Contribution of medico-administrative databases to health vigilance: example of post-oocyte retrieval infections.

STUDY QUESTION: Can we monitor post-oocyte retrieval infections in the French national health data system to complement the French ART vigilance system? SUMMARY ANSWER: Medico-administrative databases provide a more comprehensive view of post-oocyte retrieval infections and can be used to detect abnormal increases in frequency and outlier ART centers as a complementary tool to the ART vigilance system. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The various studies of ART complications are reassuring, showing relatively low overall complication rates. Nonetheless, the European Union has set up a vigilance system to monitor these complications. However, this system is not an exhaustive source of information and does not provide a complete overview of post-ART complications. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The study population was identified from the comprehensive French national hospital discharge database. It included women under 46 years of age undergoing an oocyte retrieval in 2019, classified into three population subgroups according to the indication of oocyte retrieval: infertility (IF) , fertility preservation (FP), and oocyte donation (OD) . The study population included 52 098 women who had undergone 65 948 oocyte retrievals in 2019. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Hospital stays and delivery of antibiotics within 31 days after oocyte retrieval were analyzed. Women and infections were characterized according to various characteristics (age, comorbidities, indication of oocyte retrieval, type of hospital stay, length of hospital stay, type of antibiotherapy, etc.). Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the relation between the occurrence of infection and women's characteristics, and results are expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CI. A funnel plot and a box plot were used to compare the infection rate per center with the national average and to detect outliers. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Infections in the month following the oocyte retrieval represented 6.9% of the procedures in 2019 (n = 4522). Of these infections, 112 were hospitalized (0.2% of oocyte retrievals), and 4410 were non-hospitalized (6.7% of oocyte retrievals). The hospitalized infections were essentially gynecological infections (40.9%) and urinary tract infections (23.5%). In 87.9% of non-hospitalized infections, a single antibiotic therapy was prescribed. Mixed-effect model analysis showed that the risk of infection was significantly higher in women under 30 years of age, in the FP population, in supplementary universal health coverage (CMU-C) beneficiaries, and women with endometriosis. Funnel plot and box plot analysis showed that three ART centers have an infection rate significantly higher than the national average. In the three centers that stand out from all the others, the objective is to return to these centers to understand the possible reasons for this observed rate and to implement corrective measures. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Despite all its advantages, the French national health data system presents some limitations, such as the risk of inappropriate coding. Another limitation of this study is that we cannot confirm an attributable relation between the infection and the ART procedure, even if the delay of 31 days after oocyte retrieval is consistent with the occurrence of a post-retrieval complication. In addition, antibiotics may be prescribed as a 'precautionary' measure in certain situations (women with a susceptibility to infection, complicated procedures), or as antibiotic prophylaxis for embryo transfer. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Despite the limits in identifying post-ART infections in medico-administrative databases, this approach is a promising way to complement the ART vigilance reporting system. This concept developed for infections will also be generalized to other complications with regular feedback to professionals. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No specific funding was sought for the study. The study was supported by the Agence de la biomédecine, France. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Should the trigger to oocyte retrieval interval be different in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation cycles?

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the trigger to oocyte retrieval interval (TORI) affect oocyte maturation rates differently in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cycles? DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. The interaction between the stimulation protocol and TORI was assessed in a linear mixed effects multivariable regression analysis with oocyte maturation rate as the dependent variable, and stimulation protocol (GnRH antagonist or PPOS), age (continuous), gonadotrophin type (FSH or human menopausal gonadotrophin), trigger (human chorionic gonadotrophin [HCG] or GnRH agonist), TORI (continuous) and days of stimulation (continuous) as the independent variables. Oocyte maturation rate was defined as number of metaphase II oocytes/number of cumulus-oocyte complexes retrieved. The maturation rate was calculated per cycle and treated as a continuous variable. RESULTS: A total of 473 GnRH antagonist and 205 PPOS cycles (121 conventional PPOS and 84 flexible PPOS) were analysed. The median (quartiles) female age was 36 (32-40) years. Of these cycles, 493 were triggered with HCG and 185 with a GnRH agonist. The TORI ranged between 33.6 and 39.1 h, with a median (quartiles) of 36.2 (36-36.4) hours. Maturation rates were similar between fixed PPOS, flexible PPOS and antagonist cycles (median 80%, 75% and 75%, respectively, P = 0.15). There was no significant interaction between the stimulation protocols and TORI for oocyte maturation. CONCLUSIONS: PPOS cycles do not seem to require a longer TORI than GnRH antagonist cycles.

