Lax Uterosacral Ligament and Urge Urinary Incontinence: MRI Findings in Symptomatic Patients Versus Healthy Volunteers.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to explore the association between urge urinary incontinence (UUI) and lax uterosacral ligaments (USL) using MRI. METHODS: Sixty-seven female participants were recruited prospectively: 41 continent volunteers (control group) and 26 patients with UUI. Static proton density- and T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequences of MR images were used. A radiologist employed a standardized grid system to record structural observations of the USLs on sequentially numbered axial MR images and then applied a four-point grading scale to assess ligament visibility. MR images were interpreted by a radiologist and a urologist, and then validated by an expert radiologist. RESULTS: The comparison between the mean length of uterosacral ligaments in the control and UUI groups was highly statistically significant (p < 0.001). The mean length of the right USL was 38 ± 11 mm, and the left USL was 35 ± 12 mm in the UUI group. In the control group, the mean length of the USL was 22 ± 9 mm on the right side and 18 ± 9 mm on the left side, along their craniocaudal extent. The highest inter-observer agreement was on the level of origin and insertion (image numbers), whereas the lowest agreement was on the anatomical site of origin and insertion of the USL in both the control and UUI groups. CONCLUSIONS: The average length of USLs in patients with UUI is significantly longer than that in healthy continent women, indicating laxity. Our findings support the relationship between the laxity of the USL and UUI symptoms and have therapeutic implications.

A Randomised Trial on the Effects of the Addition of Uterosacral Ligament Plication to Pectopexy Operation on Anatomical Restoration and Female Sexual Functions.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to determine whether the addition of uterosacral ligament plication to pectopexy for pelvic organ prolapse increases anatomical improvement and female sexual functioning. METHODS: This is a prospective randomised study. Forty patients who underwent laparoscopic pectopexy (LP) and laparoscopic pectopexy with uterosacral ligament plication (LPUSL) were included in the study. A total of 38 patients were evaluated in the study. Patients were assessed by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system and the patients who had symptomatic apical prolapse POP-Q ≥ II were included in the study. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at the 3rd, 6th and 12th month, with respect to anatomical changes as well as sexual function. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found when the preoperative C points was compared with the C points postoperatively, at 3rd, 6th and 12th months in both the LP and LPUSL groups (p < 0.001). Additionally, there were statistically significant difference between the LP and LPUSL groups in terms of C and Aa points at the 6th and 12th postoperative months in favour of the LPUSL group (p = 0.007, p = 0.005 respectively). There was also a statistically significant difference when Ba points were compared between the two groups at the 12th postoperative month, in favour of the LPUSL group (p = 0.002). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to the variables of the Female Sexual Function Index. Additionally, all parameters were significantly better in both groups at the 3rd and 12th months than the preoperative values in post hoc analysis; only desire also had a significant improvement between the 3rd and 12th months in the LPUSL group in post hoc analysis. CONCLUSION: Pectopexy operation seems to be a successful surgical approach as an alternative to sacrocolpopexy. The addition of uterosacral ligament plication to pectopexy operation improves the anatomical restoration more drastically than with LP on its own. Moreover, either LP or LPUSL has improved the majority of sexual function indices.

Impact of Mannitol Bladder Distension in the Intraoperative Detection of Ureteral Kinking During Pelvic Floor Surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Ureteral injuries are the most feared complications of gynecological surgery and therefore intraoperative recognition is of the utmost importance. Intraoperative cystoscopy represents the diagnostics of choice to investigate ureteral patency thanks to the direct visualization of ureteral flows after administration of infusion mediums. In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of saline versus mannitol intraoperative cystoscopy in terms of false negatives in a large cohort of patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy and high uterosacral ligament suspension for POP. Patients were divided in two groups based on the use of saline or mannitol medium for intraoperative cystoscopy. Postoperative daily control of serum creatinine was performed until discharge, as well as urinary tract imaging, in symptomatic patients. RESULTS: A total of 925 patients underwent vaginal hysterectomy followed by high USL suspension for POP. Saline and mannitol medium were used in 545 patients and 380 patients respectively. Postoperative ureteral injuries were identified in 12 patients, specifically in 2% of the saline group and in 0.3% of the mannitol group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of mannitol instead of saline as a bladder distension medium was able to significantly reduce the occurrence of postoperative ureteral sequelae.

