Elevated factor XI is associated with recurrent left ventricular thrombus of unknown origin.

BACKGROUND: Elevated factor XI (FXI) has been shown to predispose to thromboembolism. We investigated whether it is associated with left ventricular thrombus (LVT) formation, its recurrence and subsequent thromboembolic events. METHODS: In 54 patients with prior LVT of unknown origin, who stopped anticoagulation and 54 controls, we determined FXI, along with plasma clot permeability (Ks), fibrinolysis time (CLT), endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), von Willebrand factor (vWF) and fibrinolysis proteins. During follow-up, the primary endpoint involving the recurrence of LVT a symptomatic ischemic stroke or systemic embolism was recorded. RESULTS: Elevated (>120%) FXI levels were more often observed in LVT patients when compared to the control group (14 [25.9%] vs. 6 [11.1%], p = .048) in association with the presence of active FXI. FXI correlated with age (r = .406, p = .002), Ks (r = -.542, p < .001) and CLT (r = .406, p = .002), also after adjustment for age, but not with ETP, vWF or fibrinolysis proteins. During follow-up of 77.6 ± 18.5 months the primary endpoint occurred in 17 (31.5%) LVT patients, including 11 (20.4%) recurrent LVT, and in 4 (7.4%) controls (annual incidence rate 4.9% vs. 1.1%, respectively; p = .002). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, elevated FXI was independently associated with the primary endpoint (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.09-1.28). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated FXI in association with a prothrombotic state characterizes patients with prior LVT of unknown origin and predisposes to its recurrence and/or ischemic stroke during follow-up. It might be speculated that the measurement of FXI helps identify patients who could benefit from prolonged anticoagulation and FXI inhibitors in the future.

A case of successful surgical treatment of left ventricular thrombus associated with acute myocardial infarction by Impella combined with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation approach.

The mortality rate in patients with heart failure complicated by cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains high, prompting research on mechanical circulatory support. Improved mortality rates have been reported with the early introduction of EcMELLA (Impella combined with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECMO). However, clear indications for this treatment have not been established, given the associated risks and limitations related to access routes. Left ventricular thrombosis is traditionally considered a contraindication for Impella use. A 74-year-old man without specific medical history or coronary risk factors was diagnosed with Forrester IV heart failure due to cardiogenic shock complicated by AMI and left ventricular thrombosis. The patient underwent emergency coronary artery bypass surgery, intracardiac thrombus removal, and Dor surgery. Following cardiopulmonary bypass, ongoing heart failure was observed, necessitating the implementation of EcMELLA for circulatory support. Preoperative computed tomography showed that the bilateral subclavian arteries were too narrow (< 7 mm) and anatomically unsuitable for traditional access methods. Thus, we introduced a single-access EcMELLA 5.5, through which the Impella was introduced and veno-arterial-ECMO blood was delivered from a single artificial vessel anastomosed to the brachiocephalic artery. The patient was weaned off veno-arterial-ECMO and extubated on postoperative day 3. By postoperative day 14, improved cardiac function allowed for Impella removal. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 31 with improved ambulation; thereafter, the patient returned to work. Thus, the single-access EcMELLA5.5 treatment strategy combined with Dor procedure was effective in left ventricular thrombosis in patients with heart failure with cardiogenic shock complicated by AMI.

Safety and efficacy of reperfusion therapies in acute ischemic stroke related to left ventricular thrombus: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a source of cardiogenic embolic stroke. Conflicting data exist in the literature regarding the utilization of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) at the acute phase of stroke in presence of LVT. We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of reperfusion therapies (IVT and/or thrombectomy) in patients with LVT. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with acute ischemic stroke and proven LVT and divided them in two groups: an intervention group with patients treated by reperfusion therapies and a control group with untreated patients. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2021, 3890 patients were treated by reperfusion therapies in the Lyon stroke center, 33 of whom (0.9%) had LVT. We identified 27 control patients. There were more embolic recurrences at six months in the intervention group than in the control group (nine recurrences versus three, P=0.03, OR=13.56, 95% CI [1.5;195]). Only two early embolic recurrences (< 24h) occurred, both in the IVT group. There was a 4.8-fold decrease in the median NIHSS score between baseline and 24h follow-up in the intervention group (P<0.0001), and the two groups exhibited similar six-month mortality. At stroke onset, cardiopathy was known in 70% of patients, while LVT was known in 30%. CONCLUSION: Acute reperfusion therapies seem to be effective in the context of stroke in patients with LVT. However, further studies are needed to support the hypothesis that stroke recurrence might be related to the use of IVT.

