Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in Germany - incidence rates and trends based on inpatient and outpatient data.

We examined incidence rates (IR) for all distal radius fracture (DRF) events based on inpatient and outpatient data from a large statutory health insurance in Germany. Of all DRF, 56% were treated as inpatients, and thus, 44% treated as outpatients. IR were higher in women than in men. PURPOSE: Although a distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most common fractures in the elderly population, epidemiological data are limited. Many studies examine only hospitalized patients, do not analyze time trends, or include only small populations. In this retrospective population-based observational study, routine data on inpatient and outpatient care of persons aged ≥ 60 years insured by a large statutory health insurance in Germany were analyzed from 2014 to 2018. METHODS: DRF were identified by ICD-10 codes. All DRF events of an individual were considered with a corresponding individual washout period. Incidence rates (IR) and time trends were estimated assuming a Poisson distribution per 100,000 person-years, with 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] and age-sex standardization to the German population in 2018. Associations of calendar year, age, sex, and comorbidity with IR were examined using Poisson regression estimating incidence rate ratios (IRR) with CI. RESULTS: The study population consists of 974,332 insured individuals, with 16,557 experiencing one or more DRF events during the observation period. A total of 17,705 DRF events occurred, of which 9961 (56.3%) were hospitalized. Standardized IR were 439 [424-453] (inpatient: 240 [230-251], outpatient: 199 [189-209]) in 2014 and 438 [423-452] (inpatient: 238 [227-249], outpatient: 200 [190-210]) in 2018. Female sex, older age, and comorbidity were associated with higher IR and adjusted Poisson regression showed no significant time trend (IRR overall 0.994 [0.983-1.006]). CONCLUSION: A relevant proportion of DRF were treated in outpatient settings, so both inpatient and outpatient data are necessary for a valid estimate.

Clinical application of instant 3D printed cast versus polymer orthosis in the treatment of colles fracture: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The shortcomings of plaster in water resistance, air permeability, skin comfort, fixed stability and weight of wearing are still to be solved. 3D printed cast can overcome the above shortcomings. At present, there is a relative lack of data on the clinical application of 3D printed cast, probably due to its complexity, relatively long operating time, and high price. We aimed to compare and evaluate the short-term effectiveness, safety and advantages of 3D printed wrist cast versus polymer orthosis in the treatment of Colles fracture. METHODS: Forty patients with Colles fracture in our hospital from June to December 2022 were selected and divided into an observation group (20 patients, treated with instant 3D printed cast) and a control group (20 cases, treated with polymer orthosis). Both groups treated with manual reduction and external fixation. The visual analogue scale (VAS), immobilization effectiveness and satisfaction scores, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, complications and imaging data were collected and compared before immobilization and at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after the fracture. RESULTS: VAS at 2 weeks after the fracture was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group ( P < 0.05). The immobilization effectiveness and satisfaction scores at 6 weeks after the fracture were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (all P < 0.05). The DASH scores at 2 and 6 weeks after the fracture were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (all P < 0.05). There wasn't rupture of the printed cast or orthosis in both groups. There were 2 cases of skin irritation in the control group, and no skin irritation occurred in the observation group. The palmar tilt angle and ulnar inclination angle at 2 weeks and 12 weeks after the fracture were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both instant 3D printed cast and polymer orthosis are effective in the treatment of Colles fracture. But instant 3D printed cast is better than polymer orthosis in areas of good clinical and imaging performance, and high patient satisfaction and comfort.