Effect of intravenous anesthetic drugs on fertilization rate in oocyte retrieval.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of intravenous anesthetic drugs on fertilization rate in subjects receiving oocyte retrieval by assisted reproduction technology (ART). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was designed. The clinical information of subjects who received oocyte retrieval procedure was collected. The subjects were divided into two groups based on the type of anesthesia used: the no-anesthesia group and the intravenous anesthesia group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed and multiple linear regression analyses were conducted. Fertilization rate was compared between the two groups before and after PSM. RESULTS: A total of 765 subjects were divided into two groups: the no-anesthesia group (n = 482) and the intravenous anesthesia group (n = 283). According to propensity scores, 258 pairs of subjects were well matched, and the baseline data between the two groups were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Fertilization rate was 77% in the intravenous anesthesia group, and 76% in the no-anesthesia group, without significant between-group difference (P = 0.685). Before matching, Poisson regression analysis showed no effect of intravenous anesthetic drugs on fertilization rate (RR = 0.859, 95%CI: 0.59 to 1.25, P = 0.422). After matching, no difference was found either (RR = 0.935, 95%CI: 0.67 to 1.29, P = 0.618). CONCLUSION: Intravenous anesthetic drugs may exert no effects on fertilization rate in subjects receiving ART.

Predictive model of IVF outcomes for polycystic ovarian morphology and polycystic ovary syndrome in GnRH antagonist protocol using AMH-MoM and ovarian sensitivity index.

AIM: To evaluate the relationship between AMH and ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in women with PCOM and PCOS. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 559 patients who underwent the IVF-ET cycle between January 2018 and December 2022 at Gangnam Cha Hospital. Patients were divided into 3 groups matched for age and BMI: the PCOS group (n = 54), based on the new 2023 PCOS guideline; the PCOM group (n = 53); and the control group (n = 452) with normal ovaries. Serum AMH levels were converted to multiples of the median (MoM) for each corresponding age. The ovarian sensitivity index (OSI) was calculated as the number of retrieved oocytes divided by the total dose of recombinant FSH administered (per 1000 IU). RESULTS: There were significant differences in AMH-MoM value among women with PCOS [2.7 ± 1.3 (95% CI 2.3-3.0)], those with PCOM [2.0 ± 1.0 (95% CI 1.7-2.3)], and controls [0.8 ± 0.7 (95% CI 0.8-0.9)] (p < 0.001). The abortion rates in the normoovulatory, PCOM, and PCOS groups were 18.2%, 21.1%, and 25.0%, respectively. OSI and live birth rate were positively correlated with the AMH-MoM value in normoovulatory women (r = 0.389, p < 0.05, r = 0.122, p < 0.05), while no such correlation was observed in women with PCOM and PCOS. CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian response and live birth rate are possibly correlated with the AMH-MoM value in normoovulatory women, but not in women with PCOM and PCOS.

Outcomes of oocyte retrievals completed by reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellows versus faculty: a 7-year retrospective review.

PURPOSE: To examine outcomes of oocyte retrievals completed by Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (REI) fellows versus faculty physicians. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined patients who underwent oocyte retrievals at Mayo Clinic from July 15, 2009, to December 15, 2016. The primary outcome was the oocyte retrieval rate (ORR) calculated per retrieval as the number of oocytes retrieved per follicles aspirated. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare follicle and oocyte counts and ORR between fellows and faculty during the same bilateral retrieval. RESULTS: The study cohort included the first bilateral retrieval from 845 unique patients completed by 11 fellows and seven faculty. The median ORR was not statistically different for fellows and faculty (0.79 versus 0.80, p = 0.46). To assess for a learning curve, the outcomes of seven fellows who completed at least 80 retrievals in their first year were examined as four chronologically ordered sets of 20. When these sets were compared to the faculty physician mean ORR, no significant differences were found (p-values of 0.69, 0.69, 0.81, and 0.81, respectively). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in oocyte retrieval rates between fellows versus faculty over a 7-year period, with no significant learning curve observed. These findings suggest that fellows possess the requisite skills for successful oocyte retrieval upon entering REI fellowship following their OB/GYN residency. However, this does not diminish the critical role of comprehensive fellowship training and close supervision, especially in initial and complex cases.

Is there a preferred time interval between gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger and oocyte retrieval in GnRH antagonist cycles? A retrospective cohort of planned fertility preservation cycles.

