RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The gap between the expectation and the development of role competency is a dilemma that nurse practitioners (NPs) face in clinical settings. PURPOSE: This study was designed to explore the perceived importance and actual practice of the role competencies of NPs and to compare the differences between the ideal and practical domains as well as related factors. METHODS: This cross-sectional design study used Q-sort to collect data. A 56-item "Nurse Practitioner Role Capacity Questionnaire" was used as the research tool. Two questionnaires: Perceptions of Important Role Competencies and Actual Execution of Role Competencies were distributed to NPs twice, at times that were 2 weeks apart. A total of 40 participants were recruited, including 21(52.5%) internal medicine NPs and 19 (47.5%) surgical medicine NPs. RESULTS: The significant differences that were identified in this study between the perceived importance and actual practice of role competencies were, by domain: medical assistance (t = -5.62, p < .001), clinical research (t = 4.14, p < .001), professional consultation (t = 2.29, p = .027), and direct care (t = 2.21, p = .033). The correlative factors for these differences were: education level (t = -2.17, p = .036) and membership in the Nurse Practitioner Association (t = -2.36, p = .017). NPs with higher levels of education and with membership in the Nurse Practitioner Association earned higher scores for self-expectation in important clinical competency. CONCLUSIONS: NPs face discrepancies in their role expectations, in important part due to their role as providers of medical assistance in clinical practical settings. NPs need to learn and demonstrate the roles and functions of advanced nursing practice to enhance nursing professionalism profoundly.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Profissionais de Enfermagem/psicologia , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Q-Sort , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
This paper provides a brief introduction to Q methodology, a research technique which allows researchers to reveal the key subjective or 'first-person' viewpoints extant amongst a group of participants. Design and participant issues are considered and coverage is provided about the processes of Q sorting, the factor analysis of the completed Q sorts and the interpretation of any emergent factors. Useful references and websites are also provided as a means of helping the interested reader to get started with Q methodology.