Talar neck rotation angle in adults with clubfoot deformity: Observed values and intra- and inter-observer reliability using weightbearing CT.

INTRODUCTION: Adults presenting with symptomatic clubfoot represent a challenging cohort of patients. An appreciation of the location and degree of deformities is essential for management. Talar anatomy is often abnormal with varus within the talar neck, however, there are few reproducible methods which quantify talar neck deformity in adults. We describe a technique of assessing talar neck deformity, and report on observed values and intra- / inter-observer reliability. METHODS: This was a single-centre, retrospective study including 96 feet from 56 adult patients with clubfeet (82 feet had clubfoot deformity, 14 were normal). Mean age was 34.3 ± 16.9 years and 31 (55.3%) were male. Weight-bearing CT scans captured as part of routine clinical care were analysed. Image reformats were oriented parallel to the long axis of the talus in the sagittal plane. In the corresponding axial plane two lines were drawn (on separate slices): 1) a line perpendicular to the intermalleolar axis, 2) a line connecting the midpoints of the talar head and narrowest part of the talar neck. The talar neck rotation angle (TNR angle) was the angle formed between these lines. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were performed for intra- and inter-observer reliability. RESULTS: Mean TNR angle in clubfeet was 27.6 ± 12.2 degrees (95%CI = 25.0 to 30.2 degrees). Mean TNR angle in normal feet was 18.7 ± 5.1 degrees (95%CI = 16.0 to 21.4 degrees) (p < 0.001). The ICC for clubfeet was 0.944 (95%CI = 0.913 to 0.964) for intra-observer agreement, and 0.896 (95%CI = 0.837 to 0.932) for inter-observer agreement. CONCLUSION: This measurement technique demonstrated excellent intra- and inter-observer agreement. It also demonstrated that compared to normal feet, clubfeet had about 9 degrees of increased varus angulation of the talar neck. This technique and data may be used for future research into clubfoot deformity and in planning treatment. LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE: 3.

Medializing Calcaneal Osteotomy for progressive collapsing foot deformity alters the three-dimensional subtalar joint alignment.

BACKGROUND: A medializing calcaneal osteotomy (MCO) is considered as one of the key inframalleolar osteotomies to correct progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD). While many studies were able to determine the post-operative hind- and midfoot alignment, alternations of the subtalar joint alignment remained obscured by superposition on plain radiography. Therefore, we aimed to assess the hind-, midfoot- and subtalar joint alignment pre- compared to post-operatively using 3D weightbearing CT (WBCT) imaging. METHODS: Seventeen patients with a mean age of 42 ± 17 years were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria consisted of PCFD deformity corrected by a medializing calcaneal osteotomy (MCO) as main procedure and imaged by WBCT before and after surgery. Exclusion criteria were patients who had concomitant calcaneal lengthening osteotomies, mid-/hindfoot fusions, hindfoot coalitions, and supramalleolar procedures. Image data were used to generate 3D models and compute the hindfoot (HA), midfoot (MA) - and subtalar joint (STJ) alignment in the coronal, sagittal and axial plane, as well as distance maps. RESULTS: Pre-operative measurements of the HA and MA improved significantly relative to their post-operative equivalents p < 0.05). The post-operative STJ alignment showed significant inversion (2.8° ± 1.7), abduction (1.5° ± 1.8), and dorsiflexion (2.3° ± 1.7) of the talus relative to the calcaneus (p < 0.05) compared to the pre-operative alignment. The displacement between the talus and calcaneus relative to the sinus tarsi increased significantly (0.6 mm±0.5; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study detected significant changes in the sagittal, coronal, and axial plane alignment of the subtalar joint, which corresponded to a decompression of the sinus tarsi. These findings contribute to our clinical practice by demonstrating the magnitude of alteration in the subtalar joint alignment that can be expected after PCFD correction with MCO as main procedure.

Diagnostic applications and benefits of weightbearing CT in the foot and ankle: A systematic review of clinical studies.

