Phase I Single Ascending Dose and Food Effect Study in Healthy Adults and Phase I/IIa Multiple Ascending Dose Study in Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis to Assess Pharmacokinetics, Bactericidal Activity, Tolerability, and Safety of OPC-167832.

OPC-167832, an inhibitor of decaprenylphosphoryl-ß-d-ribose 2'-oxidase, demonstrated potent antituberculosis activity and a favorable safety profile in preclinical studies. This report describes the first two clinical studies of OPC-167832: (i) a phase I single ascending dose (SAD) and food effects study in healthy participants; and (ii) a 14-day phase I/IIa multiple ascending dose (MAD; 3/10/30/90 mg QD) and early bactericidal activity (EBA) trial in participants with drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). OPC-167832 was well tolerated at single ascending doses (10 to 480 mg) in healthy participants and multiple ascending doses (3 to 90 mg) in participants with TB. In both populations, nearly all treatment-related adverse events were mild and self-limiting, with headache and pruritus being the most common events. Abnormal electrocardiograms results were rare and clinically insignificant. In the MAD study, OPC-167832 plasma exposure increased in a less than dose-proportional manner, with mean accumulation ratios ranging from 1.26 to 1.56 for Cmax and 1.55 to 2.01 for area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24h). Mean terminal half-lives ranged from 15.1 to 23.6 h. Pharmacokinetics (PK) characteristics were comparable to healthy participants. In the food effects study, PK exposure increased by less than ~2-fold under fed conditions compared to the fasted state; minimal differences were observed between standard and high-fat meals. Once-daily OPC-167832 showed 14-day bactericidal activity from 3 mg (log10 CFU mean ± standard deviation change from baseline; -1.69 ± 1.15) to 90 mg (-2.08 ± 0.75), while the EBA of Rifafour e-275 was -2.79 ± 0.96. OPC-167832 demonstrated favorable pharmacokinetic and safety profiles, as well as potent EBA in participants with drug-susceptible pulmonary TB.

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Senaparib, a Novel PARP1/2 Inhibitor, in Chinese Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase I Trial.

BACKGROUND: Senaparib, a novel poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1/2 inhibitor, demonstrated antitumor activity in preclinical studies. This phase I, first-in-human, dose-escalation/-expansion study explored the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability, and preliminary antitumor activity of senaparib in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults with advanced solid tumors who had failed ³1 line of prior systemic treatment were enrolled. Senaparib (once daily [QD]) dose was escalated from 2 mg until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase II dose (RP2D) using a modified 3 + 3 design. Dose expansion included: dose groups with ≥1 objective response and one dose higher, as well as those at the MTD/RP2D. Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and tolerability, and determine the MTD and/or RP2D of senaparib. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were enrolled across 10 dose groups (2-120 mg QD, and 50 mg twice daily). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The most common senaparib-related adverse events were anemia (80.9%), white blood cell count decreased (43.9%), platelet count decreased (28.1%), and asthenia (26.3%). Senaparib exposure increased dose proportionately at 2-80 mg; absorption saturated at 80-120 mg. Senaparib accumulation was minimal after repeated QD administration (accumulation ratio=1.1-1.5). The objective response rate was 22.7% (n=10/44) overall (all partial responses) and 26.9% (n=7/26) for patients harboring BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. Disease control rates were 63.6% and 73.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Senaparib was well tolerated and demonstrated promising antitumor activity in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. The RP2D for this clinical study in China was identified as 100 mg QD. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03508011.

Oral formulation of bendamustine hydrochloride for patients with advanced solid tumors; a phase 1 study.

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of orally-administered bendamustine in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. The optimal dosing schedule, safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor effects were also evaluated. A multicenter, open-label trial with a standard 3 + 3 design and dose escalation by dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was conducted. The treatment schedules were once daily for 7, 14, and 21 days every 3 weeks as one cycle. The total dose per cycle was increased from 175 to 840 mg/m2. Eighteen patients were enrolled in this study. DLT occurred in one of six patients at 75 mg/m2/day × 7 days, and one of three patients at 37.5 mg/m2/day × 14 days and 25 mg/m2/day × 21 days. However, the delayed recovery from a decrease in neutrophil or platelet count hampered the start of subsequent treatment cycles, and the trend was more prominent at 37.5 mg/m2/day × 14 days and 25 mg/m2/day × 21 days than in 75 mg/m2/day × 7 days. MTD was determined as 75 mg/m2/day × 7 days to allow acceptable hematologic recovery. The pharmacokinetics of orally-administered bendamustine were generally dose-dependent; however, the inter-individual variability is relatively large. The major adverse events were hematologic toxicities; gastrointestinal disorders were generally mild. Adverse drug reactions did not lead to the discontinuation of the drug. A partial response was observed in two of six patients (prostatic small cell carcinoma and thymic carcinoma) at 75 mg/m2/day × 7 days. The RD and optimal dosing schedule of orally-administered bendamustine was 75 mg/m2 once daily for 7 days every 3 weeks for the treatment of advanced solid tumors. (Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03604679. Registration date July 27, 2018).

