Utility of evoked potentials during anterior cerebral artery and anterior communicating artery aneurysm clipping.

Objective: To investigate the optimal combination of somatosensory- and transcranial motor-evoked potential (SSEP/tcMEP) modalities and monitored extremities during clip reconstruction of aneurysms of the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and its branches. Methods: A retrospective review of 104 cases of surgical clipping of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms was performed. SSEP/tcMEP changes and postoperative motor deficits (PMDs) were assessed from upper and lower extremities (UE/LE) to determine the diagnostic accuracy of each modality separately and in combination. Results: PMDs were reported in 9 of 104 patients; 7 LE and 8 UE (3.6% of 415 extremities). Evoked potential (EP) monitoring failed to predict a PMD in 8 extremities (1.9%). Seven of 8 false negatives had subarachnoid hemorrhage. Sensitivity and specificity in LE were 50% and 97% for tcMEP, 71% and 98% for SSEP, and 83% and 98% for dual-monitoring of both tcMEP/SSEP. Sensitivity and specificity in UE were 38% and 99% for tcMEP, and 50% and 97% for tcMEP/SSEP, respectively. Conclusions: Combined tcMEP/SSEP is more accurate than single-modality monitoring for LE but is relatively insensitive for UE PMDs. Significance: During ACA aneurysm clipping, multiple factors may confound the ability of EP monitoring to predict PMDs, especially brachiofacial hemiparesis caused by perforator insufficiency.

Impact of operator experience on transcranial magnetic stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of an operator's experience on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measurement. METHODS: Operator B (beginner), operator E (expert), and 30 healthy participants joined the study consisting of two experiments. In each experiment, each operator performed a TMS protocol on each participant in a random order. RESULTS: Compared with operator E, operator B exhibited higher resting motor threshold (RMT) in experiment I (60.1 ±â€¯13.0 vs. 57.4 ±â€¯10.9% maximal stimulation output, p = 0.017) and the difference disappeared in experiment II (p = 0.816). In 1-mV motor evoked potential (MEP) measurement, operator B exhibited higher standard deviation indicating lower consistency in experiment I compared with experiment II (1.05 ±â€¯0.40 vs. 1.05 ±â€¯0.16 mV with unequal variances, p = 0.001) and had poor intrarater reliability between the experiments (intraclass correlation coefficient = -0.130). There was no difference in the results of active motor threshold, silent period, paired-pulse stimulation, or continuous theta burst stimulation between the operators. CONCLUSIONS: An operator's experience in TMS may affect the results of RMT measurement. With practice, a beginner may choose a more precise stimulation location and have higher consistency in 1-mV MEP measurement. SIGNIFICANCE: We recommend that a beginner needs to practice for precise stimulation locations before conducting a trial or clinical practice.

Associations between primary motor cortex organization, motor control and sensory tests during the clinical course of low back pain. A protocol for a cross-sectional and longitudinal case-control study.

Background: In people with low back pain (LBP), altered motor control has been related to reorganization of the primary motor cortex (M1). Sensory impairments in LBP have also been suggested to be associated with reorganization of M1. Little is known about reorganization of M1 over time in people with LBP, and whether it relates to changes in motor control and sensory impairments and recovery. This study aims to investigate 1) differences in organization of M1 of trunk muscles between people with and without LBP, and whether the organization of M1 relates to motor control and sensory impairments (cross-sectional component) and 2) reorganization of M1 over time and its relation with changes in motor control and sensory impairments and experienced recovery (longitudinal component). Methods: A case-control study with a cross-sectional and five-week longitudinal component is conducted in participants with LBP (N = 25) and participants without LBP (N = 25). Participants with LBP received usual care physiotherapy. Various tests were administered at baseline and follow-up. Following an anatomical MRI, organization of M1 (Center of Gravity and Area of the cortical representation of trunk muscles) was determined using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Quantitative sensory testing, a spiral-tracking motor control test, graphesthesia, two-point discrimination threshold and various self-reported questionnaires were also assessed. Multivariate multilevel analysis will be used for statistical analysis. Conclusion: We will address the gaps in knowledge about the association between reorganization of M1 and motor control and sensory tests during the clinical course of LBP. This study is registered at DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/5C8ZG.

Neurophysiological differentiation of upper motor neuron damage in neurodegenerative disorders.