Intraoperative Fluorescent Ureter Visualization for Transvaginal High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of ureteral navigation using intra-ureteric indocyanine green (ICG) and near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging during transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension for prolapse repair to reduce the risk of iatrogenic ureteral injury. METHODS: A cystoscope was inserted into the bladder, the tip of a 6-F open-end ureteral catheter was inserted into the ureteral orifices, and ICG was instilled into the ureters. The ureteral path was then clearly identified using NIRF imaging. Sutures were safely placed in the uterosacral ligaments at the level of the ischial spine, taking advantage of direct ureteral visualization. RESULTS: At the end of the procedure, diagnostic cystoscopy was performed to confirm ureteral patency. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-ureteric ICG-NIRF imaging represents a simple, inexpensive, and reproducible trick for intraoperative ureteral detection, and could reassure surgeons during difficult operations, for instance, in the case of severe prolapse and/or when ureteral course abnormalities are expected.

vNOTES versus Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Perioperative and Short-Term Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) is a novel approach in gynecological surgery. This study was aimed at comparing perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes of vNOTES versus laparoscopic approaches to uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) for apical pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included all women who underwent vNOTES versus laparoscopic USLS at two university-affiliated centers between 2017 and 2023. The relationships between variables were tested using Fisher's exact test or t test, including a sub-analysis comparing hysterectomy and hysteropexy outcomes within the groups. Logistic regression assessed the influence of baseline factors and operative factors on the primary and main secondary outcomes of interest. RESULTS: This study comprised 47 vNOTES and 54 laparoscopic USLS cases (including 11 and 15 hysteropexies respectively). Baseline demographics in the two groups were similar. There were no differences in operative outcomes and no instances of ureteral injury. The vNOTES technique allowed for the use of significantly more sutures per side (2.0 [2.0-4.0] vs 1.0 [1.0-1.0], p = 0.001). Postoperative complications within 6 weeks demonstrated no significant differences. Both groups exhibited comparable rates of baseline subjective POP symptoms (100% vs 96.2%, p = 1.00) which improved significantly at 6 weeks (4.3% vs 11.1%, p = 0.282). At 6 weeks, anatomical success was achieved by significantly more patients with vNOTES (93.5% vs 78.6%, p = 0.042). Baseline and 6-week POP symptoms in the hysterectomy and hysteropexy subgroups were similar. CONCLUSION: Both vNOTES and laparoscopic USLS demonstrated comparable subjective success rates at 6 weeks postoperatively. The vNOTES approach demonstrated improved anatomical success at 6 weeks, but the difference was not significant after adjusting for operative factors.

TWO-YEAR FOLLOW-UP ON SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF vNOTES HIGH UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION FOR THE PROPHYLAXIS AND TREATMENT OF PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE: A MULTICENTER PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the medium-term outcomes of high uterosacral ligament suspension (HUSLS) with vaginal-assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in patients either suffering from pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or undergoing routine prophylaxis to prevent post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective cohort study SETTING: Three tertiary care hospitals PATIENTS: Patients who received vNOTES-HUSLS between January 1, 2021 and January 1, 2023, were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: vNOTES-HUSLS MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The data collected included surgery duration, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative Visual Analog Scores (VAS), and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) pain subdomain scores. The changes in prolapse levels were measured using modified POP-Q scores, including the C, Ba, and Bp scores recorded prior to surgery and during the postoperative follow-up examination. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire. The final analysis included 55 women. Of these, vNOTES-HUSLS was performed in 43 patients (78.2%) to treat apical prolapse, while the remaining 12 patients (21.8%) underwent prophylaxis following hysterectomy to prevent vaginal vault prolapse. The median follow-up period was 23.5 months, with a range of 12-37 months. Ba,C, and Bp points significantly improved in patients who underwent surgery for prolapse (p<0.001). There was no recurrence in the apical compartment following vNOTES-HUSLS for both performed prophylactic and treatment purposes after hysterectomy. Two (3.6%) patients were diagnosed with stage 3 anterior compartment prolapse. The overall vNOTES-HUSLS success rate was 96.4% at approximately two years follow-up. Bladder injury was detected as an intraoperative complication in one patient (1.8%). The overall satisfaction rate was 98.1% at the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: vNOTES-HUSLS was effective in the treatment and prophylaxis of apical prolapse, demonstrating high anatomical success rates. The procedure demonstrated a low complication rate, with intraoperative and postoperative complications each observed in 1.8%(n=1) of patients. SYNOPSIS: The Medium-Term Outcomes of vNOTES High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.

Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE: Uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) is one of the most frequently used operations for the restoration of apical support in women with uterovaginal prolapse. However, existing studies are inconclusive as to whether and which surgical access route is superior. The aim of the present meta-analysis is tentatively to compare the efficiency and the postoperative complications of laparoscopic USLS (L-USLS) and vaginal USLS (V-USLS), highlighting that current evidence remains inconclusive regarding the superiority of either surgical access route. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic literature review of 5 major databases (Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Clinicaltrials.gov) from inception till April 2023. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: No language restrictions were applied. All comparative studies that compared L-USLS and V-USLS for the management of women with uterovaginal prolapse were included. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Data from 6 retrospective cohort studies on 856 patients were extracted and analyzed. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions tool and ranged between moderate to serious. The pooled results suggest that L-USLS was associated with a potentially decreased incidence of ureteral compromise (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.89; p = .04) and seemingly lower objective (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.23-0.97; p = .04) and subjective recurrence rates (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.23-0.92; p = .03). There were no significant differences between the rates of postoperative pain from USLS sutures, postoperative pelvic hematomas, the suture exposure/granulation tissue formation, and the prolapse recurrence retreatment among the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis indicates that L-USLS is possibly associated with significantly fewer ureteral compromise rates and decreased subjective and objective recurrences rates compared to V-USLS. Nevertheless, given the limitations in data quality and heterogeneity of the included studies, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Large-scale randomized studies are essential to more definitively determine the relative merits of the laparoscopic versus vaginal approach.

Fortifying the foundation: assessing the role of uterine ligament integrity in uterine prolapse and beyond.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic floor stability is influenced by various biomechanical, anatomical, and physiological factors. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for improving the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and related conditions. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the key factors affecting pelvic floor integrity and explore both non-surgical and surgical interventions to enhance stability and treatment outcomes. METHODS: This review draws from biomechanical research to assess the role of the uterosacral ligament in pelvic support, while also examining the potential of both traditional and emerging therapeutic approaches, including non-surgical interventions like vitamin C supplementation. RESULTS: - The uterosacral ligament demonstrates superior strength and stiffness, making it essential for structural support of pelvic organs. - Non-surgical interventions, such as vitamin C supplementation, show potential in improving ligament integrity and preventing pelvic floor disorders. - Emerging surgical techniques, including tendon-based procedures and injectable fibrous hydrogel composites, offer promising improvements in outcomes for patients with pelvic organ prolapse. - Additional factors such as muscle strength and neural deficiencies contribute to the complexity of pelvic floor biomechanics, indicating the need for multifaceted treatment approaches. CONCLUSION: This analysis provides a comprehensive framework for understanding and managing pelvic floor stability by integrating biomechanical, physiological, and anatomical insights. The findings highlight the potential for personalized treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes in pelvic floor disorders.

Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.

