Para-aortic Lymph Node Dissection for Colorectal Cancer: Predicting Pathologic Lymph Node Positivity and Optimizing Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: In colorectal cancer, the presence of para-aortic lymph nodes (PALN) indicates extraregional disease. Appropriately selecting patients for whom PALN dissection will provide oncologic benefit remains challenging. This study identified factors to predict survival among patients undergoing PALN dissection for colorectal cancer. METHODS: An institutional database was queried for patients who underwent curative-intent resection of clinically positive PALN for colorectal cancer between 2007 and 2020. Preoperative radiologic images were reviewed, and patients who did and did not have positive PALN on final pathology were compared. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of pathologically positive PALN on recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 74 patients who underwent PALN dissection, 51 had PALN metastasis at the time of primary tumor diagnosis, whereas 23 had metachronous PALN disease. Preoperative chemotherapy ± radiotherapy was given in 60 cases (81.1%), and 28 (37.8%) had pathologically positive PALN. Independent factors associated with positive PALN pathology included metachronous PALN disease and pretreatment and posttreatment radiographically abnormal PALN. On multivariable analysis, pathologically positive PALN was significantly associated with decreased RFS (hazard ratio 3.90) and OS (HR 4.49). Among patients with pathologically positive PALN, well/moderately differentiated histology was associated with better OS, and metachronous disease trended toward an association with better OS. CONCLUSIONS: Pathologically positive PALN are associated with poorer RFS and OS after PALN dissection for colorectal cancer. Clinicopathologic factors may predict pathologic PALN positivity. Curative-intent surgery may provide benefit, especially in patients with well-to-moderately differentiated primary tumors and possibly metachronous PALN disease.

Prognostic Impact of Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis in Resected Non-Pancreatic Periampullary Cancers.

BACKGROUND: Surgery remains debatable in para-aortic lymph node (PALN, station 16b1) metastasis in non-pancreatic periampullary cancer (NPPAC). This study examined the impact of PALN metastasis on outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in NPPAC. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with NPPAC who were explored for PD with PALN dissection was performed. Based on the extent of nodal involvement on final histopathology, they were stratified as node-negative (N0), regional node involved (N+) and metastatic PALN (N16+) and their outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2022, 153/887 PD patients underwent a PALN dissection, revealing N16+ in 42 patients (27.4%), of whom 32 patients underwent resection. The 3-years overall survival (OS) for patients with N16+ was 28% (95% confidence interval [CI] 13-60%), notably lower than the 67% (95% CI 53-83.5%; p = 0.007) for those without PALN metastasis. Stratified by nodal involvement, the median OS for N+ and N16+ patients was similar (28.4 months and 26.2 months, respectively). The N0 subgroup had a significantly longer 3-years OS of 87.5% (95% CI 79-96.7%; p = 0.0051). Interestingly, 10 patients not offered resection following N16+ identified on frozen section had a median survival of only 9 months. The perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing PD with PALN dissection were similar to standard resections. CONCLUSION: In a select group of patients with NPPAC, PD in isolated PALN metastasis was associated with improved OS. The survival in this group of patients was comparable with regional node-positive patients and significantly better than palliative treatment alone.

Short-term outcomes of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 for gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis (JCOG1704).

BACKGROUND: The prognosis for marginally resectable gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis (ELM) remains unfavorable, even after R0 resection. To assess the safety and efficacy of preoperative docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS), we conducted a multicenter phase II trial. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included histologically proven HER2-negative gastric adenocarcinoma with bulky nodal (bulky N) involvement around major branched arteries or para-aortic node (PAN) metastases. Patients received three cycles of docetaxel (40 mg/m2, day 1), oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2, day 1), and S-1 (80-120 mg/body, days 1-14), followed by gastrectomy with D2 plus PAN dissection. Subsequently, patients underwent postoperative chemotherapy with S-1 for 1 year. The primary endpoint was major (grade ≥ 2a) pathological response rate (pRR) according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma criteria. RESULTS: Between October 2018 and March 2022, 47 patients (bulky N, 20; PAN, 17; both, 10) were enrolled in the trial. One patient was ineligible. Another declined any protocol treatments before initiation. Among the 45 eligible patients who initiated DOS chemotherapy, 44 (98%) completed 3 cycles and 42 (93%) underwent R0 resection. Major pRR and pathological complete response rates among the 46 eligible patients, including the patient who declined treatment, were 57% (26/46) and 24% (11/46), respectively. Common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (24%), anorexia (16%), febrile neutropenia (9%), and diarrhea (9%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative chemotherapy with DOS yielded favorable pathological responses with an acceptable toxicity profile. This multimodal approach is highly promising for treating gastric cancer with ELM.