A prediction model for left ventricular thrombus persistence/recurrence: based on a prospective study and a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: It remains unknown whether anticoagulation for persistent left ventricular (LV) thrombus should be continued indefinitely. Identifying patients with a high risk of thrombus unresolved may be helpful to determine the optimum anticoagulation duration. This study aimed to develop a prediction model to forecast thrombus persistence or recurrence in patients with LV thrombus. METHODS: We enrolled patients prospectively from 2020 to 2022 and retrospectively from 2013 to 2019 at the National Center of Cardiovascular Diseases of China. The two cohorts were then combined to derive predictive models of thrombus persistence/recurrence. The primary study comprised patients who received systemic oral anticoagulants and had imaging records available at the end of a 3-month follow-up period. The Lasso regression algorithm and the logistic regression were performed to select independent predictors. The calibration curve was generated and a nomogram risk prediction model was applied as a risk stratification tool. RESULTS: A total of 172 (64 in the prospective cohort and 108 in the retrospective cohort) patients were included, with 124 patients in a training set and 48 patients in a validation set. Six predictors were incorporated into the multivariate logistic regression prediction model. The area under the receiving operating characteristic was 0.852 in the training set and 0.631 in the validation set. Patients with protuberant thrombus and higher baseline D-dimer levels had a reduced risk of persistence/recurrence (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.69, P = 0.025; OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.43-0.91, P = 0.030, separately), whereas thicker thrombus was linked to an increased rate of persistent thrombus (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.20, P = 0.002). Additionally, patients with diverse diagnoses or receiving different antiplatelet treatments had different rates of LV thrombus persistence/recurrence at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: This prediction model provides tools to forecast the occurrence of persistent/recurrent thrombus and allows the identification of characteristics associated with unresolved thrombus. To validate the model and determine the duration of anticoagulation in patients with persistent thrombus, prospective randomized trials are necessary.

Clinical profile and prognosis of elderly patients with left ventricular thrombus after anticoagulation.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary data regarding the clinical characteristics and prognosis of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) in older adults (aged ≥ 65 years old) are lacking. In this study, we characterized elderly patients with LVT (aged ≥ 65 years old) and investigated the long-term prognosis in this highly vulnerable patient population. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study was conducted from January 2017 to December 2022. Patients with a reported LVT were assessed primarily by transthoracic echocardiography (TEE) and classified into two groups: elderly LVT groups and younger LVT groups. All patients were treated with anticoagulant treatment. Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) was defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, systemic embolism, and rehospitalization for cardiovascular events. Survival analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazard model. RESULTS: A total of 315 eligible patients were included. Compared to the younger LVT group (n = 171), the elderly LVT group (n = 144) had a lower proportion of males and lower serum creatinine clearance, as well as a higher level of NT-proBNP, and a higher rate of history of systemic embolism. LVT resolution occurred in 59.7% and 69.0% of patients in the elderly LVT group and younger LVT group, respectively, with no significant difference (adjusted HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.74-1.28; P = 0.836). Yet, elderly patients with LVT, had higher prevalence rates of MACE (adjusted HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.10-2.11; P = 0.012), systemic embolism (adjusted HR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.20-6.59; P = 0.017) and all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.29-3.74; P = 0.004) compared with younger patients with LVT. After adjusting for mortality in the Fine-Gray model, similar results were observed. Additionally, patients treated with different anticoagulation therapies (DOACs vs. warfarin) achieved a similar improvement in prognosis (P > 0.05) or LVT resolution (P > 0.05) in elderly patients with LVT. CONCLUSIONS: Our results found that elderly patients experiencing LVT have a poor prognosis compared with the younger ones. Clinical prognosis in elderly patients did not significantly differ with the type of anticoagulant used. With aging societies worldwide, further evidence of antithrombotic therapy in elderly individuals with LVT is necessary.

