Cost-Effectiveness of Radar Localisation Versus Wire Localisation for Wide Local Excision of Non-palpable Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Wire localisation (WL) is the "gold standard" localisation technique for wide local excision (WLE) of non-palpable breast lesions but has disadvantages that have led to the development of wireless techniques. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of radar localisation (RL) to WL. METHODS: This was a single-institution study of 110 prospective patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing WLE using RL with the SCOUT® Surgical Guidance System (2021-2023) compared with a cohort of 110 patients using WL. Margin status, re-excision rates, and surgery delays associated with preoperative localisation were compared. Costs from a third-party payer perspective in Australian dollars (AUD$) calculated by using microcosting, break-even point, and cost-utility analyses. RESULTS: A total of 110 WLEs using RL cost a total of AUD$402,281, in addition to the device cost of AUD$77,150. The average additional cost of a surgery delay was AUD$2318. Use of RL reduced the surgery delay rate by 10% (p = 0.029), preventing 11 delays with cost savings of AUD$25,496. No differences were identified in positive margin rates (RL: 11.8% vs. WL: 17.3%, p = 0.25) or re-excision rates (RL: 14.5% vs. WL: 21.8%, p = 0.221). In total, 290 RL cases are needed to break even. The cost of WLE using RL was greater than WL by AUD$567. There was a greater clinical benefit of 1.15 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and an incremental cost-utility ratio of AUD$493 per QALY favouring RL. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of RL was a more cost-effective intervention than WL. Close to 300 RL cases are likely needed to be performed to recover costs of the medical device. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12624000068561.

Mohs micrographic surgery in the surgical treatment paradigm of melanoma in situ and invasive melanoma: A clinical review of treatment efficacy and ongoing controversies.

Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) for treatment of melanoma offers several advantages over wide local excision (WLE), including complete histologic margin evaluation, same-day resection and closure, and sparing of healthy tissue in critical anatomic sites. Recently, a large volume of clinical data demonstrating efficacy in MMS treatment of melanoma was published, leading to emerging patient safety considerations of incurred treatment costs, risk of tumor upstaging, and failure of care coordination for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). MMS offers a safe, effective, and value-based treatment for both melanoma in situ (MIS) and invasive melanoma (IM), particularly with immunohistochemistry use on frozen sections. Compared to wide local excision, MMS treatment demonstrates similar or improved outcomes for local tumor recurrence, melanoma-specific survival, and overall survival at long-term follow-up. Tumor upstaging risk is low, and if present, alteration to clinical management is minimal. Discussion of SLNB for eligible head and neck IM cases should be done prior to MMS. Though challenging, successful multidisciplinary coordination of SLNB with MMS has been demonstrated. Herein, we provide a detailed clinical review of evidence for MMS treatment of cutaneous melanoma and offer recommendations to address current controversies surrounding the evolving paradigm of surgical management for both MIS and invasive melanoma (IM).

Guidelines How to Integrate Surgery and Targeted Therapy with Biologics for the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Delphi Consensus Statements from an Italian Expert Panel.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent and painful nodules and abscesses in intertriginous skin areas, which can progress to sinus tract formation, tissue destruction, and scarring. HS is highly debilitating and severely impairs the psychological well-being and quality of life of patients. The therapeutic approach to HS is based on medical therapy and surgery. First-line medical therapy includes topical antibiotics, systemic antibiotics, and biologics. Main surgical procedures include deroofing, local excision, and wide local excision. Despite the availability of multiple therapeutic options, the rates of disease recurrence and progression continue to be high. In recent years, the possibility of combining biologic therapy and surgery has raised considerable interest. In a clinical trial, the perioperative use of adalimumab has been associated with greater response rates and improved inflammatory load and pain, with no increased risk of postoperative infectious complications. However, several practical aspects of combined biologic therapy and surgery are poorly defined. In June 2022, nine Italian HS experts convened to address issues related to the integration of biologic therapy and surgery in clinical practice. To this purpose, the experts identified 10 areas of interest based on published evidence and personal experience: (1) patient profiling (diagnostic criteria, disease severity classification, assessment of response to treatment, patient-reported outcomes, comorbidities); (2) tailoring surgery to HS characteristics; (3) wide local excision; (4) presurgery biologic treatment; (5) concomitant biologic and surgical treatments; (6) pre- and postsurgery management; (7) antibiotic systemic therapy; (8) biologic therapy after radical surgery; (9) management of adverse events to biologics; and (10) management of postoperative infectious complications. Consensus between experts was reached using the Estimate-Talk-Estimate method (Delphi Method). The statements were subsequently presented to a panel of 27 HS experts from across Italy, and their agreement was assessed using the UCLA Appropriateness Method. This article presents and discusses the consensus statements.

