Intercostal nerve electrodiagnostic testing in rib fractures.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Intercostal nerve injury can occur after rib fractures, resulting in denervation of the abdominal musculature. Loss of innervation to the rectus abdominis and intercostal muscles can cause pain, atrophy, and eventual eventration, which may be an underrecognized and thus undertreated complication of rib fractures. We investigated the clinical utility of intercostal nerve electrodiagnostic testing following rib fractures to diagnose and localize nerve injury at levels T7 and below. METHODS: Five patients with displaced bicortical rib fractures involving the 7th-11th ribs and clinical eventration of the ipsilateral abdominal wall underwent intercostal nerve conduction studies (NCS) and needle electromyography (EMG) on the affected side. EMG of the rectus abdominis and intercostal muscles was performed with ultrasound guidance, and ultrasound measurements of rectus abdominis thickness were obtained to assess for atrophy. RESULTS: Average patient age was 59.4 years and average body mass index (BMI) was 31.5 kg/m2. Intercostal NCS and EMG were able to reliably diagnose and localize intercostal nerve damage after rib fractures. Ultrasound demonstrated an average rectus abdominis transverse cross-sectional thickness of 0.534 cm on the affected side, compared with 1.024 cm on the non-affected side. DISCUSSION: Intercostal electrodiagnostic studies can diagnose and localize intercostal nerve damage after displaced rib fractures. Musculoskeletal ultrasound can be used to diagnose and quantify rectus abdominis atrophy and to accurately and safely guide needle EMG to the intercostal and rectus abdominis muscles.

Pectoralis Muscle Index as Predictor of Outcomes in Patients With Severe Blunt Chest Wall Injury.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcopenia has been shown to portend worse outcomes in injured patients; however, little is known about the impact of thoracic muscle wasting on outcomes of patients with chest wall injury. We hypothesized that reduced pectoralis muscle mass is associated with poor outcomes in patients with severe blunt chest wall injury. METHODS: All patients admitted to the intensive care unit between 2014 and 2019 with blunt chest wall injury requiring mechanical ventilation were retrospectively identified. Blunt chest wall injury was defined as the presence of one or more rib fractures as a result of blunt injury mechanism. Exclusion criteria included lack of admission computed tomography imaging, penetrating trauma, <18 y of age, and primary neurologic injury. Thoracic musculature was assessed by measuring pectoralis muscle cross-sectional area (cm2) that was obtained at the fourth thoracic vertebral level using Slice-O-Matic software. The area was then divided by the patient height in meters2 to calculate pectoralis muscle index (PMI) (cm2/m2). Patients were divided into two groups, 1) the lowest gender-specific quartile of PMI and 2) second-fourth gender-specific PMI quartiles for comparative analysis. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three patients met the inclusion criteria with a median (interquartile range) age 48 y (34-60), body mass index of 30.1 kg/m2 (24.9-34.6), and rib score of 3.0 (2.0-4.0). Seventy-five percent of patients (116/153) were male. Fourteen patients (8%) had prior history of chronic lung disease. Median (IQR) intensive care unit length-of-stay and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) was 18.0 d (13.0-25.0) and 15.0 d (10.0-21.0), respectively. Seventy-three patients (48%) underwent tracheostomy and nine patients (6%) expired during hospitalization. On multivariate linear regression, reduced pectoralis muscle mass was associated with increased MV duration when adjusting for rib score and injury severity score (ß 5.98, 95% confidence interval 1.28-10.68, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced pectoralis muscle mass is associated with increased duration of MV in patients with severe blunt chest wall injury. Knowledge of this can help guide future research and risk stratification of critically ill chest wall injury patients.