Impact of early rehabilitation therapy on functional outcomes in patients post distal radius fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy of early rehabilitation on patients who have undergone surgery for distal radius fractures (DRFs) with palmar plating, focusing on multiple outcome measures including upper limb function, wrist function, back extension mobility, pain levels, and complications. METHODS: A rigorous search strategy adhering to the PRISMA guidelines was employed across four major databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were included based on stringent criteria, and data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was conducted employing both fixed-effect and random-effects models as dictated by heterogeneity, assessed by the I2 statistic and chi-square tests. A total of 7 studies, encompassing diverse demographic groups and timelines, were included for the final analysis. RESULTS: The meta-analysis disclosed that early rehabilitation yielded a statistically significant improvement in upper limb function (SMD -0.27; 95% CI -0.48 to -0.07; P < 0.0001) and back extension mobility (SMD 0.26; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.48; P = 0.021). A notable reduction in pain levels was observed in the early rehabilitation group (SMD -0.28; 95% CI -0.53 to -0.02; P = 0.03). However, there were no significant differences in wrist function (SMD -0.13; 95% CI -0.38 to 0.12; P = 0.36) and complications (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.61 to 1.61; P = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Early rehabilitation post-DRF surgery with palmar plating has been found to be beneficial in enhancing upper limb functionality and back extension mobility, and in reducing pain levels. Nevertheless, no significant impact was observed regarding wrist function and complications.

Appropriateness and Reliability of an Online Artificial Intelligence Platform's Responses to Common Questions Regarding Distal Radius Fractures.

PURPOSE: Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is a novel artificial intelligence chatbot that is changing the way humans gather information online. The purpose of this study was to investigate ChatGPT's ability to appropriately and reliably answer common questions regarding distal radius fractures. METHODS: Thirty common questions regarding distal radius fractures were presented in an identical manner to the online ChatGPT-3.5 interface three separate times, yielding 90 unique responses because ChatGPT produces an original answer with each query. All responses were graded as "appropriate," "appropriate but incomplete," or "inappropriate" by a consensus discussion among three hand surgeon reviewers. The questions were additionally subcategorized into one of four domains based on Bloom's cognitive learning taxonomy, and descriptive statistics were reported. RESULTS: Seventy of the 90 total responses (78%) produced by ChatGPT were "appropriate," and 29 of the 30 questions (97%) had at least one response considered appropriate (of the three possible). However, only 17 of the 30 questions (57%) were answered appropriately on all three iterations. The test-retest reliability of ChatGPT was poor with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.12. Finally, ChatGPT performed best answering questions requiring lower-order thinking skills (Bloom's levels 1-3) and less well on level 4 questions. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that although ChatGPT has the capability to answer common questions regarding distal radius fractures, caution should be taken before implementing its use, given ChatGPT's inconsistency in providing a complete and accurate response to the same question every time. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As the popularity and technology of ChatGPT continue to grow, it is important to understand the potential and limitations of this platform to determine how it may be best implemented to improve patient care.

The Association Between Social Determinants of Health and Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if adverse social determinants of health (SDOH) are associated with differential complication rates following surgical fixation of distal radius fractures and assess which SDOH domain (economic, educational, social, health care, or environmental) is most associated with postoperative complications. METHODS: Using a national administrative claims database, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing open treatment for an isolated distal radius fracture between 2010 and 2020. Patients were stratified based on the presence/absence of at least one SDOH code and propensity score matched to create two cohorts balanced by age, sex (male or female), insurance type, and comorbidities. Social determinants of health examined included economic, educational, social, health care, and environmental factors. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the isolated effect of SDOH on 90-day and 1-year complication rates. RESULTS: After propensity matching, 57,025 patients in the adverse SDOH cohort and 57,025 patients in the control cohort were included. Patients facing an adverse SDOH were significantly more likely to experience 90-day complications, including emergency department visits (Odds ratio (OR): 3.18 [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.07-3.29]), infection (OR: 2.37 [95% CI: 2.12-2.66]), wound dehiscence (OR: 2.06 [95% CI: 1.72-2.49]), and 1-year complications, including complex regional pain syndrome (OR: 1.35 [95% CI: 1.15-1.58]), malunion/nonunion (OR: 1.18 [95% CI: 1.08-1.29]), and hardware removal (OR: 1.13 [95% CI: 1.07-1.20]). Additionally, patients facing an adverse SDOH had a significantly increased risk of 90-day complications, regardless of fracture severity, and patients with economic and social challenges had the highest odds of both 90-day and 1-year postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Social determinants of health are associated with increased complications following distal radius fracture fixation, even when controlling for demographic and clinical factors. We recommend routine screening for adverse SDOH and inclusion of SDOH data into health records to not only inform quality improvement initiatives and risk adjustment for outcome-based quality measurements but also to allow providers to begin to discuss and address such barriers during the perioperative period. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis II.