Mohs surgery for female genital Paget's disease: a prospective observational trial.

BACKGROUND: Extramammary Paget's disease recurs often after traditional surgical excision. Margin-controlled surgery improves the recurrence rate for male genital disease but is less studied for female anatomy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare surgical and oncologic outcomes of margin-controlled surgery vs traditional surgical excision for female genital Paget's disease. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a prospective observational trial of patients with vulvar or perianal Paget's disease treated with surgical excision guided by Mohs micrographic surgery between 2018 and 2022. The multidisciplinary protocol consisted of office-based scouting biopsies and modified Mohs surgery followed by surgical excision with wound closure under general anesthesia. Modified Mohs surgery cleared peripheral disease margins using a moat technique with cytokeratin 7 staining. Medial disease margins (the clitoris, urethra, vagina, and anus) were assessed using a hybrid of Mohs surgery and intraoperative frozen sections. Surgical and oncologic outcomes were compared with the outcomes of a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent traditional surgical excision. The primary outcome was 3-year recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: Three-year recurrence-free survival was 93.3% for Mohs-guided excision (n=24; 95% confidence interval, 81.5%-100.0%) compared to 65.9% for traditional excision (n=63; 95% confidence interval, 54.2%-80.0%) (P=.04). The maximum diameter of the excisional specimen was similar between groups (median, 11.3 vs 9.5 cm; P=.17), but complex reconstructive procedures were more common with the Mohs-guided approach (66.7% vs 30.2%; P<.01). Peripheral margin clearance was universally achieved with modified Mohs surgery, but positive medial margins were noted in 9 patients. Reasons included intentional organ sparing and poor performance of intraoperative hematoxylin and eosin frozen sections without cytokeratin 7. Grade 3 or higher postoperative complications were rare (0.0% for Mohs-guided excision vs 2.4% for traditional excision; P=.99). CONCLUSION: Margin control with modified Mohs surgery significantly improved short-term recurrence-free survival after surgical excision for female genital Paget's disease. Use on medial anatomic structures (the clitoris, urethra, vagina, and anus) is challenging, and further optimization is needed for margin control in these areas. Mohs-guided surgical excision requires specialized, collaborative care and may be best accomplished at designated referral centers.

Surgical management of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is an uncommon, locally aggressive cutaneous malignancy. Complete resection is the primary treatment but there is debate over the optimal method. Wide local excision was traditionally the standard of care; however, National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines now recommend Mohs micrographic surgery as the preferred approach. Medical therapy with imatinib can be used in advanced or unresectable disease. This review will discuss the current management of DFSP, focusing on optimal surgical approach.

Differences in sentinel lymph node biopsy utilization in eligible melanoma patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery or wide local excision: A population-based logistic regression model and survival analysis.