Neoadjuvant toripalimab plus platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy in stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center, single-arm, phase I study in China.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with resectable disease have presented promising results. This is a phase I study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy for NSCLC. METHODS: Treatment-naive patients with resectable NSCLC (stage II-IIIB) received two to four cycles of toripalimab (240 mg, intravenously, q3w) combined with platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy. Surgical operation was performed approximately 4 weeks after the last cycle. The primary end point was safety. The efficacy endpoints included radiographic and pathological response rates, expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and molecular targets. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients were enrolled, consisting of 2 patients (18%) with adenocarcinoma and 9 patients (82%) with squamous cell carcinoma. All patients received two to four cycles of toripalimab plus chemotherapy and underwent radical resection. Regarding safety, 5 of 11 patients (45%) had neoadjuvant treatment-related adverse events, and 1 patient (9%) experienced grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events. Radiographic partial response was achieved in 10 patients, with an objective response rate of 91%. Among 11 patients, 6 (55%) achieved pathological complete response, including 1 PD-L1-negative patient. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant toripalimab plus platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy was tolerable and induced a pathological complete response in 55% of resectable NSCLC patients.

Cysteine-lowering treatment with mesna against obesity: Proof of concept and results from a human phase I, dose-finding study.

AIM: To investigate whether mesna-sodium-2-mercaptoethane sulfonate) can reduce diet-induced fat gain in mice, and to assess the safety of single ascending mesna doses in humans to find the dose associated with lowering of plasma tCys by at least 30%. METHODS: C3H/HeH mice were shifted to a high-fat diet ± mesna in drinking water; body composition was measured at weeks 0, 2 and 4. In an open, phase I, single ascending dose study, oral mesna (400, 800, 1200, 1600 mg) was administered to 17 men with overweight or obesity. Mesna and tCys concentrations were measured repeatedly for a duration of 48 hours postdosing in plasma, as well as in 24-hour urine. RESULTS: Compared with controls, mesna-treated mice had lower tCys and lower estimated mean fat mass gain from baseline (week 2: 4.54 ± 0.40 vs. 6.52 ± 0.36 g; week 4: 6.95 ± 0.35 vs. 8.19 ± 0.34 g; Poverall = .002), but similar lean mass gain. In men with overweight, mesna doses of 400-1600 mg showed dose linearity and were well tolerated. Mesna doses of 800 mg or higher decreased plasma tCys by 30% or more at nadir (4h post-dosing). With increasing mesna dose, tCys AUC0-12h decreased (Ptrend < .001), and urine tCys excretion increased (Ptrend = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Mesna reduces diet-induced fat gain in mice. In men with overweight, single oral doses of mesna (800-1600 mg) were well tolerated and lowered plasma tCys efficiently. The effect of sustained tCys-lowering by repeated mesna administration on weight loss in humans deserves investigation.

Safety/tolerability, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of 600-µg cotadutide in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients with a body mass index of 25 kg/m2 or higher: A phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