An exploratory study of effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with left ventricular thrombus (R-DISSOLVE).

Evidence on the treatment for left ventricular (LV) thrombus is limited and mainly derives from retrospective studies. The aim of R-DISSOLVE was to explore the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with LV thrombus. R-DISSOLVE was a prospective, interventional, single-arm study, conducted from Oct 2020 to June 2022 at Fuwai Hospital, China. Patients with a history of LV thrombus < 3 months and with systemic anticoagulation therapy < 1 month were included. The thrombus was quantitatively confirmed by contrast-enhanced echocardiography (CE) at baseline and follow-up visits. Eligible patients were assigned to rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily or 15 mg if creatinine clearance was between 30 and 49 mL/min) and its concentration was determined by detecting anti-Xa activity. The primary efficacy outcome was the rate of LV thrombus resolution at 12 weeks. The main safety outcome was the composite of ISTH major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. A total of 64 patients with complete CE results were analyzed for efficacy outcomes. The mean LV ejection fraction was 25.4 ± 9.0%. The dose-response curve of rivaroxaban was satisfactory based on the peak and trough plasma levels and all concentrations were in the recommended treatment range according to NOAC guidelines. The incidence rate of thrombus resolution at 6 weeks was 66.1% (41/62, 95% CI 53.0-77.7%), and of thrombus resolution or reduction was 95.2% (59/62, 95% CI 86.5-99.0%). At 12 weeks, the thrombus resolution rate was 78.1% (50/64, 95% CI 66.0-87.5%) while the rate of thrombus resolution or reduction was 95.3% (61/64, 95% CI 86.9-99.0%). The main safety outcome occurred in 4 of 75 patients (5.3%) (2 ISTH major bleeding and 2 clinically relevant non-major bleeding). In patients with LV thrombus, we reported a high thrombus resolution rate with acceptable safety by rivaroxaban, which could be a potential option for further LV thrombus treatment.Trial registration This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04970381.

The stress clot: Mid-cavitary variant takotsubo cardiomyopathy with left ventricular thrombus.

Pregnancy and the post-partum period are known hypercoagulable states. Mid-cavitary variant Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM) is uncommon and seen in only about 14% of all Takotsubo cases. Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) in the setting of mid-cavitary TCM is extremely rare, occurring in approximately 1% of cases. We describe a case of a young female, 1-week post-partum, with an acute LVT in the setting of mid-ventricular TCM, and we discuss the striking images and clinical management of this uncommon presentation.

Left Ventricular Thrombus Management After Acute Myocardial Infarction in Clinical Practice: Results from LEVITATION Survey and Narrative Review.

PURPOSE: Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) after ST-elevation myocardial infarction still presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The LEVITATION survey was designed to take a picture of LVT management in current clinical practice. METHODS: The survey covered diagnostic, therapeutic, and prophylactic issues and was completed by 104 European cardiac centers. Most of them (59%) were university or tertiary centers. RESULTS: The survey showed anterior apical a-/dyskinesia, large MI, spontaneous echo-contrast, late presentation with delayed PCI, and TIMI flow 0-1 as the most important perceived risk factors for LVT formation. Serial ultrasound imaging is the most used tool to diagnose LVT (88% of the centers), with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and cardiac MR performed in case of poor apex visualization or spontaneous echo-contrast. One third (34%) of the centers uses prophylactic anticoagulation to prevent LVT formation. In the presence of LVT, low molecular weight heparin is the most used in-hospital therapy. At discharge, vitamin K antagonist and direct oral anticoagulants are used in 67 and 32% of the cases, respectively. Triple antithrombotic therapy with aspirin plus clopidogrel and VKA is the most used strategy at discharge (55%), whereas a single antiplatelet therapy is preferred only in the case of moderate-to-high risk of bleeding. To assess LVT total regression, half of the centers use contrast-enhanced ultrasound and/or cardiac-MR. The duration of anticoagulation is usually 3-6 months (55%), with long-term prolongation in case of LVT persistence or recurrence. CONCLUSION: The survey has depicted for the first time the current real-world management of this neglected topic and has highlighted several grey zones that are still present and not supported by evidence.