BACKGROUND: The ideal time frame between gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (GnRHa) trigger administration and oocyte retrieval in GnRH antagonist cycles has not been well studied. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of this time interval on oocyte yield and oocyte maturation rate in GnRH antagonist cycles designated for non-medical ("planned") oocyte cryopreservation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent elective fertility preservation, using the GnRH antagonist protocol and exclusively triggered by GnRH-agonist. We focused on the effect of the trigger-to-retrieval time interval on oocyte yield and maturation rate, while also incorporating age, body mass index (BMI), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, basal Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) levels, as well as the type and dosage of gonadotropin FSH medication. RESULTS: 438 cycles were included. Trigger-to-retrieval time interval ranged from 32.03 to 39.92 h. The mean oocyte yield showed no statistically significant difference when comparing retrievals < 36 h (n = 240, 11.86 ± 8.6) to those triggered at ≥ 36 h (n = 198, 12.24 ± 7.73) (P = 0.6). Upon dividing the cohort into four-time quartiles, no significant differences in the number of retrieved oocytes were observed (P = 0.54). Multivariate regression analysis failed to reveal any significant associations between the interval and the aforementioned variables. CONCLUSIONS: The GnRHa trigger to oocyte retrieval interval range in our cohort did not significantly affect oocyte yield and maturation rate.

Comparison of embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes for patients with low ovarian reserve in natural cycles and mildly stimulated cycles: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: As women with low ovarian reserve embark on the challenging journey of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment, the choice between natural and mildly stimulated cycles becomes a pivotal consideration. It is unclear which of these two regimens is superior for women with low ovarian reserve. Our study aims to assess the impact of natural cycles on embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes in women with low ovarian reserve undergoing IVF treatment compared to mildly stimulated cycles. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients with low ovarian reserve who underwent IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) at Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital between January 2017 and April 2021. The primary outcome for pregnancy rate of 478 natural cycles and 448 mild stimulated cycles was compared. Secondary outcomes included embryo quality and oocyte retrieval time of natural cycles. RESULTS: The pregnancy rate in the natural cycle group was significantly higher than that in the mildly stimulated cycle group (51.8% vs. 40.1%, p = 0.046). Moreover, natural cycles exhibited higher rates of available embryos (84.1% vs. 78.6%, p = 0.040), high-quality embryos (61.8% vs. 53.2%, p = 0.008), and utilisation of oocytes (73% vs. 65%, p = 0.001) compared to mildly stimulated cycles. Oocyte retrievals in natural cycles were predominantly performed between 7:00 and 19:00, with 94.9% occurring during this time frame. In natural cycles with high-quality embryos, 96.4% of oocyte retrievals were also conducted between 7:00 and 19:00. CONCLUSION: Natural cycles with appropriately timed oocyte retrieval may present a valuable option for patients with low ovarian reserve.

In the realm of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment, women with low ovarian reserve often face the crucial decision of opting for natural or mildly stimulated cycles. This retrospective study, conducted between January 2017 and April 2021 at Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, delves into the impact of these cycles on pregnancy outcomes. Examining 478 natural cycles and 448 mildly stimulated cycles, the study reveals a notably higher pregnancy rate in the natural cycle group (51.8% vs. 40.1%). Additionally, natural cycles demonstrated higher rates of available embryos, high-quality embryos, and oocyte utilisation compared to their mildly stimulated counterparts. The findings suggest that natural cycles, with proper oocyte retrieval timing, could be a favourable choice for those with low ovarian reserve seeking IVF treatment.

Ovarian stimulation with excessive FSH doses causes cumulus cell and oocyte dysfunction in small ovarian reserve heifers.

Excessive FSH doses during ovarian stimulation in the small ovarian reserve heifer (SORH) cause premature cumulus expansion and follicular hyperstimulation dysgenesis (FHD) in nearly all ovulatory-size follicles with predicted disruptions in cell-signaling pathways in cumulus cells and oocytes (before ovulatory hCG stimulation). These observations support the hypothesis that excessive FSH dysregulates cumulus cell function and oocyte maturation. To test this hypothesis, we determined whether excessive FSH-induced differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in cumulus cells identified in our previously published transcriptome analysis were altered independent of extreme phenotypic differences observed amongst ovulatory-size follicles, and assessed predicted roles of these DEGs in cumulus and oocyte biology. We also determined if excessive FSH alters cumulus cell morphology, and oocyte nuclear maturation before (premature) or after an ovulatory hCG stimulus or during IVM. Excessive FSH doses increased expression of 17 cumulus DEGs with known roles in cumulus cell and oocyte functions (responsiveness to gonadotrophins, survival, expansion, and oocyte maturation). Excessive FSH also induced premature cumulus expansion and oocyte maturation but inhibited cumulus expansion and oocyte maturation post-hCG and diminished the ability of oocytes with prematurely expanded cumulus cells to undergo IVF or nuclear maturation during IVM. Ovarian stimulation with excessive FSH is concluded to disrupt cumulus cell and oocyte functions by inducing premature cumulus expansion and dysregulating oocyte maturation without an ovulatory hCG stimulus yielding poor-quality cumulus-oocyte complexes that may be incorrectly judged morphologically as suitable for IVF during ART.