Age-Neutral Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures: Breaking the Ageism Barrier.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is associated with lower rates of mortality and fewer complications. This study evaluates whether the decision to undergo SSRF is associated with age, race, ethnicity, and insurance status and assesses associated clinical outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients ≥45 y old with rib fractures who underwent SSRF in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2016 to 2020. Race, ethnicity, and insurance statuses were collected. Age in years was dichotomized into two groups: 45-64 and 65+. Outcomes included ventilator-associated pneumonia, unplanned endotracheal intubation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, in-hospital mortality, failure to rescue (FTR) after major complications, and FTR after respiratory complications. Logistic regression models were fit to evaluate outcomes, controlling for gender, body mass index, Injury Severity Score, flail chest, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and smoking. RESULTS: Two thousand eight hundred thirty-nine patients aged 45-64 and 1828 patients aged 65+ underwent SSRF. No significant difference in clinical outcomes was noted between these groups. Analysis showed that the association of SSRF with ventilator-associated pneumonia, unplanned intubation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, in-hospital mortality, FTR after a major complication, or FTR after a respiratory complication did not vary by age (P > 0.05). Black (odds ratio [OR] 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.77; P < 0.001), Hispanic (OR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.71-0.91; P < 0.001), and Medicaid (OR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.76-0.95; P = 0.005) patients were less likely to receive SSRF. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in clinical outcomes were measured between adults aged 45-64 and ≥65 who underwent SSRF. Older age should not preclude patients from receiving SSRF. Further work is needed to improve underutilization in Black, Hispanic and Medicaid patients.

An ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block with continuous local anaesthetic infusion and epidural analgesia for rib fracture pain.

BACKGROUND: We compared analgesia with an ultrasound (US)-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) to thoracic epidural analgesia (EA) with continuous local anaesthetic infusion in patients with unilateral multiple traumatic rib fractures. EA often carries contraindications in patients with multiple rib fractures (MRFs), whereby having alternative effective methods to treat rib fracture pain remains important to patient care. Thus, we hypothesised that both regional anaesthetic techniques would provide effective pain relief. METHODS: In this study, we included 59 patients with unilateral MRFs and a numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score ≥4 at rest or upon movement. Patients were randomised to receive a US-guided SAPB or continuous infusion EA with 2 mg/mL ropivacaine. Patients were given a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device with intravenous oxycodone boluses for rescue medication. The primary outcome was a change in the NRS score at rest and upon movement from baseline to Day 2 following the block. We also measured the forced expiratory volume in 1 s of expiration (FEV1) and FEV1% at the same time points when NRS was measured. The total consumption of oxycodone with PCA was measured at 24 and 48 h after the block. RESULTS: We detected a significant reduction (≥2) in NRS for both groups; however, EA associated with a greater reduction in NRS upon movement after block initiation. The mean reduction in NRS upon movement within 1 h was 3 (1.8, p < .01) in the SAPB group versus 4.7 (2.4, p < .01) in the EA group. We found no significant difference between groups in pain scores on Days 1 and 2 following the block. In the EA group, FEV1% increase in the first 12 h from baseline. Finally, PCA oxycodone consumption did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: SAPB with continuous local anaesthetic infusion is an effective alternative to treat rib fracture pain when EA is contraindicated. We found that SABP significantly reduces pain in patients with unilateral MRFs, although EA achieves better analgesia over the first 12 h following the block.

Risk factors for delayed hemothorax in patients with rib fracture in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: Although rib fractures are a risk factor, not all rib fracture patients will develop delayed hemothorax. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors which can identify rib fracture patients in the emergency department who may develop delayed hemothorax. METHODS: Adult patients seen in the emergency room between January 2016 and February 2021 with rib fractures caused by blunt chest trauma were included in this retrospective observational study. Patients who underwent chest tube insertion within 2 days and those without follow-up chest radiographs within 2-30 days were excluded. We used a stepwise backward-elimination multivariable logistic regression model for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included in this study. The number of total (P < 0.001), lateral (P = 0.019), and displaced (P < 0.001) rib fractures were significantly associated with delayed hemothorax. Lung contusions (P = 0.002), and initial minimal hemothorax (P < 0.001) and pneumothorax (P < 0.001) were more frequently associated with delayed hemothorax. Age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.06, P = 0.022), mechanical ventilator use (aOR 9.67, 95% CI 1.01-92.75, P = 0.049), initial hemothorax (aOR 2.21, 95% CI 1.05-4.65, P = 0.037) and pneumothorax (aOR 2.99, 95% CI 1.36-6.54, P = 0.006), and displaced rib fractures (aOR 3.51, 95% CI 1.64-7.53, P = 0.001) were independently associated with delayed hemothorax. CONCLUSIONS: Age, mechanical ventilation, initial hemo- or pneumothorax, and displaced rib fractures were risk factors for delayed hemothorax. Patients with these risk factors, and especially those with ≥2 displaced rib fractures, require close chest radiography follow-up of 2-30 days after the initial trauma.

Analgesia for rib fractures: a narrative review.