Improvements and challenges in intraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: The novel "tent-pitching" antegrade approach and vascular anatomical variations in the para-aortic region.

INTRODUCTION: This study introduces and compares a new intraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy method to reach the level of the renal vein, the "tent-pitching" antegrade approach with the retrograde approach in gynecological malignancy surgeries in terms of success rate, complication incidence, and the number of lymph nodes removed. It focuses on the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness. Meanwhile, this article reports on the vascular anatomical variations discovered in the para-aortic region to enhance surgical safety. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including patients undergone laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy at a single center from January 2020 to December 2023 for high-risk endometrial and early-stage ovarian cancer. Patient charts were reviewed for mode of operation, perioperative complications, operative details, and histopathology. The patients were divided into anterograde group and retrograde group according to the operation mode. The two groups were further compared based on the success rate of lymph node clearance at the renal vein level, perioperative complications, and the number of removed lymph nodes. Quantitative data were analyzed using the t-test, non-normally distributed data using the rank-sum test, and categorical data using Fisher's exact test and the chi-square test, with statistical significance defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: Among 173 patients, the antegrade group showed higher surgery success (97.5% vs 68.82%), more lymph nodes removed (median 14 vs 7), and less median blood loss. The operation time was shorter in the antegrade group. Postoperative complications like lymphocele and venous thrombosis were lower in the antegrade group. Vascular abnormalities were found in 28.9% of patients, with accessory lumbar vein routing anomaly and accessory renal arteries being most common. CONCLUSIONS: The antegrade approach is feasible, safe, and effective, improving surgical exposure, reducing difficulty without additional instruments or puncture sites, and minimizing organ damage risk. It is effective in achieving better access to the renal vein and removing more para-aortic lymph nodes than the retrograde method. Recognizing and carefully managing the diverse vascular abnormalities in the para-aortic area, including variations in renal arteries, veins, and the inferior vena cava, is essential to reduce intraoperative bleeding and the likelihood of converting to open surgery.

Assessing the outcomes of posterior thoracic para-aortic lymph node dissection after induction chemotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Posterior thoracic para-aortic lymph node (TPAN) metastasis is a distant metastasis of esophageal cancer. Several case reports have shown that radical esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy for posterior TPAN improve the prognosis of patients with cStage IVB esophageal cancer and solitary posterior TPAN metastasis; however, the true value of this procedure is unclear. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of lymphadenectomy for posterior TPAN after induction chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. This study enrolled 15 patients who underwent radical esophagectomy for cStage IVB esophageal cancer with solitary posterior TPAN metastasis after induction chemotherapy between January 2013 and October 2022 at our hospital. The short- and long-term of radical esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy for posterior TPAN were retrospectively evaluated. All patients who underwent radical esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy for posterior TPAN achieved a pR0 in this study. The median operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 385 minutes and 164 ml, respectively. Four patients (26.7%) had postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade II or more. The median postoperative hospital stay was 15 days. The 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were 55.6% (95% confidence interval: 23.1-79.0) and 55.0% (95% confidence interval: 25.3-77.2), respectively. We showed that lymphadenectomy for posterior TPAN metastasis was associated with an improved prognosis of some patients with advanced esophageal cancer. This technique may serve as a viable treatment option for patients who respond well to induction chemotherapy.

Prognostic factors of para-aortic lymph node metastasis from colorectal cancer in highly selected patients undergoing para-aortic lymph node dissection.

PURPOSE: We investigated the surgical outcomes of para-aortic lymph node (PALN) dissection in patients with colorectal cancer and assessed the prognostic factors related to the survival. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 31 patients with synchronous or metachronous PALN metastasis from colorectal cancer who underwent PALN dissection between January 2006 and December 2018. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients had synchronous PALN metastasis, and 10 had metachronous PALN metastasis. Seven patients had either simultaneous distant metastasis or a history of distant metastasis other than PALN metastasis at the time of PALN dissection. Eighteen patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. The 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates were 54.2 and 17.2%, respectively. A multivariable analysis revealed that rectal cancer, metachronous PALN metastasis, and three or more pathological PALN metastases were significantly poor prognostic factors for the recurrence-free survival. Among patients with rectal cancer, lower rectal cancer and lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis were poor prognostic factors for the overall survival. CONCLUSION: Curative PALN dissection for PALN metastasis from colorectal cancer is feasible with favorable long-term outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach, including surgery and chemotherapy, is needed for colorectal cancer with PALN metastasis to improve the long-term outcomes.