Predicting the number of oocytes retrieved from controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with machine learning.

STUDY QUESTION: Can machine learning predict the number of oocytes retrieved from controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Three machine-learning models were successfully trained to predict the number of oocytes retrieved from COH. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A number of previous studies have identified and built predictive models on factors that influence the number of oocytes retrieved during COH. Many of these studies are, however, limited in the fact that they only consider a small number of variables in isolation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study was a retrospective analysis of a dataset of 11,286 cycles performed at a single centre in France between 2009 and 2020 with the aim of building a predictive model for the number of oocytes retrieved from ovarian stimulation. The analysis was carried out by a data analysis team external to the centre using the Substra framework. The Substra framework enabled the data analysis team to send computer code to run securely on the centre's on-premises server. In this way, a high level of data security was achieved as the data analysis team did not have direct access to the data, nor did the data leave the centre at any point during the study. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The Light Gradient Boosting Machine algorithm was used to produce three predictive models: one that directly predicted the number of oocytes retrieved and two that predicted which of a set of bins provided by two clinicians the number of oocytes retrieved fell into. The resulting models were evaluated on a held-out test set and compared to linear and logistic regression baselines. In addition, the models themselves were analysed to identify the parameters that had the biggest impact on their predictions. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: On average, the model that directly predicted the number of oocytes retrieved deviated from the ground truth by 4.21 oocytes. The model that predicted the first clinician's bins deviated by 0.73 bins whereas the model for the second clinician deviated by 0.62 bins. For all models, performance was best within the first and third quartiles of the target variable, with the model underpredicting extreme values of the target variable (no oocytes and large numbers of oocytes retrieved). Nevertheless, the erroneous predictions made for these extreme cases were still within the vicinity of the true value. Overall, all three models agreed on the importance of each feature which was estimated using Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values. The feature with the highest mean absolute SHAP value (and thus the highest importance) was the antral follicle count, followed by basal AMH and FSH. Of the other hormonal features, basal TSH, LH, and testosterone levels were similarly important and baseline LH was the least important. The treatment characteristic with the highest SHAP value was the initial dose of gonadotropins. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The models produced in this study were trained on a cohort from a single centre. They should thus not be used in clinical practice until trained and evaluated on a larger cohort more representative of the general population. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF FINDINGS: These predictive models for the number of oocytes retrieved from COH may be useful in clinical practice, assisting clinicians in optimizing COH protocols for individual patients. Our work also demonstrates the promise of using the Substra framework for allowing external researchers to provide clinically relevant insights on sensitive fertility data in a fully secure, trustworthy manner and opens a number of exciting avenues for accelerating future research. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by the French Public Bank of Investment as part of the Healthchain Consortium. T.Fe., C.He., J.C., C.J., C.-A.P., and C.Hi. are employed by Apricity. C.Hi. has received consulting fees and honoraria from Vitrolife, Merck Serono, Ferring, Cooper Surgical, Dibimed, Apricity, and Fairtility and travel support from Fairtility and Vitrolife, participates on an advisory board for Merck Serono, was the founder and organizer of the AI Fertility conference, has stock in Aria Fertility, TMRW, Fairtility, Apricity, and IVF Professionals, and received free equipment from Planar in exchange for first user feedback. C.J. has received a grant from BPI. J.C. has also received a grant from BPI, is a member of the Merck AI advisory board, and is a board member of Labelia Labs. C.He has a contract for medical writing of this manuscript by CHU Nantes and has received travel support from Apricity. A.R. haș received honoraria from Ferring and Organon. T.Fe. has received a grant from BPI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Follicular flushing increases the number of oocytes retrieved: a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Does follicular flushing increase the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) retrieved compared to single aspiration? SUMMARY ANSWER: Follicular flushing significantly increases the number of COCs retrieved compared to single aspiration. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: On the basis of published meta-analyses, follicular flushing does not seem to increase the number of oocytes retrieved, the probability of clinical pregnancy, or that of live birth and has been associated with an increase in the duration of oocyte retrieval. It should be noted, however, that all the eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in these meta-analyses have randomized patients into either single aspiration or follicular flushing. This study design might not allow the detection of the true effect of follicular flushing. Despite randomization, this might still be obscured, to an extent, by heterogeneity in patients, stimulation characteristics, and differences in the oocyte retrieval procedure. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A prospective, single centre, RCT, including 105 patients was performed between July and December 2022. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Eligible patients were those undergoing oocyte retrieval for ICSI, aged <43 years, with BMI 18-35 kg/m2. Patients with all types of ovarian response (low-normal-high), as assessed on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation, were included. Random allocation of the ovaries of each patient to either single aspiration or follicular flushing was performed on the day of oocyte retrieval, using a computer-generated randomization list. Patients could enter the study only once. All follicles from ovaries allocated to either follicular flushing or single aspiration, were aspirated by the same 16G double lumen needle, with a constant aspiration pressure of 190 mmHg, resulting in flow rate of 0.42 ml/s. In the ovaries allocated to the follicular flushing group, if a COC was not recovered in the initial aspirate of each follicle, follicular flushing was performed until a COC was retrieved, up to a maximum of five times. The primary outcome measure was the number of COCs retrieved. Secondary outcomes were oocyte recovery rate, oocyte maturation rate, fertilization rate, and rate of good quality embryos on Day 2. Values are expressed as a median (inter-quartile range). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Significantly more COCs were retrieved in the follicular flushing as compared to the single aspiration group in all patients [5 (7) vs 2 (3), P < 0.001, respectively], as well as in patients with high [9 (3) vs 5 (4), P < 0.001, respectively], normal [5 (2) vs 2 (3), P < 0.001, respectively] and low [1 (1) vs 1 (1), P < 0.001, respectively] ovarian response. In patients with low ovarian response, no COCs were retrieved in 5.7% of the ovaries in the flushing group vs 42.8% of the ovaries in the single aspiration group (P < 0.001). The oocyte retrieval rate was significantly higher in the follicular flushing vs the single aspiration group, in all patients [88.9% (25.0) vs 45.5% (37.5), P < 0.001, respectively], as well as in patients with high [81.8% (15.9) vs 45.5% (22.2), P < 0.001, respectively], normal [85.7% (28.6) vs 40.0% (30.0), P < 0.001, respectively], and low [100% (0) vs 50.0% (100), P < 0.001, respectively] ovarian response. No significant difference was observed regarding maturation rate [85.2% (30.8) vs 100% (33.3), P = 0.78], fertilization rate [76.4% (50) vs 83.3% (50) P = 0.42], and the proportion of good quality embryos on Day 2 [83.3% (40) vs 100% (50), P = 0.62]. Similarly, no differences in the above variables were observed in patients with different types of ovarian response. Follicular flushing as compared to single aspiration was associated with a significant increase in the duration of oocyte retrieval in all patients [248 s (332) vs 135 s (164), respectively], as well as in patients with high [464 s (225) vs 237 s (89), P < 0.001, respectively], normal [248 s (108) vs 141 s (95), P < 0.001, respectively], and low [64 s (59) vs 48 s (10), P < 0.001, respectively] ovarian response. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although the current study design allows for a more accurate evaluation of the true effect of follicular flushing on the number of COCs retrieved, it does not permit the evaluation of its role on the probability of pregnancy. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This is the first RCT to suggest that follicular flushing increases the number of COCs retrieved compared to single aspiration, independently of ovarian response. This implies that follicular flushing plays an important role in the optimization of oocyte retrieval. These results, however, need to be confirmed in future studies, in which an equal flow rate should be used during oocyte retrieval. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was obtained for this study. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05473455. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 15 July 2022. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 27 July 2022.