BACKGROUND: Foot and ankle weightbearing CT (WBCT) imaging has emerged over the past decade. However, a systematic review of diagnostic applications has not been conducted so far. METHOD: A systematic literature search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines after Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration. Studies analyzing diagnostic applications of WBCT were included. Main exclusion criteria were: cadaveric specimens and simulated WBCT. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used for quality assessment. RESULTS: A total of 78 studies were eligible for review. Diagnostic applications were identified in following anatomical area's: ankle (n = 14); hindfoot (n = 41); midfoot (n = 4); forefoot (n = 19). Diagnostic applications that could not be used on weightbearing radiographs (WBRX) were reported in 56/78 studies. The mean MINORS was 9.8/24 (range: 8-12). CONCLUSION: Diagnostic applications of WBCT were most frequent in the hindfoot, but other areas are on the rise. Post-processing of images was the main benefit compared to WBRX based on a moderate quality of the identified studies.

Application of external torque enhances the detection of subtle syndesmotic ankle instability in a weight-bearing CT.

PURPOSE: Acute syndesmotic ankle injuries continue to impose a diagnostic dilemma and it remains unclear whether weightbearing and/or external rotation should be added during the imaging process. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess if combined weightbearing and external rotation increases the diagnostic sensitivity of syndesmotic ankle instability using weightbearing CT (WBCT) imaging, compared to isolated weightbearing. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients with an acute syndesmotic ankle injury were analysed using a WBCT (N = 21; Age = 31.6 ± 14.1 years old). Inclusion criteria were an MRI confirmed syndesmotic ligament injury imaged by a WBCT of the ankle during weightbearing and combined weightbearing-external rotation. Exclusion criteria consisted of fracture associated syndesmotic injuries. Three-dimensional (3D) models were generated from the CT slices. Tibiofibular displacement and talar rotation were quantified using automated 3D measurements (anterior tibiofibular distance (ATFD), Alpha angle, posterior Tibiofibular distance (PTFD) and Talar rotation (TR) angle in comparison to the contralateral non-injured ankle. RESULTS: The difference in neutral-stressed Alpha angle and ATFD showed a significant difference between patients with a syndesmotic ankle lesion and contralateral control (P = 0.046 and P = 0.039, respectively). The difference in neutral-stressed PTFD and TR angle did not show a significant difference between patients with a syndesmotic ankle lesion and healthy ankles (n.s.). CONCLUSION: Application of combined weightbearing-external rotation reveals an increased ATFD in patients with syndesmotic ligament injuries. This study provides the first insights based on 3D measurements to support the potential relevance of applying external rotation during WBCT imaging. In clinical practice, this could enhance the current diagnostic accuracy of subtle syndesmotic instability in a non-invasive manner. However, to what extent certain displacement patterns require operative treatment strategies has yet to be determined in future studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Defining Reference Values for the Normal Adult Lisfranc Joint Using Weightbearing Computed Tomography.

The uninjured contralateral feet of consecutive patients undergoing cone-beam weightbearing computed tomography for acute Lisfranc injury between July 2017 and October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, any cases with history or radiological evidence of trauma to the Lisfranc interval were excluded. The area of the non-weightbearing (NWBA) and weightbearing (WBA) Lisfranc joint was calculated (in mm2) using a novel technique. Area difference (AD) was calculated as WBA-NWBA. Area ratio (AR) was calculated as WBA/NWBA. A subset of cases was double-measured by 2 technologists to evaluate inter- and intraobserver variability. A total of 91 patients aged 15 to 74 years were included in the study. The measurement technique was reproducible with excellent intraobserver correlation (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.998, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.996-0.999) and high interobserver correlation (ICC: 0.964, CI: 0.939-0.979). The median NWBA was 83 (range 52-171) and median WBA was 86 (range 52-171). Median AD was 1 mm2 (range -3 to 10) and median AR was 1.01 (range 0.96-1.11). No significant difference was identified in AD or AR when adjusted for age, gender, patient-weight or weight put through the foot. Both AD and AR distributions were highly skewed toward 0 and 1, respectively. Based on 95% CI, normal reference range for AD is -1 to 7 mm2 and for AR is 0.98 to 1.09. Absolute area of the Lisfranc joint is highly variable between individuals. The Lisfranc joint is rigid with little to no physiologic widening in most subjects. The normal upper limit of widening of the Lisfranc area on weightbearing was 9%. Differences in age, sex, patient-weight or weight put through the foot were not significantly associated with the extent of joint widening.

