Effect of a transitional tele-rehabilitation programme on quality of life of adult burn survivors: A randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of the transitional tele-rehabilitation programme on quality of life of adult burn survivors. DESIGN: A prospective, single centre, randomised controlled trial and reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. PARTICIPANTS: Adult burn survivors aged ≥18 years with burn size ≥10% total body surface area irrespective of the depth was considered eligible to participate. INTERVENTION: The intervention was in two phases: pre-discharge and active follow-up phase (which occurred via WeChat). In both phases, comprehensive assessment and intervention guided by the Omaha System and evidenced-based protocols guided the care delivery over an 8-week period. MAIN MEASURES: The outcome of interest was quality of life. Two outcome measures were used to assess the outcome of interest: Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) and the EQ-5D-5L tools. The outcome was assessed at three time points: T0 (baseline), T1 (immediate post-intervention) and T2 (4 weeks from T1). RESULTS: In total, 60 adult burn survivors were randomly allocated to undergo the new programme. The transitional tele-rehabilitation programme elicited statistically significant improvement in simple abilities, affect, interpersonal relationship (T2) and overall quality life (T1 and T2) measured on the BSHS-B. CONCLUSION: Ongoing rehabilitative care is essential to support the recovery process of burn survivors considering that some quality-of-life subscales may improve faster than others. The study findings highlight the potential of employing a social media platform to improve post-burn quality of life outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04517721. Registered on 20 August 2020.

The identification of clusters of risk factors and their association with hospitalizations or emergency department visits in home health care.

AIMS: To identify clusters of risk factors in home health care and determine if the clusters are associated with hospitalizations or emergency department visits. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. METHODS: This study included 61,454 patients pertaining to 79,079 episodes receiving home health care between 2015 and 2017 from one of the largest home health care organizations in the United States. Potential risk factors were extracted from structured data and unstructured clinical notes analysed by natural language processing. A K-means cluster analysis was conducted. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to identify the association between clusters and hospitalizations or emergency department visits during home health care. RESULTS: A total of 11.6% of home health episodes resulted in hospitalizations or emergency department visits. Risk factors formed three clusters. Cluster 1 is characterized by a combination of risk factors related to "impaired physical comfort with pain," defined as situations where patients may experience increased pain. Cluster 2 is characterized by "high comorbidity burden" defined as multiple comorbidities or other risks for hospitalization (e.g., prior falls). Cluster 3 is characterized by "impaired cognitive/psychological and skin integrity" including dementia or skin ulcer. Compared to Cluster 1, the risk of hospitalizations or emergency department visits increased by 1.95 times for Cluster 2 and by 2.12 times for Cluster 3 (all p < .001). CONCLUSION: Risk factors were clustered into three types describing distinct characteristics for hospitalizations or emergency department visits. Different combinations of risk factors affected the likelihood of these negative outcomes. IMPACT: Cluster-based risk prediction models could be integrated into early warning systems to identify patients at risk for hospitalizations or emergency department visits leading to more timely, patient-centred care, ultimately preventing these events. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: There was no involvement of patients in developing the research question, determining the outcome measures, or implementing the study.

Transitional and aftercare needs of persons recovering from COVID-19 using the Omaha System: A Scoping Review.

AIM: To identify and classify the transitional and aftercare needs of persons hospitalised with and recovering from COVID-19. BACKGROUND: Several studies exist that describe the patient needs at the acute phase of COVID-19. The transitional and aftercare needs that emerge during recovery, however, remain vague. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted and reported according to the PRISMA extension guidelines for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Primary studies were identified from database search. Narrative synthesis was undertaken, with the Omaha System as a framework. RESULTS: Forty studies were included. Persons recovering from the infection may have several needs in all domains of the Omaha System. Although the severity and persistence of the needs may be unrelated to the severity of the initial infection, they may vary based on factors such as age and pre-morbid factors. CONCLUSION: Recovering from COVID-19 is associated with varied biopsychosocial-environmental needs which can adversely affect the quality-of-life experience. The review findings represent an inventory of needs that can guide the development of multi-disciplinary post-acute or aftercare programmes. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Recovering from COVID-19 can be a protracted process requiring ongoing professional support after discharge. Policies are required to support the development and implementation of post-acute programmes of care. Comprehensive transitional and aftercare rehabilitative programmes are needed to support the recovery process.