Objective: Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to delineate upper motor neuron (UMN) signs of two neurodegenerative disorders: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and multiple system atrophy (MSA). Methods: Medical records including clinical signs for UMN damage and TMS results were reviewed retrospectively. The UMN signs were classified into none, mild, and severe based on neurological examination of various reflexes. Then TMS-elicited motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from a hand and a leg muscle to calculate the central motor conduction time (CMCT), which represents fast, mono-synaptic conduction along the corticospinal tract. Relations between the UMN signs and CMCT were analysed for the two diseases. Results: Prevalence and severity of the UMN signs for ALS and MSA were comparable for both upper and lower limbs. However, abnormality in CMCT was found more frequently in ALS: CMCT abnormalities were found in upper limbs for 44% in ALS patients but only for 7% in MSA patients; CMCT abnormalities in lower limbs were 55% in ALS and 20% in MSA. Some ALS patients showed abnormal CMCT in limbs without UMN signs, which was not true for most MSA patients. Conclusions: The abnormalities of CMCT were different in ALS and MSA, even for those who clinically had similar UMN signs. Sometimes, CMCT can reveal UMN damage in the absence of clinical UMN signs. Differences presumably derive from selective degeneration of different fibres in the motor descending pathways. Longitudinal studies must be conducted to accumulate neuroimaging and pathological findings. Significance: CMCT can be useful to differentiate ALS and MSA.

Fast acquisition of resting motor threshold with a stimulus-response curve - Possibility or hazard for transcranial magnetic stimulation applications?

OBJECTIVE: Previous research has suggested that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) related cortical excitability measures could be estimated quickly using stimulus-response curves with short interstimulus intervals (ISIs). Here we evaluated the resting motor threshold (rMT) estimated with these curves. METHODS: Stimulus-response curves were measured with three ISIs: 1.2-2 s, 2-3 s, and 3-4 s. Each curve was formed with 108 stimuli using stimulation intensities ranging from 0.75 to 1.25 times the rMTguess, which was estimated based on motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes of three scout responses. RESULTS: The ISI did not affect the rMT estimated from the curves (F = 0.235, p = 0.683) or single-trial MEP amplitudes at the group level (F = 0.90, p = 0.405), but a significant subject by ISI interaction (F = 3.64; p < 0.001) was detected in MEP amplitudes. No trend was observed which ISI was most excitable, as it varied between subjects. CONCLUSIONS: At the group level, the stimulus-response curves are unaffected by the short ISI. At the individual level, these curves are highly affected by the ISI. SIGNIFICANCE: Estimating rMT using stimulus-response curves with short ISIs impacts the rMT estimate and should be avoided in clinical and research TMS applications.

The impact of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) on seizure course in people with and without epilepsy.

Objective: To elucidate the effects of single and paired-pulse TMS on seizure activity at electrographic and clinical levels in people with and without epilepsy. Methods: A cohort of 35 people with epilepsy, two people with alternating hemiplegia of childhood (AHC) with no epilepsy, and 16 healthy individuals underwent single or paired-pulse TMS combined with EEG. Clinical records and subject interviews were used to examine seizure frequency four weeks before and after TMS. Results: There were no significant differences in seizure frequency in any subject after TMS exposure. There was no occurrence of seizures in healthy individuals, and no worsening of hemiplegic attacks in people with AHC. Conclusions: No significant changes in seizure activity were found before or after TMS. Significance: This study adds evidence on the safety of TMS in people with and without epilepsy with follow-up of four weeks after TMS.

Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement.

Attempts to enhance human memory and learning ability have a long tradition in science. This topic has recently gained substantial attention because of the increasing percentage of older individuals worldwide and the predicted rise of age-associated cognitive decline in brain functions. Transcranial brain stimulation methods, such as transcranial magnetic (TMS) and transcranial electric (tES) stimulation, have been extensively used in an effort to improve cognitive functions in humans. Here we summarize the available data on low-intensity tES for this purpose, in comparison to repetitive TMS and some pharmacological agents, such as caffeine and nicotine. There is no single area in the brain stimulation field in which only positive outcomes have been reported. For self-directed tES devices, how to restrict variability with regard to efficacy is an essential aspect of device design and function. As with any technique, reproducible outcomes depend on the equipment and how well this is matched to the experience and skill of the operator. For self-administered non-invasive brain stimulation, this requires device designs that rigorously incorporate human operator factors. The wide parameter space of non-invasive brain stimulation, including dose (e.g., duration, intensity (current density), number of repetitions), inclusion/exclusion (e.g., subject's age), and homeostatic effects, administration of tasks before and during stimulation, and, most importantly, placebo or nocebo effects, have to be taken into account. The outcomes of stimulation are expected to depend on these parameters and should be strictly controlled. The consensus among experts is that low-intensity tES is safe as long as tested and accepted protocols (including, for example, dose, inclusion/exclusion) are followed and devices are used which follow established engineering risk-management procedures. Devices and protocols that allow stimulation outside these parameters cannot claim to be "safe" where they are applying stimulation beyond that examined in published studies that also investigated potential side effects. Brain stimulation devices marketed for consumer use are distinct from medical devices because they do not make medical claims and are therefore not necessarily subject to the same level of regulation as medical devices (i.e., by government agencies tasked with regulating medical devices). Manufacturers must follow ethical and best practices in marketing tES stimulators, including not misleading users by referencing effects from human trials using devices and protocols not similar to theirs.