Radiological and Anatomical Evaluation of First Metatarsal Pronation in Hallux Valgus Deformity: A Comparison Between Three Different Methods.

A frontal plane metatarsal rotational (pronation) has been documented in a high percentage of hallux valgus patients. Pathoanatomical concepts leading to pronation are still debated. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on how to measure this component of the deformity. The aim of the present study was to compare three commonly used radiographic methods to measure the frontal plane deformity in hallux valgus deformity, such as 1. Round sign of the lateral edge of the first metatarsal head on anterior-posterior radiograph, 2. Non-weightbearing CT-scan and 3. Bernard's axial projection of the first metatarsal head. Afterwards, feet were dissected, and a direct measurement of the pronation was done. Our data showed that alpha angle measurements made through the Bernard's axial projection were closer with those obtained during the dissection compared to those made through the CT-scan. The main finding of our study is that osteoarthritic changes at the metatarso-sesamoid joint play an important role in severe hallux valgus cases. The proposed radiographic methods allow surgeons to verify whether rotation can be corrected during Hallux Valgus procedures and to determine which procedure may be the best for each patient.

Semi-automated 3-dimensional analysis of the normal foot and ankle using weight bearing CT - A report of normal values and bony relationships.

BACKGROUND: Foot and ankle deformities have translational and rotational components in multiple planes, at multiple levels. Semi-automatic segmentation is a relatively new technology, which when used with weight-bearing CT (WBCT), can build an accurate model of the foot and calculate the orientation and relationships of bones under physiological load. However, few papers report reference values using these techniques. We report normative values for key bony relationships based on semi-automated analysis of WBCT. METHODS: This was a single-centre, retrospective analysis of 100 feet without deformity from 55 adult patients undergoing WBCT as part of routine clinical activity (mean age 40.5 ± 17.3 years). Imaging was analysed using Bonelogic 2.1 (DISIOR, Finland). Semi-automatic segmentation was used to compute the various bony axes in 3-dimensional space. Selected coronal, axial and sagittal plane relationships were then calculated for bones of the hindfoot, midfoot and forefoot. RESULTS: Data is presented on axial and sagittal plane relationships between the metatarsals in the forefoot, and the metatarsals and cuneiforms in the midfoot. In the hindfoot, the calcaneal pitch, talar-first-metatarsal angles, talonavicular coverage angles and Saltzman angles are reported. Coronal plane axes and their relationships are reported at multiple levels from hindfoot to forefoot. Results are presented as mean values with standard deviations and 95% confidence intervals. CONCLUSIONS: We present an observational analysis of the normal values from non-deformed feet. We highlight the major relationships in the axial, sagittal and coronal planes as obtained by semi-automated analysis of WBCT. This data may serve as a reference for future research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic science study.

Hindfoot motion through helical axis image-based on dynamic CT scan using an original simulated weightbearing device.

BACKGROUND: Determining the treatment of subtalar joint (STJ) instability requires a better understanding of the biomechanical principles underlying the condition and, a proper diagnosis. This study aimed to analyze "in vivo" the range of motion of the subtalar joint (STJ) measured on two (2D) and three dimensions (3D) image-based on CT Scan using an original device that maintains a simulated weightbearing. The secondary goal was to correlate the 2D and 3D measurement. METHODS: An observational study was conducted, using an original Dynamic Simulated Weightbearing Device. Asymptomatic ankles were included. Each subject underwent a CT scan under mechanical stress and simulated weightbearing conditions, maintaining maximum eversion and inversion hindfoot positions. The images were obtained, combining both inversion and eversion positions in a single model, which allows for to calculation of the motion vector as well as the helical axis. The helical axis (rotation angle and translation distance), subtalar tilt, anterior drawer, and, subtalar and calcaneocuboid uncoverage were the determinations. RESULTS: Forty asymptomatic ankles were included. The average range of motion of the STJ amounts to 31.5° ± 9.1° of rotation and 1.56 ± 0.8 mm of translation distance. The anterior drawer and subtalar uncoverage variables were statistically significantly related to each other (r = 0.57; P = 0.00001). However, these 2-D measured variables were not related to kinematic measures of rotation through the helical axis (3D) (p = 0.14; p = 0.19) CONCLUSIONS: The average range of motion of the STJ amounts to 31.5° ± 9.1° of rotation and 1.56 ± 0.8 mm of translation distance. We found no significant correlation between 2D and 3D measurements. In our opinion, the rotation angle and translation distance should be considered the most accurate measurements and should be calculated on every STJ instability for comparison with the asymptomatic population LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Observational study.