Using data visualization to characterize whole-person health of public health nurses.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize patterns in whole-person health of public health nurses (PHNs). DESIGN AND SAMPLE: Survey of a convenience sample of PHNs (n = 132) in 2022. PHNs self-identified as female (96.2%), white (86.4%), between the ages 25-44 (54.5%) and 45-64 (40.2%), had bachelor's degrees (65.9%) and incomes of $50-75,000 (30.3%) and $75-100,000/year (29.5%). MEASUREMENTS: Simplified Omaha System Terms (SOST) within the MyStrengths+MyHealth assessment of whole-person health (strengths, challenges, and needs) across Environmental, Psychosocial, Physiological, and Health-related Behaviors domains. RESULTS: PHNs had more strengths than challenges; and more challenges than needs. Four patterns were discovered: (1) inverse relationship between strengths and challenges/needs; (2) Many strengths; (3) High needs in Income; (4) Fewest strengths in Sleeping, Emotions, Nutrition, and Exercise. PHNs with Income as a strength (n = 79) had more strengths (t = 5.570, p < .001); fewer challenges (t = -5.270, p < .001) and needs (t = -3.659, p < .001) compared to others (n = 53). CONCLUSIONS: PHNs had many strengths compared to previous research with other samples, despite concerning patterns of challenges and needs. Most PHN whole-person health patterns aligned with previous literature. Further research is needed to validate and extend these findings toward improving PHN health.

Algorithm development to improve intervention effectiveness for parents with mental health signs and symptoms.

OBJECTIVES: In this study we aimed to describe and compare groups formed by a rules-based algorithm to prospectively identify clients at risk of poor outcomes in order to guide tailored public health nursing (PHN) intervention approaches. DESIGN: Data-driven methods using standardized Omaha System PHN documentation. SAMPLE: Clients ages 13-40 who received PHN home visiting services for both the Caretaking/parenting and Mental health problems (N = 4109). MEASUREMENT: We applied a theory-based algorithm consisting of six rules using existing Omaha System data. We examined the groups formed by the algorithm using standard descriptive, inferential statistics, and Latent Class Analysis. RESULTS: Clients (N = 4109) were 25.1 (SD = 5.9) years old and had an average of 7.3 (SD = 3.2) problems, 250 (SD = 319) total interventions, and 32 (SD = 44) Mental health interventions. Overall outcomes improved after PHN interventions (p < .001 for all) and having more Mental health signs/symptoms was negatively associated with outcome scores (p < .001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: This algorithm may be helpful in identifying high-risk clients during a baseline assessment who may benefit from more intensive mental health interventions. Findings show there is value using the Omaha System for PHN documentation and algorithm clinical decision support development. Future research should focus on algorithm implementation in PHN clinical practice.

Effect of health screening and School Nurse Interventions on primary school students' knowledge, behavior, and status in Turkey: A quasi-experimental Omaha System study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the effect of health screening and school nurse interventions using a community-based, comprehensive practice and documentation system to improve knowledge, behavior, and status scores of primary school students. DESIGN AND METHODS: A quasi-experimental study design with pretest and posttest of a single group was used. The research was conducted between November 2017 and January 2018 with 473 students at a primary school in southern Turkey. Health screening procedures and the Omaha System were used to identify health problems. Evidence-based school nurse interventions were implemented. The outcomes, including knowledge, behaviors, and status scores, were measured using the Problem Rating Scale for Outcomes. The scores were evaluated at the baseline and at the end of 10 weeks. RESULTS: Students' health problems, such as inadequate vision, hypertension, obesity, and second-hand smoke, were identified during the health screening. None of the students was neglected or abused. The most common health problems concerned Oral health, Neuro-musculo-skeletal function, Nutrition, and Vision. The intervention categories included Teaching, Guidance, and Counseling (58.1%); Case Management (20.9%); Surveillance (17.8%); and Treatment and Procedures (3.2%). A significant increase in Knowledge, Behavior, and Status scores was noted after interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that health screening was effective in detecting school-age children's health problems. Knowledge, behavior, and status of primary students improved after school nurse interventions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: School nurses can use health screening and evidence-based interventions to protect and improve children's health. The Omaha System enables robust documentation to demonstrate outcomes after interventions.