Time interval between hCG administration and oocyte retrieval and ART outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

RESEARCH QUESTION: To explore whether prolonged hCG-ovum pickup interval improves assisted reproductive technology outcomes. DESIGN: CENTRAL, CNKI, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PUBMED, and Web of Science up to May 13 2023 were searched for studies reporting associations between hCG-ovum pickup intervals and assisted reproductive technology outcomes. Intervention types included short (≤ 36 h) and long (> 36 h) hCG-ovum pickup intervals in assisted reproductive technology cycles. All outcomes were based upon only fresh embryo transfers. Primary outcome is defined as the clinical pregnancy rate. Data were pooled using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistics. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis, including five retrospective cohort studies, one prospective cohort study, and six randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials. The short and long interval groups had similar oocyte maturation rates, fertilization rate and high-quality embryo rate (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.45-1.06; I 2 = 91.1%, OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77-1.0; I 2 = 44.4% and OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.95-1.17; I 2 = 8.6%, respectively). The clinical pregnancy rates in the long retrieval group were significantly higher than in the short retrieval group (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45-0.95; I 2 = 35.4%). The groups had similar miscarriage and live birth rates (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 0.66-5.60; I 2 = 0.0% and OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.24-1.04; I 2 = 0.0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical pregnancy rates can be increased by prolonging the hCG-ovum pickup interval, which would help us develop more reasonable time schedules for fertility centers and patients. META-ANALYSIS REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022310006 (28 Apr 2022).