The external carotid artery as a rare feeder of a spinal dural arteriovenous fistula causing cervical myelopathy: A review of the literature.

Introduction: A causal relationship between SDAVF's and cervical myelopathy is exceedingly rare. 1-2% of these lesions are located at the craniocervical junction of which 12% are caused by arterial feeders from the external carotid artery. A correct diagnosis can be challenging with a high rate of initial misdiagnosis. Research question: Which aspects constitute the most important potential pitfalls in the diagnostic workup and treatment of SDAVF's with feeders from the external carotid artery causing cervical myelopathy? Material and methods: We performed a PRISMA-guided review of the literature in which fourteen articles were included. We illustrate the diagnostic hazards through one of our own cases. Results: SDAVF's at the cervical segment contain unique clinical and radiographic characteristics which differ from those elsewhere. Cervical myelopathy is caused by a SDAVF in 2.3% of cases. Pitfalls are numerous and diagnosis can be challenging, due to a broad differential diagnosis, potential isolated lower extremity involvement and absence of spinal cord edema on MRI. MR-alterations not always correlate with fistula localization. Discussion and conclusion: A SDAVF should be part of the differential diagnosis in patients with subacute tetraparesis. When MRI shows signal alterations in combination with enlarged perimedullary vessels, a SDAVF should be suspected. Spinal angiography should include the vertebrobasilar system, as well as the internal and external carotid arteries. Early and adequate occlusion by means of an endovascular or neurosurgical approach of the draining radicular veins should be pursued. A multidisciplinary approach is key in the diagnostic workup and treatment of these patients.

Bipolar transesophageal thoracic spinal cord stimulation: A novel clinically relevant method for motor-evoked potentials.

OBJECTIVE: Although transesophageal motor-evoked potential elicited by monopolar cervical cord stimulation is more stable and rapid in response to ischemia than transcranial motor-evoked potential in canine experiments, direct cervical alpha motor neuron stimulation precludes clinical application. We evaluated a novel stimulation method using a bipolar esophageal electrode to enable thoracic cord stimulation. METHODS: Twenty dogs were anesthetized. For bipolar transesophageal stimulation, the interelectric pole distance was set at 4 cm. Changes in amplitude in response to incremental stimulation intensity (100-600 V) were measured to evaluate stability. Spinal cord ischemia was induced by aortic balloon occlusion at the T8 to T10 level for 10 minutes to evaluate response time or at the T3 to T5 level for 25 minutes to evaluate prognostic value. Neurological function was evaluated using the Tarlov score at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Bipolar transesophageal stimulation was successful in all animals and their forelimb waveforms were identical to those after transcranial stimulation. The minimum stimulation intensity to produce >90% of the maximum amplitude was significantly lower in both monopolar and bipolar transesophageal stimulation than in transcranial stimulation (n = 5). Time to disappearance and recovery (>75%) of the hindlimb potentials were significantly shorter by both monopolar and bipolar transesophageal stimulation than by transcranial stimulation (n = 5). Correlation with neurological outcomes was comparable among all stimulation methods (n = 10). CONCLUSIONS: Motor-evoked potential can be elicited by bipolar transesophageal thoracic cord stimulation without direct cervical alpha motor neuron stimulation, and its stability and response time are comparable to those elicited by monopolar stimulation.

Impaired conduction of Ia sensory fibers in multifocal motor neuropathy: An electrophysiological demonstration.

OBJECTIVES: To report the clinical and electrophysiological findings in two patients with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and bilateral absent patellar and Achilles tendon reflexes despite normal strength of quadriceps and calf muscles. METHODS: The medical history and clinical evaluation were completed by electrophysiological tests: sensory and motor nerve conduction studies, needle electromyography, motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) after transcranial magnetic stimulation, patellar T (tendon) responses, quadriceps and soleus H (Hoffman) reflex recordings. RESULTS: In the two patients, history, clinical evaluation, nerve conduction studies, favorable response to intravenous immunoglobulins, and positive anti-GM1 antibodies fulfilled the diagnosis of MMN. The lower limbs were asymptomatic, except for a unilateral weakness of foot dorsiflexion. The patellar and Achilles tendon reflexes disappeared during the course of the disease. The sensory nerve conduction studies were normal or minimally modified, M-wave and MEP/M amplitude ratio to the quadriceps were normal, patellar T (tendon) responses were virtually absent, and H-reflex to the quadriceps and soleus muscles were absent. CONCLUSIONS: These observations, which show the interruption of the reflex afferent pathway, raise the question of Ia afferent involvement in the lower limbs of these two patients with MMN. Further investigations should determine the frequency and significance of these findings in this disorder.

Efficacy of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Ischemic Stroke: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) along with conventional physiotherapy in the functional recovery of patients with subacute ischemic stroke. DESIGN: Double-blind, parallel group, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: The outpatient department of a tertiary hospital participants: first ever ischemic stroke patients (N=96) in the previous 15 days were recruited and were randomized after a run-in period of 75±7 days into real rTMS (n=47) and sham rTMS (n=49) groups. INTERVENTION: Conventional physical therapy was given to both the groups for 90±7 days postrecruitment. Total 10 sessions of low-frequency rTMS on contralesional premotor cortex was administered to real rTMS group (n=47) over a period of 2 weeks followed by physiotherapy regime for 45-50 minutes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy outcomes were change in modified Barthel Index (mBI) score (pre- to postscore) and proportion of participants with mBI score more than 90, measured at 90±7 days postrecruitment. The secondary outcomes were change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment-upper extremity, Fugl-Meyer Assessment-lower extremity, Hamilton Depression Scale, modified Rankin Scale, and National Institute of Health and Stroke Scale (pre- to post-rTMS) scores at 90±7 days post recruitment. RESULTS: Modified intention to treat analysis showed a significant increase in the mBI score from pre- to post-rTMS in real rTMS group (4.96±4.06) versus sham rTMS group (2.65±3.25). There was no significant difference in proportion of patients with mBI>90 (55% vs 59%; P=.86) at 3 months between the groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with subacute ischemic stroke, 1-Hz low-frequency rTMS on contralesional premotor cortex along with conventional physical therapy resulted in significant change in mBI score.

Natural Course and Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is defined as a degenerative disorder showing a narrowing of the spinal canal. The diagnosis is straightforward in cases with typical neurogenic claudication symptoms and unequivocal imaging findings. However, not all patients present with typical symptoms, and there is obviously no correlation between the severity of stenosis and clinical complaint. The radiologic diagnosis of LSS is widely discussed in the literature. The best diagnostic test for the diagnosis of LSS is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, canal diameter measurements have not gained much consensus from radiologists, whereas qualitative measures, such as cerebrospinal fluid space obliteration, have achieved greater consensus. Instability can best be defined by standing lateral radiograms and flexion-extension radiograms. For cases showing typical neurogenic claudication symptoms and unequivocal imaging findings, the diagnosis is straightforward. However, not all patients present with typical symptoms, and there is obviously no correlation between the severity of stenosis (computed tomography and MRI) and clinical complaint. In fact, recent MRI studies have shown that mild-to-moderate stenosis can also be found in asymptomatic individuals. Routine electrophysiological tests such as lower extremity electromyography, nerve conduction studies, F-wave, and H-reflex are not helpful in the diagnosis and outcome prediction of LSS. The electrophysiological recordings are complementary to the neurologic examination and can provide confirmatory information in less obvious clinical complaints. However, in the absence of reliable evidence, imaging studies should be considered as a first-line diagnostic test in the diagnosis of degenerative LSS.