One-year clinical outcome of patients with left ventricular thrombus after acute myocardial infarction discharged on triple or dual antithrombotic therapy.

In patients with left ventricular thrombus (LVT) after acute myocardial infarction (MI), both anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies are needed. It is unknown whether dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) is able to reduce the incidence of bleeding complications without significantly increasing the number of thromboembolic events, compared to triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT). We retrospectively evaluated all post-MI patients with LVT discharged on TAT or DAT from our tertiary hospital in the last decade. The primary outcome was the occurrence of all-cause mortality, thromboembolic events, hospitalizations for re-MI or heart failure and any bleeding at 1 year. A propensity-score matching was performed in order to compare the primary outcome between TAT and DAT. Out of 2564 acute MI patients, 83 (3.2%) had an LVT at echocardiography: 51 (61.4%) discharged on TAT and 32 (38.6%) on DAT. At clinical follow-up, completed in 93% of cases, the incidence of the primary outcome was 18.2% (25.5% in TAT and 6.7% in DAT group; p = 0.04). More than 2/3 of the events included in the primary outcome were related to bleeding complications and occurred during the first month from hospital discharge. In the matched cohort of 42 patients with follow-up data available, the primary outcome occurred in 9 (42.9%) patients in the TAT and 2 (9.5%) in the DAT group (p = 0.03). In post-MI patients with LVT, DAT seems more effective than TAT in reducing clinical outcome, especially early bleeding complications. A randomized study is warranted to confirm this hypothesis.

Rivaroxaban versus Vitamin K Antagonists (warfarin) based on the triple therapy for left ventricular thrombus after ST-Elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) can complicate ST-Elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and is associated with poor outcomes. Conventional triple anticoagulation [Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) plus dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)] is the first-line therapy for LVT after STEMI. In patients with LVT following STEMI, contemporary data of triple therapy with rivaroxaban are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 1335 STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among patients who developed LVT after STEMI, we observed differences in efficacy between rivaroxaban plus DAPT therapy and VKA plus DAPT. The time of LVT resolution was also evaluated, as well as net clinical adverse events, and rates of bleeding events. RESULTS: In 1335 patients with STEMI, a total of 77 (5.7%) developed LVT over the follow-up period (median 25.0 months). Of the patients diagnosed with LVT, 31 patients were started on triple therapy with VKA, 33 patients on triple therapy with rivaroxaban. There was a consistent similarity in LVT resolution with rivaroxaban application compared to VKA application during the follow-up period [HR (log-rank test) 1.57(95% CI 0.89-2.77), p = 0.096; Adjusted HR 1.70(95% CI 0.90-3.22), p = 0.104]. Triple therapy with rivaroxaban showed quicker resolution than with VKA (6 months: p = 0.049; 12 months: p = 0.044; 18 months: p = 0.045). Similar risks of ISTH bleeding were not significantly different between the 2 groups [VKA 9.7% vs Rivaroxaban 6.1%, Adjusted HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.73-3.20); p = 0.444)]. Fewer net adverse clinical events (NACE) were observed in the rivaroxaban group [VKA 58.1% vs Rivaroxaban 24.2%; HR (log-rank test) 0.31(95% CI 0.14-0.68), p = 0.003; Adjusted HR 0.23(95% CI 0.09-0.57), p = 0.001]. CONCLUSION: In the observational study, triple therapy with rivaroxaban has similar and quicker LVT resolution in patients with LVT after STEMI, compared with triple therapy with VKA, and perhaps was associated with a better clinical benefit. Larger sample sizes and randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this observation.

Large vessel occlusions requiring repeated mechanical thrombectomy caused by silent myocardial infarction in a young adult.

