Overcoming barriers and stigma: new frontiers in solid organ transplantation for people with HIV.

There is a growing need for solid organ transplantation (SOT) for people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). With the advent of antiretroviral therapy, people living with HIV are experiencing increased life expectancies and are, therefore, developing more comorbidities, including end-stage organ disease. In cases of advanced organ failure, SOT is often the best therapeutic option to improve quality of life and overall survival. As organ shortages persist, transplantation of organs from donors with HIV to recipients with HIV has become a potential therapeutic option. This article first reviews the current state of organ transplantation from donors without HIV to recipients with HIV (HIV D-/R+) by organ and discusses key lessons learned from these transplant trials, including those about drug-drug interactions, rejection, and opportunistic infections. It then explores transplantation from donors with HIV to recipients with HIV (HIV D+/R+), a new frontier. Finally, it investigates challenges of implementation, including public awareness and regulatory requirements, and explores future directions for SOT in people living with HIV.

Scoring donor lungs for graft failure risk: The Lung Donor Risk Index (LDRI).

Lung transplantation lags behind other solid organ transplants in donor lung utilization due, in part, to uncertainty regarding donor quality. We sought to develop an easy-to-use donor risk metric that, unlike existing metrics, accounts for a rich set of donor factors. Our study population consisted of n = 26 549 adult lung transplant recipients abstracted from the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file. We used Cox regression to model graft failure (GF; earliest of death or retransplant) risk based on donor and transplant factors, adjusting for recipient factors. We then derived and validated a Lung Donor Risk Index (LDRI) and developed a pertinent online application (https://shiny.pmacs.upenn.edu/LDRI_Calculator/). We found 12 donor/transplant factors that were independently predictive of GF: age, race, insulin-dependent diabetes, the difference between donor and recipient height, smoking, cocaine use, cytomegalovirus seropositivity, creatinine, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch, ischemia time, and donation after circulatory death. Validation showed the LDRI to have GF risk discrimination that was reasonable (C = 0.61) and higher than any of its predecessors. The LDRI is intended for use by transplant centers, organ procurement organizations, and regulatory agencies and to benefit patients in decision-making. Unlike its predecessors, the proposed LDRI could gain wide acceptance because of its granularity and similarity to the Kidney Donor Risk Index.

OPTN/SRTR 2022 Annual Data Report: Kidney.

The year 2022 had continued successes and challenges for the field of kidney transplantation, as the community adapted to ongoing surges of the COVID-19 pandemic and broader geographic organ distribution. The total number of kidney transplants in the United States reached a record count of 26,309, driven by continued growth in deceased donor kidney transplants (DDKTs). The total number of candidates listed for DDKT rose slightly in 2022 but remained below 2019 listing levels, with 12.4% of candidates having been waiting 5 years or longer. Following the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, pretransplant mortality in 2022 declined across age, race and ethnicity, sex, and blood type groups. Pretransplant mortality continued to vary substantially by donation service area. The proportion of deceased donor kidneys recovered but not used for transplant (nonuse rate) rose to a high of 26.7% overall, with greater nonuse of biopsied kidneys (39.8%), kidneys from donors aged 55 years or older (54.7%), and kidneys with a kidney donor profile index (KDPI) of 85% or greater (71.3%). Nonuse of kidneys from donors who are hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody positive rose to 30.2% but only slightly exceeded that of HCV antibody-negative donors. Disparities in access to living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) persist, especially for non-White and publicly insured patients. Delayed graft function continues an upward trend and occurred in 26.3% of adult kidney transplants in 2022. Five-year graft survival after LDKT compared with DDKT was 90.0% versus 81.4% for recipients aged 18-34 years and 80.8% versus 67.8% for recipients aged 65 years or older, respectively. The total number of pediatric kidney transplants performed in 2022 decreased to 705, its lowest point in the past decade; 502 (71.2%) were DDKTs and 203 (28.8%) were LDKTs. Among pediatric recipients, LDKT remains low, with continued racial disparities. The rate of DDKT among pediatric candidates has decreased by almost 25% since 2011. Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract remain the leading primary kidney disease diagnosis among pediatric candidates with a reported diagnosis. Most pediatric deceased donor recipients received a kidney from a donor with a KDPI of less than 35%. The rate of delayed graft function was 5.8% in 2022 and has been stable over the past decade. Long-term graft survival continues to improve, with superior outcomes for living donor transplant recipients.