Construction of an index system for evaluating the effectiveness of transitional care in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed that transitional care reduces the complication rate and readmission rate and improves the quality of life in kidney transplant receipts, nevertheless, in fact there are no standard evaluation indexes and debatable scientific of existing indexes in kidney transplant recipients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to construct an evaluation index system to assess the effects of transitional care in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: Based on Omaha system, an initial evaluation index system about the effects of transitional care in kidney transplant recipients was drafted by the literature review and semi-structured interview. Two rounds of correspondence were conducted in 19 experts and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to calculate the weights of all indexes. RESULTS: Five first-level indexes, sixteen second-level indexes, and forty-eight third-level indexes were selected in the initial evaluation index system. The authority coefficient of two-round expert consultations was 0.90 and coordination coefficients of indexes ranged from 0.24 to 0.34. CONCLUSION: The established evaluation index system for the effectiveness of transitional care for kidney transplant recipients was scientific and reliable. Furthermore, it would be a potential method to evaluate effects of transitional care in kidney transplant recipients after further examination.

Understanding Women's Cardiovascular Health Using MyStrengths+MyHealth: A Patient-Generated Data Visualization Study of Strengths, Challenges, and Needs Differences.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this data visualization study was to identify patterns in patient-generated health data (PGHD) of women with and without Circulation signs or symptoms. Specific aims were to (a) visualize and interpret relationships among strengths, challenges, and needs of women with and without Circulation signs or symptoms; (b) generate hypotheses based on these patterns; and (c) test hypotheses generated in Aim 2. DESIGN: The design of this visualization study was retrospective, observational, case controlled, and exploratory. METHODS: We used existing de-identified PGHD from a mobile health application, MyStrengths+MyHealth (N = 383). From the data, women identified with Circulation signs or symptoms (n = 80) were matched to an equal number of women without Circulation signs or symptoms. Data were analyzed using data visualization techniques and descriptive and inferential statistics. FINDINGS: Based on the patterns, we generated nine hypotheses, of which four were supported. Visualization and interpretation of relationships revealed that women without Circulation signs or symptoms compared to women with Circulation signs or symptoms had more strengths, challenges, and needs-specifically, strengths in connecting; challenges in emotions, vision, and health care; and needs related to info and guidance. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that visualization of whole-person health including strengths, challenges, and needs enabled detection and testing of new health patterns. Some findings were unexpected, and perspectives of the patient would not have been detected without PGHD, which should be valued and sought. Such data may support improved clinical interactions as well as policies for standardization of PGHD as sharable and comparable data across clinical and community settings. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Standardization of patient-generated whole-person health data enabled clinically relevant research that included the patients' perspective.

Exploring Large Community- and Clinically-Generated Datasets to Understand Resilience Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

