floor or ceiling effect did not occur. The reliability proved excellent between test and retest (ICC=0.99). An internal consistency showed a good Cronbach α of 0.86. The standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change at the individual (MDCind), and minimal detectable change at the group (MDCgrp) were determined to be 2.1, 5.8, and 0.7, respectively. The application of the Bland and Altman plot method revealed no bias in this study. Conclusion: The validation procedure shows that the KPS-I is a good evaluation instrument for Indonesian patients with ACL tear. However, it is suggested that this score be used for follow-up of patients after ACL reconstruction procedure, especially with anterior knee pain related to the original objective of the Kujala score.

Trochleoplasty for severe trochlear dysplasia significantly improves the quality of life of patients with symptomatic patellar instability.

BACKGROUND: Trochleoplasty is a recognized surgical technique to address severe trochlear dysplasia. The clinical and radiological outcomes of trochleoplasty surgery in trochlear dysplasia have been well reported. There is a paucity in literature regarding the correlation between trochleoplasty and quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study is to measure the improvement in QoL, in patients with severe trochlear dysplasia and recurrent patellar instability following trochleoplasty. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2019, 51 trochleoplasty cases were performed in 48 patients. They were identified from our prospectively kept database. All operations were performed by a fellowship trained consultant sports knee surgeon. Functional outcomes and QoL scores were assessed using Kujala, IKDC and EQ-5D index. Objective outcomes were obtained following each patient's latest follow-up assessment. RESULTS: The mean age at operation was 22y (SD ± 4.7, range 14-37y) and the mean follow-up period was 21.6 months (SD ± 15.2, range 12-60 months). The mean Kujala score improved from 58.1 (SD 14.9) to 77.9 (SD 17.3) at latest follow-up (p < 0.001). The mean IKDC score improved from 40.5 (SD 14.2) to 69.5 (SD 22.8) at latest follow up (p < 0.001). The mean EQ-5D index also improved from 0.593 (SD 0.257) to 0.824 (SD 0.189) at latest follow-up (p = 0.003). A higher Body Mass Index (BMI; >30 kg/m2) was associated with inferior outcomes. CONCLUSION: Trochleoplasty is an effective surgical technique which improves the QoL in patients suffering from patellar instability secondary to severe trochlear dysplasia. BMI can be used to predict post-operative outcomes.

Patellofemoral functional outcome of gracilis sparing compared to gracilis sacrificing ACL reconstruction.

Introduction: The hamstring is the most popular autograft used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Despite its excellent outcome, donor site morbidity is also irritating. Patellofemoral problems are reported to be one of the side effects after hamstring autograft harvesting, suggested to be due to both gracilis & semitendinosus sacrificing. Some experts propose retaining gracilis to decrease patellofemoral problems. The all-inside technique is an advantageous ACLR technique that can preserve the gracilis muscle while reducing muscle strength loss of affected limbs and the risk of knee joint instability under rotational load. This study aims to compare the patellofemoral functional outcome of both gracilis sparing and sacrificing using a validated Kujala score three months after ACLR. Methods: There was total of 20 subjects who underwent ACLR between December 2021 and May 2022 and met the inclusion criteria. They were then grouped into gracilis sparing group (n = 10) and gracilis sacrificing group (n = 10). Follow up assessment (Kujala Score) was conducted during phase II of the rehabilitation program. The assessed variables were surgery technique, time of surgery-to-evaluation, and Kujala Score. Result: There were no significant differences in Kujala Score between gracilis sparing and gracilis sacrificing groups (p = 0.809). There was a strong positive correlation between the time of surgery-to-evaluation and Kujala Score in each group (p = 0.942 and p = 0.910, respectively). Conclusion: There are no differences in patellofemoral functional outcomes between patients who undergo gracilis sparing and gracilis sacrificing ACLR with good scores of Kujala, which means both gracilis sparing and sacrificing show no harm to the patellofemoral after the ACLR.