PURPOSE: Rib fracture(s) is a common and painful injury often associated with significant morbidity (e.g., respiratory complications) and high mortality rates, especially in the elderly. Risk stratification and prompt implementation of analgesic pathways using a multimodal analgesia approach comprise a primary endpoint of care to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with rib fractures. This narrative review aims to describe the most recent evidence and care pathways currently available, including risk stratification tools and pharmacologic and regional analgesic blocks frequently used as part of the broadly recommended multimodal analgesic approach. SOURCE: Available literature was searched using PubMed and Embase databases for each topic addressed herein and reviewed by content experts. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Four risk stratification tools were identified, with the Study of the Management of Blunt Chest Wall Trauma score as most predictive. Current evidence on pharmacologic (i.e., acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, gabapentinoids, ketamine, lidocaine, and dexmedetomidine) and regional analgesia (i.e., thoracic epidural analgesia, thoracic paravertebral block, erector spinae plane block, and serratus anterior plane block) techniques was reviewed, as was the pathophysiology of rib fracture(s) and its associated complications, including the development of chronic pain and disabilities. CONCLUSION: Rib fracture(s) continues to be a serious diagnosis, with high rates of mortality, development of chronic pain, and disability. A multidisciplinary approach to management, combined with appropriate analgesia and adherence to care bundles/protocols, has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality. Most of the risk-stratifying care pathways identified perform poorly in predicting mortality and complications after rib fracture(s).

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les fractures des côtes sont des blessures courantes et douloureuses souvent associées à une morbidité importante (p. ex., complications respiratoires) et à des taux de mortalité élevés, surtout chez les personnes âgées. La stratification des risques et la mise en œuvre rapide de voies analgésiques à l'aide d'une approche d'analgésie multimodale constituent un critère d'évaluation principal des soins visant à réduire la morbidité et la mortalité associées aux fractures des côtes. Ce compte rendu narratif a pour objectif de décrire les données probantes les plus récentes et les parcours de soins actuellement disponibles, y compris les outils de stratification des risques et les blocs analgésiques pharmacologiques et régionaux fréquemment utilisés dans le cadre de l'approche analgésique multimodale largement recommandée. SOURCES: La littérature disponible a été recherchée à l'aide des bases de données PubMed et Embase pour chaque sujet abordé dans le présent compte rendu et examinée par des expert·es en contenu. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Quatre outils de stratification des risques ont été identifiés, le score de l'Étude de la prise en charge des traumatismes contondants de la paroi thoracique (Study of the Management of Blunt Chest Wall Trauma) étant le plus prédictif. Les données probantes actuelles sur les techniques d'analgésie pharmacologiques (c.-à-d. acétaminophène, anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens, gabapentinoïdes, kétamine, lidocaïne et dexmédétomidine) et d'analgésie régionale (c.-à-d. analgésie péridurale thoracique, bloc paravertébral thoracique, bloc du plan des muscles érecteurs du rachis et bloc du plan du muscle grand dentelé) ont été examinées, de même que la physiopathologie de la ou des fractures des côtes et de leurs complications associées, y compris l'apparition de douleurs chroniques et d'incapacités. CONCLUSION: Les fractures des côtes continuent d'être un diagnostic grave, avec des taux élevés de mortalité, de développement de douleurs chroniques et d'invalidité. Il a été démontré qu'une approche multidisciplinaire de la prise en charge, combinée à une analgésie appropriée et à l'adhésion aux ensembles et protocoles de soins, réduit la morbidité et la mortalité. La plupart des parcours de soins de stratification des risques identifiés sont peu performants pour prédire la mortalité et les complications après une ou plusieurs fractures de côtes.