Are Clinical Practice Guidelines Representative of Patients With Distal Radius Fractures? A Review of Patient Demographics and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used to Inform Guidelines.

PURPOSE: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are recommendations developed for broad application to optimize high-quality care and decision-making. The composition of patients and outcome measures used in studies informing CPGs; however, has not been rigorously evaluated. With growing evidence that outcomes in musculoskeletal surgery vary by sociocultural factors, we aimed to: (1) review the linguistic, racial, and ethnic representation of the patients in the studies informing CPGs for distal radius fractures and (2) assess their use of linguistically and culturally adapted patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons website was used to identify relevant studies. Key variables were extracted, including inclusion and exclusion criteria, language of study, patient language and proficiency, patient race and ethnicity, and use of translated or culturally adapted PROMs. If provided, the clinical trial registration page for the study was evaluated. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the frequency of each variable. RESULTS: Fifty-four published texts were evaluated. Participant language was reported in four (7%) of the published texts and six (11%) when including the clinical trial registration information. Of the published texts, one (2%) reported ethnic group/race data and 40 (74%) used PROMs. Of those using PROMs, eight (20%) of 40 reported the use of translated PROMs, and three (8%) of 40 reported the use of culturally adapted PROMs. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of reporting of linguistic, racial, and ethnic data and inconsistent use of PROMs, particularly those that are translated and culturally adapted, in studies included in the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons CPG for distal radius fractures. As sociocultural characteristics and PROMs are associated with outcomes, ensuring they are broadly represented in studies, may improve equity and shared decision-making. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Greater inclusion and reporting of demographic data and PROMs are required in musculoskeletal studies to ensure broad applicability and advance health equity.

A meta-analysis on the diagnostic utility of ultrasound in pediatric distal forearm fractures.

Pediatric distal forearm fractures, comprising 30% of musculoskeletal injuries in children, are conventionally diagnosed using radiography. Ultrasound has emerged as a safer diagnostic tool, eliminating ionizing radiation, enabling bedside examinations with real-time imaging, and proving effective in non-hospital settings. The objective of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound for detecting distal forearm fractures in the pediatric population. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted through a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases until October 1, 2023, following established guidelines. Eligible studies, reporting diagnostic accuracy measures of ultrasound in pediatric patients with distal forearm fractures, were included. Relevant data elements were extracted, and data analysis was performed. The analysis included 14 studies with 1377 patients, revealing pooled sensitivity and specificity of 94.5 (95% CI 92.7-95.9) and 93.5 (95% CI 89.6-96.0), respectively. Considering pre-test probabilities of 25%, 50%, and 75% for pediatric distal forearm fractures, positive post-test probabilities were 83%, 44%, and 98%, while negative post-test probabilities were 2%, 6%, and 15%, respectively. The bivariate model indicated significantly higher diagnostic accuracy in the subgroup with trained ultrasound performers vs. untrained performers (p = 0.03). Furthermore, diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher in the subgroup examining radius fractures vs. ulna fractures (p < 0.001), while no significant differences were observed between 4-view and 6-view ultrasound subgroups or between radiologist ultrasound interpreters and non-radiologist interpreters. This study highlighted ultrasound's reliability in detecting pediatric distal forearm fractures, emphasizing the crucial role of expertise in precisely confirming fractures through ultrasound examinations.