Geographic disparities in access to liver transplant for advanced cirrhosis: Time to ring the alarm!

Decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer are major risk factors for mortality worldwide. Liver transplantation (LT), both live-donor LT or deceased-donor LT, are lifesaving, but there are several barriers toward equitable access. These barriers are exacerbated in the setting of critical illness or acute-on-chronic liver failure. Rates of LT vary widely worldwide but are lowest in lower-income countries owing to lack of resources, infrastructure, late disease presentation, and limited donor awareness. A recent experience by the Chronic Liver Disease Evolution and Registry for Events and Decompensation consortium defined these barriers toward LT as critical in determining overall survival in hospitalized cirrhosis patients. A major focus should be on appropriate, affordable, and early cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer care to prevent the need for LT. Live-donor LT is predominant across Asian countries, whereas deceased-donor LT is more common in Western countries; both approaches have unique challenges that add to the access disparities. There are many challenges toward equitable access but uniform definitions of acute-on-chronic liver failure, improving transplant expertise, enhancing availability of resources and encouraging knowledge between centers, and preventing disease progression are critical to reduce LT disparities.

Outcomes of ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Compared to Waiting or Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is considered only for patients who do not have an ABO-compatible (ABOc) LD. Therefore, a clinically practical question is whether to proceed with ABOi LDKT or remain on dialysis while waiting for ABOc deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). However, this issue has not been addressed in Asian countries, where ABOi LDKT programs are more active than DDKT programs. METHODS: A total of 426 patients underwent ABOi-LDKT between 2010 and 2020 at Seoul National University Hospital and Severance Hospital, Korea. We compared outcomes between the ABOi-LDKT and the propensity-matched control groups (waiting-list-only group, n = 1,278; waiting-list-or-ABOc-DDKT group, n = 1,278). RESULTS: The ABOi-LDKT group showed a significantly better patient survival rate than the waiting-list-only group (p = 0.001) and the waiting-list-or-ABOc-DDKT group (p = 0.048). When the ABOi-LDKT group was categorized into a high-titer group (peak anti-ABO titer ≥1:128) and a low-titer group (peak anti-ABO titer ≤1:64), the low-titer group showed better patient survival rates than those of the waiting-list-or-ABOc-DDKT group (p = 0.046) or the waiting-list-only group (p = 0.004). In contrast, the high-titer ABOi-LDKT group showed no significant benefit in patient survival compared to the waiting-list-or-ABOc-DDKT group. Death-censored graft survival in the ABOi-LDKT group was not significantly different from that in the ABOc-DDKT group (p = 0.563). CONCLUSION: The ABOi-LDKT group has better outcomes than the waiting-list-or-ABOc-DDKT group in a country with a long waiting time.

Pregnancy after deceased donor vs living donor kidney transplant: associated obstetric and graft outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Outside of pregnancy, recipients of a deceased donor kidney transplant experience worse graft and overall survival compared with recipients of a living donor kidney transplant. In pregnancy, it is unknown whether the type of donor graft modifies either graft health in the peripartum period or pregnancy outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to define characteristics and outcomes in pregnancy based on donor type in kidney transplant recipients. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult kidney transplant recipients who received their graft between 2000 and 2019 with a subsequent pregnancy enrolled in the Transplant Pregnancy Registry International. The primary outcome was graft loss within 2 years of delivery. The secondary outcomes included severe maternal morbidity and neonatal composite morbidity. Univariate, multivariable logistic regression, and Cox proportional-hazards models were constructed for statistical analysis, with recipients of a living unrelated donor as the referent. RESULTS: Overall, 638 pregnant patients after kidney transplant had pregnancy outcomes that met our inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 168 (26.3%) received a graft from a deceased donor, 310 (48.6%) received a graft from a living related donor, and 160 (25.1%) received a graft from a living unrelated donor. Recipients of a deceased donor were more likely to be nulliparous, have an unplanned pregnancy, and self-identify as non-White. Moreover, recipients of a deceased donor were more likely to experience urinary tract infections (deceased donor: 21.8%; living related donor: 10.1%; living unrelated donor: 20.6%; P=.018). Severe maternal morbidity (deceased donor: 3.4%; living related donor: 2.8%; living unrelated donor: 7.2%) and neonatal composite morbidity (deceased donor: 8.4%; living related donor: 17.1%; living unrelated donor: 14.4%) did not differ by donor type. Deceased donor transplant was associated with graft loss within 2 years of delivery (deceased donor: 6.7%; living related donor: 3.7%; living unrelated donor: 1.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 7.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-60.8) and long-term graft loss from transplant (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.95). CONCLUSION: Although our study demonstrated an association between deceased donor transplant and graft loss after pregnancy, it did not provide evidence that pregnancy itself causes graft loss. Recipients of a deceased donor kidney transplant should not be discouraged from pursuing pregnancy based on their donor type, but these patients should undergo preconception counseling with a discussion of their individualized obstetrical and graft risks, close intrapartum monitoring for infection and hypertensive disease, and continued surveillance for at least 2 years after delivery with a multidisciplinary obstetrics and transplant team.