MRI in suspected chest wall fractures: diagnostic value in work-related chest blunt trauma.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and analyze MRI findings in suspected early fractures of the chest (ribs and sternum) and assess if this technique can add value in occupational medicine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we reviewed 112 consecutive patients with work-related mild closed chest trauma who underwent early thoracic MRI, when there was not a clear fracture on radiograph or when the symptoms were intense and not explained by radiographic findings. MRI was evaluated by two experienced radiologists independently. The number and location of fractures and extraosseous findings were recorded. A multivariate analysis was performed to correlate the fracture characteristics and time to RTW (return-to-work). Interobserver agreement and image quality were assessed. RESULTS: 100 patients (82 men, mean age 46 years, range 22-64 years) were included. MRI revealed thoracic wall injuries in 88%: rib and/or sternal fractures in 86% and muscle contusion in the remaining patients. Most patients had multiple ribs fractured, mostly at the chondrocostal junction (n=38). The interobserver agreement was excellent, with minor discrepancies in the total number of ribs fractured. The mean time to return-to-work was 41 days, with statistically significant correlation with the number of fractures. Time to return-to-work increased in displaced fractures, sternal fractures, extraosseous complications, and with age. CONCLUSION: Early MRI after work-related chest trauma identifies the source of pain in most patients, mainly radiographically occult rib fractures. In some cases, MRI may also provide prognostic information about return-to-work.

Performance of thoracic ultrasonography compared with chest radiography for the detection of rib fractures using computed tomography as a reference standard.

OBJECTIVE: Although there is growing evidence that ultrasonography is superior to X-ray for rib fractures' detection, X-ray is still indicated as the most appropriate method. This has partially been attributed to a lack of studies using an appropriate reference modality. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and X-ray in the detection of rib fractures, considering CT as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within a 2.5-year period, all consecutive patients with clinically suspected rib fracture(s) following blunt chest trauma and available posteroanterior/anteroposterior X-ray and thoracic CT were prospectively studied and planned to undergo thoracic ultrasonography, by a single operator. All imaging examinations were evaluated for cortical rib fracture(s), and their location was recorded. The cartilaginous rib portions were not assessed. CTs and X-rays were evaluated retrospectively. Concomitant thoracic/extra-thoracic injuries were assessed on CT. Comparisons were performed with the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (32 males, 27 females; mean age, 53.1 ± 16.6 years) were included. CT, ultrasonography, and X-ray (40 posteroanterior/19 anteroposterior views) diagnosed 136/122/42 rib fractures in 56/54/27 patients, respectively. Ultrasonography and X-ray had sensitivity of 100%/40% and specificity of 89.7%/30.9% for rib fractures' detection. Ultrasound accuracy was 94.9% compared to 35.4% for X-rays (P < .001) in detecting individual rib fractures. Most fractures involved the 4th-9th ribs. Upper rib fractures were most commonly overlooked on ultrasonography. Thoracic cage/spine fractures and haemothorax represented the most common concomitant injuries. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography appeared to be superior to X-ray for the detection of rib fractures with regard to a reference CT.

Symptomatic rib fracture nonunion: a systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Rib fractures commonly occur in trauma patients with varying presentations. Though the literature in recent years has moved toward favoring more early intervention of acute rib fractures, little has been reported on the matter of surgical fixation for symptomatic rib fracture nonunions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a review of PubMed and Cochrane databases for articles published since 2000. Inclusion criteria were studies with greater than six months of follow-up, while case studies were excluded. A thorough analysis was performed on patient outcomes, complications reported, operative techniques utilized, and fixation systems used, among other parameters reported by the articles. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-nine studies resulted from our review, and a total of nine studies met our inclusion criteria with a combined total of 182 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for symptomatic rib fracture nonunions. All studies reported a significant reduction of pain with increased satisfaction in the majority of patients. There were a total of 71 postoperative complications, the most common of which included surgical site infections, hardware failure, and hematoma. The most serious complications were insulting injury to the lung parenchyma or pleura; however, these were extremely rare based off the current literature. The use of bone grafting was common with eight of the nine studies mentioning the benefits of grafting. CONCLUSION: Surgical stabilization of rib fracture nonunions appears to be an appropriate treatment alternative, and various techniques and approaches may be used with similar success. Further studies with higher level of evidence are recommended on the subject.

The effect of thoracic trauma scoring system in thoracic trauma patients with rib fracture.

OBJECTIVE: Rib fractures are common in thoracic trauma patients. There are various factors, including flail chest, pulmonary contusion, and accompanying conditions, affecting morbidity and mortality. The study aimed to identify high-risk patients for morbidity and mortality with a scoring system that the authors created. METHODS: Cases over the age of 18 admitted due to trauma and diagnosed with rib fractures between 1 January 2019 and 1 March 2023, were included. Trauma scores were determined by applying the new trauma scoring system. Trauma scores and other variables regarding morbidity and mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1023 cases were included in the study. The total trauma scores were higher in bilateral and multiple fractures. In those without respiratory failure, the total score was statistically significantly lower than in the groups with respiratory failure. The total score was significantly higher in those who needed surgery, those who were hospitalized, and those who needed intensive care compared to the non-surgical groups. However, there was no correlation between intensive care unit stay and total score. Trauma mechanism, presence of additional extrathoracic pathology, and thoracic trauma-age score were independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that the number of rib fractures and the presence of pulmonary contusion did not have an effect on mortality and morbidity. The presence of extrathoracic pathology and age significantly affect survival.