Does follicular flushing increase oocyte number in poor responders? An update of a systematic review.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does flushing of the follicles at ovum retrieval increase the number of retrieved oocytes in poor-response IVF patients? DESIGN: An update of an electronic literature search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) investigating follicular flushing versus no flushing in women with a poor response to IVF treatment. No exclusion criteria for type of needle, stimulation or protocol were applied. A meta-analysis was conducted using the software RevMan 5.4. RESULTS: Six RCT were identified that had the primary objective of testing for an increase in mean number of cumulus-oocyte complexes or/and metaphase II oocytes between flushing and no flushing. A double-lumen needle was used in five trials, one study investigated a pseudo-double-lumen needle, and a conventional single-lumen needle was used in all the control groups. The main risk of bias in all the included studies is a lack of blinding of the physicians performing the puncture and incomplete data in four trials. A heterogeneity of direction and size of effect of follicular flushing on mean oocyte number retrieved was detected (I2 = 80, P = 0.0001), which precludes a synthesis of the data. Two studies showed a decrease or tendency towards a decrease in oocyte numbers, one study showed similar oocyte numbers, and one study showed a strong tendency towards increased oocyte numbers with flushing. A similar picture was seen for metaphase II oocytes (I2 = 73, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: It is uncertain whether follicular flushing in poor-response IVF patients affects the number of retrieved oocytes. Larger pragmatic trials are warranted to clarify the effect of flushing on oocyte numbers and clinical outcomes in poor responders and monofollicular patients.

Application value of Early-Follicular Phase Long-Acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Long Protocol in patients with resistant ovary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Resistant ovarian syndrome(ROS) is a rare disease. It is difficult to diagnose and treat. Most of the literature reports on assisted pregnancy treatment for ROS patients are individual case reports. In this paper, the ovulation stimulation protocol and assisted pregnancy process of ROS infertile patients in our reproductive center were summarized and analyzed to provide information and support for the clinical treatment of ROS patients. METHODS: From January 2017 to March 2022, assisted reproductive technology treatments and clinical characteristics parameters of six patients with ROS were retrospectively reviewed. Based on controlled ovarian stimulation protocols, these stimulation cycles were separated into four groups: Early-Follicular Phase Long-Acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Long Protocol (EFLL) group (n = 6), Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation(PPOS) protocol group (n = 5), mild-stimulation protocol group (n = 2), and Natural cycle protocol group (n = 3). RESULTS: A total of 16 cycles of ovulation stimulation were carried out in 6 patients with ROS. A total of 19 oocytes were retrieved, as well as 13 MII oocytes, 11 two pronuclear(2PN) fertilized embryos, and 8 excellent embryos. The oocytes acquisition rate was 50% and the fertilization rate of 2PN was 57.9%, and the excellent embryo rate was 72.7%. The EFLL protocol obtained 17 oocytes, 12 MII oocytes, 11 2PN fertilized embryos, and 8 excellent embryos; the mild-stimulation protocol obtained 1 oocyte; the Natural cycle protocol obtained 1 oocyte, and oocytes were not matured after in vitro maturation (IVM); the PPOS protocol obtained no oocytes. Compared with three other protocols, The fertilization rate of 2PN (64.7%) and excellent embryo rate (72.7%) in the EFLL protocol were higher than those of other protocols(0%). Two fresh cycle embryo transfers resulted in live births, while two frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles resulted in one live birth and one clinical pregnancy using the EFLL protocol. CONCLUSION: Although the current study is based on a small sample of participants, the findings suggest that the EFLL protocol can be employed for ovarian stimulation and may result in a live birth in ROS patients.

Optimal timing to retrieve oocytes for fertility preservation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: two cases of controlled ovarian stimulation using DuoStim with a literature review.