Efficiency of conversion surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with solitary abdominal para-aortic lymph node metastasis.

PURPOSE: Abdominal para-aortic lymph nodes (PANs) are sites of distant metastasis in esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). The prognosis of patients with Stage IVB ESCC and abdominal PAN metastasis is extremely poor. However, chemotherapy for ESCC has recently been developed, and the effectiveness of combined induction therapy and conversion surgery remains unclear. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of conversion surgery for ESCC and solitary abdominal PAN metastases after induction therapy. METHODS: Thirteen patients who underwent conversion esophagectomy for cStage IVB ESCC with solitary abdominal PAN metastasis after induction therapy between January 2017 and October 2022 at our institution were enrolled. The short- and long-term outcomes of conversion surgery were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Three patients (23.1%) had pathological abdominal PAN metastasis, and six patients (46.2%) without pathological abdominal PAN metastasis showed that chemotherapy eliminated the tumors in the abdominal PAN. Three patients (23.1%) had postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher. The 3-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates were 83.1% and 51.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that conversion surgery for ESCC and solitary abdominal PAN metastasis led to a good prognosis when induction therapy was successful.

Management of Surgically Accessible Lymph Nodes Beyond Normal Resection Planes.

This article discusses the management of isolated metastatic lymph nodes for colon and rectal cancer. There are traditionally significant differences in how certain regions of lymph nodes for colon and rectal cancer are managed in the East and West. This has led to the development of the lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer and extended lymphadenectomy techniques for colon cancer. This article will evaluate the literature on these techniques and what the surgical and oncological outcomes are at this time. In addition, colon and rectal cancers can occasionally have isolated distant lymph node metastases. These would traditionally be treated as systemic disease with chemotherapy. There is consideration though that these could be treated as similar to isolated liver or lung metastases which have been shown to be able to be treated surgically with good oncological results. The literature for these isolated distant lymph node metastases will be reviewed and treatment options available will be discussed.

Multicentric development and evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI radiomics models to predict para-aortic lymph node involvement in locally advanced cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: To develop machine learning models to predict para-aortic lymph node (PALN) involvement in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) before chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI radiomics combined with clinical parameters. METHODS: We retrospectively collected 178 patients (60% for training and 40% for testing) in 2 centers and 61 patients corresponding to 2 further external testing cohorts with LACC between 2010 to 2022 and who had undergone pretreatment analog or digital 18F-FDG PET/CT, pelvic MRI and surgical PALN staging. Only primary tumor volumes were delineated. Radiomics features were extracted using the Radiomics toolbox®. The ComBat harmonization method was applied to reduce the batch effect between centers. Different prediction models were trained using a neural network approach with either clinical, radiomics or combined models. They were then evaluated on the testing and external validation sets and compared. RESULTS: In the training set (n = 102), the clinical model achieved a good prediction of the risk of PALN involvement with a C-statistic of 0.80 (95% CI 0.71, 0.87). However, it performed in the testing (n = 76) and external testing sets (n = 30 and n = 31) with C-statistics of only 0.57 to 0.67 (95% CI 0.36, 0.83). The ComBat-radiomic (GLDZM_HISDE_PET_FBN64 and Shape_maxDiameter2D3_PET_FBW0.25) and ComBat-combined (FIGO 2018 and same radiomics features) models achieved very high predictive ability in the training set and both models kept the same performance in the testing sets, with C-statistics from 0.88 to 0.96 (95% CI 0.76, 1.00) and 0.85 to 0.92 (95% CI 0.75, 0.99), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomic features extracted from pre-CRT analog and digital 18F-FDG PET/CT outperform clinical parameters in the decision to perform a para-aortic node staging or an extended field irradiation to PALN. Prospective validation of our models should now be carried out.