When is it safe to return to driving after distal radius fracture fixation? A prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: After surgical fixation of distal radius fractures, many patients are keen to return to driving. There are however limited guidelines assisting surgeons. The aims of this study were to determine when patients could return to driving safely after distal radius fracture fixation and determine the clinical parameters (range of motion and grip strength) that patients needed to achieve before return to safe driving could be advised. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective grant-funded clinical study was conducted. Patients above the age of 21 years who underwent surgical fixation with a volar plate, possessed a class 3 standard motorcar license, and were regular drivers were recruited in a single institution from 2017 to 2019. A hand surgeon and an occupational therapist who sees routine hand therapy cases, assessed the patients at regular intervals from 2 to 12-weeks post-surgery. Clinical parameters of pain, wrist range of motion and grip strength were measured. Patients underwent off and on-road driving assessments. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients were recruited, with 21 successfully completing the driving assessment. Median time post-surgery to passing the driving test was 6 and 8-weeks for off and on-road assessments respectively. Pain score was observed to decrease over time, with a significant decrease from week 2 to week 4. Range of motion improved over time, with maximal improvement between 2 to 4-weeks post-surgery. When compared with the unaffected wrist, the difference in pronation, supination and radial deviation in the affected hand was consistently no longer statistically significant 4 to 6-weeks post-surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients with isolated surgically treated distal radius fractures can be recommended for a driving assessment as early as 4-6 weeks post-surgery if pain control is adequate, and clinical parameters for pronation and supination are met.

Considering occupational performance during recovery of distal radius fracture: A scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most common upper extremity fractures treated by hand therapists and can lead to chronic physical impairment and reduced occupational performance. This scoping review aimed to reveal what is currently known about occupational performance following DRF and to explore if and how occupational performance is defined and considered in the research. METHODS: This review was guided by the PRISMA-Scoping review and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines. Relevant databases were searched, and studies that addressed occupation performance in adult participants following DRF were included. The findings were summarised according to the components of occupational performance (person, occupation, and environment), and quality was measured using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: Forty-three articles met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. All of the studies discussed at least two components of occupational performance, while 25 recognised all three. The consideration of occupational performance was dominated by biomechanical issues associated with the person component (i.e. range of motion, strength). There was some acknowledgement of the psychosocial aspects of the person and, to a lesser extent, the environment, as well as the impact of both on return to occupational performance. CONCLUSION: Despite occupational performance being at the core of occupational therapy theory, its consideration within the context of research on DRF appears to be focussed on the person component of occupational performance and on biomechanical issues. Further research is recommended to determine how much this reflects current clinical practice and if a more comprehensive consideration of occupational performance will improve rates of recovery following DRF. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: As part of the protocol development for this review, consumers and stakeholders were consulted. They provided feedback on clarity and importance of the research questions. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: A distal radius fracture happens when you break the bone on the thumb side of your wrist. This type of injury often occurs when you fall and land on an outstretched hand. It is one of the more common injuries that hand therapists see in their practice. For some people, recovering from this fracture can take a long time and come with a lot of pain, difficulty moving, and emotional stress. These problems can make it hard to do everyday things like driving, cooking, or getting dressed. It can also affect both paid and unpaid work as well as leisure and social activities, making life more difficult for everyone involved. The findings from this review suggest that the current research usually focuses on how the body physically heals from this type of injury, but it does not pay as much attention to the emotional and social impact on healing. Also, it does not always discuss the activities that are important to the person, or the environment where they live, work, and socialise. This may show a gap in the research regarding our full comprehension of recovery from distal radius fractures. Taking a broader view and approach to recovery, considering a person's emotions, social life, environment, and daily activities, could help people recover fully and get back to their previous life routines and roles after this type of injury.

Modified Kapandji technique in pediatric displaced distal radius fractures: results in 195 patients.