PURPOSE: To explore resilience in the context of whole-person health and the social determinants of health at the individual and community levels using large, standardized nursing datasets. DESIGN: A retrospective, observational, correlational study of existing deidentified Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant data using the Omaha System and its equivalent, Simplified Omaha System Terms. METHODS: We used three samples to explore for patterns of resilience: pre-COVID-19 community-generated data (N = 383), pre-COVID-19 clinical documentation data (N = 50,509), and during-COVID-19 community-generated data (N = 102). Community participants used the My Strengths + My Health (MSMH) app to generate the two community datasets. The clinical data were obtained from the Omaha System Data Collaborative. We operationalized resilience as Omaha System Status scores of 4 (minimal signs or symptoms) or 5 (no signs or symptoms) as a discrete strengths measure for each of 42 Omaha System problem concepts. We used visualization techniques and standard descriptive and inferential statistics for analysis. FINDINGS: It was feasible to examine resilience, operationalized as strengths by problem concept, within existing Omaha System or Simplified Omaha System Terms (MSMH) data. We identified several patterns indicating strengths and resilience that were consistent with literature related to community connectedness for community participants, and sleep for individuals in the clinical data. CONCLUSIONS: When used consistently, the Omaha System within MSMH enabled robust data collection for a comprehensive, holistic assessment, resulting in better whole-person data including strengths, and enabled us to discover a potentially useful approach for defining resilience in new ways using standardized nursing data. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The notion that how we assess individuals and communities (i.e., the completeness of our assessments in relation to whole-person health) determines what we can know about resilience is seemingly in opposition to the critical need to decrease documentation burden, despite the potential to shift from a problem deficit-based assessment to one of strengths and resilience. However, a patient-facing comprehensive assessment that includes resilience and the social determinants of health can provide a transformative, whole-person platform for strengths-based care and population management.

Nursing care management based on the Omaha system for inpatients diagnosed with COVID-19: An electronic health record study.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to identify the clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and the existing nursing problems based on the Omaha System, and to establish a comprehensive nursing care management plan by determining the nursing interventions and care outcomes. DESIGN: This study used a descriptive cross-sectional design. METHODS: This study was conducted in a training and research hospital with 25 non-intubated COVID-19 inpatients between 6 April and 13 May 2020 in Turkey. Data were collected using a Socio-demographic and Clinical Characteristics Form, the COVID-19 Response Separate Guidelines and the Omaha System and Nightingale Notes software. Data were analysed using descriptive statistical tests and the chi-square method. RESULTS: Using the Omaha System, it was shown that the patients' most common problems were communicable/infectious condition, respiration, circulation, pain, nutrition, personal care and substance use respectively. The most common signs and symptoms were signs of infection, fever, cough, respiratory distress and pain. The interventions that were performed most frequently to the patients included infection precautions, medication action/side effects, signs/symptoms-physical, dietary management and nursing care targets for intervention. These interventions were applied using the category of teaching, guidance and counselling. A significant improvement was observed in the patients' pre- and post-intervention knowledge, behaviour and status scores. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that the Omaha System provided effective guidelines for diagnosing the problems, planning and implementing appropriate interventions for the COVID-19 patients. Therefore, it is recommended to use the Omaha System in nursing care of COVID-19 patients. IMPACT: This is the first study to identify the nursing problems of COVID-19 patients and to evaluate the outcomes of nursing interventions and care using an international taxonomy along with electronic health record software. The findings of this study can provide evidence-based guidelines addressing the nursing problems, interventions and outcomes of COVID-19 patients.

Medication interventions for African-American adults: Practice-based evidence from two nurse-led clinics.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to describe and examine the impact of medication intervention practices among African-American clients in two nurse-led community nursing centers (CNCs). METHODS: This study used a retrospective-descriptive design. Omaha System data from visits of 196 African-American adults living with chronic disease and having two or more CNC visits in which medication regimen was an identified problem and the main reason for the visit was analyzed. RESULTS: The sample had a mean age of 53.1 (6.67) and was primarily women (82%), uninsured, and with high school or less education. A total of 9,259 Medication regimen interventions were documented and implemented during 1,146 client CNC visits. A paired samples t test revealed statistically significant improvements in Knowledge (t = 2.434, p < .01). Behavior (t = 0.077, p = .94) and Status (t = 1.489, p = .14) remained unchanged, although the ratings trended toward improvement for each. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that the nursing center model of care does improve the knowledge of medications among African-American clients. The study also demonstrated the Omaha System's utility to evaluate the impact of nursing interventions in community settings.