Early Repair of Rib Fractures Is Associated with Superior Length of Stay and Total Hospital Cost: A Propensity Matched Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

Background and Objectives: Previous studies have suggested that early scheduling of the surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is associated with superior outcomes. It is unclear if these data are reproducible at other institutions. We hypothesized that early SSRF would be associated with decreased morbidity, length of stay, and total charges. Materials and Methods: Adult patients who underwent SSRF for multiple rib fractures or flail chest were identified in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) by ICD-10 code from the fourth quarter of 2015 to 2016. Patients were excluded for traumatic brain injury and missing study variables. Procedures occurring after hospital day 10 were excluded to remove possible confounding. Early fixation was defined as procedures which occurred on hospital day 0 or 1, and late fixation was defined as procedures which occurred on hospital days 2 through 10. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of death, pneumonia, tracheostomy, or discharge to a short-term hospital, as determined by NIS coding. Secondary outcomes were length of hospitalization (LOS) and total cost. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum testing were performed to determine differences in outcomes between the groups. One-to-one propensity matching was performed using covariates known to affect the outcome of rib fractures. Stuart-Maxwell marginal homogeneity and Wilcoxon signed rank matched pair testing was performed on the propensity-matched cohort. Results: Of the 474 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 148 (31.2%) received early repair and 326 (68.8%) received late repair. In unmatched analysis, the composite adverse outcome was lower among early fixation (16.2% vs. 40.2%, p < 0.001), total hospital cost was less (USD114k vs. USD215k, p < 0.001), and length of stay was shorter (6 days vs. 12 days) among early SSRF patients. Propensity matching identified 131 matched pairs of early and late SSRF. Composite adverse outcomes were less common among early SSRF (18.3% vs. 32.8%, p = 0.011). The LOS was shorter among early SSRF (6 days vs. 10 days, p < 0.001), and total hospital cost was also lower among early SSRF patients (USD118k vs. USD183k late, p = 0.001). Conclusion: In a large administrative database, early SSRF was associated with reduced adverse outcomes, as well as improved hospital length of stay and total cost. These data corroborate other research and suggest that early SSRF is preferred. Studies of outcomes after SSRF should stratify analyses by timing of procedure.

Near-maximum rib dose is the most relevant risk factor for ipsilateral spontaneous rib fracture: a dosimetric analysis of breast cancer patients after radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Spontaneous rib fracture (SRF) is a common late complication in treated breast cancer patients. This study evaluated the incidence and risk factors of ipsilateral SRF after radiotherapy (RT) in breast cancer patients. In addition, we identified dosimetric parameters that were significantly associated with ipsilateral SRF. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 2204 patients with breast cancer who underwent RT between 2014 and 2016, and were followed up with bone scans. We evaluated clinical risk factors for ipsilateral SRF. Dose-volume histogram analysis was also performed for patients (n = 538) whose dosimetric data were available. All ipsilateral ribs were manually delineated, and dosimetric parameters of the ribs were converted into the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2). RESULTS: Most of the patients with SRF (87.3%) were asymptomatic, and the remaining symptomatic patients complained of mild tenderness or chest wall discomfort; these symptoms all resolved within 6 months without any treatment. Ipsilateral SRF occurred in 14.5% of patients 3 years after RT. The median time to develop ipsilateral SRF was 15 months. In dosimetric analysis, near-maximum rib dose (D2cc) best predicted ipsilateral SRF. The cut-off value of D2cc was EQD2 52 Gy, as determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. In multivariate analysis including dosimetric variables, D2cc EQD2 ≥ 52 Gy was the only significant risk factor for ipsilateral SRF. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrated that near-maximum rib dose was the best dosimetric parameter to predict ipsilateral SRF in RT-treated breast cancer patients. In addition, our results suggest that patients who received RT with exceeding rib dose cut-off value and had ipsilateral SRF on bone scan be recommended routine follow-up without additional imaging tests.