PURPOSE: The modified Kapandji technique has been proposed for fracture reduction in pediatric displaced distal radius fractures (DDRFs), but evidence is sparse. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our outcomes and complications, critically and systematically, when performing the modified Kapandji technique in pediatric DDRFs. Using this technique since 2011, we asked: (1) What is the quality of fracture reduction using this technique? (2) How stable is fracture alignment with this technique? (3) What are the postoperative complications and complication rates? METHODS: Retrospective observational study of 195 pediatric patients treated with the modified Kapandji technique. Quality of fracture reduction, fixation type (intrafocal, combined, or extrafocal), and coronal/sagittal angulation were recorded at surgery and healing. Perioperative complications were graded. Patients were stratified by fracture (metaphyseal or Salter-Harris) and fixation type, as well as age (≤ 6 years; 6 to 10 years; > 10 years). RESULTS: Fracture reduction was 'good' to 'anatomical' in 85% of patients. 'Anatomical' fracture reduction was less frequent in metaphyseal fractures (21% vs. 51%; p < .001). Mean angulation change was higher in metaphyseal fractures in both the sagittal (p = .011) and coronal (p = .021) planes. Metaphyseal fractures showed a higher mean change in sagittal angulation during fracture healing for the 'intrafocal' group. We observed a 15% overall complication rate with 1% being modified Sink Grade 3. CONCLUSION: The modified Kapandji technique for pediatric DDRFs is a safe and effective treatment option. Metaphyseal fractures that do not involve the physis should be treated with extrafocal or combined wire fixation. Complications that require additional surgical treatment are rare. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level of evidence IV.

Is reduction necessary in overriding metaphyseal distal radius fractures in children under 11 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the necessity of reduction in the treatment of overriding metaphyseal distal radius fractures (DRF) in children under 11 years. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to retrieve studies published from inception to 2023. Two reviewers independently screened for studies with observational or randomized control design comparing two treatments for overriding metaphyseal DRF in patients under 11 years: simple casting without reduction (SC group) versus closed reduction plus casting or pin fixation (CRC/F group); with varying outcomes reported (CRD471761). The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. RESULTS: Out of 3,024 screened studies, three met the inclusion criteria, 180 children (mean age 7.1 ± 0.9 years) with overriding metaphyseal DRF: SC-group (n = 79) versus CRC/F-group (n = 101). Both treatment groups achieved 100% fracture consolidation without requiring further manipulation. The SC-group showed significantly fewer complications (mean difference [MD] 0.08; 95% CI [0.01, 0.53]; I2 = 22%; P < 0.009) and trends towards better sagittal alignment (MD 5.11; 95% CI [11.92, 1.71]; I2 = 94%; P < 0.14), less reinterventions (MD 0.31; 95% CI [0.01, 8.31]; P < 0.48), and fewer patients with motion limitation at the end of follow-up (MD 0.23; 95% CI [0.03,  1.98]; P < 0.18), although these findings were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a limited number of studies comparing SC versus CRC/F in overriding DRF in children under 11 years, this study suggests that anatomical reduction is not necessary. Treating these fractures with SC, even when presenting with an overriding position, leads to reduced complications, shows a trend towards fewer reinterventions, improved sagittal alignment, and less limitation in patient motion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Systematic review of Level-III studies.

Efficacy of cast immobilization versus surgical treatment for distal radius fractures in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This articl e includes high-quality randomized controlled trials in recent years and updates the past meta-analysis. It has been proved that cast immobilization can achieve similar functional results, reduce economic burden in the long-term compared with surgery, and provide a basis for doctors to make treatment choices. PURPOSE: The efficacy of conservative and surgical treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in adults is still controversial. Recently, some high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the efficacy of both treatments. We hypothesized that treatment of DRFs with closed reduction and cast immobilization would achieve functional outcomes similar to surgery. METHODS: This study is a systematic review and summary of RCTs comparing conservative and surgical management of DRFs from 2005 to March 2022. Patients were evaluated for functional and imaging outcomes and complications. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies [1-11] included 1775 cases of DRFs. At 1-year follow-up, the cast group had lower mean differences (MDs) in DASH scores than the surgery group by - 2.55 (95% CI = - 5.02 to - 0.09, P = 0.04); with an MD of 1.63 (95% CI = 1.08-2.45, P = 0.02), while the surgery group had a lesser complication rate than the cast group. CONCLUSIONS: At 1-year follow-up, the lower DASH scores of the cast group showed advantages of this treatment, but the complication rate was higher than that of the surgery group. There was no massive distinction in other scoring methods.

Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and plane radiographs of radial fractures as a basis for radiographical measurements.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether radiological measurements of radial fracture position made in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) projection images are comparable to those made on traditional radiographs and could potentially substitute them. METHODS: Sixteen patients with fractures of the distal radius referred for radiographs were recruited for an additional CBCT scan which was performed immediately afterwards. Projection images and volumetric data were saved from the CBCT scans. Measurements of ulnar variance, radial inclination and volar tilt were made from all three sets of images. RESULTS: Agreement of projection image based measurements with radiographs was nearly as good as as the agreement of cross sectional image measurements with radiographs. The average difference between the results for projection images and radiographs were -1.2 mm (SD 1.9 mm), for radial inclination 0.7° (SD 2.9°) and for volar tilt 1.9° (SD 5.6°). CONCLUSION: Differences between radiological measurements between the modalities studied are small and projection images could be used for the assessment of distal radial fractures.

Intramedullary Kirschner wire fixation of displaced distal forearm fractures in children.

AIM OF THE WORK: This study was designed to highlight internal fixation by intramedullary K-wires for displaced distal forearm fractures among children and analyze the results of this technique. We hypothesize that physis-sparing intramedullary fixation prevents displacement with a lower complication rate. METHODS: This prospective case series involving 47 patients was conducted between February 2018 and December 2019. All patients with open physis presented with recent displaced distal forearm fractures were included, and all of them were treated with an intramedullary k-wire fixation for both bones with the assessment of the union rate, union time, suspected complication, radiographic evaluation, and functional outcome. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 31 boys (66%) and 16 girls (34%). The mean age of the patients was 10.68 ± 2.728 years (range, 7-15 years). All fractures were united in a median of 6 weeks (range, 4-8 weeks), The functional outcome after 12 months was normal in 42 patients (89.4%), whereas, in five patients (10.6%), the functional parameters were minimally reduced. The median preoperative angulation improved from 36° (range, 24°-52°) preoperatively to 4° (range, 0°-10°) on immediate postoperative radiographs. After 12 months, the median angulation was 2° (range, 0°-7°) (p < 0.001). The angulation of the distal radius immediately after surgery and at the final follow-up was statistically correlated with the functional outcome (p < 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: This technique provides a good result with less susceptibility to re-displacement and low complication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Outcomes of Distal Radius Fractures in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

PURPOSE: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are one of the most common conditions that musculoskeletal providers treat. As the frequency of solid organ transplants (SOT) increases, these providers are often called upon to manage DRFs in these patients. These patients are at increased risk for osteopenia and osteoporosis, given the altered bone metabolism after SOT and frequent use of glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive medications. This study aimed to examine both surgical and nonsurgical treatment outcomes of DRFs in the SOT population and the prevalence of decreased bone mineral density. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients treated at a single institution who had previously undergone SOT and subsequently sustained DRF between 2013 and 2022 was completed. Patients were excluded for incomplete documentation and treatment initiation at an outside institution. Demographic variables, clinical outcomes, organ transplant, steroid use, and second metacarpal cortical percentage were collected for both groups. A telephone survey with the QuickDASH questionnaire was conducted for all available patients. RESULTS: A total of 34 DRFs in 33 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 15 fractures in 14 patients underwent surgical intervention, and 19 fractures in 19 patients were managed nonsurgically. The following three adverse events were observed in the patients managed operatively: hardware failure, postoperative carpal tunnel syndrome, and tendon irritation. No reported treatment complications were recorded in the patients managed nonsurgically. Of the 33 included patients, 32 had radiographic evidence of decreased bone mineral density and five were receiving treatment for osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: Management of DRFs in SOT patients is challenging, given their increased medical complexity. Decreased bone mineral density was nearly universal and undertreated in this patient population. Most of these patients in both groups had good or excellent functional outcomes with both surgical and nonsurgical management. Additionally, surgery was well tolerated with no reported anesthesia complications, wound-healing issues, or infections. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Catastrophic Health Expenditures Associated With Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures.