"On the Recovery Journey:" An Integrative Review of the Needs of Burn Patients From Immediate Pre-Discharge to Post-Discharge Period Using the Omaha System.

BACKGROUND: To establish a conceptual understanding of the needs of burn patients, the specific research question asked is: "What are the needs of burn patients from 1-week pre-discharge to the post-discharge period?" METHODS: Whittemore and Knafl's integrative review approach was used to answer the review question. The databases searched were the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Thirty-two primary studies were retained at the end of the screening process. Directed content analysis was undertaken, with the Omaha system as an organizing framework. RESULTS: Recovery after burns is not a linear process, but an intricate one filled with varied needs in the physiological (pain, skin, neuro-musculo-skeletal, and infection), psychosocial (social contact, role changes, spirituality, grief, mental health, and sexuality), health-related behavior (nutrition, sleep and rest patterns, and physical activity), and environmental (income) domains of the Omaha system. The nature and intensity of these needs change over time, suggesting that recovery for the burn patient is an ongoing process. CONCLUSIONS: Several needs exist from 1 week before discharge to the post-discharge period. The mutual relationship and evolving nature of these needs create an avenue for a flexible, regular, holistic transitional program, similar to the support offered to persons living with chronic conditions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Hospital discharge does not imply an end to the recovery of burn patients, and burn survivors still require holistic care even after discharge. The review shows the applicability of the Omaha system in exploring and classifying the needs of burn survivors and situates nursing at the core of such a program. It is possible that a nurse-led program of care needs to be considered.

An investigation of physical activity among adults in Turkey using the Omaha System.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the physical activity (PA) and associated factors among insufficiently active adults attending Family Health Centers in Istanbul, Turkey using the Omaha System. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: This descriptive-correlational study guided by the Ecological Model for Health Promotion used a convenience sample of 335 Turkish adults with insufficient PA behavior defined as an Omaha System PA Behavior rating <4. MEASUREMENTS: Measures included Omaha System problems; Knowledge, Behavior, and Status ratings; demographics; and ecological factors operationalized with the Omaha System Problem Classification Scheme. Data were analyzed using chi-square, independent t tests, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Participants were females (76.7%) and males (23.3%) with a mean age of 38.5 years. Almost half (43.6%) engaged in no appropriate PA Behavior. The most common Physiological, Psychosocial, and Environmental domain problem were oral health (61.2%), mental health (21.5%), and neighborhood/workplace safety (41.2%), respectively. Logistic regression revealed marital status, age, sex, and physiological and environmental domain problems significantly predicted PA behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions tailored to insufficiently active Turkish adults should include assessing for physiological health problems; targeting older, married adults; and advocating for policy change that supports the provision of safe, affordable, accessible, and culturally appropriate places for physical activity.

Health Assessment of Chinese Adolescents with Epilepsy in the Preparatory Phase of Transition Process from Pediatric to Adulthood:A Single-Center Study Using the Omaha System.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy is one of the most common childhood-onset neurological disorder characterized by both seizures and the related comorbidities. The preparatory phase in transition refers to a dynamic process of identifying and resolving health issues to ensure seamless continuing care from childhood to adulthood. This study identifies the health issues of the preparatory phase in transition from children to adulthood using the Omaha System. METHODS: This prospective, single-center study enrolled 86 adolescents with epilepsy in China. The Problem Classification Scheme and Problem Rating Scale for Outcomes of Omaha System were used to evaluate transition-induced health problems. RESULTS: These health problems cover all four domains of the problem classification scheme of the Omaha System, and the specific distribution is related to the type of epilepsy. The results of the four-category classification evaluation showed that the most common health problem is health-related behavioral problems (46.1%), followed by psychosocial problems (23.0%), physiological problems (20.6%), and environmental problems (10.3%). The distribution of these health problems in generalized seizures, focal seizures, and generalized-focal seizures are significantly different (P < 0.01). The results of the outcome rating scale showed that 83.4% of the children had minimal knowledge, 84.2% had inconsistently appropriate behaviors, and 86.7% had moderate symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The health problems of patients with epilepsy during the preparatory phase of transition process from pediatric to adulthood should be emphasized. Identification of health problems though the Omaha System can improve management for adolescents with epilepsy, including prevention, nursing care, social support, and therapeutic interventions.

