Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 150: 105644, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38761968

RESUMO

ICH Q3A/B guidelines are not intended for application during the clinical research phase of development and durationally adjusted qualification thresholds are not included. A central tenet of ICH Q3A is that lifetime exposure to 1 mg/day of an unqualified non-mutagenic impurity (NMI) is not a safety concern. An analysis of in vivo toxicology data from 4878 unique chemicals with established NO(A)ELs was conducted to determine whether durationally adjusted qualification limits can be supported. Although not recommended in ICH Q3A/B, a conservative approach was taken by using allometric scaling in the analysis. Following allometric scaling of the 5th percentile of the distribution of NO(A)ELs from available chronic toxicology studies, it was reconfirmed that there is a safety basis for the 1 mg/day qualification threshold in ICH Q3A. Additionally, allometric scaling of the 5th percentile of the distribution of NO(A)ELs from sub-acute and sub-chronic toxicology studies could support acceptable limits of 20 and 5 mg/day for an unqualified NMI for dosing durations of less than or greater than one month, respectively. This analysis supports durationally adjusted NMI qualification thresholds for pharmaceuticals that protect patient safety and contribute to 3Rs efforts for qualifying impurities using new approach methods.


Assuntos
Contaminação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Animais , Medição de Risco , Nível de Efeito Adverso não Observado , Preparações Farmacêuticas/análise , Preparações Farmacêuticas/normas
2.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 147: 105559, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38145838

RESUMO

Absence of clear guidance on the qualification threshold for non-mutagenic impurities during clinical development is a source of inconsistency in both sponsor qualification approaches and health authority requests. A survey was conducted in March 2020 with 6 member companies of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA). Thirteen examples were gathered of where non-International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) limits have been used in regulatory submissions for various indications and stages of development, together with the regulatory outcomes. As expected, few challenges were faced in early clinical development, with health authorities generally commenting that sponsors should work towards ICH Q3A and Q3B guideline specification limits as development progresses. However, inconsistent health authority requests were noted even for early phase clinical trials in late-stage oncology patients. For an optimised use of resources, consistent approaches would have the benefit of supporting faster access of safe medicines to patients while including Replacement, Reduction and Refinement (the 3Rs) considerations with respect to animal testing.


Assuntos
Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos , Neoplasias , Animais , Humanos , Descoberta de Drogas , Indústria Farmacêutica
3.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 150: 105647, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38777301

RESUMO

Multiple international guidelines exist that describe both quality and safety considerations for the control of the broad spectrum of impurities inherent to drug substance and product manufacturing processes. However, regarding non-mutagenic impurities (NMI) the most relevant ICH Q3A/B guidelines are not applicable during early phases of drug development leading to confusion about acceptable limits at this stage. Thus, there is need for more flexible approaches that ensure that patient safety remains paramount, while taking into consideration the limited duration of exposure. An EFPIA survey, which collected quantitative data from different types of studies applied to qualify impurities in accordance with ICH Q3A, shows that no toxicities could be attributed to any of the 467 impurities at any tested level in vivo. This data combined with earlier published toxicological datasets encompassing drug substances and intermediates, food related substances and chemicals provide convincing evidence that for NMIs, the application of a generic 5 mg/day limit for an exposure duration <6 months, and a 1 mg/day generic limit for life-long exposure, provides sufficient margins to ensure patient safety. Hence, application of these absolute limits to trigger qualification studies (instead of the relative limits described in Q3A/B), is considered warranted. This approach will prevent conduct of unnecessary dedicated impurity qualification studies and the resulting use of animals.


Assuntos
Contaminação de Medicamentos , Contaminação de Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Animais , Medição de Risco , Guias como Assunto
4.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 84: 116-123, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28038978

RESUMO

Management of organic non-mutagenic impurities (NMIs) in medicinal products is regulated by the ICH Q3A, B and C guidelines that are applicable at late stages of clinical development (Phase III onwards) and as a consequence there is no guidance for the assessment and control of NMIs in early clinical trials. An analysis of several key in vivo toxicology databases supports the ICH Q3A defined concept that a lifetime dose to 1 mg/day of a NMI would not represent a safety concern to patients. In conjunction with routine (Q)SAR approaches, this 1 mg/day value could be used as a universal qualification threshold for a NMI during any stage of clinical development. This analysis also proposes that modification of this 1 mg/day dose using an established methodology (i.e. Modified Haber's Law) could support 5 mg/day or 0.7% (whichever is lower) as an acceptable limit for a NMI in a drug substance or product in early clinical studies (<6 months). Given the controlled nature of clinical development and the knowledge that most toxicities are dose and duration dependent, these proposed NMI limits provide assurance of patient safety throughout clinical development, without the requirement to commission dedicated in vivo toxicology impurity qualification studies.


Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Contaminação de Medicamentos , Descoberta de Drogas , Compostos Orgânicos/efeitos adversos , Segurança do Paciente , Preparações Farmacêuticas/análise , Animais , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Descoberta de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes , Regulamentação Governamental , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Nível de Efeito Adverso não Observado , Compostos Orgânicos/análise , Segurança do Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Formulação de Políticas , Controle de Qualidade , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Níveis Máximos Permitidos , Fatores de Tempo , Testes de Toxicidade/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA