Comparative analysis of pain outcomes in hypoglossal nerve stimulation: Avoiding the digastric tendon.

OBJECTIVE: Upper airway stimulation effectively treats patients with obstructive sleep apnea, especially among those with low long-term compliance with continuous positive airway pressure. Traditional methods to implant the hypoglossal nerve stimulator involve retraction of the digastric tendon to identify the nerve and improve exposure for stimulator implantation. Transient submental pain and discomfort are known side effects of the procedure. Placement without retraction provides an alternative approach to minimize postoperative pain. This study compares post-operative pain outcomes of patients in whom the digastric tendon was and was not retracted. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients who received the hypoglossal nerve stimulation implant at a single institution between 2017 and 2021. A combination of descriptive and qualitative data, including age, gender, comorbidities, and postoperative symptoms are analyzed to characterize patient outcomes resulting from this intraoperative technique. The categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using chi-squared tests and independent t-tests, respectively. RESULTS: Patients report overall satisfaction after implantation and titration. A total of 108 patients underwent HGNS implantation between September 2017 and January 2021 using the aforementioned techniques. 1.69 % of patients experienced postoperative submental pain as compared to 18.37 % prior to the change in technique (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Avoidance of digastric tendon retraction in the implantation of the stimulating lead is a safe and effective technique that reduces postoperative pain and discomfort. Our institution has demonstrated an alternative technique for hypoglossal stimulator implantation which improves perioperative outcomes. LAY SUMMARY: Upper airway stimulation is an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. During surgery, the digastric tendon is often moved to identify the nerve and improve access. This study shows that avoiding digastric tendon movement safely reduces postoperative pain and discomfort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Insomnia and Upper Airway Stimulation Therapy Benefit and Adherence: A Case Series.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and insomnia are common sleep disorders that often occur concurrently. The presence of one of these disorders often negatively impacts the other, including affecting treatment benefit and adherence. While insomnia has been shown to adversely affect positive airway pressure therapy adherence, minimal data are currently available on the effects of insomnia on upper airway stimulation (UAS) therapy for the treatment of OSA. We present two cases that highlight the negative impact of insomnia on UAS therapy usage and OSA management as well as the benefits of insomnia treatment on overall outcomes. Screening for and treatment of insomnia prior to UAS implantation are recommended.

Development of a standardized evaluation of endobuccal adverse events induced by repeated tongue protrusion with both a dedicated questionnaire and an endobuccal examination.

INTRODUCTION: A new approach to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is upper airway stimulation therapy (UAS). Electrical pulses applied to the hypoglossal nerve induce tongue protrusion, increase airway patency and decrease the frequency of apneic and hypopneic events. Thus, the main objective of this study was to design a standardized evaluation of endobuccal adverse events induced by repeated tongue protrusion with both a dedicated questionnaire and an endobuccal examination. METHOD: This study has designed the Tongue Adverse Event and Satisfaction Questionnaire (TAESQ) and an endobuccal examinations divided into an endobuccal lesion examination (ELE) and an endobuccal risk factor examination (ERFE). Evaluations were conducted at month 6 post-implantation. RESULTS: The study population after implantation of UAS device consisted of ten Caucasian males with a mean age of 51.9 ± 11.8 years, and a mean BMI of 28.6 ± 3.3. The AHI of the ten participants ranged from 46.7 ± 12.2/h at baseline to 14.5 ± 8.9/h with the Inspire therapy at the 6-month follow-up. The TAESQ revealed pain (30%), followed by less tongue sensitivity (20%) and tongue weakness (10%). The ELE did not reveal any lesions. The ERFE revealed that some participants had tissue and dental risk factors but not associated to more adverse events. CONCLUSION: The TAESQ, ELE and ERFE have been designed and studied on a small number of participants. These evaluations could systematically be included in the care pathway of patients treated by UAS to better investigate tongue discomfort and tongue lesion for patients treated with this technology.

Patient-reported outcome: results of the multicenter German post-market study.

PURPOSE: Upper airway stimulation (UAS) is an alternative second-line treatment option for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). In our substudy of a previous multicentre study of patients implanted with UAS, we focused on patient-related outcomes like Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), snoring and personal satisfaction 6 and 12 months after the implantation. METHODS: 60 patients, who were initially non-adherent to CPAP and implanted with UAS, were included in a prospective multicentre study. Data were collected preoperative, 6 and 12 months after implantation regarding FOSQ, ESS, snoring, and their experience with the UAS device. RESULTS: Besides relevant Apnoea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) reduction, we saw significant improvements in ESS (p < 0.001), FOSQ (p < 0.001) and snoring under UAS therapy. A strong correlation between AHI results postoperative and the personal satisfaction of the patients after implantation was found as well as between usage results and AHI compared to the preoperative results. CONCLUSION: The more the patients benefit from UAS according to their self-reported outcome, the higher is the therapy use.

Prevalence of insomnia and restless legs syndrome in patients with upper airway stimulation therapy and effects on treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the prevalence of insomnia and restless legs syndrome (RLS) and the possible effects of these conditions on treatment adherence and outcomes in patients with upper airway stimulation (UAS) therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent UAS system implantation were retrospectively studied. Patients without insomnia or RLS, insomnia, RLS, and both insomnia and RLS were compared. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), in-lab UAS titration data, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and adherence to UAS therapy were compared. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients who had UAS implantation and completed post-implant in-lab UAS titration were identified. Insomnia was present in 47%, RLS in 28%, and both insomnia and RLS in 14%. During in-lab titration, the AHI improved for all groups and did not differ across groups. The arousal index on in-lab titration was higher in patients with both RLS and insomnia compared to those without these conditions. At the time of the in-lab titration, the hours of UAS therapy usage were reduced for patients with RLS (4.7 ± 1.9 h/night, p = 0.027) compared to those without RLS (6.0 ± 2.0 h/night). The ESS was higher in patients with RLS compared to those without RLS at in-lab titration. CONCLUSION: Insomnia and RLS are common in patients using UAS therapy. A decrease in UAS usage and higher ESS were present in patients with RLS. Further research evaluating the long-term effects of insomnia and RLS in UAS therapy usage and benefit is needed.