Impact of Asian and Black Donor and Recipient Ethnicity on the Outcomes After Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in the United Kingdom.

Patients of Asian and black ethnicity face disadvantage on the renal transplant waiting list in the UK, because of lack of human leucocyte antigen and blood group matched donors from an overwhelmingly white deceased donor pool. This study evaluates outcomes of renal allografts from Asian and black donors. The UK Transplant Registry was analysed for adult deceased donor kidney only transplants performed between 2001 and 2015. Asian and black ethnicity patients constituted 12.4% and 6.7% of all deceased donor recipients but only 1.6% and 1.2% of all deceased donors, respectively. Unadjusted survival analysis demonstrated significantly inferior long-term allograft outcomes associated with Asian and black donors, compared to white donors. On Cox-regression analysis, Asian donor and black recipient ethnicities were associated with poorer outcomes than white counterparts, and on ethnicity matching, compared with the white donor-white recipient baseline group and adjusting for other donor and recipient factors, 5-year graft outcomes were significantly poorer for black donor-black recipient, Asian donor-white recipient, and white donor-black recipient combinations in decreasing order of worse unadjusted 5-year graft survival. Increased deceased donation among ethnic minorities could benefit the recipient pool by increasing available organs. However, it may require a refined approach to enhance outcomes.

What Italian PICU Healthcare Providers Think About Donation After Cardiocirculatory Determination of Death: A National Survey.

BACKGROUND: Italy presently does not have a pediatric organ donation program after cardiocirculatory determination of death (pDCDD). Before implementing a pDCDD program, many centers globally have conducted studies on the attitudes of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) staff. This research aims to minimize potential adverse reactions and evaluate the acceptance of the novel donation practice. METHODS: We conducted an electronic and anonymous survey on attitudes toward pDCDD among healthcare professionals (HCPs) working at eight Italian PICUs. The survey had three parts: (I) questions about general demographic data; (II) 18 statements about personal wishes to donate, experience of discussing donation, and knowledge about donation; (III) attitudinal statements regarding two pediatric Maastricht III scenarios of organ donation. RESULTS: The response rate was 54.4%, and the majority of respondents were nurses. Of those who responded, 45.3% worked in the Center, 40.8% in the North, and 12.8% in the South of Italy. In total, 93.9% supported pediatric organ and tissue donation, 90.3% supported donation after neurological determination of death (DNDD), 78.2% supported pDCDD, and 69.7% felt comfortable about the idea of participating in pDCDD on Type III patients, with a higher percentage of supportive responses in the Center (77.2%) than in the North (65.1%) and South (54.5%) of Italy (p-value < 0.004). Concerning scenarios, 79.3% of participants believed that organ retrieval took place in a patient who was already deceased. Overall, 27.3% considered their knowledge about DCDD to be adequate. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides insight into the attitudes and knowledge of PICU staff members regarding pDCDD in Italy. Despite a general lack of knowledge on the subject, respondents showed positive attitudes toward pDCDD and a strong consensus that the Italian legislation protocol for determining death based on cardiocirculatory criteria respects the "dead donor rule." There were several distinctions among the northern, central, and southern regions of Italy, and in our view, these disparities can be attributed to the varying practices of commemorating the deceased. In order to assess how practice and training influence the attitude of PICU staff members, it would be interesting to repeat the survey after the implementation of a program.