BACKGROUND: Among women with symptomatic uterovaginal prolapse undergoing vaginal surgery in the Vaginal hysterectomy with Native Tissue Vault Suspension vs Sacrospinous Hysteropexy with Graft Suspension (Study for Uterine Prolapse Procedures Randomized Trial) trial, sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft (hysteropexy) resulted in a lower composite surgical failure rate than vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral suspension over 5 years. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify factors associated with the rate of surgical failure over 5 years among women undergoing sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral suspension for uterovaginal prolapse. STUDY DESIGN: This planned secondary analysis of a comparative effectiveness trial of 2 transvaginal apical suspensions (NCT01802281) defined surgical failure as either retreatment of prolapse, recurrence of prolapse beyond the hymen, or bothersome prolapse symptoms. Baseline clinical and sociodemographic factors for eligible participants receiving the randomized surgery (N=173) were compared across categories of failure (≤1 year, >1 year, and no failure) with rank-based tests. Factors with adequate prevalence and clinical relevance were assessed for minimally adjusted bivariate associations using piecewise exponential survival models adjusting for randomized apical repair and clinical site. The multivariable model included factors with bivariate P<.2, additional clinically important variables, apical repair, and clinical site. Backward selection determined final retained risk factors (P<.1) with statistical significance evaluated by Bonferroni correction (P<.005). Final factors were assessed for interaction with type of apical repair at P<.1. Association is presented by adjusted hazard ratios and further illustrated by categorization of risk factors. RESULTS: In the final multivariable model, body mass index (increase of 5 kg/m2: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.2; P<.001) and duration of prolapse symptoms (increase of 1 year: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.1; P<.005) were associated with composite surgical failure, where rates of failure were 2.9 and 1.8 times higher in women with obesity and women who are overweight than women who have normal weight and women who are underweight (95% confidence intervals, 1.5-5.8 and 0.9-3.5) and 3.0 times higher in women experiencing >5 years prolapse symptoms than women experiencing ≤5 years prolapse symptoms (95% confidence interval, 1.8-5.0). Sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft had a lower rate of failure than hysterectomy with uterosacral suspension (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-1.0; P=.05). The interaction between symptom duration and apical repair (P=.07) indicated that failure was less likely after hysteropexy than hysterectomy for those with ≤5 years symptom duration (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.9), but not for those with >5 years symptom duration (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% confidence interval 0.5-2.1). CONCLUSION: Obesity and duration of prolapse symptoms have been determined as risk factors associated with surgical failure over 5 years from transvaginal prolapse repair, regardless of approach. Providers and patients should consider these modifiable risk factors when discussing treatment plans for bothersome prolapse.

The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) is a technique to correct apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) by shortening the uterosacral ligaments with sutures. OBJECTIVE: A systematic review with meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of LUSLS as treatment for apical POP. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed and Cochrane search using 'pelvic organ prolapse', 'laparoscopy' and 'uterosacral', including synonyms. SELECTION CRITERIA: All articles in English presenting outcome of an original series of women with LUSLS as treatment of apical POP. Case reports were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study enrollment was performed by two reviewers. Our primary outcome measures were objective and subjective effectiveness of the procedure. Secondary outcome measures regarded complications and recurrence. Bias was assessed with the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. MAIN RESULTS: Of 138 hits, 13 studies were included with 933 LUSLS patients. The average follow-up was 22 months. All were nonrandomised cohort studies. The pooled anatomic success rate is 90% for all LUSLS procedures (95% confidence interval [CI] 83.3-95.5). LUSLS with hysterectomy resulted in an anatomic success rate of 96.6% (95% CI 87.5-100) and LUSLS with uterus preservation 83.4% (95% CI 67.7-94.6). The pooled subjective cure rate was 90.5% (95% CI 81.9-96.5). The rate of major complications was 1%. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (with or without uterus preservation) seems to be an effective and safe treatment for women with apical POP, but long-term prospective trials and randomised controlled trials are necessary to confirm these findings.