Isolated para-aortic nodal recurrence after treatment of early stage cervical carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical evaluation of lymph node metastasis is paramount in the treatment of cervical cancer. We sought to explore the outcomes of patients with and without para-aortic lymphadenectomy undergoing curative-intent radical hysterectomy for stage IA-IIA cervical cancer. METHODS: Institutional data were retrospectively reviewed to identify women undergoing curative-intent radical hysterectomy with concurrent lymphadenectomy for stage IA-IIA cervical carcinoma from 2004 to 2021. Any carcinoma histology was allowed. Clinical risk stratification was performed according to GOG 92 and GOG 109 protocols. Disease outcomes, patterns of recurrence, and survival were analyzed with Chi square, t-test, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional hazards multivariable statistics. RESULTS: 300 patients were identified, 265 met inclusion criteria. Median follow up was 56 months. Pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) was performed in 71%, with the remainder undergoing combined para-aortic dissection (PPaLND). Baseline patient demographics and presence of clinical risk factors were well balanced between groups. PPaLND was more common in patients undergoing open surgery (OR 10.58, p <.0001), and tumors were larger in this group (2.96 vs 2.12 cm, p = .0002) and more likely non-squamous histology (OR 2.02, p = .017). Recurrence of disease was present in 13% of cases, with no difference between PLND and PPaLND regardless of histology. There were zero cases of isolated PaLN recurrence in either group. Neither progression free nor overall survival was different between groups. Prophylactic extended field radiation (EFRT) was not prescribed. CONCLUSION: Omission of PaLN dissection, in the absence of suspicious nodes, did not decrease survival. There were no isolated PaLN recurrences after PLND alone.

Nordic anal cancer (NOAC) group consensus guidelines for risk-adapted delineation of the elective clinical target volume in anal cancer.

Background: To date, anal cancer patients are treated with radiotherapy to similar volumes despite a marked difference in risk profile based on tumor location and stage. A more individualized approach to delineation of the elective clinical target volume (CTVe) could potentially provide better oncological outcomes as well as improved quality of life. The aim of the present work was to establish Nordic Anal Cancer (NOAC) group guidelines for delineation of the CTVe in anal cancer.Methods: First, 12 radiation oncologists reviewed the literature in one of the following four areas: (1) previous delineation guidelines; (2) patterns of recurrence; (3) anatomical studies; (4) common iliac and para-aortic recurrences and delineation guidelines. Second, areas of controversy were identified and discussed with the aim of reaching consensus.Results: We present consensus-based recommendations for CTVe delineation in anal cancer regarding (a) which regions to include, and (b) how the regions should be delineated. Some of our recommendations deviate from current international guidelines. For instance, the posterolateral part of the inguinal region is excluded, decreasing the volume of irradiated normal tissue. For the external iliac region and the cranial border of the CTVe, we agreed on specifying two different recommendations, both considered acceptable. One of these recommendations is novel and risk-adapted; the external iliac region is omitted for low-risk patients, and several different cranial borders are used depending on the individual level of risk.Conclusion: We present NOAC consensus guidelines for delineation of the CTVe in anal cancer, including a risk-adapted strategy.

Minimally invasive para-aortic lymph node dissection in left-sided colonic and rectal cancer: experience based on a high-volume centre.

AIM: There is no established consensus on the optimal surgical approach to para-aortic lymph node (PALN) dissection in patients with colorectal cancer. This study aimed to demonstrate the technical and oncological safety of minimally invasive PALN dissection for left-sided colonic and rectal cancer patients with clinically suspected infrarenal PALN metastasis. METHOD: One hundered and one patients who underwent primary tumour resection and minimally invasive (laparoscopic n = 92, robotic n = 9) PALN dissection for left-sided colonic and rectal cancer were included. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for PALN metastasis. Survival outcomes were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier (log-rank) method. RESULTS: Para-aortic lymph node metastasis was pathologically confirmed in 23 patients (22.8%). Postoperative complications occurred in 22 patients (21.8%). Pathological N2 stage (OR = 9.337, p = 0.003) and inferior mesenteric artery LN metastasis (OR = 7.499, p = 0.009) were independently associated with PALN metastasis. The median follow-up time was 32 months (range 3-92 months). In all patients, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 76.1% and 69.5%, respectively. The 5-year OS and PFS rates in patients with PALN metastasis were 49.8% and 47.5%, respectively. Patients with PALN metastasis had lower 5-year OS (p = 0.023) and PFS rates (p = 0.035) than those without PALN metastasis. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive PALN dissection had acceptable postoperative complications and may be oncologically beneficial in selected patients with clinically suspicious PALN metastasis.