Use of a donor kidney with known autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in a highly sensitised paediatric recipient.

We report the use of an autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) donor kidney in a paediatric recipient. A 14-year-old boy on haemodialysis for 4 years following loss of a first kidney transplant, highly sensitised, and with limited vascular options for ongoing dialysis access, was offered a deceased brain death donor transplant from a mid-30s donor with known ADPKD but normal kidney function and negligible proteinuria. After extensive discussion with the patient and family, discussing all alternative options and review of available literature, the kidney was accepted and implanted. Graft function was immediate. An early post-transplant creatinine rise was attributed to possible antibody-mediated rejection, treated with plasmapheresis and rituximab. Ten months post-transplant, the patient remains dialysis-free with stable function. Extended criteria kidneys are already considered for highly sensitised or long-waiting dialysis patients. Though the literature is limited, kidneys from patients with ADPKD could be considered within extended criteria offers on a case-by-case basis.

Graft survival and mortality outcomes after kidney transplant in patients with lupus nephritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To explore the effect of lupus nephritis (LN) on graft survival in renal transplant patients. Literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort, and case-control studies. The target population of interest was adult patients (aged >18 years) with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and no history of previous renal transplants. Primary outcomes of interest were graft survival and patient survival. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random-effects models and reported as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 15 studies were included. Compared to patients with ESRD due to other causes, patients with LN undergoing kidney transplant had lower patient survival rate (HR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.31; N = 15, I2=34.3%) and worse graft survival (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.11; N = 16, I2=0.0%), especially when studies with deceased donor were pooled together. Studies with a larger sample size (>200) showed that LN was strongly associated with lower graft and patient survival rates. Elevated risk of mortality in LN patients was detected in case-control studies, but not RCTs. On the other hand, RCTs, but not case-control studies, showed an increased risk of poor graft survival in LN patients. The findings suggest that the presence of LN might have a negative impact on both the graft survival and the overall patient survival of post-transplant ESRD patients. Further studies that account for factors such as study methodology, donor characteristics, and sample size are needed to reach definitive conclusions. Renal transplant patients with LN should undergo regular follow-up examinations.

[Liver transplantation program at the Burnasyan Federal Biophysical Center: experience in 500 procedures]. / Programma transplantatsii pecheni v Federal'nom meditsinskom biofizicheskom tsentre im. A.I. Burnazyana: opyt 500 operatsii.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the features and outcomes of 500 liver transplantations in adults over a 12-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included data on 500 liver transplantations between May 2010 and April 2023. We analyzed 483 adults who underwent transplantation and 438 candidates for this procedure. All data were obtained from local liver transplantation registry. Clinical outcomes were recorded as of June 1, 2023. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistica 12 (StatSoft Inc., USA) and Jamovi version 2.3.21.0 software (Jamovi project). RESULTS: Among 438 patients in the waiting list between January 2012 and May 2023, liver transplantation was performed in 198 (45%) cases including 27 (6%) transplantations from living-related donors and 37 (8%) procedures in other centers. There were 109 (25%) deaths. The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 81% (95% CI 76-85%) and 50% (95% CI 42-59%), respectively. Organs from deceased donors (n=134, 27%) and living-related donors (n=366, 73%) were used for transplantations. Redo transplantations were necessary in 21 (4%) cases. The median age of recipients was 45 years (range 18-72), median MELD-Na score - 16 (range 6-43). The most common indications for transplantation were viral cirrhosis (37%), cholestatic liver disease (16%), and hepatocellular carcinoma (14%). Monotherapy with calcineurin inhibitors was performed in 39% of cases, combination of calcineurin inhibitors and glucocorticoids, antimetabolites or mTOR inhibitors - 52%, three-component schemes - 8% of cases. Annual, 5- and 7-year survival rates of recipients after primary transplantation were 87% (95% CI: 84-90%), 79% (95% CI: 75-83%) and 75% (95% CI: 70-80%), respectively. In case of liver transplantation from living-related donors, these values were 89% (95% CI: 86-92%), 84% (95% CI: 80-88%) and 80% (95% CI: 75-85%), after transplantation from deceased donors - 81% (95% CI: 74-88%), 66% (95% CI: 57-76%) and 58% (95% CI: 45-72%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Liver transplantation is highly effective for patients with diffuse and focal liver diseases. Living donors not only significantly improve availability of this technology, but also provide substantial advantages in outcomes compared to liver transplantation from deceased donors, reducing the likelihood of recipient mortality by 10% after one post-transplantation year and by more than 20% after five years.