Midterm comparison of laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of moderate to severe apical prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to retrospectively analyze the midterm efficacy of laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension (HUS) and sacrocolpopexy (SC) in the treatment of moderate to severe apical prolapse. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic HUS and SC in our center from 2013 to 2019 with follow-ups were included, consisting of laparoscopic HUS (group A, n=72) or SC (mesh added, group B, n=54). The general data of patients, pelvic organ prolapse quantitative examination (POP-Q) score, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form 20 score (PFDI-20) before and after operation, perioperative conditions, Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), and postoperative complications were collected for statistical analysis and comparison between groups. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in preoperative data between groups. The median follow-up time was 48 months. The objective recurrence rate of group A was higher than that of group B, without statistical significance. One patient in group B had a second operation owing to recurrence. The exposure rate of mesh in group B was 3.70%. There was no significant difference in deviation of POP-Q and PFDI-20 pre- and post-operation. The proportion of new defecation abnormalities in group A was lower. The total hospitalization expenses and surgical consumables in group B were significantly higher than those in group A. CONCLUSIONS: The midterm curative effect of laparoscopic HUS is similar to that of SC in the treatment of moderate to severe apical prolapse. The former has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay, lower cost, fewer new defecation abnormalities, and there were no complications related to mesh.

High uterosacral ligament suspension in radical hysterectomy: a step-by-step procedure to prevent pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Given the younger age of cervical cancer patients and improved postoperative survival, postoperative quality of life should be a reason for concern, particularly given the prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction. High uterosacral ligament suspension (HUS) has been deemed the more consistently successful surgery for the treatment of mid-pelvic abnormalities. HUS intraoperatively prevents pelvic floor dysfunction effectively. METHODS: We demonstrate the steps of surgery using surgical video and photographs. The uterosacral ligament is fan shaped and connected to the fascial and extraosseous membranes on the surface of the anterior sacral foramen of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th sacral vertebrae. Given that the uterosacral ligament was fan-shaped, the fan-shaped suture with three stitches was more compatible with the original anatomy. RESULTS: Thirty patients with HUS who underwent thorough hysterectomy had no complications, operation time 230.82 ± 43.61 min, and blood loss 62.32 ± 37.25 ml. The urinary catheter was successfully removed 1 week after the operation, and no pelvic organ prolapse, including vaginal anterior and posterior wall prolapse, or rectocele, occurred after 3 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The uterosacral ligament fulfills the role of supporting, pulling, and suspending the uterus. We should exploit the advantage of fully exposing the uterosacral ligament in radical hysterectomy. Performing HUS to prevent pelvic organ prolapse following radical hysterectomy is a procedure worthy of investigation and promotion.

Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for presacral-uterosacral ligament compound suspension in apical compartment prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to describe a novel mesh-free pelvic repair surgery for apical prolapse and to evaluate the effect of this technique and early outcomes. METHODS: We demonstrate the key techniques in a video: exposing the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) of the presacral space; securing a non-absorbable suture to the ALL by horoscope stitch; shortening the right uterosacral ligament (USL); placing a non-absorbable suture around the intermediate portion of the left USL for three stitches; placing the non-absorbable suture in the transverse portion of the pubocervical and rectovaginal fascia; locking sutures in place to approximate anterior to posterior connective tissue. Fifteen patients were enrolled to undergo this procedure between December 2020 and April 2021. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 60.67 (range 46-69) years, the mean body mass index was 24.25 kg/m2 (range 19.61-30.08). The mean operation time was 103.6 min (range 65-166), and the mean blood loss was 82 ml (range 50-200). No intraoperative complications occurred. All patients gained a significant improvement in anatomical and objective outcomes during a mean 9.93-month follow-up, and there was no recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience showed that this mesh-free repair surgery was a feasible and safe technique for apical prolapse.