Outcomes of metachronous para-aortic lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Para-aortic lymph node metastasis associated with colorectal cancer is a very rare occurrence, but at the same time an important predictor of survival. Despite its importance, there is still no gold standard management strategy, particularly for lymph nodes detected during follow-up, after resection of the primary tumour. Therefore, this review was undertaken to examine the evidence available on the surgical and non-surgical management of metachronous para-aortic lymph node metastasis (m-PALNM) in colorectal cancer treatment. METHODS: This is a systematic review using the patient, intervention, comparison, outcome and study strategy. The literature search was undertaken using Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases with the following MeSH terms: lymph node excision, para-aortic lymph node, metastasis, metachronous and colorectal neoplasms. RESULTS: Five original papers met the study criteria including 188 patients in total (55.3% male, 44.7% female). Surgical resection of the m-PALND was the management of choice in 64% of patients. Reporting styles on survival outcomes were heterogeneous. However, patients undergoing surgical management for m-PALNM had longer disease-free survival and overall survival rates. CONCLUSION: There is significant paucity in the evidence available on the management of m-PALNM. However, the evidence reported by this review suggests that surgical management should be considered whenever possible, with the aim of prolonging survival. Future randomised trials are needed in order to provide further high-level evidence on m-PALNM management.

An Extraordinary Location of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in a Patient with Endometrial Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To show dissection of sentinel lymph nodes. DESIGN: A step-by-step demonstration of the technique with narration. SETTING: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy worldwide. Sentinel lymph node biopsy with indocyanine green (ICG) has become more widely used and has been featured in recently published guidelines for EC [1]. Minimally invasive approaches with the sentinel lymph node concept (conventional laparoscopy, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal surgeries or robotic) to EC staging have resulted in lower rates of peri- and postoperative complications than conventional staging procedures [2]. INTERVENTIONS: No video article has been published in the literature about high pelvic, para-aortic sentinel lymph node dissection. An informed consent form was obtained from the patient. An institutional review board approval was not required. A 45-year-old female with gravidity 0, parity 0, and body mass index of 23.4 kg/m2 presented with complaints of abnormal uterine bleeding (spotting). Increased endometrial thickness was detected on transvaginal ultrasound (10 mm) in the postmenstrual period. Endometrioid-type endometrial adenocancer with focal squamous differentiation International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade I was detected on endometrial biopsy. The patient had hepatitis B virus positivity and no other chronic disease. A laparotomic myomectomy had been performed in 2016. Laparoscopic high pelvic, low para-aortic sentinel lymph node dissection with ICG and hysterectomy (without uterine manipulator) + bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were performed (Supplemental Video 1). The operation time for the procedure was 110 minutes and the estimated blood loss was <20 mL. No major complications occurred during or after the surgery. The patient stayed in the hospital for 1 day. The final pathology result showed an International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade I, endometrioid-type endometrial adenocancer with focal squamous differentiation, as a 1.5 × 1 cm tumorous mass invading less than one-half of the myometrium. Neither lymphovascular invasion nor sentinel lymph node metastasis was detected. A multicenter, prospective study showed that sentinel lymph node dissection with ICG in clinical stage 1 EC is feasible and has a high degree of diagnostic accuracy in detecting EC metastases. In that study, isolated para-aortic sentinel lymph node was detected in 3 of 340 patients (<1%) [2]. Another study reported the detection rate of isolated para-aortic sentinel lymph node to be 1.1% in patients with intermediate- and high-risk EC [3]. CONCLUSION: There are in some cases 2 distinct channels emanating from one side, and it is important to follow each and to acknowledge there may be more than one sentinel, one of which is lower in a typical location and one higher as in this case. This video article is the first video demonstration of bilateral isolated high pelvic, para-aortic sentinel lymph node dissection in EC.