Robotic kidney transplantation from deceased donors: A single-center experience.

Robotic-assisted kidney transplant (RAKT) has proven to be a successful approach for patients with elevated body mass index (BMI). To date, a paucity of studies comprehensively analyzing the clinical outcomes of RAKT by using the grafts from deceased donors exists. This was a single-center retrospective analysis of RAKT from deceased donor kidneys (n = 93) from 2009 to 2021. The cohort was divided into 3 groups on the basis of recipient BMI (BMI ≤ 41.2 vs BMI 41.2-44.5 vs BMI ≥ 44.5 kg/m2, n = 31). Delayed graft function was significantly higher in the group with the highest BMI (BMI ≤ 41.2 vs BMI 41.2-44.5 vs BMI ≥ 44.5 kg/m2, 12.5% vs 10% vs 45.16%, P = .001). Graft survival after 12 months of follow-up was significantly lower in the group with BMI of ≥44.5 kg/m2 (BMI ≤ 41.2 vs BMI 41.2-44.5 vs BMI ≥ 44.5 kg/m2, 93.7% vs 100% vs 83.9%. P = .05). For BMI, the relative risk of patient survival was 1.10 for each increase in a BMI in the range of 5 (CI 95%, 0.98-1.21). Death-censored graft survival after 5 years was significantly better than the UNOS-matched cohort (dRAKT vs match, 86.2% vs 68.9%, P = .03). This single-center analysis shows that RAKT can be performed safely; however, caution should be used when matching marginal kidneys with patients with high BMI.

Improving equity in kidney transplant allocation policies through a novel genetic metric: The Matched Donor Potential.

The demand for donors' kidneys continues to increase amid a shortage of available donors. Managing policies to thoughtfully allocate this scarce resource is a complex process. Although human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching has been shown to prolong graft survival, its relative contribution to allocation schemes is empirically compromised owing to competing priorities. We explored using a new metric, Matched Donor Potential (MDP), to facilitate improved HLA matching while promoting equity. We interrogated all active kidney waitlist patients (N = 164 427), their corresponding unacceptable antigen files, and all effective donors in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (January 1, 2016-December 31, 2017). Cause-specific hazard functions were evaluated to assess the potential impact of the MDP metric on deceased donor transplant access rates for all candidates. Access was affected by ethnicity, blood group type, and calculated Panel Reactive Antibody (cPRA). Importantly, we show that access to transplantation is influenced by the patient's own HLA makeup regardless of their ethnicity and by the HLA makeup of effective donors. The MDP metric demonstrates a high association with access to transplantation. Adjusting Cox models to include this new metric resulted in improved access to kidney transplantation for waitlist candidates of minority heritage while significantly promoting HLA matching. Thus, the MDP metric accounts for balanced, equitable organ allocation algorithms.

Increasing the Donor Pool: Organ Transplantation from Donors with HIV to Recipients with HIV.

Implementation of the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act marks a new era in transplantation, allowing organ transplantation from HIV+ donors to HIV+ recipients (HIV D+/R+ transplantation). In this review, we discuss major milestones in HIV and transplantation which paved the way for this landmark policy change, including excellent outcomes in HIV D-/R+ recipient transplantation and success in the South African experience of HIV D+/R+ deceased donor kidney transplantation. Under the HOPE Act, from March 2016 to December 2018, there were 56 deceased donors, and 102 organs were transplanted (71 kidneys and 31 livers). In 2019, the first HIV D+/R+ living donor kidney transplants occurred. Reaching the full estimated potential of HIV+ donors will require overcoming challenges at the community, organ procurement organization, and transplant center levels. Multiple clinical trials are ongoing, which will provide clinical and scientific data to further extend the frontiers of knowledge in this field.