OBJECTIVES: Silent myocardial ischemia, defined as objective evidence of myocardial ischemia without symptoms, is associated with ischemic stroke. Nevertheless, silent myocardial infarction is a rare cause of ischemic stroke, especially in young adults with no medical history. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Herein, we report a young adult patient with acute ischemic stroke treated with repeated mechanical thrombectomy for recurrent large vessel occlusions caused by left ventricular thrombus following a silent myocardial infarction. RESULTS: A 40-year-old man was transferred by ambulance to our hospital because of a generalized seizure. He was diagnosed with cerebral infarction and left middle cerebral artery occlusion. We performed intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy. Recanalization was achieved and his symptoms gradually improved. However, the day after treatment he developed bilateral cerebellar infarction and basilar artery occlusion. We performed a second mechanical thrombectomy and recanalization was achieved. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed a mobile left ventricular thrombus. Although he had no previous chest symptomatic episodes, cardiac examination confirmed myocardial infarction of unknown onset. He was diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusions caused by left ventricular thrombus following a silent myocardial infarction. Anticoagulation therapy reduced the amount of thrombus. At 1-year follow-up, he had not experienced any recurrences or symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Silent myocardial infarction should be considered a cause of ischemic stroke in young adults, even without any vascular risk factors. Recurrent large vessel occlusion may occur in patients with left ventricular thrombus, and repeated mechanical thrombectomy should be considered for treatment.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Left Ventricular Thrombus in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated by Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Left ventricular thrombosis (LVT) is a common complication of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study attempted to synthesize the available evidence to understand the incidence and risk factors of LVT in acute STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies published from January 2001 to January 2022. The random-effects and fixed-effects model meta-analysis estimated pooled incidence, mean difference (MD), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI). The Review Manager 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis performance. RESULTS: The results of meta-analysis showed that the incidence of LVT in acute STEMI treated by primary PCI was 4% (95% CI [0.03, 0.05]), and the overall pooled incidence in patients with anterior STEMI was 10.0% (95% CI [0.07, 0.12]). Anterior STEMI (OR = 11.93, 95% CI [6.25, 22.78], p = 0.0003), left anterior descending-related infarct (OR = 6.85, 95% CI [3.70, 12.66], p < 0.00001), left ventricular wall motion abnormalities (OR = 7.53, 95% CI [3.18, 17.82], p < 0.00001), and lower post-PCI LVEF (MD = 13.78, 95% CI [12.15, 15.41], p < 0.00001) were risk factors for post-PCI LVT. CONCLUSION: The incidence of LVT after acute STEMI in the PCI era remains high. This study provides a preliminary overview of STEMI patients at risk for post-PCI LVT and will help the design of prospective randomized controlled trials for the management and prevention of LVT.

Direct oral anticoagulants to treat left ventricular thrombus-A systematic review and meta-analysis: ELECTRAM investigators.

INTRODUCTION: Though current guidelines currently recommend using warfarin, there is also a growing interest in the utilization of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to treat left ventricular (LV) thrombus. METHODS: We performed a systematic search using PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to September 30, 2020, for studies that had reported outcomes in patients with left ventricular thrombus treated with DOACs (PROSPERO registration number CRD42020219761). RESULTS: Twelve studies (n = 867 patients) were included in the analysis. The pooled incidence of the systemic embolic events (SEE) with DOACs was 2.7%, whereas the thrombus resolution rate was 86.6%. The pooled incidence of overall bleeding (composite of major and minor bleeding) and major bleeding with DOACs were 5.6% and 1.1%, respectively. No significant difference was observed in terms of SEE (OR 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-1.52, p = .54), major bleeding (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.07-1.26, p = .24), and failure of LV thrombus resolution (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.28-2.58, p = .68); whereas overall bleeding was significantly low in patients with LV thrombus treated with DOACs compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.81, p = .02). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates no significant difference in SEE, major bleeding, or failure of LV thrombus resolution between the two groups, thus demonstrating that DOACs are an efficacious and safe alternative for the treatment of LV thrombus compared to VKAs. However, further well-designed prospective trials are needed to answer important clinical questions-optimal dosing/duration of DOACs and its safety in the background of antiplatelet therapy.

Resolution of huge thrombi in bilateral ventricles caused by severe lupus cardiomyopathy.