Imaging evaluation of para-aortic lymph nodes in cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, much literature has reported the diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET)-CT in para-aortic lymph node metastasis of cervical cancer. PURPOSE: To compare and analyze the para-aortic lymph node presentations found in cervical cancer on different images in order to determine the best precise imaging method for identifying metastatic lymph nodes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and other databases were searched for the non-invasive detection of metastatic lymph nodes for a comprehensive comparison. RESULTS: Positive lymph nodes on CT are significantly related to the following factors: short axis ≥10 mm; and round or central necrosis. Positive lymph nodes on MRI are significantly related to the following factors: short axis ≥8 mm; inhomogeneous signal intensity; morphology: round, irregular edge, extracapsular invasion, central necrosis, loss of lymph node structure, burrs, or lobes; and ADC value decreases, combined with local actuality. On PET-CT examination, when the short axis of the lymph node is >5 mm, the SUV is >2.5, or the FDG uptake is greater than that of the surrounding tissue, it is a metastatic lymph node. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, different imaging techniques show metastatic lymph nodes in different ways. Combining the patient's medical history with the symptoms of the aforementioned lymph nodes, together with one or more imaging techniques, is important to diagnose para-aortic lymph nodes in cervical cancer.

Survival benefits of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer with clinically suspected para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In patients with colorectal cancer and clinically suspected para-aortic lymph node metastasis, the survival benefit of para-aortic lymphadenectomy is unknown. We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to investigate it. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched until January 2000 to April 2022 to identify studies reporting overall survivals, complication rates, and hazard ratios of prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy, and those data were pooled. RESULTS: Twenty retrospective studies (1021 patients undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy) met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis indicates that participants undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy were associated with 5-year survival benefit, compared to those not receiving para-aortic lymphadenectomy (odds ratio = 3.73, 95% confidence interval: 2.05-6.78), but there was no significant difference in complication rate (odds ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.46-2.08). Further analysis of para-aortic lymphadenectomy group showed that 5-year survival of the positive group with pathologically para-aortic lymph node metastasis was lower than that of the negative group (odds ratio = 0.19, 95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.31). Moreover, complete resection (odds ratio = 5.26, 95% confidence interval: 2.02-13.69), para-aortic lymph node metastasis (≤4) (hazard ratio = 1.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-3.62), and medium-high differentiation (hazard ratio = 2.98, 95% confidence interval: 1.48-5.99) were protective factors for survival. Preoperative extra-retroperitoneal metastasis was associated with poorer relapse-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-3.10). CONCLUSION: Para-aortic lymphadenectomy had promising clinical efficacy in prolonging survival rather than complication rate in patients with colorectal cancer and clinically diagnostic para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Further prospective studies should be performed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42022379276.

Pattern of recurrence after stereotactic body radiotherapy for para-aortic oligo-recurrent prostate cancer, a multicentric analysis.

BACKGROUND: M1a disease represents an intermediate status between loco-regional relapse and bone metastatic disease. Metastasis directed therapy (MDT), through stereotactic body RT (SBRT) may be offered to patients, aiming to exclusively treat sites of macroscopic relapse and avoiding wide prophylactic treatment volumes. This appears as a viable treatment, especially after the rise of PSMA tailored treatment approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data about patients treated in two different institutions were retrieved from a prospectively collected dataset. All included patients were affected by oligo-recurrent M1a disease after definitive RT or radical prostatectomy, defined as ≤ 3 nodal lesions situated above aortic bifurcation and below renal arteries. Both castration resistant PCa (CRPC) and castration sensitive (CSPC) PCa patients were included. All imaging methods were allowed to detect recurrence (CT scan, Choline or PSMA PET/CT).All sites of recurrences were treated with SBRT. RESULTS: Median PFS was 10 months (95% CI 8-17). Twelve patients died, with a median OS of 114 months (95% CI 85-114). Out of the 83 recurrences, 2 (2.4%), 11 (13.25%), 36 (43.37%) and 15 (18%) patients had respectively prostate bed only, pelvic nodal, para-aortic or distant relapse. Furthermore, 19 (22.9%) patients experienced a biochemical only relapse with negative imaging at re-staging. DISCUSSION: MDT conferred a remarkable PFS outcome in a mixed cohort of CSPC and CRPC patients with m1a disease, with an optimal safety profile. Prospective trials are needed in order to compare MDT and ENRT for these patients, allowing to select the best treatment option.

Curative treatment for stage IIIC2 cervical cancer: what to expect?