Predictors and characteristics of Rib fracture following SBRT for lung tumors.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasing for primary and secondary lung neoplasms. Despite encouraging results, SBRT is associated with an increased risk of osteoradionecrosis-induced rib fracture. We aimed to (1) evaluate potential clinical, demographic, and procedure-related risk factors for rib fractures and (2) describe the radiographic features of post-SBRT rib fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 106 patients who received SBRT between 2015 and 2018 for a primary or metastatic lung tumor with at least 12 months of follow up. Exclusion criteria were incomplete records, previous ipsilateral thoracic radiation, or relevant prior trauma. Computed tomography (CT) images were reviewed to identify and characterize rib fractures. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was employed to determine clinical, demographic, and procedural risk factors (e.g., age, sex, race, medical comorbidities, dosage, and tumor location). RESULTS: A total of 106 patients with 111 treated tumors met the inclusion criteria, 35 (32%) of whom developed at least one fractured rib (60 total fractured ribs). The highest number of fractured ribs per patient was five. Multivariate regression identified posterolateral tumor location as the only independent risk factor for rib fracture. On CT, fractures showed discontinuity between healing edges in 77% of affected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one third of patients receiving SBRT for lung tumors experienced rib fractures, 34% of whom experienced pain. Many patients developed multiple fractures. Post-SBRT fractures demonstrated a unique discontinuity between the healing edges of the rib, a distinct feature of post-SBRT rib fractures. The only independent predictor of rib fracture was tumor location along the posterolateral chest wall. Given its increasing frequency of use, describing the risk profile of SBRT is vital to ensure patient safety and adequately inform patient expectations.

Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures in Severe Injury Is Not Associated With Worse Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine whether surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is associated with worse outcomes in individuals with multicompartmental injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective trauma registry was performed for adult blunt trauma patients (aged ≥ 18 y) with Injury Severity Score ≥ 15 and radiographic evidence of rib fractures (2015-2020). Individuals without concomitant head, abdomen/pelvis, or lower extremity Abbreviated Injury Scale scores ≥ 3 were excluded. Propensity match on demographic and clinical variables was performed comparing patients treated nonoperatively (NO) to those undergoing SSRF. A chart review was performed for additional data. Primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit LOS, and duration of mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred ninety three patients fit the inclusion criteria (NO = 1,951, SSRF = 42). After matching, there were 98 in the NO group and 42 in the SSRF group. Mean age was 51 y, 61.4% were male, and 71.4% were of White race. Median time to fixation was 5 d. The SSRF group had more severe chest trauma as evidenced by a higher RibScore (3.2 versus 1.7, P < 0.001) and had a longer LOS (18 versus 9 d, P < 0.001), intensive care unit LOS (13 versus 3 d, P = 0.007), and duration of mechanical ventilation (8 versus 2 d, P = 0.013) on univariate analysis. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated no association between SSRF and these short-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite delayed average time to intervention, SSRF in a trauma-patient population with multicompartmental injuries and competing management priorities is not associated with worse short-term outcomes.

Associations Between Psychiatric Diagnoses on Length of Stay and Mortality After Rib Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Concurrent psychiatric diagnoses adversely impact outcomes in surgical patients, but their relationship to patients with rib fracture after trauma is less understood. We hypothesized that psychiatric comorbidity would be associated with increases in hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality risk after rib fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 2017 National Inpatient Sample was queried for adult patients who were admitted with rib fracture after trauma. Mental health disorders were categorized into 34 psychiatric diagnosis groups (PDGs) using clinical classifications software refined for International Classification of Diseases-10. Outcomes of interest were LOS and mortality. Bivariable analysis determined associations between PDGs, patient demographics, hospital characteristics, and outcomes. Logistic regression was performed to identify adjusted effects on mortality, and linear regression was performed to identify effects on LOS. RESULTS: Of 32,801 patients, median age was 61 y (IQR 46-76), and median LOS was 5 d (IQR 3-9). No PDGs were associated with increased odds of mortality. Concurrent diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum (Coeff. 3.5, 95% CI 2.7-4.4, P < 0.001) or trauma- or stressor-related (Coeff. 1.6, 95% CI 0.9-2.5, P < 0.001) disorders demonstrated the greatest association with prolonged LOS. Increased odds of death and prolonged hospital stay were also associated with male sex, non-White patient race, and surgery occurring at urban and public hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric comorbidities are associated with death after rib fracture but are associated with increased LOS. These findings may help promote multidisciplinary patient management in trauma.