PURPOSE: Distal radius fracture is one of the most common upper-extremity traumatic injuries. These injuries result in time off work and potential financial consequences for patients. Therefore, we aimed to understand the risk of catastrophic health expenditures (CHEs) after open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures and examine the association between patient characteristics and the risk of CHE. METHODS: We used data from patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of a distal radius fracture from a large, urban, level I trauma center (2018-2020). The risk of CHE was defined as out-of-pocket expenses of ≥40% of postsubsistence income. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the impact of age, sex, race, and insurance status on the risk of CHE. RESULTS: In our cohort of 394 patients, 121 patients (30.7%) were at risk of CHE after their distal radius fracture. After controlling for patient characteristics and insurance status, patients aged 26-34 years were 5.7 times more likely to be at risk of CHE (odds ratio, 5.73; 95% CI, 1.81-18.13) than patients aged ≥65 years. Patients who were uninsured were six times more likely to be at risk of CHE than patients with employer-sponsored health insurance (odds ratio, 6.02; 95% CI, 1.94-18.66). Lastly, non-White patients were at a higher risk of CHE (odds ratio, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.70-7.79) than White patients. CONCLUSIONS: Distal radius fractures are unexpected and place patients at risk of financial harm, with one in three patients at risk of CHEs. Policies aimed at minimizing cost-sharing after traumatic injury may help alleviate the financial consequences of health care delivery and reduce disparities. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Decision Analysis II.

Do Surgeons Accurately Predict Level of Activity in Patients With Distal Radius Fractures?

PURPOSE: One factor influencing the management of distal radius fractures is the functional status of the patient. The purpose of this study was to assess the agreement between patient and surgeon assessments of patient activity level in patients sustaining a distal radius fracture. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients were included, with a mean age of 58.5 years (range, 18-92 years). Patients completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, a validated survey that provides a score of low, moderate, or high activity levels. Treating surgeons provided an independent assessment using the same scale. Agreement between patient and surgeon assessments was evaluated using a weighted kappa-statistic, with a secondary analysis using logistic regression models to assess odds of surgical treatment. RESULTS: Interrater agreement between surgeons and patients demonstrated only "fair" agreement, with a kappa-statistic of 0.33. Predictive models showed that surgeons accurately identified 73% of "high activity" patients but failed to correctly identify more than 41% of patients rated as "moderate activity" or "low activity." There was a correlation between surgical intervention and increasing physical activity status as assessed by the surgeon; however, the magnitude of this effect was unclear (odds ratio, 2.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-4.30). This relationship was no longer significant after adjusting for age, Charlson comorbidity index, and fracture class. There was no association between surgical intervention and physical activity status when using the status provided by the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon assessment of patient activity level does not have strong agreement with patients' independent assessment. Surgeons are most accurate at identifying "high activity level" patients but lack the ability to identify "moderate activity level" or "low activity level" patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Recognition of surgeon assessment of patient activity level as flawed can stimulate improved dialog between patients and physicians, ultimately improving the shared decision-making process.

Disparities in Treatment of Closed Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged 18-64 Years and ≥65 Years by Insurance Type.

PURPOSE: Type of and time to definitive treatment for distal radius fractures can influence the outcomes. The impact of social determinants of health (eg, insurance type) on distal radius fracture care remains unknown despite having health equity implications. Thus, we evaluate the association between insurance type and rate of surgery, the time to surgery, and the complication rate for distal radius fractures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the PearlDiver Database. We identified adults with closed distal radius fractures. Patients were divided into subgroups by age (18-64 years, 65+ years) and further stratified on the basis of the insurance type (Medicare Advantage, Medicaid-managed care, and commercial). The primary outcome was the rate of surgical fixation. Secondary outcomes included the time to surgery and 12-month complication rates. Logistic regression modeling was used to calculate the odds ratios for each outcome, adjusting for age, sex, geographic region, and comorbidities. RESULTS: In patients aged ≥65 years, a lower proportion of Medicaid patients underwent surgery within 21 days of diagnosis compared with Medicare or commercially insured patients (12.1% vs 15.9% or 17.5%, respectively). Complication rates did not differ between Medicaid and other insurance types. In patients aged <65 years, fewer Medicaid patients underwent surgery compared with commercially insured patients (16.2% vs 21.1%). However, in this younger group, Medicaid patients had higher adjusted odds of malunion/nonunion (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.39 [95% CI, 1.31-1.47]) and subsequent repair (aOR = 1.38 [95% CI, 1.25-1.53]). DISCUSSION: Although older Medicaid patients experienced lower surgical rates, this may not lead to differential clinical outcomes. However, Medicaid patients aged <65 years experienced lower surgical rates that correlated with the increased rates of malunion or nonunion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In younger patients with a closed distal radius fracture and Medicaid insurance, system and patient-directed efforts should be considered to address delayed time to surgery and a higher odds for malunion/nonunion.