Ventricular thrombus is an uncommon, severe condition with high morbidity and mortality. Simultaneous left and right ventricular thrombi caused by lupus myocardiopathy have not been previously reported in the literature. This case presents a 42-year-old woman who has bilateral ventricular thrombi with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (35.4%) and acute kidney injury. Pro-brain natriuretic peptide was >35000 pg/mL. Systemic lupus erythematosus was confirmed based on multiorgan injuries including malar rash, anemia, renal injury, positive antinuclear, anti-Smith antibodies, and decreased complements. Renal biopsy revealed lupus nephritis class III + V. Low molecular weight heparin, steroids, and mycophenolate mofetil were initiated, after which the patient experienced transient numbness in the right limbs and hemoptysis. She then recovered quickly and improved significantly with recovery of left ventricular systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction 46%) and the eventual disappearance of thrombi. Simultaneous left and right ventricular thrombi are rare but life-threatening condition, prompting consideration of myocardiopathy caused by autoimmune diseases such as lupus. Timely treatment with immunosuppressants and anticoagulants may resolve the thrombi and improve cardiac function.

Off-label Use for Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Valvular Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Thrombus, Superficial Vein Thrombosis, Pulmonary Hypertension-a Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical literature for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) therapy for non-Food and Drug Administration approved indications. DATA SOURCES: Articles from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and OVID databases were reviewed from 1946 through September 4, 2020. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Fully published studies assessing DOACs for atrial fibrillation (AF) with valvular heart disease (VHD), heart failure (HF), left ventricular thrombus (LVT), superficial vein thrombosis (SVT), or pulmonary hypertension (PH) were evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Our review showed that DOACs are safe to use in patients with AF and VHD except for mitral stenosis or mechanical heart valve. Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily should be used with caution in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction until further evaluation is performed. Four retrospective studies for DOAC use in patients with LVT showed conflicting results. One phase 3 randomized controlled trial showed noninferiority of rivaroxaban to fondaparinux for SVT treatment. The use of DOACs for pulmonary arterial hypertension was not evaluated in any clinical study, but 2 retrospective studies for the use of DOACs in patients with chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH) showed similar efficacy between DOACs and warfarin. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review provides clinicians with a comprehensive literature review surrounding DOAC use in common off-label indications. CONCLUSION: DOACs can be considered for AF complicated by VHD except for mitral stenosis or mechanical valve replacement. DOACs (especially rivaroxaban) are considered as an alternative therapy for SVT and CTEPH. Further prospective studies for DOAC uses are needed for HF or LVT.

Warfarin versus direct oral anticoagulants for treating left ventricular thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is not uncommon and pose a risk of systemic embolism, which can be mitigated by adequate anticoagulation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly being used as alternatives to warfarin for anticoagulation, but their efficacy and safety profile has been debated. We aim to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of DOACs versus warfarin for the treatment of LVT. METHODOLOGY: We systematically searched PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, and LILCAS databases from inception to 14th August 2020 to identify relevant studies comparing warfarin and DOACs for LVT treatment and used the pooled data extracted from retrieved studies to perform a meta-analysis. RESULTS: We report pooled data on 1955 patients from 8 studies, with a mean age of 61 years and 59.7 years in warfarin and DOACs group, respectively. The pooled odds ratio for thrombus resolution was 1.11 (95% CI 0.51-2.39) on comparing warfarin to DOAC, but it did not reach a statistical significance (p = 0.76). The pooled risk ratio (RR) of stroke or systemic embolization and bleeding in patients treated with warfarin vs DOACs was 1.04 (95% CI 0.64-1.68; p = 0.85), and 1.15 (95% CI 0.62-2.13; p = 0.57), respectively; with an overall RR of 1.09 (95% CI 0.70-1.70; p = 0.48) for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: DOACs appears to be non-inferior or at least as effective as warfarin in the treatment of left ventricular thrombus without any statistical difference in stroke or bleeding complications.

Predicting mortality, thrombus recurrence and persistence in patients with post-acute myocardial infarction left ventricular thrombus.