AIM: To assess the safety/tolerability, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of once-daily, 600-µg cotadutide in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients with a body mass index of 25 kg/m2 or higher. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT04208620) enrolled patients to receive subcutaneous cotadutide at an escalating dose to determine the highest tolerated clinical dose (Cohort 1), then applied in Cohort 2. The primary endpoint was safety, including treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); secondary endpoints included glycaemic control and body weight. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were randomly allocated to receive cotadutide or placebo in a 3:1 ratio. All patients were Asian, 62.5% were male, and the median age and body mass index were 60 years and 27.2 kg/m2 , respectively. Through the follow-up period of the study, 11/12 (91.7%) patients in the cotadutide group experienced a TEAE versus 1/4 (25.0%) patients in the placebo group. All TEAEs were mild, except for one moderate event. There were no deaths, serious TEAEs or TEAEs leading to study discontinuation. Gastrointestinal-related events were the most common TEAEs. Cotadutide-treated patients achieved significantly improved 7-day mean glucose measured by continuous glucose monitoring; the 7-day mean (standard deviation) at the end of treatment (day 70) was 112.23 (20.79) versus 206.85 (3.62) mg/dL for placebo. Mean respective changes in HbA1c were -1.13% (0.64%) and -0.17% (0.65%); and mean percentage changes in body weight were -6.93% (3.44%) and -1.23% (1.20%). CONCLUSIONS: Cotadutide was well tolerated at doses up to 600 µg; efficacy versus placebo for weight loss and glycaemic control was shown.

Total marrow lymphoid irradiation and cyclophosphamide is associated with low toxicity and good outcomes in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia and chronic myeloid leukemia in lymphoid blast crises - A phase I study.

INTRODUCTION: Total marrow lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) can deliver higher doses of irradiation without increasing toxicity compared to Total body irradiation (TBI). METHODS: Twenty adult patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and chronic myeloid leukemia with lymphoid blast crises (CML-LBC) received TMLI and cyclophosphamide for conditioning. Ten patients each received 13.5 or 15 Gy of TMLI. The graft source was peripheral blood stem cells in all, and donors included matched related (n = 15), haplo-identical (n = 3) or matched unrelated donors (n = 2). RESULTS: The median cell dose infused was 9 × 106 CD34/kg (range 4.8-12.4). Engraftment occurred in all (100%) at a median of 15 days (range: 14-17). Toxicity was low with hemorrhagic cystitis seen in two but no sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. Acute GVHD occurred in 40% while chronic GVHD was seen in 70.5%. Viral infections were seen in 55% while blood stream bacterial infections occurred in 20% and invasive fungal disease (IFD) in 10%. The Day 100 non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 10%. At a median follow up of 25 months (range 2-48), two patients have relapsed. Overall survival at 2 years is 80% while the disease-free survival is 75%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of TMLI and cyclophosphamide for myeloablative conditioning is associated with low toxicity and favorable early outcomes in patients undergoing HSCT for ALL and CML-LBC.

Pharmacodynamic Study of Miransertib in Individuals with Proteus Syndrome.

Proteus syndrome is a life-threatening segmental overgrowth syndrome caused by a mosaic gain-of-function AKT1 variant. There are no effective treatments for Proteus syndrome. Miransertib is an AKT1 inhibitor that, prior to this study, has been evaluated only in adult oncology trials. We designed a non-randomized, phase 0/1 pilot study of miransertib in adults and children with Proteus syndrome to identify an appropriate dosage starting point for a future efficacy trial using a pharmacodynamic endpoint. The primary endpoint was a 50% reduction in the tissue levels of AKT phosphorylation from biopsies in affected individuals. We also evaluated secondary efficacy endpoints. We found that a dose of 5 mg/m2/day (1/7 the typical dose used in oncology) led to a 50% reduction in phosphorylated AKT (pAKT) in affected tissues from five of six individuals. This dose was well tolerated. Two of the six efficacy endpoints (secondary objectives) suggested that this agent may be efficacious. We observed a decrease in a cerebriform connective tissue nevus and a reduction in pain in children. We conclude that 5 mg/m2/day of miransertib is an appropriate starting point for future efficacy trials and that this agent shows promise of therapeutic efficacy in children with Proteus syndrome.