Using MaxDiff Analysis to Elicit Patients' Treatment Preferences for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged 60 Years and Older.

PURPOSE: The objective of our study was to determine how the attributes of surgical and nonsurgical distal radius fracture (DRF) treatments affect patient treatment preferences. METHODS: Two hundred fifty patients aged 60 years and older were contacted from a single-hand surgeon's practice, and 172 chose to participate. We built a series of best-worst scaling experiments for the MaxDiff analysis to determine the relative importance of treatment attributes. Hierarchical Bayes analysis was used to generate individual-level item scores (ISs) for each attribute that together have a total sum of 100. RESULTS: One hundred general hand clinic patients without a history of a DRF and 43 patients with a history of a DRF completed the survey. For the general hand clinic patients, the most important attributes to avoid when choosing a DRF treatment (in descending order) were the longer time to full recovery (IS, 24.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.4-26.3), longer time spent in a cast (IS, 22.8; 95% CI, 21.5-24.2), and higher complication rates (IS, 18.4; 95% CI, 16.9-19.8). Meanwhile, for patients with a history of a DRF, the most important attributes to avoid (in descending order) were a longer time to full recovery (IS, 25.6; 95% CI, 23.3-27.9), longer time spent in a cast (IS, 22.8; 95% CI, 19.9-25.7), and abnormal alignment of the radius on x-ray (IS, 18.3; 95% CI, 15.4-21.3). For both the groups, the least concerning attributes based on the IS were appearance-scar, appearance-bump, and the need for anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Eliciting patient preferences is a vital component of shared decision-making and advancing patient-centered care. As conceptualized in this MaxDiff analysis, when choosing a DRF treatment, patients mostly want to avoid a longer time to full recovery and a longer time in a cast, whereas patients have the least concern about appearance and need for anesthesia. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Eliciting patient preferences is a vital component of shared decision-making. Our results may provide guidance to surgeons in discussions on the relative benefits of surgical and nonsurgical DRF treatments, by quantifying the most and least important factors to patients.

Are Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Distal Radius Fractures Validated for Spanish and Culture? A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used commonly to assess function to direct treatment and evaluate outcomes for patients with distal radius fractures. Most PROMs have been developed and validated in English with minimal report of the demographics of patients studied. The validity of applying these PROMs among Spanish-speaking patients is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality and psychometric properties of Spanish-language adaptations of PROMs for distal radius fractures. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to identify published studies of adaptations of Spanish-language PROMs evaluating patients with distal radius fractures. We evaluated the methodologic quality of the adaptation and validation using Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures, Quality Criteria for Psychometric Properties of Health Status Questionnaire, and the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments Checklist for Cross-Cultural Validity. The level of evidence was evaluated based upon prior methodology. RESULTS: Five instruments reported in eight studies were included: the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand, Upper Limb Functional Index, Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment. The PRWE was the most frequently included PROM. No study followed all six processes for adaptation or assessed all measurement properties. No study demonstrated the completion of more than eight of the 14 aspects of cross-cultural validity. The PRWE had moderate evidence to support half of the domains of measurement properties evaluating the level of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: None of the five instruments identified received a good rating on all three checklists. Only the PWRE demonstrated moderate evidence on half of the measurement domains. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Given the lack of strong evidence to support the quality of these instruments, we recommend adaptation and testing of PROMs for this population before use. Currently, PROMs in Spanish-speaking patients should be used with caution so as not to perpetuate health care disparities.