Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Qual Life Res ; 30(2): 467-477, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32920766

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and satisfaction with iron chelation therapy (ICT) of patients with transfusion-dependent ß-thalassemia (TDT) managed under routine care conditions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an observational, multicenter, cross-sectional study conducted in three hospital-based Thalassemia Units of Western Greece. Patients confidentially completed the 36-item short-form (SF-36) and the "satisfaction with ICT" (SICT) instruments to assess HRQoL and ICT satisfaction respectively. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-one adult TDT patients [74 female, median (IQR) age: 41 (36-47) years] were enrolled. Eighty patients (61.1%) were receiving parenteral ICT, with or without oral chelators (Group I), whereas 51 (38.9%) were only receiving oral ICT (Group II). The median SF-36 physical component summary and mental component summary scores were 76.3 and 75.7 among Group I, and 76.9 and 74.5 among Group II patients, not differing between the two groups. In their majority, Group I (84.6%) and Group II (92.9%) patients reported preferring oral ICT. Moreover, Group I patients reported greater perceived ICT effectiveness (median SICT score: 4.3 versus 4.2; p = 0.039), whereas patients receiving deferasirox-containing ICT reported higher treatment acceptance (median SICT score: 4.0 versus 3.6, p = 0.038) and greater satisfaction with the burden of their ICT (median SICT score: 4.4 versus 3.9, p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: TDT patients prefer to receive oral ICT and are more satisfied of the burden of deferasirox-containing ICT, even though those receiving parenteral ICT are more satisfied by the effectiveness of their treatment. No differences in HRQoL were not noted between patients receiving parenteral versus oral ICT.


Assuntos
Quelantes de Ferro/uso terapêutico , Talassemia beta/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Grécia , Humanos , Quelantes de Ferro/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Satisfação do Paciente , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia
2.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 53(2): 322, 2021 May 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33988782

RESUMO

Bovine tuberculosis is an economically important disease with very high zoonotic potential. Single intradermal cervical tuberculin test (SICT) is considered a gold standard assay for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. However, bovines especially buffaloes may produce a false negative result when the animal becomes cell-mediated immune (CMI) anergic in the advanced stage of the disease. In the present study, ELISA and PCR assays were successfully demonstrated to be useful in diagnosing tuberculosis especially in the CMI anergic buffaloes infected with Mycobacterium bovis. ELISA and PCR assays are able to detect 8.94% and 8.13%, respectively, more animals as positive in comparison to standard SICT assay in a selected population of 123 buffaloes. The moderate agreement between SICT and ELISA (k: 0.528; 0.249-0.807), a substantial agreement between SICT and PCR (k: 0.648; 0.364-0.931), and high agreement between ELISA and PCR (k: 0.856; 0.697-1.0) highlight that ELISA and PCR, if used in parallel with SICT, will provide better sensitivity over single assay. Reduction of false negative reactors may help in minimizing the zoonotic threat from bovine tuberculosis especially in disease endemic region where human and livestock interface is quite high.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Bovinos , Mycobacterium bovis , Tuberculose Bovina , Tuberculose , Animais , Búfalos , Bovinos , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/veterinária , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/veterinária , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tuberculina , Teste Tuberculínico/veterinária , Tuberculose/diagnóstico , Tuberculose/veterinária , Tuberculose Bovina/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA