Safety and Efficacy of Midface Augmentation Using Bio-Oss Bone Powder and Bio-Gide Collagen Membrane in Asians.

(1) Background: Asians tend to have a regressive midface. Midface augmentation is an effective treatment, and various materials have been used as fillers for this purpose. Bio-Oss bone powder has a strong positive effect on promoting new bone regeneration, and has been used in the dental field for over 30 years. However, it has not been used and reported as a filler in midface augmentation. (2) Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of midface augmentation using Bio-Oss bone powder in treating midface retrusion and resulting nasolabial folds, and to develop a predictive model for patient satisfaction. (3) Methods: 85 patients underwent midface augmentation through an intraoral approach with Bio-Oss. Treatment efficacy was assessed by blinded investigators. The data on safety were collected from patient interviews at each follow-up visit. A questionnaire was used for investigating patient satisfaction. The influencing factors of satisfaction were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. A nomogram to predict the risk of dissatisfaction was built based on significant factors with R software. Results: Compared to baseline, there was a significant improvement (p < 0.001) in Wrinkle Severity (4) Rating Scale scores at week 24, with a mean decrease of 0.52 ± 0.57. The aesthetic improvement rate evaluated by the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale was 92.9%. Four mild treatment-related adverse events were noted. The majority of patients were satisfied overall. A nomogram with good prediction performance was plotted. (5) Conclusions: This new procedure yielded safe and satisfactory aesthetic results. A nomogram with good test performance and discriminative ability was established for predicting patient satisfaction.

Computer guided maxillo-malar piezoelectric osteotomies for midface augmentation.

PURPOSE: Despite maxillo-malar osteotomies having been discarded in the most recent literature, in the setting of orthognathic surgery they provide several advantages for middle third augmentation. This paper reintroduces maxillo-malar osteotomies as an effective method to increase volume of midfacial region in combination with contemporary technology, including piezosurgery, virtual surgical planning, and navigation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with midface hypoplasia were included in this study and underwent orthognathic surgery with maxillo-malar osteotomies. All patients underwent the same workflow: virtual design of maxillo-malar osteotomies, surgery with navigation-assisted piezoelectric osteotomies, and computerized morphometric analysis. RESULTS: Simulated maxillo-malar osteotomies were successfully replicated in the operating room, as shown by accuracy evaluation performed using three-dimensional analysis. In long-term follow-up period, no permanent complications were assessed. Superimposition between postoperative and preoperative CBCTs revealed that the soft tissue area influenced by the underlying skeletal movement was comparable for all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual surgical planning, navigation, and piezosurgery are today indispensable tools to perform maxillo-malar osteotomies safely and accurately. We suggest incorporating such osteotomies in the surgeon's armamentarium for patients with severe midfacial hypoplasia as they offer an integrated solution to restore functionality and aesthetics.

Zygomaticomaxillary "lateral swing" osteotomy for augmentation of midface deficiency.

INTRODUCTION: Various surgical modalities have been proposed for the augmentation of midface deficiency without correction of the occlusal component. They include autogenous bone and cartilage grafts, alloplastic materials, and osteotomies. We propose an innovative osteotomy technique for augmentation of the midface including the infraorbital rims, the zygoma, the anterior maxillae, and the paranasal areas without advancing the dental-bearing segment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This procedure was carried out on a 21-year-old male patient who had a deficiency of the anterior maxillae including the infraorbital rims. His occlusion was in Class I molar relation. The surgical exposure was carried out through a midface degloving approach. This bilateral osteotomy encompasses the anterior maxillae and the zygoma; the osteotomy line running superiorly from the medial aspect of the infra-orbital rim to the root of the frontal process of maxilla. Inferiorly, the line runs above the apices of the maxillary teeth laterally underneath the zygomatic buttress, separating part of the zygomaticomaxillary suture posteriorly. Medially, the osteotomy line runs parallel to the piriform aperture. The osteotomy is pedicled on the zygomaticotemporal suture. A greenstick fracture at the zygomatic arch pedicled the osteotomized segment to the zygomatic process of the temporal bone. The entire segment was swung laterally outward, effectively separating part of the zygomaticomaxillary suture posteriorly. Fixation was achieved with a single 2-mm L-shaped, 4-hole plate with gap at the zygomatic buttress region. RESULTS: This osteotomy technique resulted in fullness of the anterior maxillae and infraorbital rims, with increased anterior and lateral projection of the zygoma. CONCLUSION: The zygomaticomaxillary "lateral swing" osteotomy is a reliable and stable technique for total midface augmentation not requiring occlusion correction.

Facelift Controversies.

The primary purpose of the facelift is to restore the shape, volume, and contours of the youthful face. Facelift surgery has evolved over the years into multiple techniques to accomplish the same results. This article discusses the common controversies in facelift surgery and evaluates the best available evidence to guide surgical decision-making. In regard to the salient question of whether there is a "best" technique, the literature suggests that the options are generally equal in efficacy. This highlights the need for high-quality research with standardized preoperative assessment and evaluation of postoperative results to better assess outcomes.

Midface skeletal enhancement.

Alloplastic malar augmentation offers a reliable means of achieving a permanent, yet reversible, form of midfacial volume enhancement that serves to correct the changes associated with facial aging, hypoplasia, and congenital malar asymmetry. The degree of augmentation depends on the severity of existing malar bony hypoplasia, soft tissue volume loss/ptosis, or both. Facial aesthetic surgeons have a multitude of implant designs and shapes and implant materials available. The transoral surgical approach with transcutaneous implant suture stabilization is the most commonly used surgical protocol in alloplastic midface augmentation and is, therefore, the technique specifically chosen for review in this article.

Current Concepts in Filler Injection.

When evaluating the face in thirds, the upper face, midface, and lower face, one may assume the lateral the temple, midface, and lateral mandible as the pillars of these subdivisions. Many of our facial aesthetic procedures address these regions, including the lateral brow lift, midface lift, and lateral face lift. As the use of facial fillers has advanced, more emphasis is placed on the correction of the temples, midlateral face, and lateral jaw line. This article is dedicated to these facial aesthetic pillars.