Background: Since the GOG125 study, treating radically patients with positive para-aortic lymph nodes has been a valid approach. Nevertheless, literature lacks data on how to better treat these patients since they are usually excluded from trials. In this study, we aimed to report the outcomes of patients with advanced cervical cancer and positive para-aortic lymph nodes (PAN) treated in a single tertiary/academic institution and try to identify variables that may impact survival. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with positive para-aortic lymph nodes treated in our institution. Demographic variables and treatment options were assessed and their impact on overall survival (OS), locorregional control, distant metastasis free survival, and para-aortic lymph node progression was analyzed. Results: We assessed 65 patients treated from April 2010 to May 2017. Median OS was 38.7 months. Median locorregional and para-aortic progression free survivals were not reached. Median distant metastasis progression-free survival was 64.3 months. Better ECOG performance status (p > 0.001), concurrent chemotherapy (p = 0.031), and brachytherapy (p = 0.02) were independently related to better overall survival. Conclusion: Patients with current stage IIIC2 cervix cancer may present long term survival. Treating positive PAN cervical cancer patients with concurrent chemoradiation including brachytherapy with curative intent should be standard. Poor PS and more advanced pelvic disease may represent a higher risk for worse outcomes. Distant metastases are still a challenge for disease control.

Does para-aortic lymphadenectomy improve survival in pathologically diagnosed early-stage grade 3 endometrioid and non-endometrioid endometrial cancers? A retrospective cohort study in Korea and Taiwan.

PURPOSE: The therapeutic effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in early-stage high-grade endometrial cancer remains controversial. In this study, we investigated whether combined pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy has a survival benefit compared to pelvic lymphadenectomy alone in patients with pathologically diagnosed FIGO stage I-II grade 3 endometrioid and non-endometrioid endometrial cancers. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 281 patients with histologically confirmed FIGO stage I-II grade 3 endometrioid and non-endometrioid endometrial cancers who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy alone or combined pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in staging surgery at two tertiary centers in Korea and Taiwan. Prognostic factors to predict outcomes in these cases were also analyzed. RESULTS: Among 281 patients, 144 underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy alone and 137 underwent combined pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Within a median follow-up of 45 months, there was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. In multivariable analysis, age at diagnosis ≥60 years (HR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.25-3.87, p = 0.006) and positive lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) (HR = 2.79, 95% CI 1.60-4.85, p < 0.001) were associated with worse RFS, and only non-endometrioid histology was associated with worse OS (HR = 3.18, 95% CI 1.42-7.12, p = 0.005). In further subgroup analysis, beneficial effects of combined pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on RFS and OS were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, combined pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy could not improve survival compared to pelvic lymphadenectomy alone in patients with FIGO stage I-II grade 3 endometrioid and non-endometrioid endometrial cancers. Therefore, para-aortic lymphadenectomy may be omitted for these cases.

Prophylactic extended-field irradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. Pelvic irradiation is commonly recommended for patients with negative para-aortic lymph nodes(PALNs). However, owing to the development of imaging-guided brachytherapy, distant failure has become the main failure pattern. The PALNs are a vital site of distant metastasis, and the para-aortic region may contain occult microscopic metastases that are barely detected owing to imaging technology restriction. The prognostic of patients who experienced PALN failure is dismal. Typically, there are four ways to decrease PALN failure. First, surgical staging can be performed to assess the occurrence of metastasis in the para-aortic region; however, the application of surgical staging is decreasing owing to controversial survival benefits and accompanying complications of surgery. Second, regular imaging surveillance and timely salvage of early recurrences could reduce PALN failure. Third, better systemic adjuvant therapy could be recommended since it has enormous potential to reduce distant metastases and improve overall survival. Fourth, performing prophylactic extended-field irradiation (EFI), including pelvic and para-aortic region irradiation, can sterilize occult microscopic metastases in the para-aortic region and improve survival. Prior investigations have revealed that prophylactic EFI could reduce PALN failure as well as distant metastasis and present the benefit of survival. Yet, owing to the serious morbidity induced by enlarged irradiation field in the era of conventional irradiation techniques, further research on EFI is stagnated. Nowadays, with the development of new technologies, intensity modulated radiation therapy can deliver a higher dose to tumors with acceptable toxicity. Prophylactic EFI regained attention. However, the inclusion criteria of prophylactic EFI in existing studies reveal great discrepancies. Thus, it is urgent to precisely identify indications for better survival and lower complications in patients with cervical cancer. In this review, we identify indications and summary guidelines for prophylactic EFI, which may provide a foundation for further trials and clinical applications.