Assessing the coronal plane deformity in Charcot Marie Tooth Cavovarus feet using automated 3D measurements.

BACKGROUND: This study assesses the coronal-plane deformities in cavovarus feet secondary to Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) using Weightbearing-CT (WBCT) and semi-automated 3D-segmentation software. METHODS: WBCTs from 30 CMT-cavovarus feet were matched to 30 controls and analysed using semi-automatic 3D-segmentation (Bonelogic, DISIOR). The software used automated cross-section sampling with subsequent straight-line representation of weighted centre points to calculate 3D axes of bones in the hindfoot, midfoot and forefoot. Coronal relationships of these axes were analysed. Supination/pronation of the bones in relation to the ground and within each joint were measured and reported. RESULTS: The most significant deformity in CMT-cavovarus feet occurred at the talonavicular joint (TNJ) with 23 degrees more supination than normal feet (6.4 ± 14.5 versus 29.4 ± 7.0 degrees, p < 0.001). This was countered by relative pronation at the naviculo-cuneiform joints (NCJ) of 7.0 degrees (-36.0 ± 6.6 versus -43.0 ± 5.3 degrees, p < 0.001). Combined hindfoot varus and TNJ supination resulted in an additive supination effect not compensated by NCJ pronation. The cuneiforms in CMT-cavovarus feet were therefore supinated by 19.8 degrees to the ground relative to normal feet (36.0 ± 12.1 versus 16.2 ± 6.8 degrees, p < 0.001). The forefoot-arch and 1st metatarsal-ground angles demonstrated similar supination to the cuneiforms suggesting no further significant rotation occurred distally. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate coronal plane deformity occurs at multiple levels in CMT-cavovarus feet. Majority of the supination arises at the TNJ, and this is partially countered by pronation distally, mainly at the NCJ. An understanding of the location of coronal deformities may help when planning surgical correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Multiplanar instability of the first tarsometatarsal joint in hallux valgus and hallux rigidus patients: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Hypermobility of the first ray has been considered associated with various forefoot diseases including hallux valgus (HV) and hallux rigidus (HR). Weightbearing CT scan can be a reliable method for analysis of the first tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint in axial, sagittal, and coronal planes. Our objective was to comparatively investigate signs of instability of the first TMT joint on weightbearing CT between three groups (control, HV, and HR). METHODS: In this single-centre, retrospective, case-control study, 27 HV patients (30 feet; mean age 54.2 years), 26 HR patients (30 feet; mean age 56.6 years), and 30 controls (30 feet; mean age; 43 years) were enrolled. Measurements of signs of instability were performed in multiplanes including first TMT angle, dorsal translation of the first metatarsal (M1) at the first TMT joint, plantar distance between the medial cuneiform (C1) and M1 in sagittal plane, hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA) in axial plane, rotational profiles of C1 and M1 in coronal plane. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and chi-square test were performed to compare each parameter between the three groups. Interobserver reliabilities were assessed using interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: The HV group had significantly increased first TMT angle (0.23° in controls, 1.15° in HV, 0.19° in HR, p < 0.001), HVA (7.52°, 33.50°, 11.21°, p < 0.001), IMA (9.46°, 16.98°, 11.87°, p < 0.001), C1-M1 angle (22.44°, 29.46°, 23.74°, p < 0.001), and rotational profile of the distal M1 (7.06°, 17.88°, 9.85°, p < 0.001) compared with the control and HR groups. Dorsal translation of M1 (23% in controls, 63% in HV, 70% in HR, p < 0.001) was frequently found in the HV and HR groups with significantly increased plantar distance (0.37 mm, 1.14 mm, 1.46 mm, p < 0.001) compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: Multiplanar instability of the first TMT joint was confirmed using weightbearing CT in HV and HR groups compared with controls. HV group demonstrated instability mainly in sagittal and axial planes; HR group had sagittal instability predominantly. Our measurement of rotational instability at the first TMT joint was not able to detect differences between groups. A surgical correction of the instability at the first TMT joint can be an option to address HV and HR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: First ray hypermobility at the first TMT joint is an important consideration when addressing HV and HR, a surgical correction of the instability at the first TMT joint should be taken in consideration as an option.