Absence of Motor-Evoked Potentials Does Not Predict Poor Recovery in Patients With Severe-Moderate Stroke: An Exploratory Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the role of the presence or absence of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in predicting functional outcomes following a severe-moderate stroke. DESIGN: Retrospective exploratory analysis. We compared the effects of the stimulation condition (active or sham), MEP status (+ or -), and a combination of stimulation condition and MEP status on outcome. Within-group and between-group changes were assessed with longitudinal repeated measures analysis of variance and longitudinal repeated measures analysis of covariance, respectively. The proportions of participants who achieved minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the main outcome measures were calculated. SETTING: University research laboratory within a rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 129 subjects with severe-moderate stroke-related motor impairments who participated in previous studies combining neuromodulation and motor training. INTERVENTIONS: Neuromodulation (active or sham) and motor training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). RESULTS: When participants were grouped by stimulation condition or MEP status, all groups improved from baseline to immediate postintervention and follow-up evaluations (all P<.05). Analysis by stimulation condition and MEP status found that the MEP-/active group improved by 4.2 points on FMA (P<.0001) and 1.8 on ARAT (P=.003) post intervention. The MEP+/active group improved by 5.7 points on FMA (P<.0001) and 3.9 points on ARAT (P<.0001) post intervention. There were no between-group differences (P>.05). Regarding MCIDs, in the MEP-/active group, 14.5% of individuals reached MCID on FMA and 8.3% on ARAT post intervention. In the MEP+/active group, 33.3% of individuals reached MCID on FMA and 27.3% on ARAT post intervention. CONCLUSION: As expected, the MEP+ group had the greatest improvement in motor function. However, it was shown that individuals without MEPs can also achieve meaningful changes, as reflected by MCID, when neuromodulation is paired with motor training. To our knowledge, this is the first study to differentiate the effects of neuromodulation by MEP status.

A Retrospective Study in Microsurgical Procedures of Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms: An Outcome Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Intracranial aneurysms are considered large if >10 mm and giant if >25 mm. The risk of aneurysmal rupture compounds with increase in size of the aneurysm, thus, warranting appropriate intervention. In this study, we have analyzed the outcome and effectiveness of microsurgical procedures in large and giant aneurysms. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all the patients who underwent microsurgical procedures for large and giant cerebral aneurysms from 2014-2018 in our institute was conducted. There were a total of 52 patients, in which direct clipping was performed in 42 (80.7%) patients, proximal trapping in 3 (5.7%) patients, trapping with bypass in 3 (5.7%) patients, suction decompression in 3 (5.7%) patients, and 1 (1.9%) patient underwent surgical reconstruction. RESULTS: Among the 52 patients, in the postoperative period, 1 (1.9%) patient became comatose, 1 (1.9%) patient developed hemiplegia, 1 (1.9%) patient had a transient hemiparesis, and 1 (1.9%) patient had transient lower cranial nerve palsy. Two (3.8%) patients had chronic subdural hematoma during the 3-month follow-up. There was no mortality in our series. CONCLUSIONS: There are several treatment strategies available to manage large and giant cerebral aneurysms. In this study, we had minimal morbidity (3.8%), favorable outcome (96.1%), and no mortality. Therefore, we would like to conclude that appropriate microsurgical procedures, in experienced hands, can be considered as first line in the management for large and giant intracranial aneurysms, especially those with complex anatomy, wide neck, mass effect, partial thrombosis, and the presence of critical perforating vessels from the aneurysm wall.

Static magnetic field stimulation applied over the cervical spinal cord can decrease corticospinal excitability in finger muscle.

OBJECTIVE: Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation has recently been demonstrated to modulate cortical excitability. In the present study, we investigated the effect of transspinal static magnetic field stimulation (tsSMS) on excitability of the corticospinal tract. METHODS: A compact magnet for tsSMS (0.45 Tesla) or a stainless steel cylinder for sham stimulation was positioned over the neck (C8 level) of 24 able-bodied subjects for 15 min. Using 120% of the resting motor threshold transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured from the first digital interosseous muscle before, during, and after the tsSMS or sham intervention. RESULTS: Compared with baseline MEP amplitudes were decreased during tsSMS, but not during sham stimulation. Additionally, during the intervention, MEP amplitudes were lower with tsSMS than sham stimulation, although these effects did not last after the intervention ceased. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that static magnetic field stimulation of the spinal cord by a compact magnet can reduce the excitability of the corticospinal tract. SIGNIFICANCE: Transspinal static magnetic field stimulation may be a new non-invasive neuromodulatory tool for spinal cord stimulation. Its suppressive effect may be applied to patients who have pathological hyperexcitability of the spinal neural network.

Functional MRI vs. navigated TMS to optimize M1 seed volume delineation for DTI tractography. A prospective study in patients with brain tumours adjacent to the corticospinal tract.