Phase I study of lurbinectedin in combination with weekly paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Lurbinectedin and paclitaxel showed synergism in preclinical studies and have non-completely overlapping toxicity profiles. This phase I trial evaluated a combination of paclitaxel and lurbinectedin with/without bevacizumab in advanced tumors. This trial was divided into Group A, which evaluated weekly paclitaxel (60 or 80 mg) plus lurbinectedin (3.0-5.0 mg flat dose [FD] or 2.2 mg/m2) every 3 weeks in advanced solid tumors; and Group B, which evaluated bevacizumab (BEV, 15 mg/kg) added to the recommended dose (RD) defined in Group A in advanced epithelial ovarian or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 67 patients (A, n = 55; B, n = 12) were treated. The RD was paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on Day (D)1,D8 plus lurbinectedin 2.2 mg/m2 on D1. At this RD, myelotoxicity was reversible and manageable, and most non-hematological toxicities were mild/moderate. Adding BEV did not notably change tolerability. Twenty-five confirmed responses were observed: 20/51 evaluable patients in Group A (overall response rate [ORR] = 39% at all dose levels and at the RD), and 5/10 evaluable patients in Group B (ORR = 50%). Most responders had breast (n = 7/12 patients), small cell lung (SCLC) (n = 5/7), epithelial ovarian (n = 3/9) and endometrial cancer (n = 3/11) in Group A, and epithelial ovarian (n = 3/4) and NSCLC (n = 2/6) in Group B. Clinical benefit rate was 61% in Group A (58% at the RD), and 90% in Group B. No major pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions were observed. Paclitaxel/lurbinectedin and paclitaxel/lurbinectedin/BEV are feasible combinations. Further development is warranted of paclitaxel/lurbinectedin in SCLC, breast, and endometrial cancer, and of paclitaxel/lurbinectedin/BEV in epithelial ovarian cancer.

A phase I study of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib combined with platinum/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in untreated nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Anlotinib hydrochloride is an oral small molecule inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinases, and it has been approved as a third-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China. This dose-exploration study was designed to investigate the feasibility of anlotinib in combination with other chemotherapy regimens in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. METHODS: This phase I study followed a 3 + 3 dose reduction design with three doses of anlotinib (12 mg, 10 mg, and 8 mg). Anlotinib was given at an initial dose of 12 mg with pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) plus cisplatin (75 mg/m2) or carboplatin (AUC = 5) on 21-day cycles for 4 cycles. The primary goal of the study was to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of eight participants were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in two patients (pts) at anlotinib 12 mg (grade 3 hand-foot syndrome and grade 3 appetite loss). No DLTs occurred with 10 mg anlotinib, and the MTD was 10 mg. Among seven evaluable pts, four achieved a confirmed partial response (PR), and three had stable disease (SD). With a median follow-up of 10.05 months, the median PFS was 7.00 months (95% CI: 2.76 to NE). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included appetite loss (n = 2), hypertension (n = 2), thrombocytopenia (n = 1), diarrhea (n = 1) and hand-foot syndrome (n = 1). No grade 4 or grade 5 TRAEs were observed during the treatment. CONCLUSION: The feasible dose of anlotinib in combination with platinum/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy as a first-line regimen was 10 mg, which was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.

CUSUMIN: A cumulative sum interval design for cancer phase I dose finding studies.

Recently, model-assisted designs, including the Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design with optimal thresholds to determine the dose for the next cohort, have been proposed for cancer phase I studies. Model-assisted designs are useful because of their good performance as model-based designs in addition to their algorithm-based simplicity. In BOIN, escalation and de-escalation based on boundaries can be understood as a type of change point detection based on a sequential test procedure. Notably, the sequential test procedure is used in a wide range of fields and is known for its application to control charts, statistical monitoring methods used for detecting abnormalities in manufacturing processes. In control charts, abnormalities are detected if the control chart statistics are observed to be outside of the optimal boundaries. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) statistic, which is developed for control chart applications, derives higher power under the same erroneous judgment rate. Hence, it is expected that a more efficient model-assisted design can be achieved by the application of CUSUM statistics. In this study, a model-assisted design based on the CUSUM statistic is proposed. In the proposed design, the dose for the next cohort is decided by CUSUM statistics calculated from the counts of the dose-limiting toxicity and pre-defined boundaries, based on the CUSUM control chart scheme. Intensive simulation shows that our proposed method performs better than BOIN, and other representative model-assisted designs, including modified toxicity probability interval (mTPI) and Keyboard, in terms of controlling over-dosing rates while maintaining similar performance in the determination of maximum tolerated dose.