Expanding Liver Transplant Opportunities in Older Patients With Nonconventional Grafts.

INTRODUCTION: Broader use of donation after circulatory death (DCD) and nonconventional grafts for liver transplant helps reduce disparities in organ availability. Limited data, however, exists on outcomes specific to nonconventional graft utilization in older patients. As such, this study aimed to investigate outcomes specific to conventional and nonconventional graft utilization in recipients > 70 y of age. METHODS: 1-to-3 matching based on recipient sex, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, and donor type was performed on patients ≥70 and <70 y of age who underwent liver transplant alone at Mayo Clinic Arizona between 2015 and 2020. Primary outcomes were posttransplant patient and liver allograft survival for recipients greater than or less than 70 y of age. Secondary outcomes included grafts utilization patterns, hospital length of stay, need for reoperation, biliary complications and disposition at time of hospital discharge. RESULTS: In this cohort, 36.1% of grafts came from DCD donors, 17.4% were postcross clamp offers, and 20.8% were nationally allocated. Median recipient ages were 59 and 71 y (P < 0.01). Recipients had similar Intensive care unit (P = 0.82) and hospital (P = 0.14) lengths of stay, and there were no differences in patient (P = 0.68) or graft (P = 0.38) survival. When comparing donation after brain death and DCD grafts in those >70 y, there were no differences in patient (P = 0.89) or graft (P = 0.71) survival. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent outcomes can be achieved in older recipients, even with use of nonconventional grafts. Expanded use of nonconventional grafts can help facilitate transplant opportunities in older patients.

Long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation from deceased donors with terminal acute kidney injury: Single center experience and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation from deceased donors (DDKTs) with terminal acute kidney injury (AKI) are not well defined. METHODS: Single center retrospective review of DDKTs from 1/31/07-12/31/19. AKI kidneys were defined by a doubling of the donor's admission serum creatinine (SCr) level AND a terminal SCr ≥2.0 mg/dl. RESULTS: A total of 188 AKI DDKTs were performed, including 154 from brain-dead standard criteria donors (SCD). Mean donor age was 36 years and mean Kidney Donor Profile Index was 50%; mean admission and terminal SCr levels were 1.3 and 3.1 mg/dl, respectively. With a mean follow-up of 94 months (median 89 months), overall patient (both 71.3%) and graft survival (54% AKI vs. 57% non-AKI) rates were comparable to concurrent DDKTs from brain-dead non-AKI SCDs (n = 769). Delayed graft function (DGF) was higher in AKI kidney recipients (47% vs. 20% non-AKI DDKTs, p < .0001). DGF was associated with lower graft survival in recipients of both AKI and non-AKI SCD kidneys but the impact was earlier and more pronounced in non-AKI recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite having more than twice the incidence of DGF, kidneys from deceased donors with terminal AKI have long-term outcomes comparable to non-AKI SCD kidneys and represent a safe and effective method to expand the donor pool.

Current landscape of kidney allocation: Organ procurement organization perspectives.

Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) play a central role in the recovery, preservation, and distribution of deceased donor kidneys for transplantation in the United States. We conducted a national survey to gather information on OPO practices and perceived barriers to efficient organ placement in the face of the new circle-based allocation and asked for suggestions to overcome them. Of the 57 OPOs, 44 responded (77%). The majority of OPOs (61%) reported barriers to obtaining a kidney biopsy, including lack of an available pathologist. Most OPOs (55%) indicated barriers to pumping owing to a lack of available staff and transportation. Respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the new allocation system has worsened transportation challenges (85%), increased provisional acceptances of kidneys (66%), increased communication challenges with transplant centers (68%), and worsened the efficiency of organ allocation (83%). OPO-suggested solutions include making transplant centers more accountable for inefficient selection practices, developing reliable transportation options, and removing the requirement for national sharing. These findings underscore the need to examine closely the trade-offs of the new allocation system with respect to costs, organ ischemia, and discard. These findings may help inform practice and policy for overcoming transportation barriers and improving the efficiency of organ placement.