Weightbearing CT assessment of foot and ankle joints in Pes Planovalgus using distance mapping.

INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study was to describe the abnormal joint surface interaction at the ankle, hindfoot and midfoot joints in patients presenting with Pes Planovalgus (PPV) using three-dimensional (3D) distance mapping on weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) images by comparing a series of PPVs to a series of normally-aligned feet. We hypothesized that in PPVs joint interactions would reveal significantly increased spaces in the medial side of the ankle, hindfoot and midfoot joints. METHODS: In this case-control study, ten feet (10 patients) with asymptomatic PPV were compared to 10 matched-paired (by age, gender and body mass index) normally-aligned feet (10 patients). Three-dimensional models were produced from the images and distance maps representing joint surface configuration were generated for the ankle, hindfoot and midfoot joints. The distance maps for each joint were then compared between the two groups and between regions in the same group. RESULTS: In PPV patients there was a significantly increased surface-to-surface distance anteromedially at the ankle joint (+46.3%, p < 0.001) along with an increased distance on the anterior halves of both the medial (+21.3%, p = 0.098) and lateral malleoli (+22.7%, p = 0.038). At the posterolateral corner of the posterior facet of the subtalar joint we found an increased surface-to-surface distance (by 57.1%, p < 0.001), while at the talonavicular joint there was a reduction of the distance at the superomedial corner (-20%, p = 0.097) along with a significant increase in the upper central (+20%, p = 0.039) and lateral (+30.7%, p = 0.015) zones. A reduction of the surface-to-surface distance was also observed in three of the four zones of the calcaneocuboid joint. Finally, a statistically significant increase in the mean distance was observed at the naviculocuneiform and tarsometatarsal joints in a range between 38% and 93.4% (p < 0.001 in all cases). CONCLUSION: We found significant differences in surface-to-surface interaction at the foot and ankle joints between Pes Planovalgus and normally-aligned controls. Distance mapping on WBCT images could be used in clinical practice as a diagnostic support to gauge the morphological changes of articular spaces occurring in Pes Planovalgus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

Pronation on weightbearing radiographs does not correlate with pronation from weightbearing CT scans.

INTRODUCTION: In hallux valgus (HV), first metatarsal pronation is increasingly recognized as an important aspect of the deformity. The purpose of this study was to compare pronation in HV patients determined from the shape of the lateral head of the first metatarsal on AP weightbearing radiographs with pronation calculated from weightbearing CT (WBCT) scans. METHODS: Patients were included in this study if they had preoperative and 5-month postoperative WBCT scans and corresponding weightbearing AP radiographs of the affected foot. Pronation of the first metatarsal on WBCT scans was measured using a 3D CAD model and the alpha angle and categorized into four groups on radiographs. Association between pronation groups on radiographs and WBCT scans was determined using Spearman correlation coefficients (rs) and by comparing mean WBCT pronation of the first metatarsal between plain radiograph pronation groups. RESULTS: Agreement between the two observers' pronation on radiographs was good (k = 0.634) and moderate (k = 0.501), respectively. There was no correlation between radiographic pronation and the 3D CAD model (rs < 0.15). Preoperatively, there was weak correlation between the alpha angle and the radiographic pronation groups (rs = 0.371, P = 0.048) although this relationship did not hold postoperatively (rs = 0.330, P = 0.081). There was no difference in mean pronation calculated on WBCT scans between the plain radiographic groups. CONCLUSION: Pronation of the first metatarsal measured on weightbearing AP radiographs had moderate interobserver agreement and was only weakly associated with pronation measured from WBCT scans. These results suggest that first metatarsal pronation measured on weightbearing radiographs is not a substitute for pronation measured on WBCT scans. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort study.