First-in-human study of the cancer peptide vaccine TAS0313 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

TAS0313, a novel cancer vaccine cocktail, was developed to overcome the disadvantages of previously developed short and long peptide vaccines; it comprises several long peptides targeting multiple cancer antigens. We evaluated TAS0313 monotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors for which no other therapies were available. In the dose-finding cohort, patients received TAS0313 (9 or 27 mg) on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycles 1 and 2, and then on day 1 of each subsequent 21-day cycle. The primary objective was the evaluation of safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives were evaluation of efficacy, tumor responses, and immune activation (CTL, IgG, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte [TIL] levels). The full analysis set contained 10 patients in the 9-mg group and seven in the 27-mg group. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported in cycle 1. All adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were grade 1 or 2; the most common ADRs were injection site-related events. The best response was stable disease in four of 17 patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) duration was 2.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.3) months overall; patients with baseline low lymphocyte counts (≤750/µL) had shorter PFS. Compared with baseline, TILs were increased in five patients. Although CTLs, IgG, and TILs were induced, no correlative pattern with clinical outcomes was observed. The safety, tolerability, and induction of immune responses in patients with advanced solid tumors receiving TAS0313 were confirmed. Further evaluation of TAS0313's efficacy as monotherapy or in combination with pembrolizumab is underway. The study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.jp (JapicCTI-183824).

Phase 1 study of tazemetostat in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Tazemetostat is a selective and orally available inhibitor of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), a histone methyltransferase and epigenetic regulator of cellular differentiation programs. We carried out a phase I study of tazemetostat in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin-type lymphoma (B-NHL) to evaluate its tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity. METHODS: Tazemetostat was given orally at a single dose of 800 mg on the first day and 800 mg twice daily (BID: total 1600 mg/d) on following days in a 28-day/cycle manner. Tazemetostat dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was evaluated up to the end of the first treatment cycle. Archival tumor tissues were analyzed for hotspot EZH2 mutations. RESULTS: As of 15 January 2018, seven patients (four follicular lymphoma [FL] and three diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL]) were enrolled. The median age was 73 (range, 59-85) years, and the median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was three (range, one to five). No DLT was observed (one patient was not evaluable due to early disease progression). The common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were thrombocytopenia and dysgeusia (three patients each; 42.9%). No treatment-related serious AEs were observed. The objective response rate was 57% (4/7 patients), including responses in three of four patients with FL and one of three patients with DLBCL. An EZH2 mutation was detected in one patient with FL responding to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Tazemetostat at 800 mg BID showed an acceptable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory B-NHL.

A phase I study of IMC-001, a PD-L1 blocker, in patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors.

Introduction IMC-001 is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds to human PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1). This study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of IMC-001 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Materials and Methods This open-labeled phase I study used a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, with doses ranging from 2 to 20 mg/kg. IMC-001 was administered intravenously every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The dose-limiting toxicity window was defined as 21 days from the first dose. Results Fifteen subjects were included in 5 dose-escalation cohorts. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most common adverse events (AEs) were general weakness, decreased appetite, fever, and cough. No grade 4 or 5 treatment emergent AEs were reported during the study. One subject in the 2 mg/kg cohort showed grade 2 immune-induced thyroiditis and diabetes mellitus suspected to be related to IMC-001. Over the dose range of 2-20 mg/kg IMC-001, the AUC0-14d, AUC0-∞, and Cmax generally increased in a dose-proportional manner for each step of dose escalation. Of the 15 enrolled patients, 1 subject with rectal cancer showed a partial response, and the disease control rate was 33.3%. Conclusions IMC-001 demonstrated a favorable safety profile up to 20 mg/kg administered intravenously every 2 weeks and showed preliminary efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, 20 mg/kg was selected as the recommended phase II dose. Clinical trial identification NCT03644056 (date of registration: August 23, 2018).

Efficacy and safety of lurbinectedin and doxorubicin in relapsed small cell lung cancer. Results from an expansion cohort of a phase I study.

Background A phase I study found remarkable activity and manageable toxicity for doxorubicin (bolus) plus lurbinectedin (1-h intravenous [i.v.] infusion) on Day 1 every three weeks (q3wk) as second-line therapy in relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). An expansion cohort further evaluated this combination. Patients and methods Twenty-eight patients with relapsed SCLC after no more than one line of cytotoxic-containing chemotherapy were treated: 18 (64%) with sensitive disease (chemotherapy-free interval [CTFI] ≥90 days) and ten (36%) with resistant disease (CTFI <90 days; including six with refractory disease [CTFI ≤30 days]). Results Ten patients showed confirmed response (overall response rate [ORR] = 36%); median progression-free survival (PFS) = 3.3 months; median overall survival (OS) = 7.9 months. ORR was 50% in sensitive disease (median PFS = 5.7 months; median OS = 11.5 months) and 10% in resistant disease (median PFS = 1.3 months; median OS = 4.6 months). The main toxicity was transient and reversible myelosuppression. Treatment-related non-hematological events (fatigue, nausea, decreased appetite, vomiting, alopecia) were mostly mild or moderate. Conclusion Doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 and lurbinectedin 2.0 mg/m2 on Day 1 q3wk has shown noteworthy activity in relapsed SCLC and a manageable safety profile. The combination is being evaluated as second-line therapy for SCLC in an ongoing, randomized phase III trial. Clinical trial registration www.ClinicalTrials.gov code: NCT01970540. Date of registration: 22 October, 2013.