Impact of living donor liver transplantation on long-term cardiometabolic and graft outcomes in cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a leading indication for liver transplantation (LT). This study aimed to determine whether living donor LT (LDLT) recipients experienced less recurrent NASH, cirrhosis, and cardiometabolic complications compared to deceased donor LT (DDLT). METHOD: Patients with LDLT and DDLT for NASH between February 2002 and May 2018 at University Health Network (UHN) were compared. Cox Proportional Hazard model was used to analyze overall survival (OS), Fine and Gray's Competing Risk models were conducted to analyze cumulative incidence of post LT outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-nine DDLTs and 66 LDLTs were performed for NASH cirrhosis. Time and rate of recurrence of NAFLD and NASH were comparable in both groups. Graft cirrhosis was more common in DDLT recipients (n = 14) versus LDLT (n = 0) (p < .0001). Significant fibrosis (Fibrosis ≥ F2) developed in 50 recipients (12 LDLT and 38 DDLT) post LT (DDLT vs. LDLT: HR = 1.00, 95% CI = (.52-1.93), p = .91) and there was no difference in time to significant fibrosis (p = .57). There was no difference in development of post-transplant diabetes, dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and cancers. LDLT group had better renal function at 10 years (MDRD eGFR of 57.0 mL/min vs. 48.5 mL/min, p = .047). Both groups had a comparable OS (HR = 1.83 (95% CI = .92-3.62), p = .08). CONCLUSION: Overall, LDLT recipients had significantly better renal function by virtue of having early transplantation in their disease course. LDLT was also associated with significantly less graft cirrhosis, although OS and cardiometabolic outcomes were comparable between LDLT and DDLT.

The Independent Effects of Kidney Length and Vascular Plaque on Ten-Year Outcomes of Extended Criteria Donor Kidney Transplants.

The independent effects of deceased donor kidney length and vascular plaque on long-term graft survival are not established. Utilizing DonorNet attachments from 4,480 expanded criteria donors (ECD) recovered between 2008 and 2012 in the United States with at least one kidney biopsied and transplanted, we analyzed the relationship between kidney length and vascular plaques and 10-year hazard of all-cause graft failure (ACGF) using causal inference methods in a Cox regression framework. The composite plaque score (range 0-4) and the presence of any plaque (yes, no) was also analyzed. Kidney length was modeled both categorically (<10, 10-12, >12 cm) as well as numerically, using a restricted cubic spline to capture nonlinearity. Effects of a novel composite plaque score 4 vs. 0 (HR 1.08; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.23) and the presence of any vascular plaque (HR 1.08; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.20) were attenuated after adjustment. Likewise, we identified a potential nonlinear relationship between kidney length and the 10-year hazard of ACGF, however the strength of the relationship was attenuated after adjusting for other donor factors. The independent effects of vascular plaque and kidney length on long-term ECD graft survival were found to be minimal and should not play a significant role in utilization.

Importance and Potential of European Cross-Border Deceased Donor Organ Allocation Through FOEDUS-EOEO Platform.

The FOEDUS-EOEO platform was relaunched in 2015 to allocate deceased donor organs across European borders when there are no suitable recipients in the donor's country. We analyzed organ offers from 01.06.2015-31.12.2021 and present the number of offers and transplants, and utilization as percentage of transplanted organs. 1,483 organs were offered, 287 were transplanted (19.4% utilization). Yearly number of offers and transplants increased from 2017 to 2021, while utilization stabilized after 2018. Utilization was highest for organs offered by Slovakia (47.2%), followed for organs offered by Lithuania, France, Greece, and Czechia (19.3%-22.9%). The most frequently offered organ was the heart (n = 405; 27.3%), followed by the lungs (n = 369; 24.9%) and the liver (n = 345; 23.3%). Utilization differed significantly by organ type (highest for liver, 35.7%; followed by heart, 18.8%; and kidney, 18.3%) and by donor age (highest for 1 to 5 year-old donors (25.0%)). FOEDUS-EOEO allowed for many European patients receiving a long-awaited transplant, especially for very young pediatric patients waiting for a liver, a heart, or a kidney. The increasing number of participating countries has increased both the number of offered organs and, to a lesser extent, the number of transplanted organs.