Convolutional neural network for detecting rib fractures on chest radiographs: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Chest radiography is the standard investigation for identifying rib fractures. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) for detecting rib fractures on chest radiographs is limited by image quality control and multilesion screening. To our knowledge, few studies have developed and verified the performance of an AI model for detecting rib fractures by using multi-center radiographs. And existing studies using chest radiographs for multiple rib fracture detection have used more complex and slower detection algorithms, so we aimed to create a multiple rib fracture detection model by using a convolutional neural network (CNN), based on multi-center and quality-normalised chest radiographs. METHODS: A total of 1080 radiographs with rib fractures were obtained and randomly divided into the training set (918 radiographs, 85%) and the testing set (162 radiographs, 15%). An object detection CNN, You Only Look Once v3 (YOLOv3), was adopted to build the detection model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and free-response ROC (FROC) were used to evaluate the model's performance. A joint testing group of 162 radiographs with rib fractures and 233 radiographs without rib fractures was used as the internal testing set. Furthermore, an additional 201 radiographs, 121 with rib fractures and 80 without rib fractures, were independently validated to compare the CNN model performance with the diagnostic efficiency of radiologists. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the model in the training and testing sets was 92.0% and 91.1%, respectively, and the precision was 68.0% and 81.6%, respectively. FROC in the testing set showed that the sensitivity for whole-lesion detection reached 91.3% when the false-positive of each case was 0.56. In the joint testing group, the case-level accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve were 85.1%, 93.2%, 79.4%, and 0.92, respectively. At the fracture level and the case level in the independent validation set, the accuracy and sensitivity of the CNN model were always higher or close to radiologists' readings. CONCLUSIONS: The CNN model, based on YOLOv3, was sensitive for detecting rib fractures on chest radiographs and showed great potential in the preliminary screening of rib fractures, which indicated that CNN can help reduce missed diagnoses and relieve radiologists' workload. In this study, we developed and verified the performance of a novel CNN model for rib fracture detection by using radiography.

The value of deep learning-based computer aided diagnostic system in improving diagnostic performance of rib fractures in acute blunt trauma.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the value of a deep learning-based computer-aided diagnostic system (DL-CAD) in improving the diagnostic performance of acute rib fractures in patients with chest trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT images of 214 patients with acute blunt chest trauma were retrospectively analyzed by two interns and two attending radiologists independently firstly and then with the assistance of a DL-CAD one month later, in a blinded and randomized manner. The consensusdiagnosis of fib fracture by another two senior thoracic radiologists was regarded as reference standard. The rib fracture diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, diagnostic confidence and mean reading time with and without DL-CAD were calculated and compared. RESULTS: There were 680 rib fracture lesions confirmed as reference standard among all patients. The diagnostic sensitivity and positive predictive value of interns weresignificantly improved from (68.82%, 84.50%) to (91.76%, 93.17%) with the assistance of DL-CAD, respectively. Diagnostic sensitivity and positive predictive value of attendings aided by DL-CAD (94.56%, 95.67%) or not aided (86.47%, 93.83%), respectively. In addition, when radiologists were assisted by DL-CAD, the mean reading time was significantly reduced, and diagnostic confidence was significantly enhanced. CONCLUSIONS: DL-CAD improves the diagnostic performance of acute rib fracture in chest trauma patients, which increases the diagnostic confidence, sensitivity, and positive predictive value for radiologists. DL-CAD can advance the diagnostic consistency of radiologists with different experiences.

Comparison and verification of two deep learning models for the detection of chest CT rib fractures.