BACKGROUND: Primary melanoma management relies on tumor extirpation and staging sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in eligible patients. This study compares SLNB utilization in patients undergoing wide local excision (WLE) or Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). METHODS: American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh edition ≥ patients with T1b melanoma undergoing WLE or MMS in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program were included. Propensity score matching was performed to compare patients who underwent MMS or WLE. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Fine-Gray cumulative incidence functions were used for overall and melanoma-specific survival. RESULTS: Eight hundred twenty-five MMS cases and 38,760 WLE cases were identified. SLNB was performed in 32.61% of MMS patients and 61.77% of WLE patients with positive rates of 12.5% and 14.82%, respectively. Multiple logistic regression of factors associated with SLNB utilization revealed that WLE, male gender, younger age, extremity location, and nodular and rare melanoma subtypes were significantly associated with increased odds of receiving SLNB whereas head and neck location and lentigo maligna melanoma subtype were significantly less likely to receive SLNB. LIMITATIONS: Potential selection bias from a retrospective data set. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving WLE for ≥ T1b melanoma are more likely to receive a SLNB than patients undergoing MMS.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with T1a cutaneous malignant melanoma: A multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is not routinely recommended for T1a cutaneous melanoma due to the overall low risk of positivity. Prognostic factors for positive sentinel lymph node (SLN+) in this population are poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: To determine factors associated with SLN+ in patients with T1a melanoma. METHODS: Patients with pathologic T1a (<0.80 mm, nonulcerated) cutaneous melanoma from 5 high-volume melanoma centers from 2001 to 2020 who underwent wide local excision with sentinel lymph node biopsy were included in the study. Patient and tumor characteristics associated with SLN+ were analyzed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Age was dichotomized into ≤42 (25% quartile cutoff) and >42 years. RESULTS: Of the 965 patients identified, the overall SLN+ was 4.4% (N = 43). Factors associated with SLN+ were age ≤42 years (7.5% vs 3.7%; odds ratio [OR], 2.14; P = .03), head/neck primary tumor location (9.2% vs 4%; OR, 2.75; P = .04), lymphovascular invasion (21.4% vs 4.2%; OR, 5.64; P = .01), and ≥2 mitoses/mm2 (8.2% vs 3.4%; OR, 2.31; P = .03). Patients <42 years with ≥2 mitoses/mm2 (N = 38) had a SLN+ rate of 18.4%. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study. CONCLUSION: SLN+ is low in patients with T1a melanomas, but younger age, lymphovascular invasion, mitogenicity, and head/neck primary site appear to confer a higher risk of SLN+.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy status improves adjuvant therapy decision-making in patients with clinical stage IIB/C melanoma: A population-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Given the results of the recent KEYNOTE-716 trial, the performance of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for patients with clinical stage IIB/C melanoma has been questioned. OBJECTIVE: Determine the utility of SLN status in guiding the recommendations for adjuvant therapy. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage IIB/C cutaneous melanoma who underwent wide local excision and SLN biopsy between 2004 and 2011 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Two prognostic models, with and without SLN status, were developed predicting risk of melanoma-specific death (MSD). The primary outcome was net benefit at treatment thresholds of 20% to 40% risk of 5-year MSD. RESULTS: For the 4391 patients included, the 5-year MSD rate was 46%. The model estimating 5-year MSD risk that included SLN status provided greater net benefit at treatment thresholds from 30% to 78% compared to the model without SLN status. The added net benefit for the SLN biopsy-containing model persisted in subgroup analysis of patients in different age groups and with various T stages. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: A prognostic model with SLN status estimating patient risk for 5-year MSD provides superior net benefit compared to a model with primary tumor staging factors alone for threshold mortality rates ≥30%.

No difference in survival for primary cutaneous Merkel cell carcinoma after Mohs micrographic surgery and wide local excision.

BACKGROUND: The preferred treatment for clinically node-negative Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is surgical excision in conjunction with sentinel lymph node biopsy. There is limited large-scale research on survival outcomes by surgical approach for management of the primary tumor. OBJECTIVE: To compare overall and MCC-specific survival outcomes in clinically and pathologically, node-negative MCC patients treated with wide-local excision (WLE) and Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) in a nationally representative sample. METHODS: Overall and MCC-specific survival outcomes for primary MCC tumors contained in the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results)-18 database from 1989 to 2015 were stratified by surgical modality and analyzed via competing risk analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2359 US adults with MCC were included in the analysis. For overall and MCC-specific survival, there was no significant difference in survival outcomes between WLE and MMS on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.88-1.22]; subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.53-1.09]). Sentinel lymph node biopsy was associated with improved overall survival and MCC-specific survival. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design of SEER and the lack of covariates such as comorbidities and immunostaining. CONCLUSION: There is no survival disadvantage for MMS compared to WLE as the surgical modality for primary cutaneous MCC. Sentinel lymph node biopsy should be coordinated prior to MMS.

Understanding melanoma in situ: Lentigo maligna surgical treatment terminology and guideline adherence, a targeted review.

BACKGROUND: Malignant melanoma in-situ, lentigo maligna (MMIS-LM) can be successfully treated with several different surgical techniques; however, the literature is inconsistent in defining them. OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively define and describe the national guideline recommended surgical techniques used to treat MMIS-LM to help clarify and standardize this terminology to ensure compliance with the guidelines. METHODS: A targeted literature review was performed from 1990 to 2022 focusing on articles that discussed the national guideline recommended surgical techniques of wide local excision, Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), modified Mohs surgery, and staged excision/Slow-Mohs for MMIS-LM, as well as the related methods of tissue processing. National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Academy of Dermatology guidelines were reviewed to identify how the techniques need to be employed to be compliant with guideline recommendations. RESULTS: We describe the various surgical and tissue processing techniques and discuss advantages and disadvantages of each. LIMITATIONS: This paper was styled as a narrative review defining and clarifying terminology and technique and does not investigate these topics more broadly. CONCLUSION: Understanding the methodology and terminology for these surgical procedures and tissue processing methods is critical so that both general dermatologists and surgeons can employ these techniques effectively for optimal patient care.