Fertility preservation (FP) for hematological malignancies is difficult because immediate chemotherapy is needed after diagnosis. We report two cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and oocyte cryopreservation using DuoStim after first-line chemotherapy. In Cases 1 and 2, COS and oocyte retrieval (OR) were performed using DuoStim 116 and 51 days after first-line chemotherapy, respectively, and 14 and 6 unfertilized oocytes, respectively, were cryopreserved. Another round of COS and OR was performed using the random-start method 82 days after first-line chemotherapy, and 22 unfertilized oocytes were cryopreserved. DuoStim is useful to maximize OR for patients with a short interval for FP. Many oocytes can be retrieved depending on the timing of recruitment from primary to secondary follicles, although ovarian reserve capacity declines immediately after first-line chemotherapy. Aggressive FP should be performed before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation becomes necessary.

Impact of the number of retrieved oocytes on IVF outcomes: oocyte maturation, fertilization, embryo quality and implantation rate.

The process of oocyte retrieval represents a key phase during the cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF). It involves controlled ovarian stimulation to retrieve the highest number of oocytes possible. According to many previous studies, the higher the number of oocytes the higher the chances of obtaining embryos for multiple transfers. In this study, in total, 1987 patients were retrospectively reviewed to investigate the correlations between the number of retrieved oocytes and the subsequent IVF outcomes. Patients were divided into three groups according to the number of retrieved oocytes (Group 1: ≤5 oocytes; Group 2: 6-15 oocytes; Group 3: ≥15 oocytes). The results showed a significant negative correlation between oocyte number and maturation rate as well as fertilization rate. However, a significant positive correlation was found between oocyte number and the blastulation rate. The implantation rate after fresh embryo transfers was higher in group 2 (6-15 oocytes) compared with group 1 (≤5 oocytes). According to our findings, we conclude that oocyte numbers between 6 and 15 oocytes can result in the highest chances of positive IVF outcomes in terms of embryo quality and fresh embryo transfers with lower risks of ovarian hyperstimulation.

Remote IVF: a clinical and laboratory guide to performing remote oocyte retrievals.

The aim of this guide is to describe different scenarios when remote IVF would be needed, considerations around how to plan for the procedure, proper equipment in the procedure room, and proper transportation of oocytes from the procedure room. There are two different scenarios for remote IVF: (1) IVF clinics designed knowing the embryology laboratory is nonadjacent and (2) IVF clinics that routinely provide care to patients in their clinic and want to provide care to those who are ineligible for a retrieval under anesthesia in an outpatient facility. This guide will focus on both scenarios. Much of the advice can be used for IVF clinics that routinely perform oocyte retrievals nonadjacent to their embryology laboratories. Special considerations are needed when patients with complex comorbidities require high-level of care and hospital-level monitoring while under anesthesia and/or post-oocyte retrieval, and are thus unable to be treated in the standard facility. For these reasons we have created a comprehensive guide to nonadjacent, or off-site, oocyte retrievals for reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) physicians, nurses, and embryologists to use when planning care for IVF patients. Going forward, we will refer to both these scenarios as remote IVF.

Transabdominal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval for oocyte cryopreservation using a vaginal probe: a comparison of applicability, effectiveness, and safety with conventional transvaginal approach.

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of transabdominal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval (TUGOR) using a vaginal probe and traditional vaginal approach in virgin patients undergoing oocyte cryopreservation. METHODS: A total of 116 virgin patients who underwent transabdominal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval using a vaginal ultrasound probe and 33 patients matched for BMI, antral follicle count, age, day 3 FSH, estradiol, and AMH who underwent vaginal approach were enrolled. Mean number of total oocytes collected, mean number of cryopreserved MII oocytes, duration of the procedure, duration of stimulation, mean gonadotropin consumption, mature oocyte ratio, and a modified follicle-oocyte index were compared between the groups. RESULTS: No statistical difference was found between the groups in mean number of follicles > 12 mm (4.62 ± 4.54 vs. 5.44 ± 4.52), mean number of oocytes collected (4.44 ± 4.14 vs. 5.33 ± 4.52), mean number of cryopreserved MII oocytes (4.01 ± 3.67 vs. 4.53 ± 4.13), mean duration of the procedure (12.4 ± 1.2 vs. 13.4 ± 1.6 min), mean days of stimulation (8.05 ± 1.91 vs. 8.35 ± 1.72 days), mean gonadotropin consumption (1507.9 ± 475.3 vs. 1571.74 ± 404.6 units), mature oocyte ratio (0.78 ± 0.24 vs. 0.82 ± 0.26), and modified follicle oocyte index (0.86 ± 0.63 vs. 0.84 ± 0.19). In the TUGOR group, superficial epigastric artery injury occurred in two patients and resolved spontaneously. CONCLUSION: Transabdominal oocyte retrieval using a vaginal ultrasound is a safe, effective, and feasible method of oocyte retrieval in some selected patient groups.