Understanding tailored PHN interventions and outcomes of Latina mothers.

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations of data-driven intervention approaches (IAs) with the outcomes of adolescent or adult Latina mothers with or without the Mental health problem. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: Retrospective observational study using public health nurse (PHN)-generated data for 676 Latina mothers aged 14-52. MEASURES: Mothers' age, having the Mental health problem, number of problems and interventions, and Knowledge, Behavior, and Status scores using the Omaha System. Mother-specific percentages of interventions to the total number received were calculated. Visualizations and statistical tests were used to analyze the association of IAs relating mothers' characteristics, problems, interventions, and outcomes. RESULTS: Four IAs were discovered. Sample characteristics differed significantly among IAs by age and having the Mental health problems. There was a small effect of age on outcomes (<0.10). PHNs differentially addressed problems in IA1-IA4 compared with IA2-IA3 (p < 0.001). Mothers who received IA3 had the most improvement and highest scores in Knowledge and Behavior (all p < 0.001). Mothers who received IA2 had the most improvement and highest scores in Status (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The IAs were associated with outcomes differentially among Latina mothers, depending on multiple complex factors. These methods may be useful in understanding intervention tailoring and should be replicated with other populations and datasets.

Using the Omaha System to determine health problems of urban Syrian immigrants.

OBJECTIVE(S): This study assessed the health problems of Syrian immigrants living in urban areas using the Omaha System. DESIGN: A descriptive and observational study was conducted in Istanbul. SAMPLE: The sample included 51 Syrian immigrant families and 248 Syrian refugees. MEASURES: Data were collected using the Omaha System-Problem Classification List and a sociodemographic questionnaire. RESULTS: The average household size was 6.36; 71% of those over the age of 18 were not employed. Only 8.5% of children aged 0-15 were vaccinated; 15 nursing problems and 46 signs and symptoms were diagnosed using the Problem Classification List scale. Personal care was the most frequently diagnosed problem, followed by Sanitation, Communication with community resources, Mental health, and Residence. CONCLUSIONS: Health and social problems are common Syrian immigrants living in urban areas. The Omaha System-Problem Classification List can be used as a tool by public health nurses to identify health problems encountered by immigrants.

Feasibility of describing community strengths relative to Omaha system concepts.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose was to determine the feasibility of using a standardized language, the Omaha System, to describe community-level strengths. The objectives were: (a) to evaluate the feasibility of using the Omaha System at the community level to reflect community strengths and (b) to describe preliminary results of community strengths observations across international settings. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: A descriptive qualitative design was used. The sample was a data set of 284 windshield surveys by nursing students in 5 countries: Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Turkey, and the United States. MEASURES: An online survey included a checklist and open-ended questions on community strengths for 11 concepts of the Omaha System Problem Classification Scheme: Income, Sanitation, Residence, Neighborhood/workplace safety, Communication with community resources, Social contact, Interpersonal relationship, Spirituality, Nutrition, Substance use, and Health care supervision. Themes were derived through content analysis of responses to the open-ended questions. RESULTS: Feasibility was demonstrated: Students were able to use the Omaha System terms and collect data on strengths. Common themes were described among the five countries. CONCLUSIONS: The Omaha System appears to be useful in documenting community-level strengths. Themes and exemplar quotes provide a first step in developing operational definitions of strengths at a more granular level.

Use of the Omaha System to identify musculoskeletal problems in intensive care unit nurses: a case study.