A first-in-human phase I study of TAS0728, an oral covalent binding inhibitor of HER2, in patients with advanced solid tumors with HER2 or HER3 aberrations.

TAS0728 is an oral covalent binding inhibitor of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). A first-in-human open-label, dose-escalation, phase I study (NCT03410927) was initiated to investigate the safety and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose of TAS0728 in adults with advanced solid tumors with HER2 or HER3 overexpression, amplification or mutation. In total, 19 patients received TAS0728 at escalating doses from 50 to 200 mg BID for 21-day cycles. Following escalation of the dose to 200 mg BID, a total of two DLTs were observed, both cases of Grade 3 diarrhea (lasting >48 h and not responsive to aggressive antidiarrheal treatment). Following de-escalation of the dose to 150 mg BID, another DLT of Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in one patient. Additionally, at 150 mg BID, one patient had a fatal cardiac arrest after receiving 1 cycle (21 days) of TAS0728. The etiology of the cardiac arrest event was not clear, however causal relationship to TAS0728 could not be excluded due to the temporal association observed. Partial responses were observed in 2 of 14 patients evaluable for TAS0728 treatment response. The study was stopped due to unacceptable toxicity during the dose-escalation as the overall risk-benefit ratio no longer favored the dose level being tested, therefore the MTD was not determined. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03410927 ; registered on January 25, 2018.

A phase I study of the safety and activity of K-001 in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a deadly disease that lack of effective therapeutic drugs. K-001 is an oral antitumor drug made from active ingredients of marine microorganisms. The current study aimed to evaluate safety and antitumor activity of K-001 in patients with advanced PDAC. METHODS: In this phase I, open-label trial, patients with advanced PDAC were recruited to a dose-escalation study in a standard 3 + 3 design. K-001 was administered twice daily in four-week cycles, and dose escalation from 1350 mg to 2160 mg was evaluated twice daily. Physical examination and laboratory tests were done at screening and then weekly. The safety, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of K-001 were assessed while tumor response was estimated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST). RESULTS: Eighteen patients with advanced PDAC were screened, and twelve eligible patients were analyzed in the study. No DLT was observed. Totally, 47 adverse events (AEs) presented, and 14 drug-related AEs were reported in 7 patients, including 8 grade 1 events (57.1%) and 6 grade 2 events (42.9%). There was no grade 3 or 4 drug-related AE. In these 14 drug-related AEs, the most frequent ones were dyspepsia (21.4%), followed by flatulence, constipation, and hemorrhoid bleeding (above 10% of each). Among all 12 patients, 10 patients (83.3%) maintained stable disease (SD), and 2 patients (16.7%) had progressive disease (PD). The objective response rate (ORR) was 0% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 83.3%. CONCLUSIONS: K-001 manifests satisfactory safety and tolerability, as well as meaningful antitumor activity in advanced PDAC patients. Further evaluation of K-001 in phase II/III appears warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02720666 . Registered 28 Match 2016 - Retrospectively registered.

A single-dose euglycaemic clamp study in two cohorts to compare the exposure of SAR341402 (insulin aspart) Mix 70/30 with US- and European-approved versions of insulin aspart Mix 70/30 and SAR341402 rapid-acting solution in subjects with type 1 diabetes.

