RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonate (BP) therapy has been associated with atypical femur fracture (AFF). However, the threshold of treatment duration leading to increased AFF risk is unclear. In a retrospective cohort of older women initiating BP, we compared the AFF risk associated with treatment for at least three years to the risk associated with treatment less than three years. METHODS: We used observational data from a large population of female members of an integrated healthcare system who initiated oral BP during 2002-2014. Women were retrospectively followed for incident AFF confirmed by radiologic adjudication. Demographic data, pharmacologic exposures, comorbidity, bone density, and fracture history were ascertained from electronic health records. Inverse probability weighting was used to estimate risk differences comparing the cumulative incidence (risk) of AFF if women discontinued BP within three years to the cumulative incidence of AFF if women continued BP for three or more years, adjusting for potential time-dependent confounding by the aforementioned factors. RESULTS: Among 87,820 women age 45-84 years who initiated BP (mean age 68.6, median T-score - 2.6, 14% with prior major osteoporotic fracture), 16,180 continued BP for three or more years. Forty-six confirmed AFFs occurred during follow-up in the two groups. AFF-free survival was greater for BP treatment < 3 years compared to treatment ≥3 years (p = 0.004 comparing areas under survival curves). At five years, the risk of AFF was 27 per 100,000 (95% confidence interval, CI: 8-46) if women received BP treatment < 3 years and 120 per 100,000 (95% CI: 56-183) if women received BP treatment ≥3 years (risk difference 93 per 100,000, 95% CI: 30-160). By ten years, the risks were 27 (95% CI: 8-46) and 363 (95% CI: 132-593) per 100,000 for BP treatment < 3 and ≥ 3 years, respectively (risk difference 336 per 100,000, 95% CI: 110-570). CONCLUSIONS: Bisphosphonate treatment for 3 or more years was associated with greater risk of AFF than treatment for less than 3 years. Although AFFs are uncommon among BP-treated women, this increased risk should be considered when counseling women about long-term BP use. Future studies should further characterize the dose-response relationship between BP duration and incident AFF and identify patients at highest risk.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Fraturas do Fêmur , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Difosfonatos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fraturas do Fêmur/induzido quimicamente , Fraturas do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Fêmur/epidemiologia , Fêmur , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess biomechanical performance of short and long Cephalomedullary nail constructs consisting of different number of distal screw for stabilizing different levels of subtrochanteric fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The femur obtained from computed tomography scanner was used to create a transverse fracture at 15 mm (level A), 35 mm (level B), and 55 mm (level C) below the lesser trochanter. Short and long Cephalomedullary nails were virtually inserted to the fractured femur. Four-node tetrahedral element was used to build up finite element (FE) models for biomechanical analysis. The analysis focused on post-operative stage of partial weight-bearing. RESULTS: Stress on the implant localized at the surface between lag screw/nail and distal screw/nail. Short Cephalomedullary nail exhibited higher stress than long Cephalomedullary nail. The stress in short Cephalomedullary nail could be reduced by using two distal screws fixation and the fracture at level A produced less stress than that of level B and C. Either short or long nail with two distal screws is sufficient to withstand the stress magnitude produced from the physiologic load. When single dynamic distal screw was used, stress on implant, elastic strain at fracture gap, and bone stress reached the high values. Elastic strain of the fracture gap at level C were less than that of level A and B, but no statistically significant difference. There was no proximal cancellous bone damage observed from the FE analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Long Cephalomedullary nail with at least two distal locking screws remains a proper implant for subtrochanteric fracture fixation in overall locations. However, short Cephalomedullary nail with two distal screws may be a candidate for a high subtrochanteric fracture. Single dynamic screw insertion is strongly not recommended with either short or long nail regarding implant failure.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas , Fraturas do Quadril , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Pinos Ortopédicos , Fraturas do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fraturas do Quadril/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , HumanosRESUMO