Reliability of measurements assessing the Lisfranc joint using weightbearing computed tomography imaging.

INTRODUCTION: Subtle Lisfranc joint injuries remain challenging to diagnose in clinical practice. Although of questionable accuracy, bilateral weightbearing radiographs are considered the current gold standard to assess these injuries. However, weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT), which provides clearer visualization of bony landmarks, can also be used for evaluation. This study aims to design a protocol that reliably measures the distance between the medial cuneiform (C1) and second metatarsal (M2) to assess the Lisfranc joint using WBCT imaging. METHODS: Two unique methods of measuring the C1-M2 distance were designed that localize the center of the interosseous Lisfranc ligament (ILL, reference point). This reference point was located by (I) measuring a specific distance at the M2 base, or (II) approximating from nearby bony landmarks, on both axial (Ax) and coronal (Cor) WBCT images. Four parameters (I-Ax, I-Cor, II-Ax, and II-Cor) were evaluated for each of 96 specimens. Measurements were recorded by three independent observers and repeated for inter- and intra-observer agreement. RESULTS: In total, 96 patient image series were included and assessed in our study with an average age of 46 (19-66, SD 16.1) and average BMI of 25.8 (17.8-30.5, SD 4.3). I-Ax showed excellent agreement for intra-observer evaluation (R = 0.802) and good agreement for inter-observer evaluation (R = 0.727). I-Cor demonstrated excellent inter- (R = 0.814) and intra-observer (R = 0.840) agreement. Good agreement was found for both II-Ax and II-Cor for both intra- (R = 0.730, R = 0.708) and inter-observer (R = 0.705, R = 0.645) evaluation. CONCLUSION: Measuring the C1-M2 joint space with coronal WBCT imaging through a protocol that localizes the ILL is reproducible, simple, and can potentially be utilized clinically to evaluate the Lisfranc joint.

Distance mapping of the foot and ankle joints using weightbearing CT: The cavovarus configuration.

INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study was to characterize the abnormal joint surface interaction at the ankle, hindfoot and midfoot joints of the cavovarus foot using distance mapping on weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) images by comparing a series of cavovarus feet to a series of normally-aligned feet. METHODS: In this case-control study, ten feet (10 patients) with asymptomatic cavovarus shape (cases; N = 10) were compared to 10 matched-paired (by age, gender and body mass index) normally-aligned feet (10 patients) (controls; N = 10). Three-dimensional models were produced from the images and distance maps representing joint surface configuration were generated for the ankle, hindfoot and midfoot joints. The distance maps for each joint were then compared between the two groups and between regions in the same group. RESULTS: In the cavovarus group there was a significant increase in surface-to-surface distance at the posterior tibiotalar joint and a reduced distance at the anterior part, together with a greater distance at the posterior half of the medial gutter. Also, a decrease in surface-to-surface distance on the anterior half of the anterior facet and an increased distance on the posterior quadrants of the posterior facet of the subtalar joint were found. At the sinus tarsi, the lateral aspect of the talonavicular joint, the naviculocuneiform and the tarsometatarsal joints there was a statistically significant increase in surface-to-surface distance in cavovarus patients as compared to controls. CONCLUSION: Distance mapping analysis on WBCT images identified significant differences in surface-to-surface interaction at the foot and ankle joints between cavovarus and normally-aligned feet. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

A bi-radial approach to define the sagittal geometry of the healthy ankle.

BACKGROUND: Previous descriptions of the sagittal geometry of the tibia and talus have involved single radius curves. The purpose of this investigation was to: determine if the sagittal curvature of the medial and lateral sides of the talus and tibia can be described by dividing the condyles into anterior and posterior regions, determine tibiotalar congruency, and categorize the morphological configurations of the talus and tibia. METHODS: Eighteen subjects underwent weightbearing CT scans and the osseous curvature was analyzed. RESULTS: For the talus, the medial anterior radius was smaller than the lateral anterior radius. For the distal tibia, the lateral posterior radius was smaller than the medial posterior radius. Tibiotalar congruency varied by region. The most common geometric configuration was two cones, one anterior and one posterior, pointed in opposite directions. CONCLUSION: The sagittal profiles of the tibia and talus can be more accurately described using a bi-radial approach as compared to a single radius.