AIM: To compare the pharmacokinetic exposure of SAR341402 Mix 70/30 (SARAsp -Mix) with US- and European (EU)-approved versions of insulin aspart Mix 70/30 (NovoLog Mix 70/30 [NN-Mix-US]/NovoMix 30 [NN-Mix-EU]) and SAR341402 insulin aspart solution (SAR-Asp) in subjects with type 1 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial in two cohorts. Fifty-two subjects received a single subcutaneous 0.3 U/kg dose of each treatment and underwent a euglycaemic clamp procedure lasting for a maximum of 24 hours after dosing. In cohort 1, subjects (N = 36) were exposed once each to SARAsp -Mix, NN-Mix-US and NN-Mix-EU. In cohort 2, subjects (N = 16) were exposed once each to SARAsp -Mix and SAR-Asp. RESULTS: Of the 52 subjects randomized, 48 completed all treatment periods. In cohort 1, the extent of exposure (total and maximum concentration) was similar among the three treatments, with the 90% confidence intervals for pairwise treatment ratios meeting the predefined acceptance range (0.80 to 1.25). In cohort 2, statistically significant differences (P < .001) in early (0-4 hours) and intermediate (4-12 hours) exposure to SARAsp -Mix compared with SAR-Asp were observed, all exceeding a 20% difference. Pharmacodynamic results were in support of the pharmacokinetic findings for both cohorts. All treatments were well tolerated and there were no relevant differences in safety variables among treatments. CONCLUSIONS: SARAsp -Mix showed similar pharmacokinetic exposure to commercially available insulin aspart Mix 70/30 formulations, and a distinct exposure profile compared with SAR-Asp.

Phase I Study of Intraperitoneal Administration of Paclitaxel Combined with S-1 Plus Cisplatin for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis.

INTRODUCTION: Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy is a promising treatment option for gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal metastasis (PM). Recently, superiority of IP administration of paclitaxel (PTX) combined with S-1 and intravenous PTX over conventional systemic chemotherapy was suggested in a phase III study, although the difference in overall survival did not reach statistical significance in the primary analysis. Thus, attempts to combine IP PTX with other systemic therapies with higher efficacy are warranted. We designed a new regimen combining IP PTX with S-1 plus cisplatin (SP), which is regarded as the standard first-line treatment for metastatic GC in Japan, and subsequently carried out a dose-escalation study. METHODS: The combination was a 5-weekly regimen. IP PTX was to be administered on days 1, 8, and 22 with an initial dose of 15 mg/m2 at level 1 and 20 mg/m2 at level 2. S-1 was to be administered orally at a fixed dose of 80 mg/m2 b.i.d. for 21 days followed by a -14-day rest. Cisplatin was to be administered intravenously at a dose of 60 mg/m2 on day 8. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as grade 4 leukopenia, grade 3 (G3) febrile neutropenia, G3 thrombocytopenia, and G3 nonhematological toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 9 patients with macroscopic PM were enrolled. No DLTs were observed among the 3 patients at level 1 and 6 patients at level 2. No adverse events or technical problems associated with the IP administration were observed. Consequently, the maximum-tolerated dose was not reached, and the dose for further clinical trials of IP PTX was determined as 20 mg/m2. As for efficacy, peritoneal lavage cytology turned negative after the first course in 4 of 7 patients who had positive cytology before treatment. CONCLUSION: The present study determined the dose for further clinical trials of IP PTX to be 20 mg/m2, when combined with the 5-weekly SP regimen.

Chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide after high-dose methotrexate for primary CNS lymphoma: a multicenter phase I study of a response-adapted strategy.

This study aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of temozolomide (TMZ) concurrent with radiotherapy (RT) after high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) for newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Adult patients with PCNSL were treated according to a response-adapted strategy. HD-MTX (3.5 g/m2) was followed by concomitant RT and escalating TMZ (50-60-75 mg/m2/day, 5 days/week). The total radiation dose was modulated according to the patient's response to HD-MTX. All patients received 30 Gy to the whole brain plus leptomeninges to C2, including the third posterior of the orbital cavity (clinical target volume 2; CTV2), plus 6, 10, or 16 Gy to the primary site, including the residual mass (CTV1), if a complete response (CR), partial response (PR)/stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD) was observed, respectively. Acute toxicities were graded according to the RTOG-EORTC criteria. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 4 hematological toxicity or grade 3-4 hepatic toxicity, although 75 mg/m2/day was the maximum dose regardless of DLT. Neurocognitive function was evaluated using the Mini-Mental State Examination. Three patients were enrolled at each TMZ dose level (total = 9 patients). Twelve lesions were treated. Six patients received 2 cycles of HD-MTX, while 3 received only 1 cycle because of hepatic or renal toxicity. All patients completed chemoradiotherapy without interruptions. No DLT events were recorded. TMZ appears to be tolerable at a dose of 75 mg/m2/day when administered concomitantly with radiotherapy and after HD-MTX.