BACKGROUND: DTI-based tractography is an increasingly important tool for planning brain surgery in patients suffering from brain tumours. However, there is an ongoing debate which tracking approaches yield the most valid results. Especially the use of functional localizer data such as navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) or functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) seem to improve fibre tracking data in conditions where anatomical landmarks are less informative due to tumour-induced distortions of the gyral anatomy. We here compared which of the two localizer techniques yields more plausible results with respect to mapping different functional portions of the corticospinal tract (CST) in brain tumour patients. METHODS: The CSTs of 18 patients with intracranial tumours in the vicinity of the primary motor area (M1) were investigated by means of deterministic DTI. The core zone of the tumour-adjacent hand, foot and/or tongue M1 representation served as cortical regions of interest (ROIs). M1 core zones were defined by both the nTMS hot-spots and the fMRI local activation maxima. In addition, for all patients, a subcortical ROI at the level of the inferior anterior pons was implemented into the tracking algorithm in order to improve the anatomical specificity of CST reconstructions. As intra-individual control, we additionally tracked the CST of the hand motor region of the unaffected, i.e., non-lesional hemisphere, again comparing fMRI and nTMS M1 seeds. The plausibility of the fMRI-ROI- vs. nTMS-ROI-based fibre trajectories was assessed by a-priori defined anatomical criteria. Moreover, the anatomical relationship of different fibre courses was compared regarding their distribution in the anterior-posterior direction as well as their location within the posterior limb of the internal capsule (PLIC). RESULTS: Overall, higher plausibility rates were observed for the use of nTMS- as compared to fMRI-defined cortical ROIs (p < 0.05) in tumour vicinity. On the non-lesional hemisphere, however, equally good plausibility rates (100%) were observed for both localizer techniques. fMRI-originated fibres generally followed a more posterior course relative to the nTMS-based tracts (p < 0.01) in both the lesional and non-lesional hemisphere. CONCLUSION: NTMS achieved better tracking results than fMRI in conditions when the cortical tract origin (M1) was located in close vicinity to a brain tumour, probably influencing neurovascular coupling. Hence, especially in situations with altered BOLD signal physiology, nTMS seems to be the method of choice in order to identify seed regions for CST mapping in patients.

Improved nTMS- and DTI-derived CST tractography through anatomical ROI seeding on anterior pontine level compared to internal capsule.

Imaging of the course of the corticospinal tract (CST) by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is useful for function-preserving tumour surgery. The integration of functional localizer data into tracking algorithms offers to establish a direct structure-function relationship in DTI data. However, alterations of MRI signals in and adjacent to brain tumours often lead to spurious tracking results. We here compared the impact of subcortical seed regions placed at different positions and the influences of the somatotopic location of the cortical seed and clinical co-factors on fibre tracking plausibility in brain tumour patients. The CST of 32 patients with intracranial tumours was investigated by means of deterministic DTI and neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS). The cortical seeds were defined by the nTMS hot spots of the primary motor area (M1) of the hand, the foot and the tongue representation. The CST originating from the contralesional M1 hand area was mapped as intra-individual reference. As subcortical region of interests (ROI), we used the posterior limb of the internal capsule (PLIC) and/or the anterior inferior pontine region (aiP). The plausibility of the fibre trajectories was assessed by a-priori defined anatomical criteria. The following potential co-factors were analysed: Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), resting motor threshold (RMT), T1-CE tumour volume, T2 oedema volume, presence of oedema within the PLIC, the fractional anisotropy threshold (FAT) to elicit a minimum amount of fibres and the minimal fibre length. The results showed a higher proportion of plausible fibre tracts for the aiP-ROI compared to the PLIC-ROI. Low FAT values and the presence of peritumoural oedema within the PLIC led to less plausible fibre tracking results. Most plausible results were obtained when the FAT ranged above a cut-off of 0.105. In addition, there was a strong effect of somatotopic location of the seed ROI; best plausibility was obtained for the contralateral hand CST (100%), followed by the ipsilesional hand CST (>95%), the ipsilesional foot (>85%) and tongue (>75%) CST. In summary, we found that the aiP-ROI yielded better tracking results compared to the IC-ROI when using deterministic CST tractography in brain tumour patients, especially when the M1 hand area was tracked. In case of FAT values lower than 0.10, the result of the respective CST tractography should be interpreted with caution with respect to spurious tracking results. Moreover, the presence of oedema within the internal capsule should be considered a negative predictor for plausible CST tracking.