BACKGROUND:: there is a need for a standard terminology to identify and manage occupational risks in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. AIM:: this study was conducted to investigate the occupational musculoskeletal symptom-related problems of one ICU nurse using the Omaha system. METHOD:: a case study method was employed. An Evaluation of Knowledge form and Rapid Upper Limb Assessment tools were used to identify musculoskeletal symptoms and ergonomic risks. Three components of the Omaha System were used: Problem Classification Scheme, Intervention Scheme and Problem Rating Scale for Outcomes. RESULTS:: eight signs/symptoms related to four problems were identified from three domains: environmental (neighbourhood/workplace safety), physiological (pain and neuro-musculoskeletal function), and health-related behaviours (physical activity and healthcare supervision). Interventions were mapped to Omaha System terms, and nursing outcomes were evaluated. CONCLUSION:: this study presented an example of using the Omaha System in occupational health nursing practice. The Omaha System can be used effectively to identify musculoskeletal problems and related factors of ICU nurses in a standardised and computerised concept. Use of this system could aid prevention of occupational musculoskeletal problems in ICU nurses.

Relationships between public health nurse-delivered physical activity interventions and client physical activity behavior.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to identify physical activity interventions delivered by public health nurses (PHNs) and examine their association with physical activity behavior change among adult clients. BACKGROUND: Physical activity is a public health priority, yet little is known about nurse-delivered physical activity interventions in day-to-day practice or their outcomes. METHODS: This quantitative retrospective evaluation examined de-identified electronic-health-record data. Adult clients with at least two Omaha System Physical activity Knowledge, Behavior, and Status (KBS) ratings documented by PHNs between October 2010-June 2016 (N=419) were included. Omaha System baseline and follow-up Physical activity KBS ratings, interventions, and demographics were examined. RESULTS: Younger clients typically receiving maternal-child/family services were more likely to receive interventions than older clients (p<0.001). A total of 2869 Physical activity interventions were documented among 197 clients. Most were from categories of Teaching, Guidance, Counseling (n=1639) or Surveillance (n=1183). Few were Case Management (n=46). Hierarchical regression modeling explained 15.4% of the variance for change in Physical activity Behavior rating with significant influence from intervention dose (p=0.03) and change in Physical activity Knowledge (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study identified and described physical activity interventions delivered by PHNs. Implementation of department-wide policy requiring documentation of Physical activity assessment for all clients enabled the evaluation. A higher dose of physical activity interventions and increased Physical activity knowledge were associated with increased Physical activity Behavior. More research is needed to identify factors influencing who receives interventions and how interventions are selected.

Toward Improving Quality of End-of-Life Care: Encoding Clinical Guidelines and Standing Orders Using the Omaha System.

BACKGROUND: End-of-life care (EOLC) relieves the suffering of millions of people around the globe each year. A growing body of hospice care research has led to the creation of several evidence-based clinical guidelines for EOLC. As evidence for the effectiveness of timely EOLC swells, so does the increased need for efficient information exchange between disciplines and across the care continuum. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using the Omaha System as a framework for encoding interoperable evidence-based EOL interventions with specified temporality for use across disciplines and settings. METHODS: Four evidence-based clinical guidelines and one current set of hospice standing orders were encoded using the Omaha System Problem Classification Scheme and Intervention Scheme, as well as Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT). The resulting encoded guideline was entered on a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and made available for public use on the Omaha System Guidelines website. RESULTS: The resulting EOLC guideline consisted of 153 interventions that may enable patients and their surrogates, clinicians, and ancillary providers to communicate interventions in a universally comprehensible way. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Evidence-based interventions from diverse disciplines involved in EOLC are described within this guideline using the Omaha System. Because the Omaha System and clinical guidelines are maintained in the public domain, encoding interventions is achievable by anyone with access to the Internet and basic Excel skills. Using the guideline as a documentation template customized for unique patient needs, clinicians can quantify and track patient care across the care continuum to ensure timely evidence-based interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical guidelines coded in the Omaha System can support the use of multidisciplinary evidence-based interventions to improve quality of EOLC across settings and professions.