Human granulosa cells of poor ovarian responder patients display telomeres shortening.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the telomere length in granulosa cells of the young normal and poor ovarian responder patients and elderly patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF. METHODS: The main outcome measures granulosa cells telomere Length in the 3 study groups of patients undergoing IVF treatment in our center. 1) young normal responder patients (< 35 years); 2) young (< 35 years) poor ovarian responder patients; and 3) Elderly patients (40-45 years). Granulosa cells were obtained at the time of oocyte retrieval. Granulosa cells telomere length was assessed by absolute human telomere length quantification qPCR Assay. RESULTS: The telomere length of the young normal responder was significantly longer as compared to young poor ovarian responder (15.5 vs 9.6 KB, p < 0.001) and the elderly patients (15.5 vs 10.66 KB, p < 0.002). No significant difference was observed in the telomere length between the young poor ovarian responder and the elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: Granulosa cells telomere length of the young normal responder was found to be significantly longer than young poor ovarian responder or elderly patients, highlighting the role of telomere length as a predictor, or contributor to poor oocyte yield following IVF treatment.

Factors associated with the collection of isolated immature oocytes during ovarian tissue cryopreservation.

PURPOSE: To identify patient characteristics associated with successful isolated immature oocyte retrieval (IsO) during ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) and to determine whether they are predictive of the collection of larger numbers of oocytes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients undergoing OTC with IsO for fertility preservation over three years of activity at a university hospital. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the patients with the highest and lowest chances of oocyte recovery, and those with the largest numbers of oocytes. We also analyzed the correlation of IsO with the number of ovarian fragments collected and histological parameters. RESULTS: We analyzed 257 consecutive patients undergoing these procedures, at a median age of 17.1 years [0.3-38.3 years]. Isolated oocytes were obtained from 47.1% of patients, and IsO was more likely in patients with ovulatory cycles (63.0% vs. 38.6%; P≤ .001), without chemotherapy before OTC (61.4% vs. 33.1; P< .001) and with non-malignant diseases other than Turner syndrome (77.5%). Oocyte collection failure rates were highest in patients with Turner syndrome (OR 25.0, 95% CI 3.99-157.0; P< .001) or undergoing chemotherapy with alkylating agents before OTC (OR 37.6, 95% CI 8.36-168.8; P< .001). Prepubescent status (P= .043) and large numbers of ovarian fragments (P< .001) were associated with the retrieval of larger numbers of oocytes. Oocyte recovery was correlated with the presence of follicles in the medulla, but not with follicular density. CONCLUSION: The chances of IsO differ between patients. Identifying patients with the highest chances of success facilitates appropriate resource allocation.

Severe Hemoperitoneum due to Ovarian Bleeding after Transvaginal Oocyte Retrieval with Surgical Management: A Retrospective Analysis and Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Background and Objectives: Severe hemoperitoneum of ovarian bleeding origin is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of transvaginal oocyte retrieval (TVOR) procedure. The study aimed to present a case series of surgically managed patients from our clinic with hemoperitoneum caused by ovarian bleeding after TVOR, as well as to perform a comprehensive literature review in order to summarize and analyze all published cases with this condition and their management. Materials and Methods: The data of 2939 patients, who underwent TVOR procedures for IVF/ICSI (in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection) in our clinic between 2010 and 2021 were reviewed. Moreover, a systemic literature search was performed. Main outcome measures from the pooled analysis were incidence and risk factors, type of surgery, intraoperative finding and intervention leading to hemostasis. Results: In our Clinic 4 (0.136%), cases of hemoperitoneum due to ovarian bleeding were surgically managed. Moreover, 39 cases from 18 studies reported in the literature were identified. No risk factors besides lean women with PCOS were identified. In the pooled analysis, the bleeding symptoms appeared in 58.1% of patients within eight hours after TVOR and cumulatively in 81.4% cases during the 24 h after TVOR. The average time from TVOR to surgery was 27.19 ± 53.25 h. Hemostasis was mostly established using electrocoagulation, although few cases of ovariectomy were also reported. Embryo transfer at 60% of cases was postponed and embryos cryopreserved. Conclusions: Severe hemoperitoneum due to ovarian bleeding after TVOR is a rare event that should be treated by techniques of minimally invasive surgery whenever possible. Protocols should be developed to enable optimal management strategies for infertility patients. Embryos obtained should be cryopreserved.