BACKGROUND: A high false-positive rate remains a technical glitch hindering the broad spectrum of application of deep-learning-based diagnostic tools in routine radiological practice from assisting in diagnosing rib fractures. PURPOSE: To examine the performance of two versions of deep-learning-based software tools in aiding radiologists in diagnosing rib fractures on chest computed tomography (CT) images. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 123 patients (708 rib fractures) were included in this retrospective study. Two groups of radiologists with different experience levels retrospectively reviewed images for rib fractures in the concurrent mode aided with RibFrac-High Sensitivity (HS) and RibFrac-High Precision (HP). We compared their diagnostic performance against the reference standard in terms of sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). RESULTS: On a per-patient basis, RibFrac-HS exhibited a higher sensitivity compared with RibFrac-HP (mean difference=0.051, 95% CI=0.012-0.090; P = 0.011), whereas the latter significantly outperformed the former in terms of the PPV (mean difference=0.273, 95% CI=0.238-0.308; P < 0.0001). The use of RibFrac-HP significantly improved the junior and the senior groups' sensitivities respectively by 0.058 (95% CI=0.033-0.083; P < 0.0001) and 0.058 (95% CI=0.034-0.081; P < 0.0001), and decreased the diagnosis time by 206 s (95% CI=191-220; P < 0.0001) and 79 s (95% CI=67-92; P < 0.0001), respectively, when compared to no software assistance. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and efficiency of radiologists in identifying rib fractures can be improved by using RibFrac-HS and/or RibFrac-HP. With an added module for false-positive suppression, RibFrac-HP maintains the sensitivity and increases the PPV in fracture detection compared to Rib-Frac-HS.

Characteristics of rib fracture patients who require chest computed tomography in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: The disadvantages and complications of computed tomography (CT) can be minimized if CT is performed in rib fracture patients with high probability of intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries and CT is omitted in rib fracture patients with low probability of intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the factors that can identify patients with rib fractures with intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries in the emergency department among patients with rib fracture. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with rib fracture on chest radiography prior to chest CT due to blunt chest trauma in the emergency department who underwent chest CT from January 2016 to February 2021. The primary outcomes were intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries that could be identified on a chest CT. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Among the characteristics of rib fractures, the number of rib fractures was greater (5.0 [3.0-7.0] vs. 2.0 [1.0-3.0], p < 0.001), bilateral rib fractures were frequent (56 [20.1%] vs. 12 [9.8%], p = 0.018), and lateral and posterior rib fracture was more frequent (lateral rib fracture: 160 [57.3%] vs. 25 [20.5%], p < 0.001; posterior rib fracture: 129 [46.2%] vs. 21 [17.2%], p < 0.001), and displacement was more frequent (99 [35.5%] vs. 6 [6.6%], p < 0.001) in the group with intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries than in the group with no injury. The number of rib fractures (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.78; p = 0.001), lateral rib fracture (aOR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.32-5.95; p = 0.008), and posterior rib fracture (aOR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.45-6.94; p = 0.004) were independently associated with intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries. The optimal cut-off for the number of rib fractures on the outcome was three. The number of rib fractures ≥ 3 (aOR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.35-6.71; p = 0.007) was independently associated with intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries. CONCLUSION: In patients with rib fractures due to blunt trauma, those with lateral or posterior rib fractures, those with ≥ 3 rib fractures, and those requiring O2 supplementation require chest CT to identify significant intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries in the emergency department.

Automated Rib Fracture Detection on Chest X-Ray Using Contrastive Learning.

To develop a deep learning-based model for detecting rib fractures on chest X-Ray and to evaluate its performance based on a multicenter study. Chest digital radiography (DR) images from 18,631 subjects were used for the training, testing, and validation of the deep learning fracture detection model. We first built a pretrained model, a simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations (simCLR), using contrastive learning with the training set. Then, simCLR was used as the backbone for a fully convolutional one-stage (FCOS) objective detection network to identify rib fractures from chest X-ray images. The detection performance of the network for four different types of rib fractures was evaluated using the testing set. A total of 127 images from Data-CZ and 109 images from Data-CH with the annotations for four types of rib fractures were used for evaluation. The results showed that for Data-CZ, the sensitivities of the detection model with no pretraining, pretrained ImageNet, and pretrained DR were 0.465, 0.735, and 0.822, respectively, and the average number of false positives per scan was five in all cases. For the Data-CH test set, the sensitivities of three different pretraining methods were 0.403, 0.655, and 0.748. In the identification of four fracture types, the detection model achieved the highest performance for displaced fractures, with sensitivities of 0.873 and 0.774 for the Data-CZ and Data-CH test sets, respectively, with 5 false positives per scan, followed by nondisplaced fractures, buckle fractures, and old fractures. A pretrained model can significantly improve the performance of the deep learning-based rib fracture detection based on X-ray images, which can reduce missed diagnoses and improve the diagnostic efficacy.