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a common complication of acute myocardial infarction and is associated with morbidity from embolic complications. Predicting which patients will develop death or persistent LVT despite anticoagulation may help clinicians identify high-risk patients. We developed a random forest (RF) model that predicts death or persistent LVT and evaluated its performance. This was a single-center retrospective cohort study in an academic tertiary center. We included 244 patients with LVT in our study. Patients who did not receive anticoagulation (n = 8) or had unknown (n = 31) outcomes were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of death, recurrent LVT and persistent LVT. We selected a total of 31 predictors collected at the point of LVT diagnosis based on clinical relevance. We compared conventional regularized logistic regression with the RF algorithm. There were 156 patients who had resolution of LVT and 88 patients who experienced the composite outcome. The RF model achieved better performance and had an AUROC of 0.700 (95% CI 0.553-0.863) on a validation dataset. The most important predictors for the composite outcome were receiving a revascularization procedure, lower visual ejection fraction (EF), higher creatinine, global wall motion abnormality, higher prothrombin time, higher body mass index, higher activated partial thromboplastin time, older age, lower lymphocyte count and higher neutrophil count. The RF model accurately identified patients with post-AMI LVT who developed the composite outcome. Further studies are needed to validate its use in clinical practice.

Comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin for the treatment of left ventricular thrombus.

Left ventricular (LV) thrombus is a complication of acute endomyocardial injury and chronic ventricular wall hypokinesis, resulting in increased risk of thromboembolic complications. Observational studies support the general safety and efficacy of warfarin for this indication. Limited data exists regarding the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for LV thrombus. This retrospective cohort study sought to compare the incidence of thromboembolic events, bleeding rates, and blood product administration in patients receiving a DOAC versus warfarin. A total of 949 patients met inclusion, 180 (19%) received a DOAC and 769 (81%) warfarin. For the primary endpoint of new onset thromboembolic stroke, no difference existed between treatments (DOAC: 7.8% vs warfarin: 11.7%, p = 0.13). When compared to warfarin, no difference existed in the composite of thromboembolic events (33% vs 30.6%, p = 0.53, respectively) or in GUSTO bleeding (10.9% vs 7.8%, p = 0.40, respectively). More patients on warfarin received blood products compared to those taking a DOAC (25.8% vs 13.9%, p < 0.001).DOACs may be an alternative to warfarin for the treatment of LV thrombus based on a retrospective assessment of thromboembolic events and GUSTO bleeding events within 90 days of diagnosis of LV thrombus. However, further prospective studies are warranted.

Left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with left ventricular thrombus.

An intra-cavitary left ventricular (LV) thrombus is a relative contraindication to LV assist device (LVAD) implantation based on increased thromboembolic risks. Herein, we present our experience with LVAD patients with or without preoperative diagnosis of LV-thrombus. We retrospectively investigated 563 patients who received LVAD implantation between 2004 and 2018. Diagnosis of LV-thrombus was verified with computed tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, or intraoperative LV inspection. The primary endpoint was 30-day survival free of stroke and pump thrombosis. Overall, 72 patients (12.8%) had a diagnosis of LV-thrombus. They were younger (51 years; IQR:41-59), affected by severely reduced ejection fraction (15%; IQR:10-20), more often presenting with dilated cardiomyopathy (61.8%) and INTERMACS profile 1 (33.3%). Preoperative atrial fibrillation was frequent in patients without LV-thrombus (38.9%). Conventional sternotomy was the preferred approach in LV-thrombus patients (77.8%), based on more HMII implantations in these patients (41.7%). Survival free of strokes and pump thrombosis at 30 days was comparable (P = .5751) between patients with (83.3%) or without LV-thrombus (80.9%). LVAD implantation in patients with preoperative LV-thrombus is safe and feasible. When managed through correct diagnostic and intraoperative strategies including accurate inspection of the LV cavity, these patients show similar 30-day outcomes compared to patients without LV-thrombus.

Massive left ventricular thrombosis in pericardial decompression syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Pericardial decompression syndrome (PDS) is defined as paradoxical hemodynamic deterioration associated with left, right, or bi-ventricular dilation and systolic dysfunction following pericardiocentesis. It is uncommon yet under-recognized, underreported, and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. CASE REPORT: We report a unique case of PDS associated with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and massive apical thrombosis following surgical removal of 800 ml of pericardial fluid in a 72-year-old man with undiagnosed lung cancer. Treatment with anticoagulation and anti-remodeling medications resulted in complete resolution of the thrombus and recovery of LV function. CONCLUSIONS: PDS, although rare, can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Left ventricular apical thrombosis could result from PDS in the setting of hypercoagulable state. Treatment of the underlying disease may lead to successful resolution of PDS and its complications.