Pes cavovarus in Charcot-Marie-Tooth compared to the idiopathic cavovarus foot: A preliminary weightbearing CT analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pes cavovarus is a foot deformity that can be idiopathic (I-PC) or acquired secondary to other pathology. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is the most common adult cause for acquired pes cavovarus deformity (CMT-PC). The foot morphology of these distinct patient groups has not been previously investigated. The aim of this study was to assess if morphological differences exist between CMT-PC, I-PC and normal feet (controls) using weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of WBCT scans performed between May 2013 and June 2017 was undertaken. WBCT scans from 17 CMT-PC, 17 I-PC and 17 healthy normally-aligned control feet (age-, side-, sex- and body mass index-matched) identified from a prospectively collected database, were analysed. Eight 2-dimensional (2D) and three 3-dimensional (3D) measurements were undertaken for each foot and mean values in the three groups were compared using one-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between CMT-PC or I-PC and controls (p<0.05). Two-dimensional measurements were similar in CMT-PC and I-PC, except for forefoot arch angle (p=0.04). 3D measurements (foot and ankle offset, calcaneal offset and hindfoot alignment angle) demonstrated that CMT-PC exhibited more severe hindfoot varus malalignment than I-PC (p=0.03, 0.04 and 0.02 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CMT-related cavovarus and idiopathic cavovarus feet are morphologically different from healthy feet, and CMT feet exhibit increased forefoot supination and hindfoot malalignment compared to idiopathic forms. The use of novel three-dimensional analysis may help highlight subtle structural differences in patients with similar foot morphology but aetiologically different pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

A simple foot pedal device in a horizontal bore imaging facility replicates weightbearing outcomes for Hallux Valgus patients.

BACKGROUND: Weightbearing images are important to the diagnosis of foot pathologies as are the three dimensional views available from CT and MRI. Standard three-dimensional imaging hardware, however, does not have a simple tool to obtain weightbearing images. The current research aimed to design, build and test a simple device to apply load in a horizontal bore imaging facility. METHODS: With the immediate need in hallux valgus studies, hallux valgus subjects were imaged using the new loading device, which could be easily transported and had no additional electronics. RESULTS: Testing showed that the usual angular measures of the foot (intermetatarsal and hallux valgus) replicated the results from the standard of care standing plain film results. With application of load, HV angle changed from 29.9° non-weightbearing to 32.2° weightbearing, while IM angle changed from nonweightbearing 15.8° to weightbearing 16.5°. CONCLUSION: The pedal-like device can provide weightbearing images in a horizontal bore MRI facility.

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of cone beam weightbearing semi-automatic three-dimensional measurements in symptomatic pes cavovarus.

INTRODUCTION: Pes cavovarus is a three-dimensional (3D) foot deformity. New 3D semi-automatic measurements utilising weightbearing computerised topography (WBCT) images have recently been proposed to assess hindfoot alignment, but reliability in pes cavovarus has never been investigated. The aim of this study was to assess intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the foot ankle offset (FAO), calcaneal offset (CO) and hindfoot alignment angle (HAA) in pes cavovarus. METHODS: Anonymised WBCT datasets from 51 feet (17 Charcot-Marie-Tooth related cavovarus, 17 idiopathic cavovarus and 17 controls) were retrospectively reviewed. Three observers (two senior foot and ankle fellows and one orthopaedic resident) independently measured FAO, CO and HAA using dedicated software, with measurements repeated two weeks apart. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess whether aetiology or severity of varus deformity and level of seniority affected reliability. RESULTS: Mean values for intra and interobserver reliability for FAO (r=0.98; ICC: 0.99), CO (r=0.97; ICC: 0.98) and HAA measurements (r=0.97; ICC: 0.98) were excellent. Subgroup analyses showed that FAO, CO and HAA's intra (r/ρ range, 0.77-0.95) and interobserver (ICC range, 0.88-0.98) reliability remained excellent in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth related cavovarus, idiopathic pes cavovarus and normal feet, regardless of the severity of deformity. No difference was found in FAO, CO and HAA mean values from three observers (p>0.05 in all cases). DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates that 3D semi-automatic measurements of WBCT images have excellent intra and interobserver reliability in the assessment of hindfoot alignment in pes cavovarus. Aetiology and severity of deformity, and level of seniority do not affect reliability of these measurements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Is load application necessary when using computed tomography scans to diagnose syndesmotic injuries? A cadaver study.

BACKGROUND: Injuries to the distal tibio-fibular ligaments are common. While pronounced injuries can be reliably diagnosed using conventional radiographs, assessment of subtle syndesmotic injuries is challenging. This cadaver study determines the impact of loading on the assessment of incomplete and more complete syndesmotic injuries when using weightbearing computed tomography (CT) scans. METHODS: Fourteen paired male cadavers (tibial plateau to toe-tip) were included. A radiolucent frame held specimens in a plantigrade position while both non-weightbearing and weightbearing computed tomography (CT) scans were taken. The following conditions were tested: First, intact ankles (Native) were scanned. Second, one specimen from each pair underwent anterior inferior tibio-fibular ligament (AITFL) transection (Condition 1A), while the contralateral underwent deltoid transection (Condition 1B). Third, the remaining intact deltoid or AITFL was transected from each specimen (Condition 2). Finally, the distal tibiofibular interosseous membrane (IOM) was transected in all ankles (Condition 3). Eight different measurements were performed to assess the integrity of the distal tibio-fibular syndesmosis on axial CT scans. RESULTS: Load application had no impact on most measurements. While incomplete syndesmotic injuries could not be identified, cadavers with more complete injuries differentiated from native ankles when assessed using axial CT images. No significant difference was evident between discrete AITFL or deltoid ligament transection. CONCLUSIONS: In a cadaver model, load application had no effect on the assessment of the distal tibio-fibular syndesmosis in incomplete and more complete syndesmotic injuries. Only more complete injuries of the distal tibio-fibular syndesmosis could be identified using axial CT images.

Results of more than 11,000 scans with weightbearing CT - Impact on costs, radiation exposure, and procedure time.

BACKGROUND: Weightbearing CT (WBCT) has been proven to more precisely measure bone position than conventional weightbearing radiographic series (R) and conventional CT (CT). The purpose of this study was to assess the benefit of using WBCT instead of R and/or CT as the standard imaging modality, evaluating image acquisition time, radiation dose, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: All patients who obtained a WBCT as part of standard of care from July 1, 2013 until March 15, 2019 were included in the study. Image acquisition time (T), radiation dose (RD) per patient, and cost-effectiveness were analyzed and compared between the time period using WBCT (yearly average) and the parameters from 2012, i.e. before the availability of WBCT (RCT group). RESULTS: 11,009 WBCT scans were obtained from 4987 patients (4,987 scans (45%) before treatment; 6,022 scans (55%) at follow-up). On a yearly average, 1,957 WBCTs (bilateral scans) and an additional 10.6 CTs (bilateral feet and ankles) were obtained (WBCT group). In 2012, 1,850 Rs (bilateral feet, dorsoplantar and lateral, metatarsal head skyline view) and 254 CTs were obtained from 885 patients (RCT group). The mean yearly RD was 4.3/4.8uSv for the WBCT/RCT groups (mean difference of .5uSv; a decrease of 10% for the WBCT group; p<.01). Yearly mean T was 114/493h in total (3.3/16.0min per patient) for WBCT/RCT groups (mean difference of 379h; a 77% decrease for the WBCT group; p<.01). Yearly cost-effectiveness was a mean profit of 43,959/-723 Euros for WBCT/RCT groups. CONCLUSIONS: 11,009 WBCT scans from 4,987 patients over a period of 5.6 years at a foot and ankle department resulted in 10% decreased RD, 77% decreased T, and increased financial profit (51 Euros per patient) for the institution.