Five-year surgical outcomes of transvaginal apical approaches in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: In women with advanced prolapse, differences in vaginal apex anchoring sites may impact surgical outcomes over time. The primary aim was to compare 5-year surgical outcomes of uterosacral ligament suspension (ULS) versus sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) in women with advanced (stage III-IV) prolapse. METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted in a subset of women with advanced prolapse from a multicenter randomized trial comparing ULS versus SSLF and its extended follow-up, using publicly accessible de-identified datasets. The primary outcome was time to failure, defined as any one of (1) apical descent > 1/3 into the vaginal canal or anterior/posterior compartment beyond the hymen, (2) bothersome vaginal bulge symptoms, or (3) re-treatment. Secondary outcomes include symptom severity measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI) and adverse events. RESULTS: Of 285 women, 90/147 (61.2%) in ULS and 88/138 (63.8%) in SSLF had advanced prolapse. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups except for median-vaginal deliveries (3.0 [2.0, 5.0] versus 3.0 [2.0, 4.0], p < 0.01). The median time to failure was 1.7 years ULS versus 2.0 years SSLF (p = 0.42). Surgical failure increased over time in both groups with no intergroup difference; by year 5, the estimated failure rate was 67.7% ULS versus 71.5% SSLF (adjusted difference -3.8; 95%CI [-21.9, 14.2]). No differences were noted in individual failure components (p > 0.05). POPDI scores improved over 5 years without intergroup difference (ULS -68.0 ± 61.1 versus SSLF -69.9 ± 60.3, adjusted difference -0.1 [-20.0, 19.9]). No difference in adverse events were observed (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In women with advanced prolapse, surgical failure, symptom severity, and adverse events did not differ between ULS and SSLF over 5 years.

Outcomes of Manchester procedure combined with high uterosacral ligament suspension for uterine prolapse.

AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the Manchester procedure (MP) with or without concomitant high uterosacral ligament suspension (HUSLS) for treating uterine prolapse. The primary outcomes were to compare the two methods for differences in perioperative complications and recurrence rates, and to explore whether MP combined with concomitant HUSLS is beneficial in reducing recurrence rates. METHODS: A total of 98 uterine prolapse patients underwent MP or MP-HUSLS during the study period. Demographic data, perioperative, and follow-up outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to explore the effect of surgical methods on recurrence. RESULTS: The MP-HUSLS group had a higher degree of apical compartment prolapse before the operation, but the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) values of points Ba and C in the MP-HUSLS group improved significantly compared with the MP group (p < 0.05). The operation time in the MP group was shorter than that in the MP-HUSLS group. There were no differences in baseline characteristics or perioperative complications between the two groups. Twelve patients had subjective recurrence during follow-up, although 20 developed anatomical recurrence. After controlling for confounding factors, the MP group had a higher risk of recurrence in the anterior compartment than the MP-HUSLS (adjusted hazard ratio: 4.191, confidence interval: 1.195-14.701, p = 0.025). There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate of the two groups' total, apical, and posterior compartments. CONCLUSION: Compared with MP, MP-HUSLS seems more effective in treating uterine prolapse, with a higher location of the points C and Ba. However, further studies with large samples and long follow-up times need to confirm this result.

Surgical outcomes in patients aged 70 years and older following uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparative study.

PURPOSE: The number of elderly patients bothered by pelvic organ prolapse symptoms is growing rapidly. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between age and surgical outcomes in women undergoing uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of apical prolapse. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including women who underwent uterosacral ligament suspension between 2010 and 2020. The cohort was divided into two groups: (1) Patients 70 years or older; (2) Patients under the age of 70. Outcome measures included clinical, anatomical, and composite outcomes as well as patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 271 patients were included in the final analysis. Of them 209 patients were under age 70 and 62 patients 70 years or older. Mean age was 59 ± 6 vs. 73 ± 3 for the young and elderly age groups, respectively. Clinical success was high for both groups, reaching 94% vs. 89% for elderly and young patients, respectively (p = 0.34). Anatomical and composite outcome success were higher in the young age group (76% vs. 56%, p < 0.01 and 70% vs. 54%, p = 0.02, respectively); however, following multivariate analysis these differences were no longer statistically significant. Following multivariate logistic regression analysis for the dependent parameter of anatomical success, increased pre-operative genital hiatus and vaginal surgical route were associated with anatomical failure while performing a concomitant posterior colporrhaphy increased likelihood for anatomical success. CONCLUSION: Women over the age of 70 undergoing uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of apical prolapse have comparable outcomes to younger patients.

Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.

BACKGROUND: Given that the number of surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse is expected to increase worldwide, knowledge on risk factors for prolapse recurrence is of importance for developing preventive strategies and shared decision-making. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for subjective and objective failure after either sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension over a period of 5 years after surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of the 5-year follow-up of the SAVE-U trial. The SAVE-U trial was conducted in 4 Dutch hospitals. A total of 208 women with uterine prolapse stage ≥2 were randomized to sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension. For the current analysis, available annual 5-year follow-up data of 207 women were analyzed. Without missing values this analysis would have included 1035 measurements in total over the 5-year follow-up. Recurrences were analyzed as "events" using generalized linear mixed models because recurrences of anatomic failure and bothersome vaginal bulge symptoms fluctuated over time. The primary outcome was the composite outcome of failure defined as prolapse beyond the hymen, bothersome bulge symptoms, repeated surgery, or pessary use for recurrent prolapse. Secondary outcome measures were bothersome vaginal bulge symptoms, overall anatomic failure (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage ≥2 in any compartment), apical compartment recurrence (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage ≥2), anterior compartment recurrence (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage ≥2), and posterior compartment recurrence (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage ≥2). RESULTS: For the composite outcome of failure (164 events in 66 different women), statistically significant risk factors were: body mass index (odds ratio, 1.10 [per 1 kg/m2]; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.19; P=.02), smoking (odds ratio, 2.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-7.40; P=.03), and preoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification point Ba (odds ratio, 1.23 [per 1 cm]; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.50; P=.04). When analyzing each surgical outcome measure separately, body mass index and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification point Ba were risk factors for overall anatomic failure (462 events in 147 women; odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.25; P<.01 and odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.30; P=.05, respectively) and anterior compartment recurrence (385 events in 128 women; odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.22; P=.02 and odds ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.34; P=.02, respectively). Vaginal hysterectomy was a risk factor for posterior compartment recurrence when compared with sacrospinous hysteropexy (93 events in 40 women; odds ratio, 5.21; 95% confidence interval, 2.05-13.27; P<.01). Smoking was a risk factor for bothersome vaginal bulge symptoms (70 events in 41 women; odds ratio, 3.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-9.75; P=.01), and preoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage 3 or 4 was significantly protective against bothersome bulge symptoms (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.89; P=.03). CONCLUSION: Body mass index, smoking, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification point Ba were statistically significant risk factors for the composite outcome of failure (prolapse beyond the hymen, bothersome bulge symptoms, repeated surgery, or pessary use for recurrent prolapse) in the period of 5 years after surgery.

Late-occurring pain/other dysfunctions in midurethral sling class actions are likely caused by uterosacral ligament weakness, not implant or surgeon.

BACKGROUND: Large sums of money have been awarded against manufacturers of midurethral slings (MUS) because of complaints of pain and other complications, even though pelvic pain is rarely seen at the 6-12 weeks review. HYPOTHESIS AND AIMS: Pain/other posterior fornix symptoms (urge, frequency, nocturia, and abnormal emptying) may appear weeks or months after MUS surgery due to dislocation of already weakened uterosacral ligaments (USL), a consequence of diversion of pelvic forces from pubourethral ligaments strengthened by the sling. METHODS: Review for prevalence, pathogenic pathway from damaged USLs to pain, OAB, emptying, and other late complications by reference to data from functional anatomy imaging, mechanical support of USLs (speculum test), and post-USL surgical repair. RESULTS: Pelvic pain and other pelvic symptoms frequently co-exist pre-operatively with SUI, but are not volunteered because patients complain of one main pelvic symptom, others being "under the surface" (Pescatori Iceberg). Late de novo occurrence of symptom complications beyond perioperative MUS surgery may occur: pain (5.7%), retention (5.4%), UTI (9.3%), and OAB (10.2%). Xray/ultrasound evidence of pelvic forces acting on USLs support the hypothesis of diversion of forces. Improvement of pain and urgency by the "speculum test" indicates USL causation, as do cure of pain and other pelvic symptoms by USL slings. CONCLUSIONS: Late-occurring PFS symptoms are the fault of neither implant, nor surgeon, but more likely consequences of pelvic forces acting on USLs already weakened by childbirth/age. Bladder/bowel/pain symptoms need to be sought out preoperatively and discussed before MUS surgery. BRIEF SUMMARY: Late MUS complications, OAB, pain, retention subject to class actions, may be caused by uterosacral dislocation from pre-existing structural weakness, not surgeon or device.