Intramedullary (IM) nail fixation is widely used for the treatment of atypical fractures of the femoral shaft. The configuration and location of proximal interlocking screws are unique to each nailing system and maybe transverse or oblique in direction. The authors experienced two cases of incomplete secondary fractures at the subtrochanteric region after IM nail fixation for atypical femoral shaft fractures. The proximal screw fixation of the two cases was different from one another. One was fixed with a spiral blade plus transverse screw and the other was fixed using an oblique direction screw from the greater trochanter to the femoral neck base. Based on our experience, we recommend only using a proximal locking screw toward the head when using an IM nail for the treatment of atypical femoral diaphyseal fractures. An 82-year-old female patient who had been fixed with an IM nail for the treatment of atypical femoral shaft fracture 13 months ago visited the outpatient clinic with pain in the right hip joint for one month. Local hot uptake was observed at the proximal interlocking screw insertion site around the subtrochanteric region on bone scan. A simple removal of the proximal locking screw was enough to treat the incomplete fracture. A 79-year-old woman visited the emergency room for pain in the right hip joint. On the radiograph, the right femur was found to be fixed with an IM nail, and an incomplete fracture line around the lower border of the lesser trochanter was observed. This patient was treated by replacing the IM nail with a reconstruction nail. When using an IM nail for the treatment of atypical femoral shaft fractures, it is appropriate to insert only the screw toward the femoral head for proximal fixation to prevent secondary subtrochanteric fracture.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Several epidemiologic studies suggest that compared to white women, Asians have a greater propensity to suffer an atypical femur fracture (AFF) while taking bisphosphonate therapy. This study examines the relative risk of AFF following bisphosphonate initiation for Asian compared to white women. METHODS: Using data from a large integrated northern California healthcare delivery system, we examined diaphyseal femur fracture outcomes among women age≥50years old who initiated oral bisphosphonate therapy during 2002-2007. An AFF was defined by the 2013 American Society of Bone and Mineral Research Task Force criteria. The risk of radiographically-confirmed AFF was examined for Asian compared to white women, adjusting for differences in bisphosphonate exposure and other potential risk factors. RESULTS: Among 48,390 women (65.3% white, 17.1% Asian) who newly initiated bisphosphonate therapy and were followed for a median of 7.7years, 68 women experienced an AFF. The rate of AFF was 18.7 per 100,000 person-years overall and eight-fold higher among Asian compared to white women (64.2 versus 7.6 per 100,000 person-years). Asians were also more likely to have longer bisphosphonate treatment duration compared to whites (median 3.8 versus 2.7years). The age-adjusted relative hazard for AFF was 8.5 (95% confidence interval 4.9-14.9) comparing Asian to white women, and was only modestly reduced to 6.6 (3.7-11.5) after adjusting for bisphosphonate duration and current use. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms marked racial disparity in AFF risk that should be further investigated, particularly the mechanisms accounting for this difference. These findings also underscore the need to further examine the association of bisphosphonate duration and AFF in women of Asian race, as well as differential risk across Asian subgroups. In the interim, counseling of Asian women about osteoporosis drug continuation should include consideration of their potentially higher AFF risk.
Assuntos
Difosfonatos/administração & dosagem , Difosfonatos/efeitos adversos , Etnicidade , Fraturas do Fêmur/induzido quimicamente , Fraturas do Fêmur/epidemiologia , Grupos Raciais , Administração Oral , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Management of bisphosphonate-associated subtrochanteric fractures remains opinion- or consensus-based. There are limited data regarding the outcomes of this fracture. We retrospectively reviewed 33 consecutive female patients with a mean age of 67.5 years (47 to 91) who were treated surgically between May 2004 and October 2009. The mean follow-up was 21.7 months (0 to 53). Medical records and radiographs were reviewed to determine the post-operative ambulatory status, time to clinical and radiological union and post-fixation complications such as implant failure and need for second surgery. The predominant fixation method was with an extramedullary device in 23 patients. 25 (75%) patients were placed on wheelchair mobilisation or no weight-bearing initially. The mean time to full weight-bearing was 7.1 months (2.2 to 29.7). The mean time for fracture site pain to cease was 6.2 months (1.2 to 17.1). The mean time to radiological union was 10.0 months (2.2 to 27.5). Implant failure was seen in seven patients (23%, 95 confidence interval (CI) 11.8 to 40.9). Revision surgery was required in ten patients (33%, 95 CI 19.2 to 51.2). A large proportion of the patients required revision surgery and suffered implant failure. This fracture is associated with slow healing and prolonged post-operative immobility.