Mechanical stress influences the morphology and function of human uterosacral ligament fibroblasts and activates the p38 MAPK pathway.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition in older women that affects quality of life. Mechanical injury of the pelvic floor support system contributes to POP development. In our study, we aimed to examine the mechanical damage to human uterosacral ligament fibroblasts (hUSLFs) to preliminarily explore the mechanism of mechanical transduction in POP. METHODS: hUSLFs were derived from POP and non-POP patients. Mechanical stress was induced by the FX-5000 T-cell stress loading system. Student's t-test was used for comparisons between different groups. RESULTS: We found that hUSLFs from POP patients were larger and longer than those from non-POP patients and exhibited cytoskeleton F-actin rearrangement. Collagen I and III expression levels were lower and matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1) levels were higher in POP patients than in non-POP patients. Additionally, the apoptosis rate was significantly increased in POP patients compared to non-POP patients. After mechanical stretching, hUSLFs underwent a POP-like transformation. Cells became longer, and the cytoskeleton became thicker and rearranged. The extracellular matrix (ECM) was remodelled because of the upregulation of collagen I and III expression and downregulation of MMP1 expression. Mechanical stress also induced hUSLF apoptosis. Notably, we found that the p38 MAPK pathway was activated by mechanical stretching. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical stress induced morphological changes in ligament fibroblasts, leading to cytoskeleton and ECM remodelling and cell apoptosis. p38 MAPK might be involved in this process, providing novel insights into the mechanical biology of and possible therapies for this disease.

Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: There is growing interest in and performance of uterine-preserving prolapse repairs. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) recurrence 2 years following transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy (USLH) and sacrospinous ligament hysteropexy (SSLH). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study with a cross-sectional survey of women who underwent transvaginal uterine-preserving POP surgery from May 2016 to December 2017. Patients were included if they underwent either USLH or SSLH. POP recurrence was defined as a composite of subjective symptoms and/or retreatment. A cross-sectional survey was used to assess pelvic floor symptoms and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 47 women met the criteria. Mean age was 52.8 ± 12.5 years, and all had a preoperative POP-Q stage of 2 (55.3%) or 3 (44.7%). Thirty (63.8%) underwent SSLH and 17 (36.2%) underwent USLH. There were no differences in patient characteristics or perioperative data. There was no difference in composite recurrence (26.7% [8] vs 23.5% [4]) and retreatment (6.7% [2] vs 0%) retrospectively between SSLH and USLH groups at 22.6 months. Survey response rate was 80.9% (38) with a response time of 30.7 (28.0-36.6) months. The majority of patients (84.2%) reported POP symptom improvement, and both groups reported great satisfaction (89.5%). In respondents, 13.2% (5) reported subjective recurrence and 5.3% (2) underwent retreatment, with no differences between hysteropexy types. There were no differences in other pelvic floor symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Although 1 in 4 women experienced subjective POP recurrence after transvaginal uterine-preserving prolapse repair and <5% underwent retreatment at 2 years, our results must be interpreted with caution given our small sample size. No differences in outcomes were identified between hysteropexy types; however, additional studies should be performed to confirm these findings. Both hysteropexy approaches were associated with great patient satisfaction.